Awwww … Barry got his feelings hurt …

Loading

Poor wittle President Thin-skin

Meanwhile:

Liberals Rail Against Clint Eastwood’s “Racist” Empty Chair Skit; But Not Piers Morgan’s?

This is too precious.

Breaking News!!!! Clint is yelling racist slurs at the chair. #RNC
— Samantha Gibbs (@LiberalChick89) August 31, 2012

Eastwood Chair Rant so racist white man manipulating mouth of black man like puppet getting him to say swear words
— Mike Elk (@MikeElk) August 31, 2012

OUCH! good i missed it RT @mikeelk: Eastwood chair rant was RACIST, white man putting dirty words into mouth of black man like a puppet
— Liza Sabater (@blogdiva) August 31, 2012

Eastwood chair rant was RACIST, white man putting dirty words into mouth of black man like a puppet
— Mike Elk (@MikeElk) August 31, 2012

6 retweets from moron followers.

“It was like Amos & Andy meets Waiting for Godot.” – @meeshellchen on racism of#eastwooding
— Mike Elk (@MikeElk) August 31, 2012

Ok, the Godot thing is clever.

Romney trying to take away grants hell now Obama need to sit in the chair for another term Romney seem racist
— Jα’Mεяiα(@_iRunThisShxt) August 31, 2012

Read more

If you haven’t seen it here is the whole raaaaaaaaacist speech

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRsfCteQxCE[/youtube]

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
363 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Tom
no he did not say that, you say that

@Tom:

Perhaps he is. He is a big fan of me. …

I doubt Mr. Eastwood has ever heard of you, so he certainly couldn’t be a fan of you.

As for Obama’s Twitter feed; It doesn’t matter if it was the President or not who sent it. It is his Twitter feed, so he owns whatever is sent out on it. If he enables a lower staff member to tweet on his behalf, it still represents Obama as if he himself sent it. (Just as the far-left holds Republicans responsible for their Tweets).

Eastwood Chair Rant so racist white man manipulating mouth of black man like puppet getting him to say swear words

There is a white man manipulating the mouth of a black man: Soros tells Obama what to say.

@Liberal1 (objectivity): Lib1 you still angry. You might be either Olberman or maybe Maddow, they’re both angry people who hate everything and everyone who has an opinion different than there own. If you don’t have anything intelligent to add to a debate, stop posting because you’re just showing your ignorance.

Obama responds to a convention he says he isn’t watching. LOL

@Tom:

Perhaps we should psychoanalyze this tweet through a paranoid, xenophobic lens, and come to all sorts of wild conclusions about Obama’s current abnormal psychology and Socialists tendencies based on it. What do you think?

Sure go ahead. Let’s us know how that works out for yah.

However, as I explained to a graduate of Berkeley Law School (University of California) four years ago.
If some chap is a card carrying member of a Socialist/Marxist political party such as (CPUSA or) the New Party, and that chap was nominated to run for political office by a Socialist/Marxist political party such as the New Party, and that chap indeed ran for political office as a candidate of a Socialist/Marxist political party such as the New Party, it should be safe to presume that such a chap is a socialist (and maybe even a Marxist).

It’s a looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck thing. Wouldn’t you think Tom? (double entendre intended).

How much damage young Barack’s triple parental abandonment do to the child and man in your view Tom?

@Tom:

Let’s all imagine the response if a Republican President was the butt of such ribalb tom foolery: “this is a disgraceful lack of respect for the office! And to sanction it at your convention. For shame. This is a turning point, the downfall of the West. When we freely mock THIS office, we are no longer a people worthy of being called American”.

How was that?

LOLZ!

Tell that to President George W. Bush!

President Obama dissed President Bush over and over again while standing right next to the seated Pres. Bush during Pres. Obama inauguration speech on 1/20/09. President Bush acted like the perfect gentleman he is.

.

I doubt not that you believe it when you say “when we freely mock THIS office (when occupied by a Democrat), we are no longer a people worthy of being called American”.

Tom, reassure me that you believe it when you say “when we freely mock THIS office (when occupied by a Republican), we are no longer a people worthy of being called American”.

Mike O’Malley
yes, and OBAMA WON HIS ELECTION ON TRASHING PRESIDENT BUSH,
he did it so many times that he convince the people to hate bush, but he also provide a propaganda to adore himself in the schools, even paid and provide lodging to some baby sitters to include his name as oppose to GOD’S NAME which disappear from schools along with the FLAG AND THE LEARNING OF THE CONSTITUTION, HE OBAMA SAID; I will change AMERICA IN 5 DAYS,
TEMPTING GOD CREATOR WHO MADE IT IN SIX DAYS AND REST ON THE SEVENTH DAY,
IS IN IT A TALK FROM LUCIFER THE FALLEN ANGEL, WHO WAS MADE SO PERFECT, THAT HE THOUGHT HE COULD BE BETTER THAN GOD? YES AND OBAMA said the OCEANS WILL SLOW
AND THE PLANET WILL HEAL, HOW ABOUT THAT?
DIDN’T WE LEARNED THAT GOD SAID, THOW WILL ADORE
NO ONE BUT ME,

@crosspatch: @Ditto: @alanstorm: @Aye: @Hard Right: @ilovebeeswarzone: @Meremortal:

Recall Eastwood’s disordered white hair. Don’t think for a moment that Eastwood’s un-slick appearance was unintentional.
Don’t think for a moment that Eastwood’s moment or two of ramble was unintentional.
Recall Eastwood leaving by CENTER stage as if into the sunset.
Recall that Republican Party stage announcer reminding us at the moment that Eastwood left by center stage that Eastwood is an accomplished artistic director who is 82 years old.

None of this was hapschance

Americans can hear hard messages coming from Clint. He has a certain immunity that comes with being old and beloved. Yes, some of his sentences did not complete themselves. Yes, he was a bit doddering. And yes, his F yourself jokes were crude. Grandpa sometimes embarrasses the family at birthdays and anniversaries by bringing up uncomfortable topics. But everyone also loves Grandpa, and realizes he tells the truth because he hasn’t got that much longer with us, and doesn’t give a damn anymore what people think…

There are lots of truths about President Obama — including that he really isn’t such a nice guy — that the media will not allow consideration of. Except from Grandpa.

So yes, MSNBC pundits, go on and on about “senile old Clint” or his “bizarre” presentation. Keep people thinking about the un-pc message he delivered.

This is going to be one interesting campaign.

The pundit class has no imagination, apparently, no understanding of real art. No understanding of how people process what they see and hear.

Thank God, Mitt has people who get it. I wonder who proposed this strategy? I bet it was Clint, and the Romney image makers had the wit to recognize the right way to deliver the message.

Clint going over into 10 PM was no accident. Everyone who tuned in at the appointed hour saw Clint. Then they watched him again on YouTube. And told their friends about the YouTube.

This makes it the only thing people are talking about, instead of knocking Mitt. The more they beat up on Clint, the better. That Grandpa sure is outrageous.

No, President Obama in not a nice man. No, President Obama is not surrounded by a political guard of nice men. And no, President Obama has no respect for the American elderly. No, President Obama is not surrounded by a political guard who have respect for average Americans or for the American elderly.

Thanks to Eastwood, it is OK to know that President Obama, the Alinskian Chicago politician, has no respect for any otherwise broadly respected elderly American theatrical artist who stands between Pres. Obama and power. Thanks to Eastwood, we can know that President Obama’s political guards have no respect for any otherwise respected elderly American theatrical artist who stands between Pres. Obama and power.

The Greatest Piece of Performance Art in American Political History

To mix a metaphor, Pres. Obama and his political guard have unwisely chased Clint Eastwood into a briar patch.

@Ditto:

I understand that he is responsible for the tweets, but that doesn’t change the fact that it makes zero sense to use them as fodder for analyzing them for proof of character defects if he didn’t write then. Is this tweet evidence that Obama is thin-skinned in light of knowing he didn’t personally fire it off in a fit of annoyance? Again, how the account works is spelled out plainly: personal tweets from Obama are signed “bo”.

In light of this information, do you think it was honest when a post on FA charged that Obama’s reaction to Neil Armstrong’s death was to tweet a picture of himself, yet not share the actual PERSONAL tweet Obama sent?
https://mobile.twitter.com/BarackObama/status/239474001750159360

@Mike O’Malley:

I’m not the one mocking it, Mike. Perhaps you should be giving the reassurances.

As for President Bush, and this goes for Romney too, never cared for his politics, didn’t particularly like him, don’t have anything in common with a person who grew up wealthy and privileged : but I never hated him. No there is no precedent for the seething hatred that Obama seems to create out of thin air. It’s really disturbing and facinating to witness the need certain individuals have to justify their hatred for him through wild theories and character analysis. Politics stopped being a good enough reason long ago. He can’t just be bad at his job, he must be a bad person, so the flawed reasoning goes. I wonder what it is about this man that causes some people to drag so much personal baggage into their assessments of him? And i’m not referring to Obama’s baggage.

Personally, I find it shameful and years from now i wager that shame will catch up to some of the perpetrators. How will they feel when their theories crumble to dust, I wonder, and they’re finally forced to look at themselves instead of Obama for the answers?

@Tom:

Equally interesting, to me, is that almost nothing he said was something a Republican could agree with or identify with (aside from the anti O bits).

If that’s what you think, then you really need to go back and watch Eastwood’s performance again because it was packed chock full of things that Republicans agree and identify with.

Those on the Left who have mocked and derided and attempted to dismiss Eastwood are woefully missing the message and its’ effectiveness.

@Tom:

I understand that he is responsible for the tweets, but that doesn’t change the fact that it makes zero sense to use them as fodder for analyzing them for proof of character defects if he didn’t write then.

The whole schtick with Obama’s tweets is that Obama is a hipster smart enough to personally use social media to connect with his peeps.

If you are indeed correct Tom and indeed some Whitehouse RP apparatchik is responsible for typing and sending that tweet. Then it still reflects badly on Obama’s character: 1) because the campaign reflects the man, and 2) the WH staffing reflects on the man.

The only way it seems to me that this does not reflect poorly upon Obama’s character is if :
Whitehouse RP apparatchik is responsible for that typing and sending that tweet,
Whitehouse supervisor of that RP apparatchik who approved the publication of that tweet, and
for good measure that WH manager in charge of both supervisor and apparatchnik
were permanently detailed to the Agriculture Department or maybe to HUD or to the Coast Guard’s new office in say:
Kandahar, or
Khartoum, or
Detroit
starting at 9:00am Tuesday morning, September 3, 2012.

@Mike O’Malley:

I don’t subscribe to Predestination, Mike. I don’t think it’s a sign Obama is flawed because he didnt come from the model Leave it to Beaver home. I think overcoming obstacles builds character. I think what Obama has done in his life is truly remarkable, and I dont need to explain it through conspiracy theories that he was mysteriously helped along the way. Is there a reaso you would care to share why someone from his background can’t achieve great things through his own hard work and perseverance?

@Mike O’Malley:

Clearly you have not looked at the Twitter site if you’re still questioning how it works. Yet that doesn’t stop you from having an opinion on something you haven’t seen.

@Tom:

The mocking abuse of Pres. Bush was no less than a relentless ruthless political campaign of character of assassination of which Senator Obama was a part. President Obama dissed President Bush over and over again while standing right next to the seated Pres. Bush during Pres. Obama inauguration speech on 1/20/09. President Bush acted like the perfect gentleman he is.

I doubt not that you believe it when you say “when we freely mock THIS office (when occupied by a Democrat), we are no longer a people worthy of being called American”.

Tom, reassure me that you believe it when you say “when we freely mock THIS office (when occupied by a Republican), we are no longer a people worthy of being called American”.

.

No there is no precedent for the seething hatred that Obama seems to create out of thin air.

Nonsense!The American Left had seething contempt and hatred for Presidents:
Eisenhower (and his wife)
Nixon
Reagan (and his wife)
Bush Sr.
Bush Jr.

.

As for President Bush, and this goes for Romney too, never cared for his politics, didn’t particularly like him, don’t have anything in common with a person who grew up wealthy and privileged

Like Presidents
Washington
Adams
Jefferson
Madison
Monroe
T. Roosevelt
F. Roosevelt and
Kennedy?

@Aye:

His reaction to Obama’s election? Everything about Afghanistan? Ok.

@Mike O’Malley:

I don’t have a lot in common with Washington, starting with the fact I live in the 21st century. Am i a bad American?

@Tom:

LOLZ!

You leave me with the impression that you are insufficient for task at hand. Are sure you want to convey such intellectual weakness?

The mocking abuse of Pres. Bush was no less than a relentless ruthless political campaign of character of assassination of which Senator Obama was a part. President Obama dissed President Bush over and over again while standing right next to the seated Pres. Bush during Pres. Obama inauguration speech on 1/20/09. President Bush acted like the perfect gentleman he is.

I doubt not that you believe it when you say “when we freely mock THIS office (when occupied by a Democrat), we are no longer a people worthy of being called American”.

Tom, reassure me that you believe it when you say “when we freely mock THIS office (when occupied by a Republican), we are no longer a people worthy of being called American”.

I don’t have a lot in common with Washington, starting with the fact I live in the 21st century. Am i a bad American?

Since only two men have served as POTUS in the 21st Century, the two men in question, perhaps we can speak of President Clinton, one of the more recent.

Tell us Tom, how much do you have in common with a fellow who was unable and unwilling to refute a creditable charge of rape?

LOLZ!

@Tom:

I don’t subscribe to Predestination, Mike. I don’t think it’s a sign Obama is flawed because he didnt come from the model Leave it to Beaver home.

One is left to infer that you don’t subscribe to modern science either? 😉

@Tom:

Here’s something you didn’t address:

“I would just like to say something, ladies and gentlemen. Something that I think is very important. It is that, you, we — we own this country.

“Politicians are employees of ours.”

“And when somebody does not do the job, we got to let them go.” – Clint Eastwood, RNC 2012

And, for all the claims that Eastwood was ineffective, look what you find yourself spending so much of your time on… Strange how that works, eh?

Rule 5 writ large.

@Mike O’Malley:

Mike, am I supposed to seriously address your strawman about my lack of suficient patriotism? Do you already have a sanctimonious lecture queued up to educate me? Perhaps others will approve and you’ll have the satisfaction of being a right wing hero for a day. Anything to avoid the topic at hand or explain your persistent slander of the sitting POTUS.

@Aye:

I agree that was the most effective part and well said on his part. Overall, I still have my doubts about the impact this will have. A stronger candidate would likely not welcome being overshadowed and pushed to the side, but several news cycles without tax returns, Cayman islands or Bain cant hurt.

I still find it odd that Republicans can so easily filter out the parts of his speach that were less than orthodox but trying to parse it for specific meaning is probably a futile task.

AYE
YES CLINT EASTWOOD DON’T SPEAK FOR NOTHING,
and what he said was powerful, like; ” WE OWN THIS COUNTRY”
this will stay forever in the ears of AMERICANS,
THE MEANING OF IT IS SO VAST, IT COULD TAKE MANY BOOKS ,AND THERE WOULD BE DIFFERENT ADDED QUOTES ON THESES FOUR SHORT WORDS,
BYE

@Mike O’Malley:

I don’t recall Bush being accused of being a foreigner, or an ally of Islamic terrorists. The criticisms I remembereere that profited from nepotism, that he lacked intellect, that he was a puppet of Cheney. Are you ready going to put those on par with accusations that Obama is an anti-American foreigner intent on destroying America? Please make that argument.

@Tom:

I don’t recall Bush being accused of being a foreigner

You don’t recall do you? Because those particular concerns were shaped by particulars of President Obama’s life as any thoughtful person of integrity would know.

It was Pres. Obama’s own Kenyan grandmother who got the story going about Barack Jr. being born in Kenya to start with. It was Pres. Obama’s own wife who told Black American school children that her husband was a Kenyan. Thereafter for years Pres. Obama refused to help anyone figure out just what hospital he was born in in Hawaii. Candidate Obama could have cleared that one up real fast. He choose not to does so.

I don’t recall Bush being accused of being … an ally of Islamic terrorists.

You mean you don’t recall Michael Moore and much of the Democratic Party base accusing Pres. Bush being an ally of Saudi Royal Family and thereby the Islamic terrorists who committed 9/11.

It is hard to believe that you do not remember.

You mean you don’t recall some part of the Democratic Party base accusing Pres. Bush being an ally of the Zionist Israeli terrorist entity?

It is hard to believe that you do not remember.

You mean you don’t recall some part of the Democratic Party base accusing Pres. Bush being an ally of Zionist terrorists who committed 9/11

It is hard to believe that you do not remember.

You mean you don’t recall much of the Democratic Party base accusing Pres. Bush and Vice President Cheney of covertly conducting the 9/11 attacks and mass murdering three thousand Americans?

It is hard to believe that you do not remember.

.

What I do believe you don’t recall is the founded charges that Senator Obama and Mrs. Obama illicitly benefited from a corrupt relationship with that convicted felon Tony Rezko and the Chicago University Medical Center too.

.

@Tom:

LOLZ! The straw-man about your patriotism is your own Tom. I’m approaching a moment when I accuse you of exercising unbelievability poor judgment . I’ve already begun to question your good faith.

@Mike O’Malley:

Am I supposed to know what LOLZ!” means?

Photobucket

@Mike O’Malley:

And you didn’t even list some of the most loathsome, and false, criticism of Bush.

You didn’t talk about how Bush supposedly allowed the bin Laden family to hop a plan and escape in the hours following the attacks of 9/11.

You didn’t mention anything about how Bush was excoriated for sitting in a Florida classroom and not rushing out as word arrived of a plane hitting the WTC.

Remember how he supposedly “lied” us into war? “Bush lied…People died” they said.

Remember how Iraq and Afghanistan were “wars for oil” and how Bush and Cheney were supposedly going to benefit financially?

Remember all of the accusations of nefarious conduct and no bid contracts that Halliburton supposedly received? Remember how Halliburton was the hue and cry of the anti-war movement?

Remember all the “no blood for oil” protests? Of course, there never was any oil to be gained for the blood that was shed there. Those were just baseless accusations with no foundation in truth.

Remember how Iraq was supposedly GW’s way of getting even with Saddam for wanting to have GHW assassinated?

Remember how Bush was accused of purposely abandoning New Orleans and allowing a great American city to drown?

Not only were Bush and Cheney accused of neglecting New Orleans while it flooded, they were accused of actually blowing up the levees so that blacks would die.

Through their accusations regarding 9/11, the wars, and Katrina, the Left wanted us to believe that Bush was guilty of at least 7,000 plus cases of accessory to murder if not worse.

I vividly remember all of those things. There are many more beyond that as well.

Finally, it should be pointed out once again that the whole birther thing originated within the Hillary Clinton campaign team. They’re the ones who ginned all that stuff up. Of course, it’s convenient for the Leftists to have some situational amnesia when it comes to the facts regarding that issue.

@Tom:

I understand that he is responsible for the tweets, but that doesn’t change the fact that it makes zero sense to use them as fodder for analyzing them for proof of character defects if he didn’t write then.

Where did I do that?

Is this tweet evidence that Obama is thin-skinned in light of knowing he didn’t personally fire it off in a fit of annoyance?

You don’t know that. You can’t prove that. And even if he did order a minion to do it, it still indicates that he had it sent off.

Again, how the account works is spelled out plainly: personal tweets from Obama are signed “bo”.

That is not proof. That is assumption. He could purposely not sign a tweet “bo” to make people like you think that he didn’t personally send it. It’s his Twitter account and he owns everything that goes out on it

In light of this information, do you think it was honest when a post on FA charged that Obama’s reaction to Neil Armstrong’s death was to tweet a picture of himself, yet not share the actual PERSONAL tweet Obama sent?

You again make assumptions. You can not prove what he personally sends or what a minion does. That “bo” is typed in does not indicate who physically did it. Nor does it’s absence prove that Obama wasn’t the one with his fingers on the keys.

What I think was honest about what Obama thought of the space program, was when Obama canceled the manned space program, and humiliated Americans further by sending our astronauts and tax dollars to our opponents in that space race, Allowing Russians to snicker as they put US astronauts in orbit at greatly inflated prices.

AYE
they DEMOCRATES WILL HAVE TO PAY THE PRICE FOR HAVING DEMONIZE N INNOCENT MAN AND A PRESIDENT IN TIMES OF SORROW FOR THE NATION HE WAS IN CHARGE TO PROTECT,
HE DID IT THE BIG WAY FOR THE HATERS TO REMEMBER NEVER TO TAUNT THE UNITED STATES,
HE WAS BRAVE AND HAD THE COURAGE OF HIS CONVICTIONS, AND KEPT HIS COOL WHILE THOSE DEMOCRATS WHO HAD THE MAJORITY IN THE HOUSE, USED IT TO SWINDLE THE BILLS SIGN BY PRESIDENT BUSH BY INJECTING THEIR DEMOCRATS BILLS WITHIN THE PILE OF PAPERS LIKE TRAITORS IN THE BACK OF THE PRESIDENT BUSH, THIS WAS SAID BY A VERY CREDIBLE PERSON ON THIS BLOG IN 2009, IT STRUCK ME ALONG THE HATE BUSH WORDS SPRAYED ALL OVER THE UNITED STATES, AND I was dumfounded by the vicious tactics of the DEMOCRATS WHICH HAD BEEN VOTED ,
and it went on and non stop demonizing GEORGE BUSH, THAT WAS UNACCEPTABLE,
AND THEIR TIMES IS COMMING SOON FOR THEIR PUNISHMENT TO TAKE PLACE,
THEY DEMOCRATES SHOULD BE ALL DEFEATED BY THE PEOPLE, ALL OF THEM ARE GUILTY FOR
ALLOWING THAT HATE CARD TO DESTROY AN HONEST AND BETTER MAN MORE THAN ANY OF THEM.

MITT ROMNEY SAID AND REPEATED; IT’S BEEN A HARD TIME FOR FAMILY THESE LAST YEARS,
HE DOESN’T FOLLOW UP BY SAYING; THAT’S WHY I’M RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT,
HE DOESN’T BRAG HIMSELF, SO HE WON’T SAY,
BUT I KNOW NOW IT’S TRUE,

@Aye:

Quite a list indeed. Its interesting that some would use this to justify equally questionable accusations about Obama and his motives. Perhaps Mike could weigh in on that. Is his motivation an eye for an eye?

@Ditto:

I’m confused. So you’ve come full circle from believing Obama wrote all these tweets to questioning whether he writes any of them?

@Ditto:

If Sarah Palin tweets we are justified in presuming it was Sarah Palin who tweeted.

If Congressman Weiner tweets we are justified in presuming it was Wiener who tweeted.

But if Pres. Obama tweets tweets we are justified in presuming it was kiddie-korps staff at the Whitehouse who tweeted in his name!

Hmmm, and Tom does not discern a dangerous national security risk in such a scenario? Pres. Obama would have to be as dumb as a box of rocks and incompetent to allow such a thing to happen!

@Mike O’Malley:

Because Presidents often use Twitter where national security is concerned? You still haven’t bothered looking at the Obama twitter account obviously if you’re still this confused how it works. Not that I mind seeing you embarrass yourself.

@Tom:

Tom, you are the one embarrassing yourself. Your confusion is because you assume that “bo” can only mean that Obama is personally tweeting, and an absence of “bo” means he isn’t. This is an assumption that you simply can not prove. You try to pass off your self-assured superior knowledge of “how tweeting works”, yet you can’t understand that there is no true way to prove “who” really sent a tweet. Are you really that naive?

If I give my account information over to someone else, they can send messages and the recipient has no idea if I sent it or not. They can even put “Ditto” at the end. Yet if I send a message out and don’t put “Ditto” on it does it then mean that I didn’t send it? Of course not! The only way to positively tell “who” sent an Obama tweet is to video record them as they inputted and sent it. Failing that, you can’t really know!!!

@Tom:

Perhaps Mike could weigh in on that. Is his motivation an eye for an eye?

Projection on your part? Or do I detect a glimmer of Plato’s ring?

@Aye:

Good lord! I read no few of the primary historical documents behind many of these malicious accusations against President Bush.

Tactfully Tom seems chooses to forget that it was Pres. Obama’s own Kenyan grandmother who got the story going about Barack Jr. being born in Kenya to start with. It was Pres. Obama’s own wife who told Black American school children that her husband was a Kenyan. Thereafter for years Pres. Obama refused to help anyone figure out just what hospital he was born in in Hawaii. Candidate Obama could have cleared that one up real fast. He choose not to does so. All that was needed to clear that up was a first class letter to the Secretary of State of Hawaii!

But when the skeptical American people asked about young Barack’s years in Indonesia , Time magazine (I think it was) found an enrollment application to a Indonesian Catholic school, a primary historical document prepared by young Barack’s legal guardian at the time, on which Barack’s legal guardian declares that Barack was an Indonesian citizen and a Muslim!

But if we read the primary historical document in the Senate Joint Intelligence Committee’s authoritative report about intelligence failures and the Iraq war we find out without doubt that Pres. Bush did NOT lie. [Pres. Clinton some 8 or so years earlier did indeed knowingly lie about genocide in Rwanda. 960,000 Rwandans died and over a quarter of a million Rwandan women and girls were gang raped before being hacked to death. But to my knowledge no leftist ever taunted Pres. Clinton with: “Clinton lied and people died”!]

Much can be said about the fraudulent accusations made against Pres. Bush but I expect all of it would be over the head of some on this thread.

@Ditto:

It’s a campaign site he occasionally jumps on to tweet something personal. It’s social media marketing, not official policy statement. I would think this is all painfully obvious, but apparently not. Like everything else with Obama it has a sinister purpose, right?

@Tom: @Tom:

LOLZ!

Yes (more laughter) it’s not a national security risk you say Tom?

Let’s explore this hypothetical. Cubbie, one of the Whitehouse Mouseketeers gets on Pres. Obama’s personal twitter account and tweets: Mohammed was a homo. What happens next?

Darlene, one of the Whitehouse Mouseketeers gets on Pres. Obama’s personal twitter account and tweets: “$1 million for the head of the prime minister of Japan or Britain. What happens next?

or Annette, one of the Whitehouse Mouseketeers gets on Pres. Obama’s personal twitter account and tweets:
“The King of Jordan works for Mossad”. What happens next?

@Mike O’Malley:

Another fancy pants evasion. Another example of Mike’s inability to back up anything he writes. Yet i am supposed to answer for things other people said about Bush a decade ago.

@Mike O’Malley:

BTW how is Birtherism going? You defenders of the Republic making any headway?

@Tom:

You seem to ignore one major fact; that Twitter account has ONE person’s name on it, and that ONE person is responsible for whatever appears. Not some lamebrain lackey in the White House; the person who claims ownership of that account.

Now, I suspect you are correct in your assumption that Obama didn’t Tweet that, but that is simply because he seems to do little beside play golf, campaign and take vacations. If the truth were known, it is not Obama calling the shots, but Valerie Jarrett.

Tom
listen what the chair is telling you,
it’s the same chair,

GOVERNOR HUCKABEE
YOU WON’T BE ABLE TO FIGURE OUT THE LINES ON THE DNC CONVENTION,
BECAUSE THEY WILL BE IN ARABIC TONGUE

@Tom:

BTW how is Birtherism going? You defenders of the Republic making any headway?

It fell off significantly a day or two after Pres. Obama finally released his birth certificate. 9/11 Trutherism however seems to be holding steady at around 1/3rd or 1/4 of registered Democratic voters. One might surmise that if Birtherism and Trutherism are equals, some are more equal than others.

Perhaps you know Tom. What country’s passport did Barack Obama use to travel to Pakistan back in the 70s when American citizens were forbidden to travel to Pakistan?

@Tom:

more laughs … it’s not a national security risk you say Tom?

Let’s explore this hypothetical. Cubbie, one of the Whitehouse Mouseketeers gets on Pres. Obama’s personal twitter account and tweets: Mohammed was a homo. What happens next?

Darlene, one of the Whitehouse Mouseketeers gets on Pres. Obama’s personal twitter account and tweets: $1 million for the head of the prime minister of Japan or Bahrain. What happens next?

or Annette, one of the Whitehouse Mouseketeers gets on Pres. Obama’s personal twitter account and tweets:
The King of Jordan works for Mossad. What happens next?

@Mike O’Malley:

Fell off? You seem to be going strong with it. That African background of his, it really intrigues you huh?