“Climate change” is about the money. It’s always about the money- and look who’s going to profit.


U.S. President Barack Obama, second left, and Brazil's President Dilma Rousseff, right, pose with world leaders for a group photo at the COP21, United Nations Climate Change Conference, in Le Bourget, outside Paris, Monday, Nov. 30, 2015. (AP Photo/Jacky Naegelen, Pool)


Prince Charles has kicked off the global warming summit in Paris. As is always the case with liberals, Charles is preaching of combatting climate change via the use of other people’s money. He has not committed the wealth of the crown to the effort.

One look at the above image makes clear that Obama is in Paris to, as much as anything else, preen. Not surprisingly, they couldn’t get him to shut up.

The warming thing is a tool being used to bludgeon the masses into submission. The goal is redistribution of wealth, worldwide. But it’s your wealth that’s going to be redistributed, not Obama’s, not Pelosi’s, not Reid’s, not Hollande’s and not Cameron’s. And a lot of it going to go from you to the wealthiest liberals on the planet.

Have a look at who is “investing” in Obama’s new “clean energy”:

George Soros

Tom Steyer

Billionaires both. Soros, who broke the Bank of England leaving millions of Brits with their homes and savings severely devalued, curiously has invested millions in coal. Among the list of organizations supported by Soros: ACORN, Apollo Alliance, National Council of La Raza, Tides Foundation, Huffington Post, Southern Poverty Law Center, Soujourners, People for the American Way, Planned Parenthood, and the National Organization for Women. The famously anti-American Soros once said “The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States.”

Steyer made millions in coal and oil but now he doesn’t want you to be able to do the same.

The rest of the Breakthrough gang can be found here. These people aren’t fools. They know where the money is going, they know the plan is redistribution and their buckets are waiting for your cash.

And you wonder why the richest continue to get richer? Thank Obama. Thank democrats. Al Gore knows. He’s worth over $200 million thanks to globaloney.

The problem is the climate isn’t cooperating. The “pause” in global warming is now nearly nineteen years long. What does one do when the data doesn’t fit the narrative?

Alter the data.

Which is what has been going on now for some time.

Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, had checked the published temperature graphs for three weather stations in Paraguay against the temperatures that had originally been recorded. In each instance, the actual trend of 60 years of data had been dramatically reversed, so that a cooling trend was changed to one that showed a marked warming.


Homewood has now turned his attention to the weather stations across much of the Arctic, between Canada (51 degrees W) and the heart of Siberia (87 degrees E). Again, in nearly every case, the same one-way adjustments have been made, to show warming up to 1 degree C or more higher than was indicated by the data that was actually recorded. This has surprised no one more than Traust Jonsson, who was long in charge of climate research for the Iceland met office (and with whom Homewood has been in touch). Jonsson was amazed to see how the new version completely “disappears” Iceland’s “sea ice years” around 1970, when a period of extreme cooling almost devastated his country’s economy.

This is a scam. Heap on the guilt. It’s is an Alinsky tactic- the same one that was used to convince America that banks were racist and which consequently saw lending standards largely eliminated, which in turn saw loan default after loan default and in part contributed to the financial crisis. The financial crisis was a failed effort at redistribution of wealth. Global warming is the new horse to ride. Just as in the financial crisis, which saw Valerie Jarrett and Tony Rezko rake in the big bucks, the global warming scam will only further enrich Soros and Steyer all in the name of saving humanity.

It’s always about the money.

Media outlets have been pounded into submission by the left and are now as compliant for this nonsense as they were for the financial mess. You’re evil if you even question the dogma. John Effin Kerry now asserts that Climate Change is a threat to national security– even more than is ISIS. An even bigger threat than Jenjus Khan.

Fear mongering. If that doesn’t convince you this is one big pile of horsesh*t, nothing will. I suspect that responses to climate change doubters will grow even more strident over time as the evidence for doubt mounts.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NOAA wont pony up the data the american taxpayer paid for, calling the asking harassment.
This is a federal agency, another budget cut is called for, 100% of the funds going to these frauds.
NOAA needs to come clean about why they altered the data to get the results they needed to advance this administration’s extreme climate change agenda,” Smith said. “The Committee intends to use all tools at its disposal to undertake its Constitutionally-mandated oversight responsibilities.”

I am SHOCKED to learn that Soros is investing in coal….. (smirk)

Waiting with baited breath for the leftists who pretend to be reporters to give Soros the same scrutiny they give the oh-so-evil Koch brothers…

Funny how you don’t mention the Koch Brothers who can outspend Soros a hundred times over and have invested billions in anti climate change crap to support their industries. Get real, will you?

@Reem: Ha…Koch Brothers…the response to Soros…always invoked by the left, yet never seen as the hypocrisy it is.

Agreed…rich white guys can be a problem…like the ones that put Obama into office. If you hate the Koch brothers and oppose them, then you oppose Soros…unless you’re a biased windbag programmed by lib media to be irate about what the Right does….as it copies the tactics of the left.

Funny how most of all the “cheap” healthcare out there..from the exchanges to biz to management…is being provided by Obama’s No. 1 donor in 2008: United Healthcare.

Take you’re predigested opinions, throw them out, and “get real” yourself. The adults are speaking, junior.


I am happy to entertain any evidence you want to furnish in support of your assertions

Dont forget the Canadian version of Soros, Mr. Strong

The World Bank is already deeply involved in developing carbon trading schemes and is a member of the Climate Exchange. One can only imagine what more they would have been able to do had Brown’s efforts to worm his way into the presidency been successful.

What was Brown’s consolation prize? He lived at an estate — owned by Soros — while he waited in the wings for the World Bank post. When that plan went awry, Soros named Brown vice chairman of his hedge fund (despite no previous experience in the field) and of Soros’s Open Society Institute — an organization that can best be described as another Soros tool to bring about vast changes in societies around the world. These might be sinecures, as Brown awaits other opportunities to become a player in the world of geopolitics to benefit his friends.

What is Maurice Strong doing these days in China? He has a lot “going on” there, we have been told. Per Claudia Rosett and George Russell (“At The United Nations, The Curious Career of Maurice Strong”):

China is a special place for Strong, a self-declared, life-long socialist. It is the burial place of a woman said to be one of his relatives, the famous pro-communist American journalist Anna Louise Strong, a vociferous supporter of Lenin and Stalin until the mid-‘30s, and a strong booster of Mao Zedong’s China. Maurice Strong’s presence in Beijing, however, raises awkward questions: For one thing, China, while one of the world’s biggest producers of industrial pollution, has been profiting from the trading of carbon emissions credits — thanks to heavily politicized U.N.-backed environmental deals engineered by Strong in the 1990s.

Strong has refused to answer questions from FOX News about the nature of his business in China, though he has been linked in press reports to planned attempts to market Chinese-made automobiles in North America, and a spokesman for the U.S.-based firm that had invited him to speak in San Francisco, Cleantech Venture Network, says he has recently been “instrumental” in helping them set up a joint venture in Beijing. Strong’s assistant in Beijing did confirm by e-mail that he has an office in a Chinese government-hosted diplomatic compound, thanks to “many continuing relationships arising from his career including 40 years of active relationships in China.

China is also a special place when it comes to the environment. When the international community focuses on climate change, China, as a “developing nation,” often seems to get a pass. Instead, the focus has been on penalizing Western factories and businesses. This disparity would redound to the benefit of China. Even if China did agree to some measures to control its own massive pollution (it burns a great deal of dirty coal to power its growth), some incredulity would be warranted that China would ever abide by them.

Of course, China has benefited in other ways from the rush towards “green energy.” It is a major producer of windmills and is becoming a force in electric cars.

Has Strong, who has played such a large role in creating the environmental movement, figured out yet another way to gild his own lily and enrich climate change hucksters such as Al Gore, Ted Turner, and George Soros?

These wealthy elites… the Breakthrough Energy Coalition… what exactly do they do? Are they investing in the new energy source that will effectively replace fossil fuel with affordable energy or are the investing to cash in on the collapse of the world economy when energy becomes too expensive to power industry?

The War on Climate is the perfect vehicle for Obama, when you think about it. It requires huge sums of money (trillions), with vast opportunities for graft and corruption, and there is absolutely NO way to measure failure, success or progress. Brilliant!

Obama claims the economy is doing wonderfully, but their are inconvenient data points which say otherwise. Obama claims Obamacare is the savior of mankind, but obvious facts and measures show it collapsing under its own weight. Obama claims to have whipped al Qaeda and contained ISIS, but then they rudely and inconveniently sack a consulate, down an airliner and kill 129 innocent citizens. The guy just can catch a break… seams like EVERYONE is catching him lying.

But climate change…. oh, what a gift! How do you prove it’s not working? How do you disprove claims it is working? Imagine, if they had gotten traction 5 years ago, what kind of claims of progress could be attributed to the billions and billions they would have spent on conferences and studies they had undertaken?

If Soros is involved, it HAS to be righteous. Right, Reem?

@Reem #3

Funny how you don’t mention the Koch Brothers who can outspend Soros a hundred times over and have invested billions in anti climate change crap to support their industries. Get real, will you?

Well, OK, happy to ‘get real’, but, as the saying goes, be careful what you wish for, you just might get it…

Facts can be SOOOOO inconvenient…

Based on the information at http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php

Soros is #18 on the contributions list, making $46,644,808 worth of political contributions (98% to democrats/liberals) compared to Koch Industries at #49 with $29,519,116 of contributions (94% to republicans/conservatives).

I know Common Core is screwing with a lot of things, but according to the math I learned that doesn’t look like the Koch’s are outspending Soro’s at all, let alone by ‘100 times’.

Not only that, but of the top 20 contributors on the list 14 of them made over 90% of their contributions to democrats/liberals. Six of the top 10 are unions (with 99% to dem/libs) and #2 is a Dem super PAC. In terms of $$$, the contributions to the Dem/Libs are over 4 times what the conservatives are getting.

Tell me again how the conservatives are outspending the liberals?

If we can get the data from both sides of this “science” perhaps someone real smart can either debunk or prove it.
but NOAA wont provide as to how they came up with its conclusion, and who would trust the data or conclusions from the oil companies?
What I do know is that at the climate summit each speaker was given 3 mins to speak, as we exhale C02, and Obama despite the times up bell rambled on for 14 mins, I hope he has the carbon credits to cover that.

This is for 2014, which comes up on a search of donors–I’ll see if they have 2015 numbers. Still…


#1 – Thomas Steyer $75 million to democrats

#10 – Charles Koch $5 million to republicans

#12 – George Soros $3.8 million to democrats

#25 David Koch $2.5 million to Republicans

I add Steyer to the mix because for some mysterious reason his contributions don’t bother liberals who rail about big money in politics–at all.

Koch Brothers = $7.5 million

Steyer and Soros = $78 million+

Yes, I can see how the Koch brothers are wrecking our political system….

@kitt: That’s kind of the problem; the left wing global warming worshipers plow head-long into the financial abyss of destroying economies to tax energy producers and users out of existence. Meanwhile, there is just as much, if not more data, which indicates while there is (and always has been) climate change, it occurs naturally, normally and cyclically and cannot be controlled by man; furthermore, it is not disastrous to humanity. So, this would appear to be a draw; choose your side, who do you believe?

Except there is one major difference between the two: only warming alarmists rely on manipulated data and flawed conclusions. As yet, those showing NO human-caused warming have not been shown to have lied.

@Bill: Wouldn’t it be great if we could take all these really smart scientists and fund them to find really clean cheap alternative or super efficient fossil energy. Alas that takes engineers and rocket scientist kinds they never get any funding cause that kind of stuff would ruin this redistribution thingee they have “invested” into.
So much cool science being suppressed cause it doesn’t fit into their agenda. 🙁 (the old Tesla story)

@JSW: Soros would have more to donate but his piddies are too deep into controlling he Media , oh wait the media drives political agendas lets add that money to contributions too.

Seems the dem party has coal dust on its hands.
short excerpt

Looked at another way, the coal mines that Mr. Steyer has funded through Farallon produce an amount of CO2 each year that which is equivalent to about 28% of the amount of CO2 produced in the US each year by coal burned for electricity generation.8

• As above, the companies in which Farallon has made these huge strategic investments produced about 150 mt of coal in 2012. On a combined basis this would make them one of the largest private coal sector companies in the world9 (by comparison the “famously evil” Koch brothers appear to own a grand total of … wait for it ….one coal mine which, at its peak, produced 6 mtpa and is no longer in operation).10