Iranian Scientist Claims Earthquake is Second Iranian Nuke Test

Loading

UPDATED
True or not, this is exactly how it will happen; sketchy, uncertain reports backed by minimal scientific data, precluded by rhetoric from Iran and rhetoric from Israel, and at a time of maximum American political instability.

In any event, true or not, it seems abundantly clear that diplomacy has failed with Iran. Senator Obama says he’d talk to Iran, that more sanctions would work (as if even possible given Russian and China’s near lovefest w Iran). Well, if the good Senator really believed that, then he’d have already opened backdoor talks himself, or quietly met w an Iranian ambassador at a friendly, neutral embassy.

Iran is making nuclear bombs
Diplomacy has failed
If this report is true, then there are nukes near the Straits of Hormuz-ready to be used against 25% of the world’s oil shipping, against hundreds of thousands of Americans in the area, or to be put on a ship and sent to a target city.

Sober up people. America’s at war. Do we need a warrior or a lawyer? Do we need a man who can’t fit his the long list of resume accomplishments into a single book, or a man who has zero national accomplishments on his resume, and barely 100 y/n votes in his entire lifetime? You decide which wil deter Iran. Meanwhile, the bombs are near the ships, and they’re already in the shadows.

Israel Insider exclusively reports that a seismic event this weekend in southern Iran may in fact have been a massive underground nuclear bomb test. According to the USGS, the tremor measuring 5.0 on the Richter scale took place Saturday night, October 25 just before midnight Iran time, with its epicenter at 26.70°N, 55.02°E, just north of the strategic straits of Hormuz, opposite Abu Dhabi.
Zoomable map source: Google Maps.

The claim that the tremor was in fact a nuclear test came from an Iranian nuclear scientist who claims to be working in uranium enrichment for the project. A report published by Israel Insider on Friday, October 24 included a captionless map that portrayed the area of the seismic event that occurred the following night, based on location information previously provided by the Iranian source.

Israel Insider’s source reports that the test is in fact the second in a series. A 4.8 Richter scale event occurred on October 21 with an epicenter (26.70N, 54.96E) within 5 km (3 miles) of the October 25 tremor

link

UPDATE
North Korea’s nuclear tests were actually announced just before they happened so as to prevent any military response. However, they were conducted in October of 2006 (just before a US election at a time of maximum American political instability), and they were confirmed by seismic data. They were also conducted relatively close to the coastline.

Whether the reports about Iran are true or not…the UN’s IAEA claims that Iran might already have a nuke. They at least have hundreds of ballistic missiles that could devastate any city in the Middle East, and they have enough radioactive matl to make those warheads dirty.

There is a very real threat from Iran-according to Senator Obama (who has also said there is no threat from Iran; duplicitous as usual). In a matter of hours, we’ll know how America will deal with them.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
50 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This is very interesting. Remember all the “earth quakes ” in the southern part of China? I read that there was a nuclear underground storage place there. The first earth quake was for real, but it was speculated that the subsequent “quakes” were some of the nuclear bombs that were stored there going off. They were deep in the mountain. Even months after the first quake there were many more explosions.

I don’t think iran nuclear facilities has enough deterrent capacity, I think we exaggerate their ability in military industry. Iranian conventional weapon and nuclear weapons are considerably ancient technology compared to US sophisticated industry. So American can sleep well and have anice dream, and Amercan should not worry about iran. God bless America.

Sleeping well here is a given, however-a strike to interupt oil at this point with a shaky economy would likely devastate our country——-and they know it.

so Mr. Scofield, where have you been living ? Iran has tested several nuclear items and has weapon sytems and capabilities sold to them by China, Russia and others. They are definitely NOT ancient. Their stated goal is to eliminate the US and Europe, so what makes you think they aren’t going to do us in the first chance they get. If you are so positive , you go live there..

Obama = the next Jimmy Carter… only this time, with even MORE disastrous results. The guy is a total fraud

A 5.0 is pretty big for a nuclear device. Also, it was determined to be at a depth of 28km. That much shaking at that depth, color me skeptical.

Tom

“So American can sleep well and have anice dream, and Amercan should not worry about iran” (Scofield)

Boy, Scofield, what is it exactly that you smoke? Powerful stuff for sure! Keep you head in the sand… don’t worry, be happy!

What was it that Obama said? Oh yes, I remember now: “Iran is a tiny country, a tiny threat.”

Brandon said:

don’t think iran nuclear facilities has enough deterrent capacity, I think we exaggerate their ability in military industry. Iranian conventional weapon and nuclear weapons are considerably ancient technology compared to US sophisticated industry. So American can sleep well and have anice dream, and Amercan should not worry about iran. God bless America.

INteresting that your lack of concern is not shared by the world community, the US and the IAEA. But, ya know, opines come in all flavors.

I’d say we’ll all sleep *very* well knowing you aren’t running for any federal elected office, Brandon.

Underground nuclear detonations have a very distinctive signature and cannot be mistaken for earthquakes of any kind. Get real.

Really, R? Something does not make sense in what you say.

According to The History Channel encyclopedia, underground detonations can trigger an earthquake.

The same is said at the San Diego Naural History Museum site.

Now, this certainly isn’t within my expertise, but it strikes me as this can be the quintessential “which came first, the chicken or the egg” connundrum. The “signature” you suggest… of which I know nothing of the specificity… may be different for a detonation that did not cause an earthquake.

But why are you so sure that Iran did not conduct an underground detonation which, in fact, caused an earthquake?

r

You want to go down and check it out?

No reason to panic yet. The Iranians are bluffing (badly). An underground nuclear explosion and an earthquake have totally different seismic signatures. An earthquake is not an explosion, and it does not generate explosive shock waves. Earthquakes happen when layers of rock snap or crack along a fault line, or when 2 of the tectonic plates that carry the continents collide. It is possible for a underground nuke to cause a small earthquake, since the rock in the immediate vicinity of the bomb shatters, and this can release the elastic strain energy in the rock around it. But a seismologist could instantly tell the difference between the waves from a natural earthquake and those from an earthquake combined with an explosion. It’s absolutely impossible for the Iranians to set off a nuke underground without US seismologists knowing about it, or for them to pass off a natural earthquake as the result of a nuke.

Some perspective on the energies we’re talking about here: The biggest underground nuke test the US ever conducted was a 5 megaton blast in the Aleutian Islands in 1971(which, by the way, did not set off an earthquake). The biggest bomb ever tested was the 50 megaton “Tsar Bomba” set off by the Russians in the sky over the Arctic in 1961. The earthquake that caused the Boxing Day Tsunami in 2004 had an energy of more than 9 teratons (that’s 9 trillion tons) of TNT. The entire planet wobbled on it’s axis a bit.

I’m not being complacent here. I’m actually terrified that an Obamunist presidency will be Jimmy Carter’s second term, except that this time the ayatollahs will have nukes. But so far at least, all they have is bullshit.

Wars and rumors of wars. This seems like another attempt to make up the new president’s mind before he even takes office. Most of the media sound like a war has already started. Do you seed another WMD episode? Innocent until proven guilty is a basic right.Stop fanning the flames of war. We’re not getting off easy in Iraq. What makes people think it would be any easier with Iran? Mind your own business and find out who your real enemies are.

Leo Nag,

We know who the real enemy is. It’s Obama.

No its Mccain you guys are so ignorant i swear…. mccain is just going to mess up our economy even more and get into war again and spend more money n kill even more innocent lives and then since iran has such nuclear power as everybody claims they are going to use it on us…its just that obvious we need change not more war…havent enough of our soliders died? and innocent civilians…. not to mention the millions of people that have been ignorant and prejudice of those who are innocent. i’m not saying go obama or go mccain im going for the person who pushes more for world peace not war….

Oh my… it appears the Obamatron hit squad has been drinking too much coffee and are in a true snit over being outed for their sleazy, manipulative campaign, fending off the obvious morphing middle class wealth threshold,… and the dismay when even CBS starts catching on to Obama’s “fuzzy math”.

I guess she hasn’t figured out that that Obama’s the guy for escalating now… in Afghanistan. McCain, of course, would rather hold the NATO allies’ feet to the fire for the obligated troops, and only use US troops as a back up.

My my… who’s the “unilateralist” now, danya? LOL

But thank you, danya, for that stellar example of “ignorance” and desperation. We always like a lift of spirits here at FA by the demonstration of the welfare government mentality.

EPICENTER APPEARS TO BE OFF SHORE?
http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/last_event/world_iran.html

(even if it isn’t, you DO NOT test nukes on the coast of your country)

AND IT OCCURRED AT A DEPTH OF 28.8 KM.

AS A POSTER (slimguy) ON ATLASSHRUGS POINTED OUT…
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/11/iran-tests-seco.html
…THAT’S A LONG WAY TO DRILL (it’s just shy of 18 miles).

…and, 9 people were injured. Nope, that couldn’t possibly have been a real earthquake, snicker chortle guffaw (NOT at the injuries and damage, but the lies. They’re almost as brazen as Obama).

UPDATE – the deepest hole drilled EVER (until now?) was by the Russians, it took them 15 years, and they got all the way down to 7.6 miles. But now the Iranians, in the flash of an eye, have beaten them by almost 10 miles! (те сволочи!)

BUT, I say we bomb them anyway, just to be sure.

Another moonbat coming out of the closet. Gee, what’s happening? Halloween is over, didn’t you know Danya?

Craig

Isn’t that O’ACORN something?! I mean they not only register the dead to vote, but teach them how to post comments to websites, too.

NOT GOING TO ASK HOW MANY OF THESE OPINIONS ARE BACKED UP BY PHDs. IRAN WOULD NOT TEST A NUKE.THEY KNOW THAT BEFORE THE LAST VIBRATION FROM THE LAST SHOCK WAVE DISSAPATED.THERE WOULD BE A WAVE OF ISRAILIE NUKES THAT WOULD TURN IRAN INTO A SEA OF GLASS THAT WOULD GLOW FOR THE NEXT 1000YRs HEADED THERE WAY.BESIDES WHY TEST SOMETHING THAT N.KOREA HAS ALREADY TESTED OR THEY COULD HAVE SAY HALF A DOZEN OF THE COUPLE DOZEN RUSSIAN WARHEADS THAT ARE UNACCOUNTED FOR FROM THE BREAKUP OF THE U.S.S.R. OR THERE IS AROUND 100 KILOs OF WEAPONS GRADE PLUTONIUM THAT WAS ALSO MISS PLACED OUT THERE FLOATING AROUND SOMEWHERE. ANYBODY REMEMBER THE COLLEGE STUDENT THAT POSTED PLANS FOR A SUITCASE NUKE THAT WAS NASTY ENOUGH TO TAKE OUT A CITY THE SIZE OF N.Y.CITY.JUST HOW HIGH TECH DO YOU THINK THEY ACTUALLY HAVE TO BE TO BE OF A CONCERN. JUST HOW HARD WOULD IT BE TO STASH A BOMB ABOUT THE SIZE OF A 55 GALLON DRUM ABOARD A CARGO SHIP, OIL TANKER,OR EVEN A YACHT OR SAIL BOAT THEN ENTER THE HARBOR OF 3 OR 4 PORT CITIES.HOW MANY SHIPS ARE IN OUR WATERS AT ANY GIVEN TIME. I WOULD GUESS HUNDREDS. DONT SEEM TO HARD FOR THEM TO FIND SOMEONE WILLING TO BLOW THEMSELVES UP.HELL IF THEY GET TO GO TO HEAVEN AND HAVE A HANDFULL OF VIGINS WAITING FOR THEM FOR BLOWING UP A FEW MARINES.JUST THINK OF THE REWARDS WAITING FOR THEM FOR TAKING OUT A AMERICAN CITY. WHICH PREZ CANIDATE KNOWS HOW TO DEAL WITH THEM.ID SAY JOHN IS GUARANTEED TO BE QUICKER ON THE TRIGGER THAN OBAMA. THINK THE BETTER QUESTION IS WHEN WILL SOMEONE IN IRAN COME TO POWER THAT IS CRAZY ENOUGH NOT TO CARE THAT THE END RESULT WOULD BE THAT IRAN WOULD BE TURNED INTO A REALLY BRIGHT NITE LITE. I BELIEVE THAT IT WONT BE US THAT DEALS WITH THE PROBLEM.IF THE ODDS THAT IRAN HAS A NUKE EVER GET AS CERTAIN AS 50/50 ISREAL WILL DEAL WITH IT IN THEIR TIME PROVEN METHOD OF KILLING THEM ALL THEN LETTING THEIR GOD SORT THEM OUT. I THINK THE POINT I AM TRYING TO GET TO IS THEY DONT HAVE TO BE HIGH TECH TO COME UP WITH A NUKE AND THEY DONT HAVE TO HAVE A 100MIL. DOLLAR ICBM TO DELIVER A NUKE TO AMERICAN OR ISRAILIE SOIL.JUST LOOK AT IRAQ OR AFGHANISTAN.GOAT HERDERS DRESSED IN ROBES WITH NO BODY ARMOR OR ANY HIGH TECH HAVE FOUGHT THE WORLDS BEST TRAINED AND EQUIPED ARMY WITH HOMEMADE BOMBS AND AK47s AND WE STILL HAVENT KICKED THEIR ASS. SO HOW CLOSE DO YOU LIVE TO THE COAST.COME TO THINK OF IT HOW MANY TONNES OF DRUGS ARE SMUGGLED INTO OUR COUNTRY.I BET SOMEONE WITHIN 10MILES OF YOUR HOME HAS A KILO OF HERION OR COCAIN.HMMMM…………SLEEP WELL!! 🙂

“What was it that Obama said? Oh yes, I remember now: “Iran is a tiny country, a tiny threat.”” — Craig

Good thing that the little stuff is harmless, like scorpions and black widows, which are so tiny it’s ridiculous to consider them a threat.

THERE NOT AFTER YOU STEP ON THEM!!>>>>:)

What’s the difference between a socialist and a democrat?

Gee…let me think a minute.

They both believe in big government? CHECK

They both believe government should be responsible for ensuring that no one has significantly more than anyone else? (Otherwise known as “spreading the wealth around”) CHECK

They both believe that “negotiating” with terrorists will keep said terrorists from attacking such hopeful countries? (France, for example) CHECK

They both believe countries attacked by terrorists did something to said terrorists that provoked the attack? (such as not being a good jihadist muslim goat-herder) CHECK

They both believe they know better than you what’s good for you? CHECK

They both believe that if you don’t agree with the preceeding statement that you are obviously too stupid to be trusted to make your own decisions–and they have to make them for you whether you agree with them or not? Check

They never met a tax bill they didn’t like (unless it had too little money in it), or a military bill they did like (unless it guts our military even more)? CHECK

They both believe the UN should have ultimate authority over ALL nations on the earth? CHECK

They both believe deficit spending is a good thing. CHECK

My, my, there seems to be a pattern here isn’t there. It kind of brings to mind the old saw about walking and talking like a duck doesn’t it? CHECK to that too.

What does the above have to do with Iranian nuke tests? Stated or not, Obama believes all the above–except the duck part–and those beliefs have been shared by other politicians who paved the way for major conflicts. Remember McMillen and his “peace in our time” in 1938? Or Wilson’s ” He kept us out of war” slogan in 1916? If Obama is elected I predict that within 18 months he will have begun lifting sanctions against Iran as a gesture of “peaceful good will”, that within 4 years Iran will announce they too now have a nuke–and we, and everyone else, better toe their line in the middle East…or else, and that within 3 years we will have another major terrorist attack here in the U.S. Obamas efforts to “improve” our image abroad will open the doors to all the above…and DON’T even get me started on his economic policies.

All in all, comparing Obama’s term to Carters “2nd term” is being overly generous…Comparing it to Carters 3rd or 4th term would probably be more accurate. Personally, I don’t like either of the contenders though I intend to vote for Big John, mostly as a vote against Obama rather than as a vote for a Republican president. The absolute worst scenario for the U.S. will be Obama as president and a significantly improved democratic presence in congress. (check out youtube for “burning down the house” for a good explanation for how we got into the mortgage mess we’re in right now)

To sum up, Obama is a political amateur who will prove to be an utter disaster for the country. The Iranian “nuke test” WAS an earthquake–having seen seismograph tapes of both nuke tests and real earthquakes in my military (retired ater 24 years) and geological (2-3 semesters from BS in Geology) training I can attest that the signatures are very different and that earthquakes caused by nuke tests always show the nuke test signature prior to the following earthquake signature, though sometimes the signatures are very close togather.

Now could someone spare a buck or two to help with my property taxes??? (You know, “spread the wealth” a little in my direction…)

RWS in FLA

For something REALLY hair-raising check out “Chasing loose nukes” (YAHOO or GOOGLE search if the following address doesn’t work.)

http://www.fdungan.com/duke.htm

Reporting from downwind of the most problematic one…

RWS in FLA

Not being one to let a nit go by unpicked, “Peace in our time” was Chamberlin, not MacMillan.

Wow! The people supporting the Republican party are really loosing it! I am independent and used to lean nore towards the party but after watching over the last 4 yes or so I am no longer in that boat. Sounds like the same things that were said about Iraq but we know that was B.S. Most higher ranking generals say that we cannot win anything without sitting down with others. And why didn’t we attack North Korea! They made threats and actually had and tested nukes? I hate to tell you all but the U.S. doesn’t rule the world! And for you people talking about the democratic congress, you have the last two years compared to the prior six years. And Ronald Regan started something called the earned income credit. Sounds like re-distribution of wealth! Is he a socialist?

If Iran were to attack any oil or USA reserves the nation of Iran would be decimated by nuclear bombs and cease to exist. As every president has always said, any nuclear attack is against America no matter where they explode the bomb and we will defend our nation with the full amount of our armed forces including atomic bombs. Iran would be the next Hiroshima so they better watch there ass or they all will die. Let them kid there selves like Sadam Hussein and nobody will be able to set foot in Iran for the next five years. Roboter

I hope all you people that think mcCain is so great still think so when he caused all of you to lose all your money and your homes, then sends all of your children to war. and gets them killed, cuased he thinks we need to fight with every country over his time in prison camp, good luck to you all, he is just what this country needs a hothead with control of the nuke triggers,.

@toadhopper:

Here we have another ill informed Obama supporter. Along with Jason #26.

I’ve lost count of all the Obama loons (like “Jason”) who pretend to be “moderates” and who are always so “stunned” that we are able to believe bad things about really bad people.

And what’s that nonsense about the EIC? It was fine until that economic “genius” Clinton put it on steroids by greatly expanding it, just like he did the CRA which wasn’t such a good idea, and certainly not as good a thing to do as the original EIC.

Now stop spewing your love for Oddmashuggahjob and Obama. If you love the poison Iranian dwarf so much, go over to Iran and suck up to his sick filthy keister in person, you silly Democrat “moderate” imposter you.

Did any of the people who are ranting about McCain being a warmonger or denying the plausibility of this report actually read the first few words that I wrote?

True or not, this is exactly how it will happen; sketchy, uncertain reports backed by minimal scientific data, precluded by rhetoric from Iran and rhetoric from Israel, and at a time of maximum American political instability.

btw, those who say nukes have a different signature than earthquakes…I agree. I do wonder how it came to be that the world recognized North Korea had nukes? Anyone? Anyone? Yeah, that’s right! Seismic activity. At first they denied it, then they admitted it a few days later.

Would you test a nuke near your coastline? I doubt it, but I do think you’d test it as far from your own facilities as possible, and….that puts it near the coastline.

I’m still not sold that this report is true, but MY POINT REMAINS THE SAME:

True or not, this is exactly how it will happen; sketchy, uncertain reports backed by minimal scientific data, precluded by rhetoric from Iran and rhetoric from Israel, and at a time of maximum American political instability.

While we sleep Obama will sit down with Iran’s leaders and ask them please do not hurt my people. “My people were taken from Africa and they made slaves out of them, we have been
through so much, like my poor dear old auntie has to go back Africa even though I tried to tell
the white folks I knew nothing about her. I don’t know much about talks as I usually vote, “pass”. “I can’t leave the White House for fear of being shot for you see I lied to the American people. I got my black foks and the youth of America all stired up about finding jobs,
crap there ain’t no jobs. I increased income taxes, dividend taxes, raised income taxes on the wealthy, raised social security taxes, raised medicare taxes, got government health insurance
at a cost nobody can afford. So, guys I screwed up the nation really good.”

it amazes me how many people are asleep in our country and how all it takes is a guy with good speaking skills to wake up a this huge amount of people by saying what they want to hear, which turns out to be absolutely nothing. And the people that tell you that talking with our enemies is how to win the conflicts are the same people that would tell you anything just to get elected. Would your enemy tell you anything just to get you to go home so they could go back in and take over can anyone say obama !!! Wake up America war should be shoot ,ask questions later. If we had fought WWII like we fight our fights now we would be speaking german

I am always happy to find out where the students go that barely graduate from high school. They almost alway makeup the bulk of the Republican voters. Its no wonder they can be enthused with the label “joe sixpack” and “joe the plumber” as if those labels of underachievement are values you want to find in a President. Remember the last time we “elected” someone as intellectually challenged as you folks are ? Yeah we got W and Cheney and Rumsfeld, and Brownie . Why don’t you want to elect someone that is smarter than you are ? Is it really that threatening to your self image ?

And we’ll watch as Israel pleads with the United Nations to protect her from Iran. Like the US, Israel has placed its well being in the hands of the dedicated left. And will we learn any lessons about this dangerous folly when Israel is vaporized? Of course! We’ll learn that Israel “deserved” to be destroyed because of her prior misbehavior. Welcome to the universe of the radical left.

My hat’s off to Morris S. who seems to have a very practical understanding of the facts. A practical understanding of the facts is not a very common occurence on this webpage. But to summarize what he has logically articulated……. Iran is still in the centrifuge phase of trying to generate enriched plutonium. Enriched to the point that it would be useful as a weapon. Both U.S., European, U.N. and Israeli estimates are that they are between 2 and 10 years away from achieving this level of sophistication. Bear in mind this a country that can’t even refine their own oil into gasoline — they have to import if from us. Without trying to slander Arabs, they are not smart enough to figure these things out wihout substantial outside assistance and that outside assistance is getting more difficult to hire and easier to detect than it was a few years ago now that the worlds’ attention is focused on them. On top of that, since rulers of countries tend to have a gene that developes a strong ego it is their express desire to continue to be a ruling power and not to have themselves and their countrymen emolated by thermo-nuclear explosions from countries much more advanced and able to inflict precise punishment than they are. I would think the scariest thing that could ever happen to Iran is to achieve a nuclear weapon and then have to lay awake at night trying to figure out how to keep the U.S. and Israel from wiping them off the map with a pre-emptive strike justified by self-defense. Unfortunately almost nobody on this website is up to making such simple and fact-based conclusions. Most of you are still trying to prove that there is bigfoot hiding in the woods and a loch ness monster hiding successfully in the shallow flat bottom of an otherwise sterile lake in Scotland. If you’re going to argue an opinion on the facts you’re entitled….. but you’re not entitled to make up your own set of facts.

What’s the fuss all about if Iran has nukes? The US has lots of them and it has proofed to be the worst of the rogue nations, what with Iraq invasion and lies about weapons of mass destruction. When many other nations are allowed to have these weapons, the US will stop its big brother mentality.

@faul flay:

America ONLY used nukes to STOP a war, not start one.

@Scott Malensek:

o.k., that’s plausable enough, though not by the coast and certainly not in a populated area. I wasn’t attacking you, just presenting the facts as I found them, and making fun of the Iranian “Bagdad Bob” (Tehran Bob, here, I guess?) who claimed it was a nuke.

In know Yonason. It’s cool.

I do find it funny in a dark humor kinda way that those who claim the US is a warmongering rogue regime are also the same people who would vote for Sen Obama who:
vows to continue the war in Iraq For 16months min
wants to escalate the war in Afghanistan (ie The Graveyard of Empires)
admits his Pakistan policy re pre-emptive, unilateral attack is the same as Bush’s
and has an Iran policy that’s already been tried and failed (Iran refuses to talk to us)

Some people just need to see a D next to the name, and then they’ll come up w all kinds of excuses to worship em

@Scott Malensek:

LOL

Yeah, dark humor (no racial overtones meant). Who are we gonna believe, them, or our lying eyes.

But just how much of that stuff does he mean, and how much is saying to apeal to the “moderate” conservatives? Who was it that said, “move to the center to get elected, then move the “center” to the Left once you are”? or something to that effect.

Anyway, we need to keep Obama out, and hopefully keep other far Left Dems out, too. In the mean time, after we win, I hope someone FINALLY comes up with a plan how to take back our schools and media, because if we don’t it will be as Even Sayet said in a podcast with Pamela Geller, (I paraphrase from memory) “If McCain is elected, we’ve bought a little more time” i.e., if we just do that, and nothing more, they will keep gaining ground and we will keep losing it. If not this election, then the next or the next, but eventually if we do nothing, they will win. Then we could really push back the clock, to say the 10th century?
http://www.dontvoteobama.net/cousin%20odingo.htm
http://iperceive.net/barack-obama-kenyan-jihadi/

If Iran has nukes, Russia is at risk, China also. Europe is threatened. USA is not. If this is true, where are Russia, China, EU countries? Are they suicidal?

OK, Iran has nukes, and And let’s assume that Iran has 200 missiles and America is threatened,

Folks ! answer me now ? what kind of threat ? Iran’ ancient insignificant missiles will not reach American territory !
US Patriot missiles are much more reliable in regard to missiles counterattack .

IRANIAN THREAT TO AMERICA

Those Damn fool Dems do not want to develop America’s natural resources. They are content to rely on MidEast oil.

How could Iran hurt us? Take out America’s ability to get that oil, ALL OF WHICH IS WITHIN THEIR REACH.

And they could put serveral missles on several tankers and sail them close enough to America to launch them from the high seas. And what they would do wouldn’t be to nuke cities, but to generate an E.M.P. which would neutralize our communications, power distribution, vehicles, and much of our defense capability for many months to possibly even years.
.

yonason wrote:

And they could put serveral missles on several tankers and sail them close enough to America to launch them from the high seas. And what they would do wouldn’t be to nuke cities, but to generate an E.M.P. which would neutralize our communications, power distribution, vehicles, and much of our defense capability for many months to possibly even years.
.——-

Yonason, are you a four star military general ? It is easily seen , you’ve got no military background or experience … 🙂 Iranian military is absolutely incapable of doing such thing … ask the generals ! Ask the Chairman 0f Joint chief of staff …

Iran is just a small nation … so is the their military 🙂

faul flay;
It’s not the threat to America if Iran has nukes we are worried about. It’s the threat to Israel. An Iranian nuke directed at Israel would not require intercontinental ballistic capability to reach it’s target, and as such might not register on our ICBM early missile launch detection systems. Hence, there would be little or no forewarning.

Iraq DID have WMDs. The US government sold them to Iraq during the 1980-1988 Iraq/Iran War to defend itself against Iraq:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran-Iraq_War

The Iraqis used chemical weapons against the Iranians and even against possibly unreliable civilians of their own in Halabja.
————————————————————————————————-
President Ronald Reagan decided that the United States “could not afford to allow Iraq to lose the war to Iran”, and that the United States “would do whatever was necessary to prevent Iraq from losing the war with Iran.” President Reagan formalized this policy by issuing a National Security Decision Directive (“NSDD”) to this effect in June, 1982.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._support_for_Iraq_during_the_Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_war

Reagan/Bush administrations permitted — and frequently encouraged — the flow of money, agricultural credits, dual-use technology, chemicals, and weapons to Iraq.
——————————————————————————————
the Central Intelligence Agency secretly directed armaments and dual-use technology to Iraq through false fronts and friendly third parties such as Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Kuwait, and they quietly encouraged rogue arms dealers and other private military companies to do the same.
——————————————————————————————
Operation Staunch was created in spring 1983 by the United States State Department to stop the illicit flow of U.S. arms to Iran.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms_sales_to_Iraq_1973-1990

October 1, 2002, article entitled “Iraq Got Germs for Weapons Program from U.S. in ’80s,” Associated Press writer Matt Kelly wrote:

[The] Iraqi bioweapons program that President Bush wants to eradicate got its start with help from Uncle Sam two decades ago, according to government records that are getting new scrutiny in light of the discussion of war against Iraq.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sent samples directly to several Iraqi sites that U.N. weapons inspectors determined were part of Saddam Hussein’s biological weapons program, CDC and congressional records from the early 1990s show. Iraq had ordered the samples, saying it needed them for legitimate medical research.

The CDC and a biological-sample company, the American Type Culture Collection, sent strains of all the germs Iraq used to make weapons, including anthrax, the bacteria that make botulinum toxin, and the germs that cause gas gangrene, the records show. Iraq also got samples of other deadly pathogens, including West Nile virus.

The transfers came in the 1980s, when the United States backed Iraq in its war against Iran.

Reagan knew much of what they had and this information would have been passed on to later presidents. The full lists were not made public. But; Bush Sr. knew it, Clinton knew it, Dubya knew it, the UN security counsel knew it, and all our NATO allies knew it. Our military found the chem labs we sold them and many other WMDs on the list. What were not accounted for were only the mobile missiles. Presumably, Saddam smuggled those into Syria. To get them out of Iraq before we invaded. He had several years to do that after refusing to adhere to unfettered UN inspections and then blocking them all together.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html

yellowcake;
Iran bought it’s military gear from the USSR and China. Why would they threaten an arms supplier?

brandon;
You’re thinking about Scud missiles which don’t have the range to hit America or most of Europe if launched from Iran. Those couldn’t even hit Israel. Here is a link to their ranges:
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/iran/missile/

However, we don’t know what delivery system Iran has in mind to use. Ahmadinejad isn’t saying, but his rhetoric seems to indicate he already has a plan. It’s not 100% confirmed Iran doesn’t have a better ballistic missile or ICBM capability or not. Russia wanted to sell off many of their older ICBM systems to Third World countries for newer multiple target-multiple warhead systems. NATO allies tried to block this, but it would be difficult to confirm if any were ever covertly sold and delivered.

You also say you’re not worried about nuke attacks on America because we have patriot missile batteries. Oh really? How many have you seen set up on permanent watch on Main Street in your town? How about the Star Wars anti-missile systems program that Reagan wanted in space to give us a chance to intercept ICBMs that the Dems shot down? And neither would be very effective against a “suitcase bomb” nuke.

Careful using Wikipedia, as it’s not always reliable, especially where politically charged material is involved.

It wasn’t the US government that transfered bio WMD technology to the Iranian government. The Iranians used it’s university “research” facilities as front groups to acquire the technology from ATTC, “American Type Tissue Collection” which is not a governemt entity, and others. The regulations at the time allowed transfer of some pretty nasty stuff, as long as it was to “legitimate” research institutions. We weren’t being careful enough, but we weren’t deliberately consciously involved. It was a time when no one realized the danger, not only from Saddam but for almost anyone else. Pretty stupid, but not the conscious act that those who want to slander America in general, and the Reagan White House in particular, want it to be.

True yonason;
I’ve also noticed some of the wikipedia entries are sometimes politically slanted. That wikipedia entry did not mention that Iran also had chemical weapons and had used them against Iraq early in the war, but even if the entry were somewhat tilted to being critical of Reagan, it still supports the point we knew Iraq had WMDs. I figured the moonbats would discount the Fox one and find Wikipedia more palatable.

I was searching for the list of WMDs we knew Iraq had to link, but was having trouble locating it on-line. So used Wikipedia as an expedient reference. Last time I read through the list was over a year ago and I couldn’t find the FOIA link tonight. I’ll keep looking. Maybe this will help, looks like several links to supporting news stories there:
http://newsbusters.org/node/11907

@Rocky_B:

I’ve got some links on my other computer, but getting them out is more trouble than I want to invest at the moment. As to finding those links on line, the farther away in time the less likely it is. I’ve got sites that I bookmarked 8 years ago which are still active, but I couldn’t find today without those bookmarks if my life depended upon it. And I think that’s on thing the dishonest ones are trying to accomplsh by posting so many false and/or misleading reports – to bury the truth. It’s like the fellow who’s whispering the truth in a lynch mob. No one’s going to hear him, and the incited nuts who are driving the crowd aren’t going to listen even if they do hear.

Thanks for that Newsbusters link. I didn’t have it, and it looks like a good one.

HERE ARE A COUPLE OF THE LINKS I DO HAVE ON THIS COMPUTER…

FIRST, AN INTERVIEW WITH DAVID KAY, HEAD WMD INSPECTOR RIGHT AFTER THE WAR…

TB: David, as you know, a lot of the president’s political critics are going to say, “This is clear evidence that he lied to the American people.”

DK: Well, Tom, if we do that, I think we’re really hurting ourselves. Clearly, the intelligence that we went to war on was inaccurate, wrong. We need to understand why that was. I think if anyone was abused by the intelligence it was the president of the United States rather than the other way around. [I.E., BUSH DIDN’T LIE]

TB: The president described Iraq as a gathering threat — a gathering danger. Was that an accurate description?

DK: I think that’s a very accurate description.

TB: But an imminent threat to the United States? [WHICH BUSH NEVER SAID, BUT A COUPLE OF DEMS DID.]

DK: Tom, an imminent threat is a political judgment. It’s not a technical judgment. I think Baghdad was actually becoming more dangerous in the last two years than even we realized. Saddam was not controlling the society any longer. In the marketplace of terrorism and of WMD, Iraq well could have been that supplier if the war had not intervened.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4066462/

THIS ADDRESSES WHO WAS ACTUALLY LYING ABOUT THE WAR…
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/mostert/070205