Adam Schiff has pursued Donald Trump with a religious fervor. He desperately want Trump out of office and will resort to just about anything to that end. Of late he is conducting secret impeachment proceedings, having failed to produce his mysterious Russian collusion evidence. In his zeal he has made a gigantic error- his “whistleblowers.”
#1- Eric Ciaramella
- registered democrat
- Contacted Schiff’s office first
- Had whistleblower forms changed just for him
- worked for John Brennan
- worked with Alexandra Chalupa, who sought and obtained 2016 Ukranian election in interference
- worked for Joe Biden
- left post at NSC under cloud of leaking
- authored the “Putin told Trump to fire Comey” story
- disapproved of Trump foreign policy
- He lied about Trumps’s phone call: “I was concerned by the call. I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’ s support of Ukraine.” Trump made no such demand.
- Actively worked with Ukraine against Giuliani and Trump
- He thinks he controls foreign policy
This from the article: “he was deeply troubled by what he interpreted as an attempt by the president to subvert U.S. foreign policy…” There is a huge fallacy in this. Anyone know what it is? https://t.co/L1Jfgck6G2
— Brit Hume (@brithume) November 2, 2019
Vindman clearly does not understand government. Foreign policy is what the President wants it to be, not what he or Ciaramella want it to be.
Why was Vindman, an 0-5, engaging in unsanctioned foreign policy discussions with Ukrainian officials behind the back of the President of the United States?
There is nothing remotely OK with that.
— John Cardillo (@johncardillo) October 29, 2019
https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1189186557929897984
Neither Ciararmella nor Vindman had a problem with Joe Biden threatening to withhold aid to the Ukraine unless the prosecutor investigating the company on whose board Hunter Biden sat was fired.
Neither was bothered by the inherent Ukrainian corruption.
This is why I doubt that democrats will actually impeach Trump, but rather try to cause death by a thousand leaks.
If Trump is impeached, this all moves to the Senate where the GOP rules. A trial would include subpoenas – of Ciaramella and Vindman. It would mean testifying under oath. It would mean questions-
Did John Brennan ask them to spy on Trump?
Were they in contact with John Brennan during this time?
What was Joe Biden’s role in all of this?
What did obama know and when did he know it?
Is hillary clinton involved?
It is no wonder Ciaramella got cold feet but it’s too late. Schiff made a yuge error dragging them into this. Now they’re fair game.
When you actively undermine the President from within you are not a whistleblower. You’re a criminal.
DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 40 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 45 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter who is in the field of education.
DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed.
Except for liberals being foolish.
@Deplorable Me: So stay a night in trump licensed hotel and gain influence hmmmm Funny how it clearly does not note any new contracts.
Any outlets carrying all that China made Ivanka fashions? nope none of those listed.
Its more commie style hate on the hard working successful, providing jobs across the planet.
Heaven forbid he keeps Melania in new shoes for the fashion rags to harp at. If he is so inept at foreign relations how does he get so many of these agreements across the globe? Oh thats why he wants to end the wars and get terrorists so his hotels wont get blown up…the sneaky bastid!
@kitt: Meanwhile, for a mere $150 million dollars from Russia to HER, Hillary approved the sale of 20% of US uranium to Russia, which probably went to Iran. But, for people like Greg… that’s OK.
@Deplorable Me: Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
500K speech
Jun 22, 2016 · Assuming Giustra is telling the truth, the donation amount from confirmed Uranium One investors drops from over $145 million to just $4 million. All of these occurred before the Russia deal. and didnt get room service or complimentary continental breakfast or free wifi… WTF They had to arrange their own plane ride with Epstein to get a spa massage, geeze such poor service.
@kitt: For Democrats, Russia is bad… sometimes. Sometimes they are lucrative.
Republicans have floated 17 different defenses of Trump’s Ukraine actions
The public impeachment hearings begin in the House tomorrow morning.
@Greg: Democrats have not presented 1 good reason to impeach.
@kitt, #156:
Trump withheld approved military aid from a strategically important nation that’s resisting armed Russian territorial incursion in an effort to extort a politically useful investigation from that nation’s president.
He did this by using his personal lawyer to conduct shadow “diplomacy” that ran contrary to the official objectives of our own nation’s State Department—including the removal of our own ambassador, who would never have agreed to improperly place Trump’s personal political objectives ahead of our nation’s foreign policy objectives. His personal lawyer is receiving no official compensation for these services—though he did receive a payment of $500,000 from unknown sources the month before he launched this efforts.
That alone should be enough to impeach, but it’s only one thing. In addition there’s obstruction of justice, efforts to neutralize congressional oversight, and ordering subordinates to break laws that Trump took an oath to uphold.
The foregoing to my mind seems more than sufficient, as reasons go.
God only knows how the emoluments clause might apply, since God alone knows what’s in the tax returns Trump promised to make available but never has. For all we know the guy is beholden to Russian mob money laundered through Deutsche Bank. There’s really no logical reason why Deutsche Bank would extend to him a hundred of million more when he had already defaulted on previous loans and no other bank would touch him with a ten-foot pole. Do republicans care about such unanswered questions? Hell no. Not with regard to Trump.
You can’t impeach a president for compulsive lying, or for stealing from his own charity foundation, or for dozens of alleged sexual assaults, or for paying off porn stars, or for appointing unqualified and opportunistic people to high positions in return for hefty campaign donations, or for favoring our nation’s adversaries over its allies, or for blatant nepotism and cronyism, but none of it constitutes an endorsement of his character or competence. Nor can you impeach for a political strategy that involves exploiting the ignorance, fear and prejudices of your base and dividing the nation into us and them—with them being anybody or anything that gets in your way or calls you on your bullshit. Voters can certainly think about it all on their way to the ballot box, however.
@Greg: Very well said.
@Greg:
Trump didn’t tell Biden to use extortion to protect his corrupt son.
What Democrats should do is shut up and quit before they do any more damage to themselves. They are exposing themselves fully. Why did Obama stop government efforts to prevent Russia from interfering in the 2016 election? Because the DNC was working with Russia, Ukraine, England, Italy and Australia to get help interfering. Why do Democrats want to run a diversionary investigation of Trump for colluding with Russians? Because THEY were conducting the colluding. Why run a faux impeachment “investigation” on Trump for extorting Ukraine for personal gain because THEY extorted Ukraine for personal gain. I guess Democrats are too stupid to realize this is that transparent or they are simply used to and reliant on dealing with the stupid people that vote for them.
You have nothing that is even suspicion-worthy against Trump. Democrats have been fishing for an alternative to lawful elections. Democrats are so damn weak with their “evidence” that Schitt, forced to cease having secret hearings where he leaks whatever benefits HIM, has to make rules to try and keep his “open” hearings as closed as is possible. Basically, no testimony that does not accuse Trump is not allowed. That’s the Democrat vision of justice.
Police state.
@Richard Wheeler: Don’t worry; I won’t ask again for answers to my questions in #134. Your avoidance provides the answers. Yes, Biden committed extortion to protect his corrupt, drug-addled son, but that’s OK with you because he ain’t Trump. Likewise, you don’t mind fully supporting a military hating draft dodger because, in reality aside from your own adulation for yourself, that’s what you think of other active military and veterans… unless they come forth and denounce Republicans.
I hope that Snuggie is big enough for both you AND Greg.
@Deplorable Me: For 3 years they have been screeching impeachment any reason they could dream up.
Trump delayed military aid Obama refused to give any.
Trump sets foreign policy not unaccountable career government employees.
The democrats not only demanded his taxes but all his business and bank papers for the President and his children.
They have never stopped twisting his quotes as racist.
Things Trump has done in the same exact way Obama did them were called bans on Muslims.
Unable to find the Quid pro quo in the released transcript the chairman ofthe intelligence committee read his twisted, insane, interpretation of the unclassified document. That document remains the only evidence presented in the inquisition. A one sided soviet style hearing up to this point held behind closed doors the minority unable to call any witnesses, as the Chairman searches for those that interpreted the Presidents actions exactly as he had, or were disgruntled for being replaced.
So far few facts have been revealed tons of gossip, rumors and feelings.
In 2017, Trump announced his intent to provide the Javelin, and Congress approved an assistance package of 210 missiles and 37 launchers, together worth $47 million.
“When Trump was elected, the first thing they did was send in the Javelin.
A strange thing to do for a Putin puppet.
@kitt: Don’t waste time looking for continuity in Democrat rhetoric. There isn’t any. Schitt’s rules prohibits any testimony other than “Trump committed treason”. He has been forced to conduct open hearings, so he continues to exert his police state tactics to make open hearings as fact-suppressed as is possible.
Biden commits extortion, Trump gets accused. Obama fails, Trump gets blamed. Schitt lies, Trump gets impeached.
@Deplorable Me: The article from a left leaning site that is mentioned in testimony https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Notice the irregular back channel the White House sent to Ukraine also #6 on a tacobell menu.
Its beyond a sound bite so I dont expect the liberals to have the attention span to read it.
@Deplorable Me, #159:
Biden didn’t do any such thing. The removal of Viktor Shokin was an openly acknowledged foreign policy objective of the United States State Department—which is more than can be said about ginning up an investigation of the man who achieved that end, by a means that would be much appreciated by Vladimir Putin.
People seem to miss the point that delaying military aid was not only to the disadvantage of Ukraine, but to the benefit of the invading Russian aggressor, and that the Crowdstrike conspiracy theory Trump mentioned during his telephone call is about not just about providing Trump with something politically useful, but also about shifting blame for 2016 election meddling from Russia to Ukraine.
@Greg:
Biden DID. It is an established FACT and Biden bragged about it. There is no ambiguity, doubt or argument he did. THAT is the FACT. Denying it really, really, really makes you look foolish and dishonest. Do you WANT to look foolish and dishonest?
Early in his administration, Trump sent lethal defensive aid to Ukraine, which Obama had denied. So, enough of THAT.
@kitt: Could this be why Democrats don’t want to talk about investigating Ukraine campaign interference?
@Deplorable Me, #164:
It IS NOT an established fact, anywhere other than inside Trump supporters’ heads, where it coexists with a number of other “established facts” that are unsupported by evidence existing outside in the real world.
Maybe at the impeachment hearings tomorrow, republicans will have scantily-clad women marching around the hall carrying their giant signs like 1930s nightclub cigarette girls. They’ll do anything to put their propaganda memes in people’s heads in a way that circumvents independent thought and critical analysis.
@Greg:
It IS. PERIOD. DONE. End of debate, settled science, HE DID IT. It may be embarrassing to you to acknowledge it, but it’s a FACT.
@Greg:
Again deny corrption and criminal activities that are confessed to on film, if it isnt a fact why did you earlier say Joe took credit for having a prosecutor fired and replaced by another prosecutor who never looked into the oligarch absconding with aid. NABU was suppose to investigate, that didnt happen never even taken up.
Policy is what these government employees feel it should be, policies that lost the Crimea and precipitated the invasion of Ukraine, doubling the cost of NG to the people they care so much about and loss of billions in aid.
@Greg:
Biden’s exact quote:
“I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time,”
Biden told the Ukrainians if they did not fire the existing prosecutor, no money.
That, Comrade Greggie, is a true quid pro quo. If the Ukrainians did not do what Biden wanted, there would be no U.S. aid. I cannot believe that you can argue to the contrary in spite of Biden’s own words.
@retire05, #168:
The existence of a quid pro quo is not itself the wrongness of the Trump proposition. The wrongness of the proposition lies in the thing he was seeking to gain out of the exchange—personal political advantage. And if you can’t see how ginning up an investigation of his most likely 2020 political opponent would be to Trump’s personal advantage, you’re not likely to correctly figure out anything else.
What Joe Biden got was the fulfillment of an openly acknowledged U.S. foreign policy objective. He successfully accomplished what he had been sent to Ukraine to do. There was no effing investigation involving his son to be terminated.
And what was it that Hunter Biden supposedly did that so greatly benefited Burisma Holdings, anyway? As near as I can tell, his name on their board of directors list did little more than add to the company’s public image. There were no big deals Biden was instrumental in pulling off. The company owner has been investigated, but Hunter Biden had nothing to do with that. What wrongful thing is he supposed to have been part of? Or have the conspiracy theorists felt no need to work that out?
@Greg:
If you can’t see exactly what these hearings, beginning today that I have watched from its very beginning, is simply a political attempt to prevent Donald J. Trump from being President by being reelected in 2020, you are dumber than I thought you were. Al Green (D-Tx) was clear that the President needed to be impeached to prevent him from being reelected.
Trump would be failing his duty, under the agreement with Ukraine signed by President Clinton, if he did not seek to assure that the money the U.S. gives them is not lost in corruption, as a previous $1.8 billion was. Also, the President has a responsibility to find out what part Ukraine played in its involvement in our 2016 election which was extensive.
The problem you have, as well as the rest of the Democrats, is that all roads lead back to the Ukraine kelptocrats working to support Hillary Clinton. You, being the Communist globalist you are, who has no loyalty to the United States, wants to try to do you best imitation of a Dervish trying to deny that.
You keep saying you were in Vietnam. I would ask “Which side did you support?”
@retire05, #170:
That’s a bullshit argument. Burisma Holdings had nothing whatsoever to do with the dispersal or management of U.S. military assistance to Ukraine. Burisma is an energy company.
Trump’s objective was to obtain a politically useful investigation. His focus was specifically on Joe and Hunter Biden, and on the crackbrained conspiracy theory that Ukraine was somehow behind election meddling rather than Russia, and that it was done on Clinton’s behalf rather than his own. This is typical Trumpian gaslighting, which should be easily recognized by anyone who’s halfway objective and halfway paying attention.
@Greg:
Oh. “Political advantage”. I see. Then, would THIS be wrong?
Mendez, Durbin and Leahy threatened Ukraine to continue investigations of Trump in 2018 and feed Mueller
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/24/democrats-wrote-to-ukraine-in-may-demanding-it-investigate-trump/
How about this?
Ukraine helping Hillary’s campaign
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Investigation of Obama’s surveillance and unmasking
https://www.commdiginews.com/politics-2/president-cant-be-indicted-but-ex-president-obama-can-and-should-be-119782/
Prove to me that NONE of this was not done for political advantage. Trump was a CANDIDATE. There was no wrongdoing FOUND. Most was conducted ILLEGALLY. If running investigations of an individual that happens to be a candidate is WRONG, then you have to ADMIT Democrats have been wrong all along.
Trump is pursuing acknowledged US foreign policy objectives; support Ukraine’s fight against Russia, root out illegal interference in our elections and assure money is not wasted on corruption. Democrats don’t want this to happen, for apparent and obvious reasons.
No?
Onyshchenko states Burisma made off-the-books payments to the Biden’s and the FBI knew about it
Hiring Hunter was an attempt by Burisma to shield them from investigation… I guess it worked
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/19/ukrainian-official-hunter-biden-appointed-to-burismas-board-to-protect-the-company/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+breitbart+%28Breitbart+News%29
Obama administration was warned about Hunter’s conflict of interest, but they blew it off… then Biden told Ukraine to kill the investigation of Burisma
https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2019/10/18/breaking-impeachment-witness-says-tried-warn-ukraine-influence-biden/
That is EXACTLY where the investigation was heading and Biden got it KILLED.
Wow. Did you just write that out loud? What, indeed? The ONLY purpose he served is clearly explained in the second link above.
Have you not watched Biden in his campaign? Do you really think Trump needs a conspiracy to help him show the nation what a babbling dumbass this stupid idiot is? He CONFESSED to extortion, for God’s sake. Trump didn’t bring Biden up, Zelensky did. What’s more, Trump has supported Ukraine for more effectively than Obama ever did; he just tried to make sure no one was stealing the money, which probably has cut into the disposable income of numerous Democrats.
@Greg:
OMG, Comrade Greggie, ARE YOU F*CKNG KIDDING ME? Are you so damn stupid, and uninformed, that you really don’t know the connection between Burisma and the missing U.S. aid money? I guess Mark Zaid’s partner in the coup, CNN, did not report on it.
What the hell do you think the objective of Schitt-for-brains hearing was today?
You’re a real POS, Comrade Greggie Goebbels.
@retire05: Your answer is yes, Greg is that stupid and uninformed. He drank the kool-aid and has been smoking Mary Jane and taking LSD!
@retire05, #173:
Correct. Do please enlighten me. There’s no evidence whatsoever that a nickel of U.S. aid sent to Ukraine went to Burisma or anyone connected with the company. There aren’t even any plausible suggestive indications that such a thing happened. This tale has no more basis than a totally unsubstantiated claim floated by Steve Hilton on FOX News, and he himself is on the FOX News payroll.
@Greg:
Probably should have an investigation to find out, huh? With Quid Pro Quo Joe’s permission, of course. Maybe he won’t mind now that his snorting son has banked all his swag from Burisma.
@Greg:
Today, during testimony in the Schitt-for-brains tax payer funded clown show:
“To summarize, we thought the [CEO of Burisma] had stolen money. We thought a prosecutor had taken an bribe to shut the case,”
“I think, since U.S. taxpayer dollars were wasted, I would love to see the Ukrainian prosecutor general’s office find who the corrupt prosecutor was that took the bribe, and how much of it was paid.”
George Kent, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State
Munch on that, Comrade Greggie, you lying POS.
@Deplorable Me: @retire05: I do not know why you even reply to little greggie. His responses are infantile and his reference are nonsense. He has no deductive abilities and his intelligence level is likely in the low double digits.
It’s Donald J. Trump whose conduct is under congressional investigation to determine if he should be removed from office, not Joe Biden. Nor is Biden presently involved in 10 separate federal criminal investigations and another 8 state and local investigations, as is Donald J Trump.
This isn’t a new development indicative of partisan-motivated persecution. This guy has a list of court cases behind him stretching back long before his entry into politic. His past legal affairs would normally have been enough to keep anybody else from ever being seriously considered for the presidency.
@Greg:
.Both Biden and Kerry championed $1.8 billion in taxpayer-backed loans to be given to Ukraine courtesy of the IMF. That money would go directly through Kolomoisky’s PrivatBank, and then it would disappear.
According to the Ukrainian anticorruption watchdog Nashi Groshi, “This transaction of $1.8 billion … with the help of fake contracts was simply an asset siphoning operation.”
Ihor Valeriyovych Kolomoyskyi is a Ukrainian Jewish billionaire business oligarch and is the controlling partner in Burisma through his Privat Group. He is suspected of looting funds sent from the US and the IMF (International Monetary Fund). try again to research before making stupid comments.
This oligarch has been linked to the newly minted president, I wonder why the state dept has no reservations about further plundering. The oligarch has returned to Ukraine. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-summit-kolomoisky-idUSKCN1VY1P8
@Greg:
Doing your Dervish imitation again, Comrade Greggie? What happened to your “There’s no evidence whatsoever that a nickel of U.S. aid sent to Ukraine went to Burisma or anyone connected with the company” bullshit?
You’re an idiot. And a liar. And a coward. And a paid troll who doesn’t have an I.Q. equal to your shoe size.
@kitt:
It’s the only thing Comrade Greggie Goebbels knows how to do.
@retire05, #177:
Uh huh. Was the prosecutor Joe or Hunter Biden, or did Joe or Hunter Biden bribe him?
You no doubt throw this out because it turned up on some outlet from the Trump spin machine, which they’re presently pedaling as fast as their little legs can possibly go. But what is it supposed to mean?
Nobody denies there was corruption in Ukraine. Viktor Shokin was removed because he wasn’t looking into it. Joe Biden is the guy who got that to happen.
And, as observed above, it isn’t Biden who is the subject of an impeachment investigation. It’s Donald effing Trump. Maybe on Friday republicans should bring more and bigger signs. Maybe the clowns should be juggling. Maybe Nunes should set his hair on fire. It’s all an effort to change the subject, because Donald Trump’s efforts to extort something politically useful from a foreign leader at the cost of screwing with U.S. foreign policy is totally indefensible. If voters are allowed to get a clear picture of that in their heads Trump is toast, and his enablers are going to get burnt in the same toaster.
@retire05: This Kolomoisky guy has a bad reputation, it isnt any healthier to be associated with him than it is with the Clintons.
@Greg:
Yeah, you want to ignore the actual corruption but the fact is that Biden extorted.
How many of those investigations you love to refer to cropped up since he became President? It’s all politically driven. Every bit of it. Crybaby crap.
@Greg:
https://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/2015/08/28/ukrainischer-oligarch-bereichert-sich-an-iwf-krediten/
Note the date of the article, you dumbass.
Hunter Biden, coke head, was on the board of Burisma knocking down a cool $83,000.00 a month. Now, who was the head of the Burisma board and who do you think hired him?
““I raised my concerns that I had heard that Hunter Biden was on the board of a company owned by somebody that the U.S. Government had spent money trying to get tens of millions of dollars back and that could create the perception of a conflict of interest.” “The message that I recall hearing back was that the vice president’s son Beau was dying of cancer and that there was no further bandwidth to deal with family related issues at that time… That was the end of that conversation.”
George Kent, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State
Testimony of October 2019
Can someone please take the shovel out of Comrade Greggie’s hand?
@Deplorable Me, #185:
If there are ever specific charges against Biden, remind me to pay attention. The same for Clinton. Until then, it just Trump and the fallen members of the GOP blowing hot air.
@Greg: I’ve only given you the specific accusation in just about every one of my posts. You can deny it but it doesn’t make it go away. He did it and, when Trump is reelected he will be investigated.
@retire05, #186:
Deutsche Wirtschaftsnachrichten is an anti-European Union publication, known for provocation and alarmist reporting. Are you suggesting this German-language article reveals some pertinent fact? If so, maybe you should mention what it is.
@Deplorable Me:
And I’m pointing out that it’s a vague claim supported by absolutely nothing, which was rolled out by the likes of Devin Nunes in an effort to distract from the fact that Trump’s own actions are both apparent and indefensible.
They better have something better on days 2, and 3, and 4, because Shiff has a load of compelling testimony from a lot of credible people.
@Greg:
Says who?
Read it and tell me what you disagree with in the article.
@Greg:
Well, the Democrats lost Jeffrey Toobin when it comes to day one.
@retire05, #191:
Says Netzpolitik
I prefer to stick to English-language publications, so I can be sure I know what I’m reading.
@Greg: It’s cute how you, like Schiff, only allow sources and ideas that fully comport with what you already think. However, it is indisputable that Biden committed extortion to support his son and avoid the embarrassment of exposure of the corruption his son was involved in and which he and the Obama administration simply looked the other way as it happened. That being the case, Trump asking Zelensky to find out IF that actually happened is totally and absolutely legal and proper.
None of that is hearsay. None of that is “he said he said he said he said” bullshit; not only did Biden admit it, but we have testimony and documentation of the White House being informed, warned and then asked to stop the investigations into a matter that would inevitably name Biden’s son as a part of it.
But… that’s all OK with you. Because Democrats are doing it.
Who would that be? Someone that was up the gossip chain from Kent and Taylor? None of Schitt’s circus is legitimate or valid. He is wasting the nation’s time.
But… that’s all OK with you. Because Democrats are doing it.
Repetition doesn’t work on everybody. There’s no corrupt act Hunter Biden has been demonstrated to have committed. There’s not even a specific allegation of one. There was no investigation of Hunter Biden underway for Joe Biden to have ended in exchange for anything. Trump would like to have one begun. That and the CrowdStrike nonsense are the only “corruption” issues Trump mentioned on his phone call.
Giuliani knows plenty, but Giuliani refused to comply with the House subpoena.
@Greg:
Aside from following his daddy around and getting lucrative jobs that he has no qualifications for, no one is accusing Hunter of being involved in corruption. He MAY have… he PROBABLY did, but he’s not the point.
The point is that Burisma hired Hunter because he was the son of the Vice President of the United States of America (Obama had no working-age children) and, as an article I have provided for you shows, Burisma utilized that name on their roster to get the Obama Administration to stand down on promoting the investigation of Burisma corruption in Ukraine. And then, son of a bitch, that’s exactly what the Obama administration, vis a vis the VP, did. Joe told them they would be without $1 billion unless they fired that Shokin pain-in-the-ass.
No matter how you look at it, no matter what side you are on, it looks rotten with the very, very great probability that it IS rotten.
Giuliani knows plenty, alright, and when his findings come forth, you won’t like it one bit.
@Deplorable Me: It only took 371 posts to get Greggie to see what the issue is! Maybe. If he comes back with another dumb post, you have failed!
What we really need is a full investigation of USAID and the IMF they toss around billions good money after bad. The bank of the oligarch is now state owned they grabbed his piggy bank only to find out it had already been emptied, can we look for transfers? Caymen or Switzerland maybe? How about Dr. Vanessa Kerry’s nonprofit organization that saw 9 million of state dept money.
Best way to do this is follow the money.
@Randy: He will be back after mainlining cnn and MSNBC and be just as dumb.
my new favorite site, no more searching other sights for his journalism.
https://johnsolomonreports.com/
@Deplorable Me, #196:
Andrew Giuliani, Rudy’s son, is the Public Liaison Assistant to President Donald Trump. Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump are both Senior White House Advisers, having no more experience with government or foreign policy than Donald himself. They’ve got security clearances they weren’t qualified to have. You seem to have no problem with that.