School Children Teach The Obamas A Powerful Lesson


Michelle Obama

Every school-age child in America is getting a serious dose of what it means to be governed by arrogance. Our school-age children are getting a taste of what an Administration, weaned on hateful communist dicta of Ayers and Alinsky, can ignorantly impose on the population when it has been given the power to do so.

Michelle Obama’s personal crusade to find her entry into the history books besides being First Lady, has been to force schools to feed only certain foods to our children through the implementation of meal standards with the “Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act.”

This imposition of statist and bureaucratic regulations even dictates that birthday parties can only be celebrated with non-food treats and favours — NO FOOD. NO CUPCAKES. And you know those fundraisers we’ve all been supporting since all of us were kids? NO SWEETS. No sweets even if the fundraiser is held by an outside group. You won’t be buying a candy bar from those kids knocking on your door, fund-raising for their schools. Perhaps the Obamas want them to sell you erasers.

And just in case anyone of these young children might enjoy the sweet taste of a pretty cake for a celebration, Michelle Obama has dictatorially decreed that, Birthday parties in classrooms may be celebrated with non-food treats and favors for students. No food is allowed as part of a birthday celebration.

The progressive radicals are attempting to wean children on being indoctrinated. Their nutrition has nothing to do with this authoritarian program. The children have figured it out, and intuitively, they know what their Administration doesn’t. They’re not buying it. Unlike the parents who reverently re-elected this Administration, the children are reacting to being dictated-to.

“More than 1 million fewer students eat lunch at school each day since the first round of standards went into effect in 2012, following decades of steadily increasing participation, said Diane Pratt-Heavner, a spokeswoman for The School Nutrition Association.” Already stressed school districts are losing money on the Obama lunches because kids won’t eat them. They’re being asked to pay more for less food. In fact, many of the lunches are getting thrown away. We shouldn’t be surprised to learn that the waste is monumental, costs are overwhelming and compliance by school districts is difficult.

We note that Michelle Obama cannot condescend to meeting with this association’s request to meet, so her Chef Sam Kass will sit in for her.

Michelle Obama

Let’s look at the blind arrogance at the root of this program, “I thought to myself, if a Princeton- and Harvard-educated professional woman doesn’t know how to adequately feed her kids, then what are other parents going through who don’t have access to the information I have?” This is actually Michelle Obama speaking — you know, that educated, but unelected First Lady who has insinuated herself into the laws of the Nation and the lives of children with this ignorant program. Yah, her. The extent of the lack of intuition in this pompous mind is staggering — all you mothers out there aren’t as educated as I am and you have no clue how to adequately feed your kids.

The fact that the kids don’t want to be dictated-to seems to not land on her. THEY WILL OBEY! Freedom? Not here. Not in the Obama America. We will impose NON-FATNESS.


The Obama Administration is incapable of improving the broken educational system, and is certainly incapable of managing the “education” of children or their parents on healthy nutrition, so it defaults to the only thing it knows — impose, dictate and threaten.

The children don’t care to be imperiously dictated-to by a bully pulpit. Their nature is to enjoy Freedom. SURPRISE. Listen and learn.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

School nutrition group turns on Michelle O, now fighting federal lunch regulations

SNA officials rightly point out that many students are throwing away the additional fruits and vegetables included in their lunches, amounting to $684 million in food waste every year – or roughly “enough to serve complete reimbursable school lunches to more than 228 million students,” according to the Times.

The association contends the “nutritious” federal lunch menu is also proving costly for many school districts that are now forced to purchase more expensive foods to comply with the new regulations.

SNA reportedly first expressed concerns about the new federal regulations in 2011, and later met with Agriculture Department officials, but have been largely ignored. That prompted SNA leaders to call on Congress instead, and they have now targeted the group’s lobbying efforts at lawmakers in the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, which are considering legislation to waive the nutrition standards for next school year, according to the Times news service.

“SNA saw the appropriations process as the only way of providing our members immediate relief,” Diane Pratt-Heavner, SNA spokeswoman, told the Times.

The SNA’s 180 on the school nutrition standards directly conflicts with other nutrition groups, teachers unions and parent-teacher organizations that want to press forward with the federal lunch regulations regardless of the impact on students or schools.

A problem too, is the “one size meal fits all” idiocy of the program. As noted below, athletic program competitors and other physically active children often need more caloric and protein intake than Queen Obama’s skimpy meals provide. And surprise, surprise, Self acclaimed healthy eating activist-guru Ms. Obama admits she has no training in child nutrition.

Aside from the significant school lunch revenue declines and massive food waste tied to the changes, hungry students across the country have protested against the strict nutrition guidelines.

Many student athletes, for example, have argued their limited-calorie lunches leave them famished. Parents have reported their children are now going without school lunch, then binge eating when they get home. Parents have also complained about ridiculously strict interpretations of the federal lunch rules, which have resulted in a ban on birthday cupcakes in classrooms, among other things.

This doesn’t faze our food-fascist first lady: Michelle Obama will fight to the ‘bitter end’ in school lunch battle

The first lady and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, whose department runs the school meals program, oppose changing the law.

Critics of the association say the about-face is motivated not only by overburdened school officials but also by the food industry. Food companies are some of the association’s highest-paying members and supply schools with most of their food. The industry largely has kept silent through the debate but will spend millions of dollars to reformulate many products to meet the new standards.

The last thing that we can afford to do right now is play politics with our kids’ health, especially when we’re finally starting to see some progress on this issue,” Mrs. Obama said at the White House, where she met with a group of school nutrition experts, all of whom were friendly toward the standards.

So if that’s the last thing we should be doing, WHY ARE YOU DOING IT Ms. Obama?!

Michelle O was not elected to any office responsible for overseeing school nutrition, but she has inserted herself because, (with her lack of any training in nutrition,) our despotism loving Lady M “knows” what’s best for the children of America, (over the protests of those children, their parents, and local departments of education.)

‘Let them eat broccoli!’

1. What happened to the right to do with your body what you choose?

2. Who made Michelle Obama Food Empress?

Anything to ‘break the morale’ among the citizens and children in this country huh?

Moochelle – Self designated Food Nazi. “No sweets for YOU”!!!! “No FUN for YOU”!!!

Wonder how HER girls react to being lorded over by a Food Nazi? Bet THEY get sweets!

This statement exemplifies the elitism of our current leaders:

“I thought to myself, if a Princeton- and Harvard-educated professional woman doesn’t know how to adequately feed her kids, then what are other parents going through who don’t have access to the information I have?”

Perhaps, she took the wrong courses in college; obviously, she didn’t waste time with logic or composition, judging from her senior thesis:


The purpose of this study is to examine various attitudes
of Black Princeton alumni in their present state and as they
are perceived by the alumni to have changed over time. This
study tries to examine the following attitudes of alumni:
the extent to which they are comfortable interacting with
Black and with White individuals in various activities; the
extent to which they are motivated to benefit the Black com-
munity in comparison to other entities such as themselves,
their families, God, etc.; the ideologies they hold with re-
spects to race relations between the Black and White commu-
nities; and feelings they have toward the Black lower class
such as a feeling of obligation that they should help im-
prove the lives of this particular group of Blacks.

As a future Black alumnus, this study is particularly in-
teresting because often times I take my own attitudes about
such issues for granted;. never pausing to reflect upon how
my experiences at Princeton may somehow have caused my atti-
tudes to change. This is important for Blacks in contempo-
rary society because as more Blacks begin attending predomi-
nately White universities it will be helpful to know how
their experiences in these universities affect their future


attitudes. In years to come if their attitudes do change,
is it possible, for example, that they will become more
comfortable interacting with Blacks or with Whites in vari-
ous activities? Will they become more or less motivated to
benefit the Black community? If there is a change in their
attitudes to what might it be attributed? Will they feel
any obligation as a member of the Black community to help
other Blacks in particular who are less fortunate than them-


It is my belief, as seen by the above causal model, that
the independent variable which measures the actual time the
respondents have spent throughout the three periods of their
lifetime with Blacks and with Whites will have a strong ef-
fect on the dependent variables of the study because the
more the individual spends time with a group of people, the
more the individual will be familiar with that particular
group of people. For example, if the study shows that more
respondents spend time with Blacks than with Whites during
each period of his/her lifetime, the study is likely to show
more respondents tend to be comfortable with Blacks than
with Whites when interacting in various activities.


I also further hypothesize that this sense of comfort
with Blacks will be greatest in all the activities measured
by this dependent variable except intellectual activites.
Intellectually, Blacks may be more comfortable with Whites
as a result of a greater amount of exposure to Whites in an
academic setting while at Princeton. Attending Princeton
has probably forced the respondents to compete intellectual-
ly with Whites more than with Blacks and, thus, they have
probably become more familiar with Whites intellectually,
but in other activities they are not likely to have gained
familiarity with Whites if they did not spend time with
Whites in other activities besides intellectual ones.

The need to establish the elitism of a Black graduate of an Ivy League is obvious, but defining those boundaries and remaining separate because of her “Blackness” is an integral of her personality.

@James Raider: Someone should interview the kids who are refusing to take orders.

Done and done!
included photos of said ”healthy” lunches as well as Twitters from many students.

@JamesRaider#5 – Good read by the way.

….indoctrination starts when they’re young, and get them used to being told what to do, how to do it, when to do it.

I see your point but, like it or not sweets and treats are a part of EVERY culture and an American TRADITION!

Problem with all this is once a state sells it’s soul to the Government, through Federal Funds the Government feels it can dictate too many things to the state and all entities involved.

The article is correct, no child wants to be told they cannot have sweets or treats, not by parents and especially the presidents wife – the First Lady. I don’t believe I have ever heard a First Lady prior to Michelle “dictate” to kids and schools they cannot ‘have’ something “fun to eat” AND ‘must’ prepare and serve what ‘she’ thinks they should have…

that is a dictatorship not choice, not freedom, and not liberty.

what a mess they did with the children, AND THEY EPRESS THE ADULTS ALSO,if they only can leave
the people and children alone, to eat what they want is what is good for them,
no wonder the olders turn to weed, it make them get away from them,
what a mess they did, and more mess inviting plane loads of people and children when
America can no more afford it,
they don’t fit in AMERICA,

the obamas shovel down hamburgers, french fries, lobsters (and an article from New England says she downs 3 at one sitting – which brings to mind another theory being floated around) , milkshakes, cakes, pies etc and yet they demand their subjects eat differently. Who the hell does michelle think she is anyway? She is not an elected official, she has no power and no authority. She is living in the WH because the highest paid temporary federal employee happens to live there. because she went to Harvard she knows better? give me a break.


The progressive radicals are attempting to wean children on being indoctrinated. Their nutrition has nothing to do with this authoritarian program. The children have figured it out, and intuitively, they know what their Administration doesn’t. They’re not buying it. Unlike the parents who reverently re-elected this Administration, the children are reacting to being dictated-to.

One thing I learned through 25 years as a Scoutmaster: Kids can smell BS a mile away.

it”s good that children develop that inner knowledge of being abused
and what and who is the maker of it,
that is a lecon they will never forget, and by the same token will refuse the indoctrination by teachers,
who follow the orders, and selling the leader’s mindset , by force to keep their jobs or by their own belief
that all is okay in their country,

@Faith7 Not only do the Obama girls get sweets, their father says the chef puts crack in the pie crusts! Smoke ’em if you got ’em!