You have no idea how big the Obama lie is

Loading

big lie

image courtesy of grumpyelder.com

It’s HUGE. John Rosenthal at PJ Media:

And thanks to the recent reporting of CNN (where were they and the other media three years ago, when we needed them?), more people will realize that shortly after the passage of Obamacare the Obama administration implemented rules specifically designed to ensure that millions of people — those who provided for themselves on the individual market, i.e., who did not receive coverage through their employer or union — would not be allowed to keep their current insurance. Thus not only were Obama’s assurances untrue; they were purposeful deceit in which a supine press was complicit.

Jay Carney, the Official Propagandist of the Obama regime said:

One of the things health reform was designed to do was to help not only the uninsured but also the underinsured. And there are a number of Americans, fewer than 5 percent of Americans, who’ve got cut-rate plans that don’t offer real financial protection in the event of a serious illness or an accident.

Now if you had one of these substandard plans before the Affordable Care Act became law and you really liked that plan, you were able to keep it. That’s what I said when I was running for office.

That was part of the promise we made.

No, not 5%. Try 69%.

John Hinderaker at Powerline Blog:

The Obama administration projected low-end, mid-range and high-end estimates for how many plans would be terminated, in total and broken down between large and smaller employers. The bottom line is that the administration expected 51% of all employer plans to be terminated as a result of Obamacare. That is the mid-range estimate; the high-end estimate was 69%. So as of 2010, the Obama administration planned that most Americans with employer-sponsored health care plans would lose them, whether they liked those plans or not.

As for individual, as opposed to group plans, the Obama administration said that data were insufficient to predict how many would lose grandfather status, but in any given year the percentage of such policies losing such status would “exceed[] the 40 percent to 67 percent range.”

Those numbers starkly contradict Obama’s “if you like your insurance, you can keep it” assurances. But it is worth noting that the percentage of pre-Obamacare plans that would terminate within the first few years after the law was enacted isn’t the main point. The administration never intended to allow any American to keep a non-Obamacare insurance policy for any length of time.

And for small business, it’s more like 80%.

Sen. Mike Enzi:

Unfortunately, the regulation writers at the Departments of Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services broke all those promises. The regulation is crystal clear. Most businesses–the administration estimates between 39 and 69 percent–will not be able to keep the coverage they have.

Under the new regulation, once a business loses grandfathered status, they will have to comply with all of the new mandates in the law. This means these businesses will have to change their current plans and purchase more expensive ones that meet all of the new Federal minimum requirements. For the 80 percent of small businesses that will lose their grandfathered status because of this regulation, the net result is clear: They will pay more for their health insurance.

Obama said in video that you could keep your plan at least 36 times:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpa-5JdCnmo[/youtube]

This is not simply a lie. It is a lie of galactic proportions. All hell is going break loose next year when nearly everyone loses their plans, and that is why the employer mandate was delayed. So Obama could lie through another election cycle.

Democrats see the handwriting on wall and are getting skittish:

More than a dozen anxious Senate Democrats facing reelection next year met with President Obama at the White House Wednesday to review the administration’s progress in fixing technical problems hobbling the rollout of the Affordable Care Act.

The website is the least of their problems.

Megyn Kelly asks the obvious:

Megyn Kelly interview Fox editor Chris Stirewalt on a White House press conference with Jay Carney, and the political possibility arose that Obama may have won the 2012 election by lying about ObamaCare.

As if there was any doubt. The real question is- does he ever tell the truth about anything? And when will the press stop treating Obama as a novelty and hold him to account for these lies?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
464 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Dr John
IT TAKE OR AN IDIOT TO DEFEND HIS LIES,
or one of his paid sinister adept,
or one who is as stone as him
or a weak mind who has been indoctrinated
BY THE UNIONIZE TEACHERS
OBAMA IS NOT AN EXCEPTIONAL PERSON, BUT THEY
in position of power to teach PLANTED THERE TO INDOCTRINATE OBAMAS AGENDA, have elevated him as a god
HE IS A LIAR WITH A BIG MOUTH,
notice how he try to supress CHRISTIANITY,
BECAUSE HE IS LIKE THE EVIL ONE JEALOUS OF THE POWER OF GOD, WHICH WAS THROWN IN THIS EARTH ETERNALY,
AND JEALOUS OF THE IMPORTANCE WE GIVE TO GOD HIS SON JESUS AND HIS HOLY SPIRIT,
HE BAN EVERYTHING PATRIOTIC PRECIOUS TO AMERICANS,
IN A PREVIOUS TIME HE WOULD HAVE BEEN HANG TO A TREE A LONG TIME AGO
FOR DOING SUCH THINGS AND DESSECRATION OF GOD COMMANDS,
DONE BY HIS ADEPTS FROM HELL,

@Richard Wheeler:

: My trend in politics is nothing but wins.

It’s all in definition RW, Obama was/is nothing but a loser.

Rich, curious to know if you picked the Tea Party Patriots and the Republicans to win back the House of Representatives by historic numbers in 2010? This election was a referendum on Obamacare, and if the trend of disaster with Obamacare continues then 2014 could prove to be an even more historic take back!!

#28 – Wow your comment was chilling… most excellent and dead on…I do hope it resonates with some of our gullible(s) Lefty’s that come here…

…Although many Americans are ‘feeling the pain’ by losing their health care, I do hope the disaster unfolding, know as obamacare is actually a blessing in disguise… something happening right now to wake up the American people, before it is way too late… to the LIES of this President, his false promises and his compliant Administration and a compliant Media to swear to his LIES…..and the fact Socialist(s) on the “verge” of humongous power over people will continue to Promise the world all based on a Lie and more LIES…

Remember the old adage “If it sounds too good to be true…then it isn’t” to be sure…

@Redteam: Since you picked BHO to win -twice, you musta thought Mac and Mitt were big losers. Are there any Repubs that you feel aren’t losers?
Don’t miss 2nd half Bama=LSU–GREAT GAME.

Richard Wheeler
THAT IS DESPICABLE OF YOU BUT AS USUAL NOT SURPRISING FROM A LIBTARD.
THERE ARE MORE GOOD REPUBLICANS TO TAKE THE PRESIDENTCY
THAN ANY DEMOCRATS,
AND SARAH PALIN COULD DO A FAR BETTER JOB THAN ANYONE ON YOUR SIDE OF THE FENCE, ALSO,SHE DID TRY HARD TO WARN THE PEOPLE IN 2008, BUT THE FRENZY ON THE MEDIA AND TINGLING ON MATHEW’S LEGS WAS IN SELLING MODE PLUS THE OTHER PUSHING AT THE RALLYES,
WHERE THE CABALE WAS MAKING THE CROWD LIKE TURNING AROUND AND AROUND IN A CIRCLE OF FRENZY, UNTIL THEY FELL DOWN UNABLE TO THINK RATIONALY, IT LOOK LIKE THE DEVIL HIMSELF WAS CEASING THEIR MINDS, SO ANY WARNING WAS NOT HEARD,
AND WHAT YOU GOT NOW IS WHAT YOU SEE,
AND THEY KEEP SAYING THAT’S FOR THE GOOD OF THE PEOPLE, TO PUNISH THEM AND GIVE THEM PENALTY, AND
SEQUESTRATION FOR THE MILITARY, AND THE IRS INTIMIDATING THE GOOD FAMILIES OF THE TEAPARTY,
AND ALSO PICKING ON THE MITT ROMNEY DONORS,
AND THE 4 GREAT BRAVES FIGHTING AN ARMY OF ALQUADA,
IN BENGHASI LIBYA
THINKING THAT NO MEN LEFT BEHIND AMERICAN ASSURANCE WILL COME TO HELP ANY WAY THEY CAN AND SAVE THEIR LIVES OR KILL THE ATTACKER AND BRING BACK THE WOUNDED AND DEAD BACK TO AMERICA WHICH WAS DENYED, FOR THE FIRST SHAME OF HISTORY UNTO THEM, BECAUSE OF OBAMA ELECTION TOOK THE NUMBER ONE PRIORITY,
NOT GOOD AS YOU CLAIM TO BE,

@Richard Wheeler:

you musta thought Mac and Mitt were big losers.

actually RW, I didn’t think it, I knew it. Same as Christie (Rino) I’m watching that game, LSU needs to step up.

@Redteam: If I where a Dem I would worry a lot more about the losers on the Dem side for the next election cycle!! 2010 all over again for the same reason, Obamacare and what a disaster it was forecast to be in 2010 and the reality which will be even worse than the forecast. Mac is a loser, if 0-blama would have not lied to America the last election cycle it would have been a much much closer outcome.

@Redteam: Roll Tide Still #!
You’ve DQ’d Cruz and Rubio and you don’t like RINO Christie. Leaves Paul and Ryan. Do you like anybody?

Bees I like Mac xnd Mitt. It’s RT that bad mouthed them, Yell at him if you’re angry. lol

Common Sense 2010 off year election Repubs. were expected to gain but they certainly out performed in The House. Expect gains in 2014 off year. I give em +3 in Senate and around +2-5 in House. Some Tea Party reps. will be primaried.

The Obama lie is HUGE.
Add to it that he and Sebelius ”promised” to;
1. give us national numbers on Nov. 15th.
2. have the O-Care site up and running by Nov 30.

But, in case that #2 doesn’t work out, Obama is accepting technical help from private enterprise’s medical insurers!
Private insurers will NOT be doing side-by-side comparisons like O-Care’s site was going to do, however.
Might as well bring back travel agents while you’re at it, Obama! 😉

To put Obama’s huge LIE into perspective, let’s do a thought experiment with some of Obama’s other promises….

“I will close GITMO in a year, period.”

“I will not take private funding for my campaign, period.”

“I will spend every waking moment on jobs, period.”

“Don’t use those chemical weapons or else, period.”

“I will get to the bottom of the IRS misuse of information, period.”

“I will get to the bottom of the Benghazi attack and will bring those responsible to justice, period.”

“I am for traditional marriage, period.”

“My father was a World War II veteran, period.”

“No family making under 250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase, period.”

“I will sign a universal health care bill into law by the end of my first term as president that will cover every American and cut the cost of a typical family’s premium by up to $2,500 a year, period.”

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/11/there_are_so_many_instances.html#ixzz2kDh476zO

@DrJohn:

A civilian national security force that’s as powerful as the military?

Bombers and carriers and firearms? Why?

And what did FactCheck say?

Dr. J., don’t we have enough to bash Obama about without breaking out false narratives?

We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set.

We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded. We need to use technology to connect people to service. We’ll expand USA Freedom Corps to create online networks where American can browse opportunities to volunteer. You’ll be able to search by category, time commitment and skill sets. You’ll be able to rate service opportunities, build service networks, and create your own service pages to track your hours and activities.

This will empower more Americans to craft their own service agenda and make their own change from the bottom up.

As for Fact Checker, they said it was false:

Q: Is Obama planning a Gestapo-like “civilian national security force”?

A: This false claim is a badly distorted version of Obama’s call for doubling the Peace Corps, creating volunteer networks and increasing the size of the Foreign Service.

Obama’s ‘National Security Force?’

If we want to bash President Obama on this, isn’t it better to call him out. Just look at what Halperin wrote in his new book:

Mark Halperin and John Heilemann’s book “Double Down: Game Change 2012” notes President Obama commenting on drone strikes, reportedly telling his aides that he’s “really good at killing people.”

Aqua
YOU ALL HAVE THE WRONG SPEECH,
YEP OBAMA SAID WHAT IS REPEATED, HIS OWN CIVILIAN ARMY AS STRONG AS THE MILITARY,
AND MORE OF,EVEN FACT CHECK MADE THE MISTAKE OF USING ANOTHER SPEECH,
THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT OBAMA CHANGE THE RHETORIC BY GIVING ANOTHER SPEECH AND CALL THEM PEACE
SOMETHING,
DID YOU NOTICE THE NEW TREND OF NEW KIND OF LAWOFFICER BREAKING THE DOOR OF PEACEFULL CITIZENS SHOOTHING THE DOG AND SEARCHING THE HOUSE LATE AT NIGHT WITHOUT ANY WARNING,
YEP IT HAPPENED ALSO,
ALL THIS IS QUITE ENOUGH TO BASH,

WHAT ABOUT CJ OUR AUTHOR OUT FROM AFGHANISTAN ,
walking in a ccountry road with his son and with his LEGITIME weapon on his back ,
being called on and question BY A POLICE OFFICER, TAKING HIM IN PRISON,
WHERE HE HAD TO LEAVE HIS SON THERE,
AND SPEND A FEW DAYS IN JAIL FOR NO OFFENSE WHATSOEVER,
WHERE ARE THE POLICE FORCE THE REAL ONE OF BEFORE THEY GOT EXTRA ORDERS WHICH AGGRESS THE LAW ABIDING CITIZENS AND EMPRISON THEM FOR NOTHING,
YEP IT’S REALY HAPPENING,

@FAITH7: #109

Faith,

Thanks for those kind words. That was actually kind of tame for me as we all know I can go off on tirades.

None the less, it is something that has to be said and pointed out as loudly as possible. This isn’t just about Comrade Obama and his leftist Commie lackeys on both sides of the aisle. This is about an electorate that has lost it’s way, be it by indoctrination or sheer laziness. Unfortunately history has shown us that human nature tends to lead people to the easy way, be it taking rather than earning or expecting someone else to do it and so on.

The fact that the electorate time and again (look no further than the idiots in Virginia who just elected a corrupt person who is under investigation for various things) heed the siren call of the false promises rather than even remotely make a decision based on fact and record is sad enough. But the problem is much deeper than that now.

The electorate as I said before has decided to shun every ideal this country was founded on. Our so called leaders now openly abuse and berate the law of the land. We are now not to be responsible for our selves. The Commie bastards that run our government will take care of us. Comrade Obama openly defies the Constitution with no outcry from the MSM or most of the leaders in Congress. The so called loyal opposition is trying to purge those in their party that have the spine to stand up to the loss of our liberties and for what? To keep their power, nothing else.

I just noticed the newly elected mayor of NYC is espousing a five year plan! A five year plan? Sounds just like the old USSR, but guess what! The Mayor has a hard left background, better know in some circles as Commie like. Yet, the lemmings in NYC dutifully voted this guy in.

In my home town of Chicago, murders are literally off the charts. The ultra vast majority of these shootings are black on black crimes but we are told it is a problem caused by the privileged whites. Anyone who stands up against this President and his asinine policies is branded racist or worse a traitor, after all, his own TSA and other entities have branded anyone who is against many of his policies is a possible terrorist or worse.

I can go on, but you get the gist of this. We do not have much leeway left, but this downhill drive to hard core Socialism and the dictatorship that come with it has to be stopped now! Someone somehow has got to turn this country back to it’s basic ideals and the responsibilities that come with a Democracy. Our forefathers warned us of exactly what is now happening and as in moist historical instances, man ignores the warnings and lessons of history at their own peril.

Democracy and individual liberty comes with a price. That price is not only fighting for the rights of all but accepting not only the responsibility of being a good citizen but in fact accepting responsibility for one’s self. The fact that in the eyes of this administration and the scum balls on both sides the basic ideals this country was founded on are nothing more than a liner for the bottom of a birdcage is something every man and woman should be ashamed of. Yet, the electorate refuses to face the reality. That reality is as you said, chilling to say the least. Where are the leaders that will stand up to it?

@joetote: You asked “Where are the leaders that will stand up to it?”… a well written comment with a sad question at the end; sad because I am wondering the same thing, and I don’t see any real leaders stepping up. That distresses me greatly.

@Scott in Oklahoma: Leadership has to come from within I think. As such, I really wonder if the indoctrination that has occurred as to our kids and their education (after all, we know as a fact they do not teach the basics anymore) combined with the “you owe it to me” mentality that is now instilled in society has not in fact diluted those leadership qualities to the few who seem to still believe in our country’s ideals. If one chooses to believe the statistics, the majority of the electorate do not believe in this country as founded. And the very few that do stand up, take Ted Cruz for example are vilified by all sides. Sad situation my friend.

@Aqua:

Let me ask you why we need a

“… civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

as the military?

Just as powerful? What do you think those words mean?

Defense force? Defense from what?

Why not call it “Doubling of the peace corps” if that’s what he meant?

Hmmm… sounds like Obama speaking to me:

Scott in Oklahoma
THANK YOU FOR FINDING IT,
his adepts where trying to apply the repeat words to another of his speech,
now the bird in in the cage,
proof they want, well here it is LET TEM put it in THEIR pipe and smoke it with THEIR weed

joetote,
I will make you president because of the clear speechs you can come up with,
you say the right words, you love AMERICA with passion, you cannot fail EVER, and
i can see what crew would become your advisers and would follow your orders, and i can see the military be secure to execute your commands of implementing a real war with real actions under GOD they believe,
BYE

@ilovebeeswarzone: Bees, can’t thank you enough for that thought! There are people out here that still love our country. Somehow we have to get them to reopen their eyes to it.

joetote
MANY LOVE WITH THE LIPS, BUT WHAT WE WANT IS
A TOTAL body and mind and soul dedication to this AMERICA,
TO RISE UP AND DECLARE PUBLICLY THAT HIS OR HER PROJECT
ONLY IS TO SEE AMERICA RESTAURED TO WHAT SHE IS REALLY ,
NOT LIKE TODAY TAKEN AS A GARBISH CAN FOR ALL THE TRASH WHICH COME FROM OTHER COUNTRIES SPECIALY THOSE WHO HATE ANYTHING AMERICAN BUT COME BY MILLIONS TO INSTALL THEIR AGENDA TO DESTROY AMERICA, WHICH IS NOW ON THE WAY AS WE SPEAK,
AND TO LET IT HAPPEN IS UNAMERICAN,
BYE

@ilovebeeswarzone: Well put Bees. I couldn’t say it better myself.

@drjohn: Scott and Dr.J. See Aqua’s #116 and read or listen to the full Colorado Springs speech.Why is this so difficult for you guys? From Bees I expect it.
I say again. You are helping the Dems.

Happy Birthday USMC.—-not concerned about phantom “civilian fighting forces.” ooh rah.

@Richard Wheeler:

“… civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

as the military?

Simple question RW, did Obama say that quote, or not? What do you think he meant by it? Why don’t you believe he meant what he said? Is it because you know he can’t tell the truth about anything?

@Redteam, #130:

…did Obama say that quote, or not? What do you think he meant by it? Why don’t you believe he meant what he said? Is it because you know he can’t tell the truth about anything.

He did in fact say those words, but the meaning, in it’s original context, was entirely different than the bat-shit crazy interpretation right-wing loons such as Paul Broun have been promulgating ever since. Here’s the original statement, in its proper context, from a campaign speech on July 2, 2008, at Colorado Springs, Colorado:

“[As] president I will expand AmeriCorps to 250,000 slots [from 75,000] and make that increased service a vehicle to meet national goals, like providing health care and education, saving our planet and restoring our standing in the world, so that citizens see their effort connected to a common purpose.

“People of all ages, stations and skills will be asked to serve. Because when it comes to the challenges we face, the American people are not the problem – they are the answer. So we are going to send more college graduates to teach and mentor our young people. We’ll call on Americans to join an energy corps, to conduct renewable energy and environmental clean-up projects in their neighborhoods all across the country.

“We will enlist our veterans to find jobs and support for other vets, and to be there for our military families. And we’re going to grow our Foreign Service, open consulates that have been shuttered and double the size of the Peace Corps by 2011 to renew our diplomacy. We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set.

We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded. We need to use technology to connect people to service. We’ll expand USA Freedom Corps to create online networks where American can browse opportunities to volunteer. You’ll be able to search by category, time commitment and skill sets. You’ll be able to rate service opportunities, build service networks, and create your own service pages to track your hours and activities.

“This will empower more Americans to craft their own service agenda and make their own change from the bottom up.”

Obviously Obama wasn’t talking about setting up a “Gestapo-like security force to impose a Marxist or fascist dictatorship” as was asserted by Georgia Rep. Paul Broun shortly afterward. Nor, you might have noticed, as he done so over the 5 years he’s been in office.

I don’t know how some people can rant about lies when their whole world view seems to be composed of deliberate lies and distortions. If people actually care about truthfulness, they might demonstrate that by practicing it a bit more often.

Greg
YUP THE WRONG SPEECH AGAIN,

If that’s the wrong speech, and not the one the quote was taken from, maybe someone would be good enough to provide a link to the correct one.

@Greg:

Obviously Obama wasn’t talking about setting up a “Gestapo-like security force to impose a Marxist or fascist dictatorship”

Obviously? to who? Why is it supposed to be obvious?

“… civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded as the military?

What does ‘just as strong as the military’ mean to you? Arm strength of the men in it? Guns all the same size? Same number of tanks and planes? just what does it mean?

Nor, you might have noticed, as he done so over the 5 years he’s been in office.

So your claim is, he was lying? he’s not doing what he promised? Are you happy about that? Do you want a civilian force just as strong as the military?

Is Paul Broun too d-mn stupid to understand the meaning of what Obama said, or is he a liar?

Why are you concerned about anyone lying? You seem to admire Obama and there surely is no bigger liar in the world. I guess it just doesn’t matter to the secular progressives if someone lies or not, as long as it’s not a conservative.

@Greg: Greg, you can’t deny what Obama said, you can claim it didn’t mean what it has been interpreted to mean, but I think what happened was he let the cat out of the bag prematurely and his handlers (puppeteers) quit pulling those strings til the opportunity is ‘ripe’, it may have to wait for the next socialist president, this one might have screwed up too many times. The progressives can only expect to fool most of the people some of the time, not all of the time

Richard Wheeler
you have the wrong speech,
Scott gave it a while ago,
IT’S ON ANOTHER POST, I AM SEARCHING FOR IT,

Richard Wheeler
YES i FOUND IT,
check on 124 Scott in Oklahoma,THE LINK IS THERE, AT THE END,

Greg
CHECK THE LINK ON THIS POST AT 124 FROM Scott in Oklahoma, BYE,

@Redteam: I’ve answered that at least three times but you continue to ignore. See Aqua’s #116.
Bees Same. Scott is referencing (partially) speech Aqua is referring to in #116.

@drjohn:

Why not call it “Doubling of the peace corps” if that’s what he meant?

Look, I have absolutely zero political love for Obama. This is a long standing dem dream started by JFK. The belief is a national defense supplemented by a national security policy that incorporates the Peace Corps. Look up their mission. Evidently the radical islamists weren’t exactly thrilled with the Peace Corps message because they seem even more irritated than when Bush was in office.
Even if Obama wanted a Brown Shirt Brigade, where would he put them? The Red States aren’t going to allow them quarter.

@Richard Wheeler: Richard, I know we may be opposite relevant to politics and policy but I also know you served!! From me to you, a heart felt “Many Thanks” for your service. Ooorah!!

@Aqua:

Executive Orders.

Why does a civilian defense force need to be as powerful as the military?

That level of power means weapons and organization.

I see these things as they are written and said- not as FactCheck choose to interpret them.

@Common SenseDoc Thanks for all you’ve done for the Marines you’ve met and served with. We salute you.

@Richard Wheeler: RW, neither of those places that you gave me where you had answered that question 3 times contains anything you said. Are you confused? Why can’t you just tell us what was confusing about what Obama said? Was he lying? If you state that you want a force as strong as the US military, would you be looking for a Boy Scout organization, or Aircraft carriers, Jet planes, tanks, rockets? Why would the Peace Corps need to be as strong as the US Military? I’m not ‘continuing’ to ignore anything relative to his speech, but is seems you want to give him a pass. Just because he also spoke about the peace corps in that speech has nothing to do with his Homeland Security Force. You’re pretending as if two separate subjects can’t be addressed in the same paragraph, for example, war and peace. Planning for both can be carried out at the same time. It is getting a little tiresome for that same old song and dance about Obama saying one thing and meaning something else. Some people (if they’re truthful) would say he was lying, a la, Obamacare.
While I appreciate everything the US Marine Corps has done for this country, I am saddened by the fact that you claim that they taught you ‘name calling’ during your service. I think they are above that and that you owe them an apology.
Just for the record, I didn’t learn any of my bad habits in the US Navy.

@drjohn:

That level of power means weapons and organization.

Says who?

Anyone with a rudimentary understanding of the the Peace Corp and national security wouldn’t be this confused about the President’s remark. Sorry, Dr J, the military – “weapons and organization” – isn’t the only aspect of a smart national security strategy. Try reading the following remarks by JFK, then go back and read Obama’s remarks, and see if the fog starts to lift.

http://www.jfklibrary.org/JFK/JFK-in-History/Peace-Corps.aspx

The Peace Corps program was an outgrowth of the Cold War. President Kennedy pointed out that the Soviet Union “had hundreds of men and women, scientists, physicists, teachers, engineers, doctors, and nurses . . . prepared to spend their lives abroad in the service of world communism.” The United States had no such program, and Kennedy wanted to involve Americans more actively in the cause of global democracy, peace, development, and freedom.

http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/kennedy-establishes-peace-corps

During the course of his campaign for the presidency in 1960, Kennedy floated the idea that a new “army” should be created by the United States. This force would be made up of civilians who would volunteer their time and skills to travel to underdeveloped nations to assist them in any way they could.

To fulfill this plan, Kennedy issued an executive order on March 1, 1961 establishing the Peace Corps as a trial program. Kennedy sent a message to Congress asking for its support and made clear the significance of underdeveloped nations to the United States. The people of these nations were “struggling for economic and social progress.” “Our own freedom,” Kennedy continued, “and the future of freedom around the world, depend, in a very real sense, on their ability to build growing and independent nations where men can live in dignity, liberated from the bonds of hunger, ignorance, and poverty.”

@Tom: Tom, give us ANY quote by JFK about how big and powerful, as strong as the military, the peace corps would be. Your defense and lying to cover for Obama is getting just a little pathetic.

@drjohn:

Executive Orders.

Executive orders what? Like I said, even if this were a possibility no Red State would provide quarter. There is no GOP governor I can think of that would allow a civilian national defense force in their State.

Why does a civilian defense force need to be as powerful as the military?

National security force and civilian defense force are not the same thing. Words mean things Dr. J., you know this. We have national security teams that carry no weapons.

That level of power means weapons and organization.

You’re reading too much into it. Think 1960’s era lingo. Plus, Dr. King ran one of the most successful wars in history with zero weapons. I’m a strong proponent of national defense, by our military, but I like what the Peace Corps does. To an extent, they do what Green Berets do without the military training. One of the Green Berets primary missions is to win hearts and minds. It was one of the main goals when McClure formed the unit.

I see these things as they are written and said- not as FactCheck choose to interpret them.

I don’t put a lot of stock in Fact Check or Politifact, but you quoted part of their conclusions. I’m an engineer, I rely on empirical data. I see no such data that Obama is trying or is going to try to put together a civilian armed force.

@Aqua:

We’re still avoiding the obvious. Why does a civilian defense force need to be as powerful as the US military?

Let us not forget that this is Barack Obama, whose philosophic idol Saul Alinsky wrote:

What follows is for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be. The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power. Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away.

@Aqua:

I see no such data that Obama is trying or is going to try to put together a civilian armed force.

Ever wonder why DHS is hoarding ammunition? Why DHS is collecting riot kits? Why civilian law enforcement is getting MRAP’s?