It was just fine when Biden’s open-door flood of illegal aliens was overwhelming Texas. It’s just Texas, after all. Biden smugly making Texas bear the burden of millions of illegals was terrific. Liberal idiots in New York and Chicago were blathering on about how they were sanctuary cities- right up until they were forced to become sanctuary cities. Then OMG things went sideways. Eric Adams made very clear what a flaming hypocritical moron he is:
(Bloomberg) — In August 2022, after greeting one of the first buses of immigrants arriving in New York City with handshakes and boxes of food, Mayor Eric Adams pledged officials would set “the right tone of being here for these families.”
A year later, that tone has shifted dramatically. Adams is warning of dire consequences for the city after 110,000 arrivals. He’s begging the federal government for money, telling migrants at the border not to come and demanding state officials find other places to house those who arrive anyway.
“Let me tell you something New Yorkers: Never in my life have I had a problem that I did not see an ending to. I don’t see an ending to this,” Adams said at a town hall meeting this week, lamenting the 10,000 people pouring into the Big Apple every month. “This issue will destroy New York City.”
His big words are being shoved down his big bloody mouth. Now he’s crapping his pants about the cost of his phony largesse and worried that NYC will be destroyed. But Adams is worried not for New Yorkers, but his own ass. Adams had the gall to call Greg Abbott a “madman” for sharing the illegal alien wealth with the cretinous mayor of the Big Apple. Adams has begun shipping the illegals to outlying New York counties who now suffer for the financial burden and accompanying crime.
Over in Chicago, the land of unimaginable things- that Chicagoans are so inconceivably stupid that they could elect someone freaking worse than Lori Lightfoot- illegal aliens are turning O’Hare airport into something out of “Mad Max.”
Thanks to a flood of Joe Biden’s illegal aliens, Chicago’s O’Hare Airport looks like a “scene from Mad Max,” says a local reporter. Mad Max is a dystopian movie franchise set in the near future after the breakdown of society.
“More than 400 [illegals] are reportedly being housed in a section of the airport, hidden from public view behind black curtains,” reports Fox News. This is a jump from 31 in early August.Chicago reporter William Kelly told Fox News that O’Hare is just one of “18 migrant shelters in Chicago and that homeless Americans are no longer allowed to stay at the airport.”
Get a load of this…
Former Democrat Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot booted the homeless from O’Hare due to citizen complaints. But now, illegals are allowed to stay there.
Those brain-dead Chicagoans are now whining about the galactically stupid choice of President they made
Nothing is more satisfying than the sight of leftists finally getting what they voted for
pic.twitter.com/X4lbibeqjt— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 7, 2023
It’s getting so bad that even up to now comatose dumbass democrat politicians, their own asses in electoral jeopardy, are voicing concern about the crisis
The voters’ increasing concern about the immigration crisis reflected in the poll has not been lost on Democratic lawmakers.
Rep. Pat Ryan (D-N.Y.), who narrowly won election in New York’s 19th District, called on Biden to take charge of the deteriorating situation at the border.
“The No. 1 thing I learned as an Army officer: When in charge, take charge,” Ryan said. “We are in a crisis, the president is in charge, and he and his team need to take charge.”
Josh Riley, a New York Democratic congressional candidate, said Biden’s “aloofness” on the border issue is “offensive,” calling it a “federal problem” that requires a federal response. “I think President Biden needs to get his act together and help solve it,” he said. His campaign website says that “Our immigration system is completely broken, and it needs to be fixed in a way that upholds both the law and our values.”
But now our mentally addled leader is considering a solution to the woes of blue states. Is to shut off the broken water main of illegal invasion?
Of course not.
He’s likely to order illegals to remain in Texas.
President Joe Biden is reportedly considering a plan to require illegal aliens with dubious asylum claims to remain in Texas — a move that would see the Lone Star State absorb tens of thousands of illegal aliens every week.
Biden administration officials who spoke anonymously to the Los Angeles Times said the plan is being considered so that if newly arrived border crossers fail their initial asylum screenings, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents can more easily locate and deport the illegal aliens within Texas since they would be close to the United States-Mexico border.
The move reeks of political favoritism and a nod to Trump’s remain in Mexico policy.
An added benefit for blue state governors and blue city mayors, such as New York City’s Eric Adams, is that the Biden administration would use the Remain in Texas program to shield sanctuary states and cities from waves of illegal immigration that have spurred chaos in recent months.
He has done NOTHING to try limit the invasion and everything he can to weaken the border
A fixture of the Biden administration’s lax enforcement of federal immigration law has been to oppose policies that seek to limit the movement of border crossers and illegal aliens — opting for an expansive Catch and Release network that has released millions into American communities in the last two and a half years.
But who gives a bloody feck about Texas, right? After all, it’s a red state.
I wish the Americans would effing wake up. Joe Biden is a corrupt goddam moron who cares about himself and no one else- certainly not me and damn sure not you either. He’s a f**king a******.
And here’s a bonus from what could not be a more dim-witted set of women
JUST IN: The ‘loving and tolerant’ co-hosts of The View say migrants need to be kicked out of New York City before blaming the migrant crisis on “global warming and climate change.”
You can’t write comedy better than this.
“They need to be resettled elsewhere. They need to… pic.twitter.com/AxV5O8w0Ia
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 8, 2023
Damn you Biden voters for what he’s doing to this country.
DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 40 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 45 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter who is in the field of education.
DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed.
Except for liberals being foolish.
The first priority for distribution of illegal aliens is to send them exclusively to sanctuary cities and states
Send more to Martha’s Vineyard
I hope Abbott lines up hundreds of buses, loads them up and sends them all at once. Flood these bleeding hearts (as long as they someone else does the suffering) with their beloved “asylum seekers”. Let’s see Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden stop them.
The collapse of the domestic energy industry by biden has caused inflationary economic pressure.
Under President Trump we became energy independent. That is no longer the case and it is the principle driving force in the economic collapse.
Biden Cancels Previously Issued ANWR Oil and Gas Leases in Alaska
He should be applauded for doing so. We don’t yet have the technology to safely access these resources without risk of an environmental disaster that we couldn’t control.
Not only do we have the technology, we’ve been doing it for decades, you moron.
Yeah
It has nothing to do with lacking technology. What a maroon greg is.
I suppose that explains why lingering effects of the Deepwater Horizon disaster are still with us a decade later.
You really want to go there, an example where Obama waived safety measures because BP made campaign contributions and Obama just let the oil spew and spread because the union would not waive the Jones act? The technology is there, as long as Democrats don’t sell the safety features.
Please don’t call Greggie a moron, it’s an insult to morons. He’s nothing more than a Dumb ¢het tool, emphasis on DUMB.
Leftists never understand the repercussions of their actions. They just lash out like spoiled children and then blame everyone else for the disastrous consequences.
Most overland LNG transport is by pipeline. Oversea transport is by LNG carrier.
Wendy should provide how-to instructions for making your own tinfoil hat.
The Bible says to knock the dust off your feet when trying to make commonsense of a personage likened unto you . TROLL !
Just recently you were on this forum bragging more oil was being produced than ever with Biden as president. Now here you are fussing oil production is a bad thing and supporting shutting it down. So in other words whatever the regime’s position is on any subject at any given time is your position.
Just for FYI, Biden is an environmental disaster. Just go look a the southern border and all the tent cities springing up in Democrat run cities which also includes crimes sprees on merchants and car jacking.
Leftists never think about the lies they are supporting and promoting or worry about reconciling them with past statements or positions.
They are ten year leases and legally biden cannot cancel them citing indigenous people reasons.
Anyone that expects Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden to do anything more than he is doing right now (absolutely nothing) is a moron that hasn’t been paying attention. But, if Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden wants to force millions more illegal immigrants to stay in Texas, go right a-f**king head. You can also kiss any fantasy of Texas turning blue goodbye forever. Ignorant Democrats have this delusion that Hispanic Americans think flooding their neighborhoods with illegal immigrants that have no stake in this country and don’t care about what kind of mess they make or leave is wonderful. They don’t. No one hates illegal immigration more than Hispanic citizens that work their asses off to have a home and keep it nice. They don’t like being associated with illegal immigrants. A guy I worked with that actually immigrated legally called them “visitors” derisively. He called them stupid. He hates them.
Democrats live in their own little coastal world, believing their own fantasies. Illegal immigration is not only hurting the country, it’s hurting their party. So, let er rip, Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden; if we can prevent you from giving them all ballots, they will be the destruction of your whole degenerate party.
Biden’s “asylum ineligibility rule” had reduced asylum requests by nearly 40%; illegal border crossings dropped from 10,000 a day to around 3,500. The rule was blocked in federal court.
Republican politicians want the political issue, not a solution.
You probably need to take a refresher course on counting. Tens of thousands are still flooding the border every day. Abbott’s mid-river barrier is so effective in stopping illegal immigration and drownings, Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden wants it removed.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2023/08/31/border-families-record-crossings-biden/
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/august-marks-highest-number-of-illegal-family-crossings-at-us-mexico-border-in-four-years/ar-AA1g6KVb
You hit the spot like Victor David Hanson did today and any any legal US voter who votes Democrat in ’24 is either a doofus or now, a traitor. This nation is simply unraveling on and in all segments of our social, economic ,political life. Electing the Bidens of the world has made the US absolutely unsafe and open to conquest by a variety of our foreign enemies ala the Chicoms, Russia, Iran and the NORKS and if they tied together, it would be the end of this nation after 200+ years.
Biden just keeps on hammering more nails into his reelection Coffin each day
It doesn’t matter what biden does. Democrats control the voting machines and the mail in ballots. Can anyone give me any evidence to the contrary?
TX might want to put them in tents and charge them $2,200. each per month for the accommodations. https://ktrh.iheart.com/featured/houston-texas-news/content/2023-08-25-biden-giving-illegals-2200-per-month-welfare-only-1400-to-us-retirees/
They need to be packed off to Austin, San Antonio, Houston and all the other self-proclaimed sanctuary cities. These are cities eaten up with liberalism and they need to have to climb over piles of illegal immigrants every time they make a move. Texas will be forever red.
8 U.S. Code § 1324 – Bringing in and harboring certain aliens
(a)Criminal penalties(1)(A)Any person who—
(i)knowing that a person is an alien, brings to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien;
(ii)knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law;
…
shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (B).
(B)A person who violates subparagraph (A) shall, for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs—
(i)in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i) or (v)(I) or in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), or (iv) in which the offense was done for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both;
(ii)in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), (iv), or (v)(II), be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;
…
Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden has declared that law invalid and no longer in effect. You can’t hide behind it. NEXT?
Great. Biden has violated all of those. Let’s indict and convict him today
Isn’t that a riot, an open-border supporting leftist citing immigration law? That’s like Hillary teaching a class on decision making… oh, wait. Like Lori Lightfoot teaching a class on health… damn. Wait… Like DeBlasio teaching policy making and…. shit. OK, like Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden teaching ethics.
The Frightened Left
09/13/23 – Trump privately discussed Biden impeachment with GOP lawmakers –
The corrupt s.o.b. is currently facing 91 felony counts, but still puppeteering the GOP to attack his political enemies.
His son-in-law received $2 Billion from the Saudis and was paid to manage their investment for two years while making no investments.
The corruption is the 91 false charges and election interference, but people dedicated to stupidity can’t realize that.
Note that they reported their income. That means they paid taxes on it and it was on the up and up. Now, compare that to Hunter, who did NOT report the millions he was raking in from his influence peddling and did NOT pay his taxes, yet the investigations were quashed and Hunter and Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden corruption was protected by the IRS, FBI and DOJ. Why hasn’t Hunter been charged with FARA violations?
Paying taxes on income doesn’t have a damn thing to do with whether the income was acquired legitimately acquired or not.
No, but if it’s illicit, a criminal is more likely to NOT declare it as it’s source has to be revealed. Like Hunter did when he evaded taxes on millions of dollars. When the income is legitimate, it is usually declared, as honest people (who aren’t Democrats) don’t want to get in trouble with the IRS.
Hunter and Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden are corrupt criminals. This is confirmed and undeniable, no matter how many “whatabouts” you want to try.
The two legal scholars who say the 14th Amendment would prevent Trump from holding office are both constitutional originalists. I might call that irony—except for the fact Trump neither a conservative nor a supporter of the Constitution. His followers somehow missed the fact that he publicly stated it should be suspended if it proved to be an obstacle:
The Conservative Legal Roadmap to Disqualify Trump From Office – A pair of originalist scholars say that Article 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment is alive and well—and capable of ending the former president’s return to the White House.
The Conservative Legal Roadmap to Disqualify Trump From Office – A pair of originalist scholars say that Article 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment is alive and well—and capable of ending the former president’s return to the White House.
The soapbox, not credible at all. part of the left wing rag new republic
There is no hierarchal ordering from highest to lowest, because the all-inclusive description of who is excluded, “any office, civil or military, under the United States, or any State”, comes last.
Clark’s “argument” is a perfect example of the “begging the question” logical fallacy. You have to assume that there’s a hierarchal intention to begin with—otherwise the all-inclusive statement at the end instantly demonstrates that there isn’t. The video distracts from this bit of fatally flawed “logic” using cartoonish video effects and dramatic musical score.
Jeffrey Clark is a Trump tool, plain and simple. He was part of Trump’s failed effort to overturn the elections and is presently one of the indicted in Fulton County, Georgia.
Why did jack smith not charge President Trump with insurrection?
The framers made clear neither the President or Vice President are federal offices.
No, they did not. The presidency is the highest office of the Executive Branch of federal government.
“a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state”
Fourth, the amnesty or removal element allows Congress to remove the disqualification or disability:
“Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”
Most of the current debates about Section 3 have focused on the offense element: Has President Trump “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the [United States], or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof?” Some recent discussions of Section 3 have glossed over the text of the jurisdictional and disqualification elements. These two elements, which refer to two different types of officers and offices, raise two difficult and novel legal issues. First, does the President meet the jurisdictional element? Second, does the disqualification element extend to the presidency? In this post, we will focus on the first question.
The Impeachment Clause, Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution of 1788, expressly applies to the President. The Impeachment Clause provides:
“The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
But the jurisdictional element of Section 3 does not specifically mention the presidency. Instead of using express language akin to the Impeachment Clause, the jurisdictional element of Section 3 applies to:
A “person . . . who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States.”
President Trump has never been a “member of Congress” or “a member of any state legislature” or an “executive or judicial officer of any state.” Therefore, the only way for Section 3’s jurisdictional element to cover President Trump would be if he had taken an oath “to support the Constitution” as an “officer of the United States.” But the sole article of impeachment against President Trump elides over this issue. Indeed, the House’s impeachment article did not discuss Section 3’s jurisdictional element.
There is a recent Supreme Court opinion discussing the scope of the Constitution’s “Officers of the United States”-language. In Free Enter. Fund v. Pub. Co. Accounting Oversight Bd. (2010), Chief Justice Roberts observed that “[t]he people do not vote for the ‘Officers of the United States.'” Rather, “officers of the United States” are appointed exclusively pursuant to Article II, Section 2 procedures. It follows that the President, who is an elected official, is not an “officer of the United States.”
Nonsense. They’ve taken a few words from what Roberts wrote and plugged them into their own crack-brained opinion. Here’s the actual context of what Roberts said:
There’s not a damn thing in there suggesting that the presidency isn’t a federal office. The presidency is the highest office of the Executive Branch of federal government.
Moreover, there is some good authority to reject the position that Section 3’s “officer of the United States”-language extends to the presidency. In United States v. Mouat (1888), Justice Samuel Miller interpreted a statute that used the phrase “officers of the United States.” He wrote, “[u]nless a person in the service of the government, therefore, holds his place by virtue of an appointment by the president, or of one of the courts of justice or heads of departments authorized by law to make such an appointment, he is not strictly speaking, an officer of the United States.” Justice Miller’s opinion, drafted two decades after the Fourteenth Amendment’s ratification, is some probative evidence of the original public meaning of Section 3’s “officer of the United States”-language. Miller’s opinion is some evidence rebutting any presumption of post-1788 linguistic drift with respect to the phrase “officer of the United States.” Likewise Mouat rebuts the position that, circa 1868, the obvious, plain, or clear meaning of the phrase “officer of the United States” extended to the presidency.
Grasping at straws… A president is not King of the Federal Government. A president is the Chief Executive of the Executive Branch of the federal government. He or she holds a federal office.
So far, advocates for Section 3 disqualification of President Trump have not advanced comprehensive or systematic evidence that the President is an “officer of the United States.” They have the burden to establish that the “officer of the United States”-language of Section 3’s jurisdictional element extends to the presidency. They should also rebut the evidence we have put forward in this post (and elsewhere, on many prior occasions).
Lets send them all to the United Nations and let them take them all in