Subscribe
Notify of
706 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

@Aye:

So, you’re not up for the challenge, eh? Just what I thought.

I get it. You’ll only stick your neck out if someone is “up for it.” OK.

I was up enough to have thought it through and actually put up a post.

@drjohn: I do not know about the rest of you, but I load a round in the chamber and then insert a full mag into the weapon. It is likely that if there was a struggle in close quarters, then the action likely would not cycle to eject the casing.

@drjohn:

You edited your post to add in this little gem after I had already responded to you:

If you don’t like people disagreeing with you, take it up with Curt and simply disallow any more reader posts.

It’s amusing that you would think that I have a problem with people disagreeing with me. Really, really amusing because, quite frankly, you have not one iota of fact or proof to back up that contention. Quite the opposite is true actually. I love it when people disagree with me. Absolutely love it in fact because it gives me the opportunity to not only defeat their ideas but defend my own. Salt adds flavor and steel sharpens steel.

Those who wither under pressure and confrontation are either not strong in their knowledge and convictions or they simply don’t have the facts on their side.

This is Curt’s site. He can and will allow or disallow reader posts at his own discretion without any input from me one way or the other. I will, however, continue to challenge things that are written here, both in posts as well as in the comments up until such time as Curt asks me to no longer do so.

How about this pardner: If you have a problem with people disagreeing with you, and you’re not willing or able to stand your ground and defend your positions when challenged, then don’t write any more posts. That will get the burr from under your saddle.

In short, if you don’t wanna get dust kicked onto your boots, then stay away from the saloon.

It’s real simple.

@drjohn:

Aye, I believe I said that the entire law was presented and I think so as not to allow anyone to think something was omitted.

No, that’s not what you said:

SYG does not apply here, nor is it needed.

It was not specifically used. It was part of the overall law.

So, when the Chief of the SPD cited the SYG law as the reason Zimmerman was not arrested was that a correct, or incorrect application of the SYG law?

I don’t know why you’re trying to find hairs to split.

Not searching for hairs to split. No need to search for minutia when there are so many large issues up for discussion. Clearly the SYG law was a foundational issue in the decision making process used to justify not arresting Zimmerman. The misapplication of that law is not an insignificant, but rather a foundational, issue in this discussion.

You assume Zimmerman to be the aggressor.

Zimmerman clearly acted the part of the aggressor. He left his vehicle and pursued in violation of Neighborhood Watch guidelines. He carried a weapon, also in violation of those guidelines.

It’s obvious that he continued to pursue even when the dispatcher told him that wasn’t necessary.

As Zimmerman asked Martin why he was there in the first place

Another example of Zimmerman acting as the aggressor. As if Zimmerman had any right to confront someone and challenge them on the legitimacy of their presence in the neighborhood. That’s nothing but sheer arrogance.

So far, I’ve been pretty on target about this whole thing.

Well yeah, except for the parts you’ve gotten woefully wrong, you’ve been pretty on target.

@Aye: If you want to dispute what I wrote, go right ahead. I’ll read it. Criticism is always easier than craftsmanship.

Just stop being a girl. Why everything with you always has to be so adversarial is a mystery to me. We’re on the same side.

@Aye:

No, that’s not what you said:

SYG does not apply here, nor is it needed.

It was not specifically used. It was part of the overall law.

So, when the Chief of the SPD cited the SYG law as the reason Zimmerman was not arrested was that a correct, or incorrect application of the SYG law?

As Kopel said, they overlap, but it is the self-defense portion of the law that matters here, not the SYG.

Former Gov. Jeb Bush, who signed the Stand Your Ground bill in ’05 said that law does not apply to the George Zimmerman case:

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/community-news/arlington/headlines/20120323-in-arlington-jeb-bush-says-stand-your-ground-invalid-in-trayvon-martin-case.ece

@Aye:

Another example of Zimmerman acting as the aggressor. As if Zimmerman had any right to confront someone and challenge them on the legitimacy of their presence in the neighborhood. That’s nothing but sheer arrogance.

In light of the criminal activity in the area, it’s not unreasonable and it is entirely within his Constitutional rights to ask.

@drjohn: Hey, you are both smart guys. There are many more important topics I would like to see you comment on. Let’s wait until the Grand Jury or trial results. Do either of you think the Broncos should have traded Tebow and signed Manning?

I think you have a typo in the last paragraph: “I think Martin approached Zimmerman’s car from the direction of the clubhouse, passed the car and then bolted. Zimmerman then rounded the corner and hid. Zimmerman pursued until being asked to stop but lost Martin.” I think you meant Martin rounded the corner and hid.

@Randy: I have doubts about the Jets and wonder what they are going to do with Tebow.

c. lindy
hi,
you mentioned that BLACK TEEN AGES are within their right to fear the WHITES HE FEARED FOR HIS LIFE.
I THINK THE BLACK TEEN AGES DON’T FEAR THE WHITES UNLESS THEY HAVE COMMITED CRIMES BEFORE AND CARRY THE FEAR OF BEING CAUGHT ANY TIME NOW OR LATER,
AND TRAYVON WAS ONE OF THEM,
AND FEAR NOT FOR HIS LIFE BUT FEAR TO BE ARRESTED FOR PREVIOUS UNLAWFUL ACTIONS, LIKE PROBABLY CARRYING JEWLRIES NOT BELONGNING TO HIM OR DRUGS IN PREVIOUS TIME,
HERE , I, AM ASSUMING THAT after being suspended from MIAMI SCHOOL and sent by his mother there to his father both separated, and to stay there for the period of suspension.
okay?
now I go back to the school must surely had written a letter to the authority and mother, to explain the action, and this being why TRAYVON WAS AFRAID OF THE GUY ON THE CELL PHONE FOLLOWING HIM,
SO, he decide to attack him from the back when ZIMMERMAN TURN TO GO BACK TO HIS CAR THEREFOR NOT BEING A DANGER IN TRAYVON ‘S MIND ANYMORE BECAUSE THE DANGER WAS RETREATING,
BUT TRAYVON IS ANGRY FIGURE HE COULD BEAT HIM UP AT THAT POINT, AND HE SURPRISE HIM FROM THE BACK COMING RAPIDLY, THINK [ OF 15.24 TO 16 AS HE STOP TALKING TO HIS GIRLFRIEND WALKING FAST TOWARD HIS TARGET BACK THEN 16 TO 17 EQUAL ONE MINUTE ]
FOR THE STRUGGLE YES FOR THE GUN, AS ZIMMERMAN TOLD THE POLICE TOO
IN THAT ONE MINUTE, THERE WAS A STRUGGLE, A BASHING HEAD ON THE CONCRETE , A GUN RETRIEVED BY ZIMMERMAN, AND THE SHOT, ALL THIS WHILE THE TWO ARE LAYING ON THE GROUND HAVING FALL FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE STRUGGLE,, AND TOUCHING ONE STRAYVON BASHING THE HEAD THE YELLING FOR HELP BY ZIMMERMAN THE WITNESS STATING IT TO 911, THE TAKE OVER SOLELY OF THE GUN BY ZIMMERNMAN, THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STRAYVON , LIFTING HIS BODY FROM THE BODY TOUCHING POSITION SO TO GET UP AND RUN SCARE BUT SHOT STILL IN MID AIR AND THE WITNESS SAID NOW THE ONE WHICH WAS ON TOP IS UNDER, AND WE KNOW
STRAYVON WAS FACE DOWN HIS HAND BOTH OVER HIS CHEST WHERE THE SHOT HIT….. AND WE DID NOT HEAR THAT ZIMMERMAN PROBABLY GOT UP AS SOON AS
HE COULD GET OUT FROM UNDER…..
MY VIEW ONLY
BYE

@George:

I think you have a typo in the last paragraph: “I think Martin approached Zimmerman’s car from the direction of the clubhouse, passed the car and then bolted. Zimmerman then rounded the corner and hid. Zimmerman pursued until being asked to stop but lost Martin.” I think you meant Martin rounded the corner and hid.

Yes it is a typo.

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-04-02/news/os-two-arrested-seminole-beating-20120402_1_victim-arrest-affidavits-crimeline Wonder what else has happened in the area. These poor boys were only 19 and 18 years old.

@Randy:

Do either of you think the Broncos should have traded Tebow and signed Manning?

Cannot intelligently comment on Tebow or Manning because I don’t follow sports of any type or variety. It just doesn’t interest me. I think that comes from being force fed sports by my dad when I was growing up.

I would rather spend time with my nose in a book or with my hands in the soil instead.

Randy
hi, wow, if this is not hate crime what is.
what OBAMA WILL SAY ABOUT HIS COULD HAVE BEEN SONS,
WHAT WILL SHARPTON SAY ABOUT LYNCHING THE BLACKS NOW FOR BEATING WITH A HAMMER A VICTIM WHO MIGHT DIE FROM HIS WOUND, IF NOT HAVE BEEN FOUND IN THE WOODS WHERE THE CRIMINALS DRAGGED HIM TO HIDE HIM AND LEFT HIM TO DIE FROM HIS WOUNDS.
THEY ARE WORSE THAN ANIMALS

Randy,
a big tornado on the WEST DALLAS AREA GOING UPWARD AND CROSSING STRAIGT NORTH TO EAST
BASEBALL HAIL FLOODING
FOLKS TO GET COVER NOW

Look at all you fools, the only reason O’DUMBSHIT said anything about this is for it to be a distraction and you clowns swallowed it hook, line and sinker. It’s been about a week since the liberal trolls have come here and posted their I AM TRAYVON BS, they’re probably laughing at all you Matlock wannabe’s like I am.

GregSucks
hi,
they haven’t checks our other POSTS, WE ARE ON THEIR TAILS , which is our priority also,
here we are just exercising the brain to elucidate the two participants to a deadly action of survival
when face with confrontation.
who is fooling who?
bye

@drjohn:

In light of the criminal activity in the area, it’s not unreasonable and it is entirely within his Constitutional rights to ask.

He followed then pursued Trayvon. And no, he had no business confronting him. He’s not a cop and does not have the same powers as one. All the kid did was walk down the street. He did not cross onto anyone’s property until Zimmerman followed him. It’s not a crime to walk down the street.
He put himself into a position where an altercation was much more likely to occur. As I stated on another thread I felt he should have been charged. Turns out the lead investigator agreed. I based my decision on my understanding of the laws for self defense and not SYG.
You can say he had right to do what he did all you want, but that simply isn’t the case.

hi ilovebeeswarzone,
The only thing that I’ve seen changing in the responses on this subject over the last week have been the adjectives.

Hard Right
hi,
when he turn his back to go to his car and was attack then his right prevailed
to shoot the attacker ? yes or no
and he did not, he waited to be injured, and be put in a position of asking for help which never came, the witness choose to call 911 instead. I am not blaming his actions here.
and there was a struggle for the gun, he took hold of the gun and shoot to save his life.
what else could he do, wait longer? if so, he is dead. why should he?
even if he walk a bit longer behind the one he assume to be out to no good,
and we found out the TRAYVON HAD BEEN PREVIOUSLY OUT TO NO GOOD, AND PROBABLY AT THAT TIME ALSO.
BYE

Humm… so you “thought it through”, eh drj? Not much further along than last week, I see. Except, perhaps, you’ve outdone yourself on emulating a pretzel. I have to say, drj, your obsession with keeping this story hyped day after day is just as puzzling as the case itself.

I’ve pretty much stayed away from all things FA lately, most especially this particular subject. But in the interest of providing a ying to your yang – you know, the fair and balanced bit – I’ll put my thoughts here. I have no desires to do a post because I have no desire to keep fanning the flames of BS that is flying from both sides of the political spectrum on this. All I’ve wanted to see is the investigation better scrutinized because I’m worried that the fed’s promise to interfere with states’ SYG laws is the inevitable. And as a RKBA advocate, I don’t see that as good. Therein lies the real story… not a perpetual push to prove Zimmerman is innocent beyond all doubt.

But since you’ve decided to expand on last week, I’m going to throw in my two cents worth here, then again exit the personal ugliness that will ensue for doing so. Life’s too short to wage war over this when my focus is on far larger issues.

I believe your problem is that you are constructing it to fit Zimmerman’s story, and assume there are no obvious holes there. If you believe he is telling the truth, you’re going to find a way to make it plausible.

That ain’t the way it works, Drj. You cannot assume an analytic approach when you begin with a conclusion, then arrange the puzzle pieces to fit your conclusion.

Let’s stick to what we know instead, so allow me to point out a few flaws with your carefully constructed puzzle.

So why didn’t he? Why didn’t Martin call 911 and say he was being followed instead of calling his girlfriend?

Cell phone call logs indicate that the girlfriend called Martin, not the other way around. That phone call lasted at least four minutes, no additional seconds above that were provided in the news outlets, but that doesn’t mean it couldn’t have been four minutes, ten seconds, etc. We only know at least four full minutes until more detailed call logs are released to the public.

As to why did he not call 911? You know, I’m not under the impression that young male teens, most especially young black male teens, have the penchant to dial 911 easily. I don’t think there is any question that there is an inherent distrust of LE by that age group, and in particular by minorities.

So I find your suggestion he call 911 an amusing indication that you may be out of touch here, guy.

SYG does not apply here, nor is it needed.

This is precisely what I’ve been arguing, and excoriated for, since the beginning. It is also why the state investigation is reopened… but only after being forced via public outcry.

The purpose of that state investigation is to determine if the SYG law was correctly applied in the Zimmerman case, allowing him to walk free without charges. If it’s not, then manslaughter charges could, and should, be applied to investigate as to whether there was unnecessary force (i.e. shooting death) used in repelling any suggested attack by Martin.

60 seconds of fighting, and Zimmerman’s non life threatening injuries during that short duration, indicate that Zimmerman seemed to be pretty quick on the trigger for defense.

And we still do not know who began the physical confrontation. We only have Zimmerman’s account, and dead teens can’t speak for themselves.

Martin had nothing to fear until he tried to take the gun. If Martin was in fear, why call his girlfriend and not 911?

You’ve left the realm of fact and now incorporate hearsay. We have no official statement of Zimmerman’s account, and only the brother states there as a fight for the gun. But let’s play your game, shall we?

1: Martin is doing nothing illegal when spotted by Zimmerman

2: With your account, Martin needs to now walk right past Zimmerman, on the phone with 911. He doesn’t mention dodging between homes, cutting thru yards. There’s only so many ways that Martin can “run”/walk fast away from Zimmerman. He has limited time with any path before he meets up with the grim reaper.

This looks even worse for Zimmerman. Why, if Martin walked right past him, did he not roll down the window, ID himself as a neighborhood watch person, and ask him politely if he lived in the neighborhood?

He did not… Instead, view this from the opposite perspective. After Martin passes – presumably on the phone with his girlfriend, worried about Zimmerman’s scrutiny – that same guy now climbs out of a car and starts following him on foot.

Threatening or intimidating much? To most of us – me as a female, or perhaps a black youth – when we’re doing nothing wrong and that person is not a cop, hang yeah that’s threatening activity.

BTW, we don’t know if Martin was actually “running”. His girlfriend says he refused, but would “walk fast”. Zimmerman most definitely wasn’t running. The movement on the 911 tape supports a fast stride, but no heavier breathing, no sound of heavier footsteps on pavement, and fast cloth movement indicating running. The benefits of years of recording/cutting foley sound for film and TV…

For whatever path that Martin took, from the time Zimmerman noted in the 911 call that he moved faster away, to the time of his death was about three minutes.

Actually, as Neighborhood Watch, he does, as long as it’s “non-contact surveillance.” But then he stopped when asked to do so. The audio indicates it.

Ohhhh… a twofer here. How fun. To the first sentence… didn’t you, yourself, spend oodles of threads and posts, telling us that Zimmerman was only on a “personal errand”?

Like Aye says… pick a horse and ride it.

Of course, that’s only one of Zimmerman’s questionable statements in his story. The direct route from the Super Target, north of the complex on Rinehart and Ball Rds, to his home on Retreat View Circle at the SW part of the complex does not include a jaunt down Twin Trees Lane where he was parked. In fact, Twin Trees Lane is no direct route to his home from either gate.

So if Zimmerman were on a “personal errand”, he also decided to deviate and incorporate one of his “nightly patrols”, as his neighbors say that he does. So why should he make an issue of being on a “personal errand” to the police?

Because on “patrol”, he’s in violation of the neighborhood watch guidelines that do not sanction any action save alerting the police, and most importantly, no armed patrols.

But then, Zimmerman, studying criminal justice and wanting to be LE, knows that… which is why he likely decided to say he was on a “personal errand”. His location in the complex proves that statement to be shaky alone.

Which brings me to the second sentence, and the largest flaw in your Aesop’s fable… and you stated this more than one between your post and comments:

Zimmerman begins chase, but then stands down when it was requested he do so and he apparently loses sight of Martin.

This is where Zimmerman’s story… and your analysis… falls apart. It’s really not rocket science to prove this isn’t even close to true.

As I said, we do not know the actual path of Martin’s movements. Any information on that is solely confined to Zimmerman’s account alone. But we do know where Zimmerman could be at the moment he hung up the phone with the 911 dispatcher.

Allow me to illustrate visually.

Fact… the average fitness walker does a mile in 12-15 minutes. If we take the fastest pace, that’s 5.8 feet per second.

Fact… Zimmerman moved away from his car, in some direction, for 33 seconds. Assuming the fastest stride, that’s about 165 feet in any direction.

Below, the radius of 165′ from the SUV’s approximate location.

At the outer edges of that circle is where Zimmerman would be when he stopped his movement – going one direction only – and finished his conversation with the dispatcher. If he had turned around when the dispatcher asked him to, he would be right back at his SUV. So for debate purposes, let’s assume Zimmerman took a one way trip, 33 seconds away from his vehicle.

One of those areas, to the east, would be the site of the death.

At the point that Zimmerman hangs up with 911, Martin was still on his phone call with his girlfriend for another minute afterwards.

If Zimmerman were returning to his car, “as requested” (according to you), he could have made it back to the SUV two times over before the altercation began…. from anywhere on that radius rim.

Therefore, Zimmerman did not return to his car after hanging up.

And the more important question that has everything to do with the truth revolves around just where did Zimmerman go in that minute before meeting up with Martin?

And BTW, your portrayal that it was about 30 seconds before the altercation is an incorrect conclusion. What we do know is that Zimmerman 911 call was 4’12” long from moment he called. According to call logs, the girlfriend’s call to Martin was at least 4 minutes long. Since we are not privy to the actual logs/billing, we do not know how many seconds longer than four minutes it may be.

Considering that Zimmerman documented Martin, putting his hand in his waistband at 1’06” into his 911 call, it might be concluded that Martin was actually answering his phone…. Which fits with the cell call log records.

Advancing each of the calls, without seconds, at least four minutes is a more accurate depiction of time than your “30 seconds” estimate in your original post. That’s a luxury you opt to abuse – applying seconds to Zimmerman’s call, and none to Martin’s – without justification to again support a conclusion you are trying to prove as fact.

If Zimmerman continued to follow, stalk, hunt, chase… take your pick for whatever suits your particular PC attitude… did he go further south towards Brandy Green’s house from that spot, and then turn around to come back?

Did he just stand there for a minute?

If Martin were laying in wait, as you suggest, what was the likelihood that he’d talk to his girlfriend for another minute while Zimmerman just stood there, then attack? And, in fact, while you want to put the onus on Martin not running home (altho I wouldn’t since I wouldn’t want a loon, following me, to know where I live…), could not Zimmerman’s immediate retreat to his SUV after hanging up with 911 also prevented any confrontation?

Somehow, in the minute when Zimmerman chose NOT to return to his SUV, he and Martin came face to face in that death site location… a place that Zimmerman *might* have been standing when he hung up with 911 a minute earlier.

When they do come meet, is Zimmerman’s jacket open so that Martin can see his gun? After all, aren’t you, and Zimmerman’s brother, now saying they fought over the gun? Obviously what you are now conceding is that Martin is, indeed, aware that Zimmerman is packing.

Threatening and intimidating much? First the guy has been tailing/tracking him for 5 minutes when he’s doing nothing wrong. He has no idea who he is. And now, face to face with him, he sees that guy is armed. If Martin shoved Zimmerman first, was it because he saw he was armed?

In that case, who feels more threatened? Who is more entitled to SYG defense in that moment? Especially since Martin had apparently attempted to avoid Zimmerman in that time.

Did Zimmerman, after spending five minutes tracking Martin’s whereabouts… of which at least a minimal of four of them Martin was aware of… identify himself as a neighborhood watch person? Or does Martin just think he’s some armed and crazy loon, stalking him? Not exactly out of the realm of possibilities.

Every bit of this has to do with who felt justified in “defending” themselves in this event.

And what’s with Zimmerman’s supposed story that he was attacked from behind? Are most “thugs”, as so many of you portray Martin, generally in the habit of plotting a fight and launching an attack while on their cell phone with their girlfriends? Is it the optimum way to win a fight you start to do so while multitasking fighting with cell phone chit chat?

Dunno… sounds pretty spontaneous to me.

In fact, if Martin’s hiding at the death site, waiting to attack Zimmerman, why wait for a full minute as Zimmerman stands there, chatting up the gal pal, before doing so? And if he’s hiding close enough, can’t Zimmerman hear him talking on the cell,or is he whispering? There’s no indication from the girl’s media accounts that Martin was hiding, or whispering, plotting an attack.

All of these questions are what an investigation should address. And an investigation there should be because Zimmerman’s story has holes. This has been the contention of the more reasonable minds. Whether the State Attorney’s office or the Sanford police chose to conclude this investigation early using SYG is less relevant than the fact that it was, indeed, prematurely ended.

And it’s the perfect right of the family to demand closer scrutiny.

For the record, SYG has been invoked 140 times since the law was enacted. There are eleven cases that might bear *some* similarity to the Zimmerman/Martin case, but none of them involves pursuit of a guy doing nothing while walking down the road. There’s road rage, arguments out of control, domestic violence, robbery, vehicle theft and harassment in the home. But only Zimmerman/Martin has one person, pursing another who is not engaged in an illegal act.

Again I will say, I find the conservative resistance for investigative oversight to be baffling. And I find it even more baffling that people jump thru so many hoops to declare Zimmerman’s story as unquestionably true when there is enough that does not jive to warrant a closer look.

GregSucks
hi,
you mean to say they are my adjectives, yes, I agree,
bye

@Hard Right:

“…he had no business confronting him.”

To date, the most credible version of events is that TM initiated the confrontation. Whatever pursuit of TM that GZ was initially embarked upon was apparently terminated shortly after Zimmerman received the dispatcher’s advice: “Okay, we don’t need you to do that.”

He’s not a cop and does not have the same powers as one.

I must have missed the part where he tried to assume the powers of a LEO. Perhaps you have read something that I have not. While perhaps unwise, it is not illegal to ask someone what they are doing. This appears to be the full extent of GZ’s assertion of authority.

MATA
Hard Right
I have been working so hard theses last days, on my case, and you discredit all my hard work
with a click of a key,
now I have to figure some more, to include your added infos,
and I have to rush, before they hang him.
bye

@MataHarley:

Ohhhh… a twofer here. How fun. To the first sentence… didn’t you, yourself, spend oodles of threads and posts, telling us that Zimmerman was only on a “personal errand”?

I’ll let you find it, because as I don’t recall such a thing. I even chose not to argue with you about SYG.

@MataHarley:

And BTW, your portrayal that it was about 30 seconds before the altercation is an incorrect conclusion. What we do know is that Zimmerman 911 call was 4’12″ long from moment he called.

Zimmerman called 911 and was directed to the SPD. You’ll note the dispatcher answers “Sanford Police Department” and not “911”. The log has him connected to SPD at 7:11:12.

@MataHarley:

When they do come meet, is Zimmerman’s jacket open so that Martin can see his gun? After all, aren’t you, and Zimmerman’s brother, now saying they fought over the gun? Obviously what you are now conceding is that Martin is, indeed, aware that Zimmerman is packing.

I believe Martin saw the weapon as he was pounding Zimmerman’s head into the pavement and then reached for it.

@MataHarley:

If Zimmerman continued to follow, stalk, hunt, chase… take your pick for whatever suits your particular PC attitude… did he go further south towards Brandy Green’s house from that spot, and then turn around to come back?

Did he just stand there for a minute?

He told his girlfriend he was going to walk fast. Let’s say he did wait. He asked Zimmerman why he was following and Zimmerman asked what he was doing there, according to the girlfriend. It’s highly unlikely the smaller and armed Zimmerman is going to shove Martin and get into an altercation with the chance he could lose posession of the weapon.

Lots of suppositions on all sides.
Many of the facts are contained in the autopsy report of Martin.
Odd that it is not being released.
His having stipling (sp?) on his clothes, his having gunshot residue on his hands would both bolster one version of events over the other.
I appreciated the comments of the LAPD officer who writes under the pseudonym “Jack Dunphy” over at PJMedia:

“………. even if Zimmerman is shown to have acted illegally in shooting Martin, would this crime reflect some national outbreak of vigilante violence among neighborhood watch volunteers?

No, there has been no such outbreak.…..
……
To Rep. Waters and her cohorts in the racial grievance industry, racial profiling is a greater threat to blacks in America than violent crime, this despite the stark numbers available for all to see.
Her Los Angeles office is located near the intersection of 101st Street and Broadway, within two miles of which, according to the Los Angeles Times, there have been 236 homicides since January 1, 2007. In examining the map at the link, you’ll see that you can scarcely walk a single block in parts of that area without coming upon the scene of at least one murder.
Wouldn’t the loved ones of those 236 people wish that some police officer had “profiled” the killers in the moments before the crimes occurred?
Would Rep. Waters ask that the police in those neighborhoods be less proactive?
…..
Joining Rep. Waters in that same CNN interview was Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, Democrat of Missouri and chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus. Soledad O’Brien raised the question of whether Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson were exploiting the Trayvon Martin case while “missing the bigger issue of black-on-black crime.” Rep. Cleaver dismissed such talk:

The bigger issue is the low esteem in which black life is held, particularly black males. And so it doesn’t matter whether it’s black on black or brown or green or whatever, it means that there is hot a high level of appreciation for the life of a black male who is a human being.


…..
Even if George Zimmerman is as guilty as his most vociferous accusers claim, his arrest and imprisonment won’t change this grim reality: According to the CDC, homicide is the fourth leading cause of death of black males in America. More than 90 percent of those deaths are at the hands of other black males.

Meanwhile, all out war has been declared between Obama and the Court.
Today the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals has given Obama until noon Thursday to make his case ON PAPER in 3 single-spaced pages or less.

All this ”us VS them” crap is diversion.
Obama is trying to usurp another third of the federal government.
He has his own 3rd as well as 1/2 of the Congress; the Senate.
He made his play.
This really is important.

@Mike O’Malley:

Yes. You get the gist. Imagine you were walking through that neighborhood and some guy starts trailing you, first in his vehicle and later on foot. Zimmerman did go after the kid as evidenced by the map.

Again, put yourself in the kid’s shoes. You’re not in your neighborhood and a man is following you. Martin’s suspensions, drug use have nothing whatsoever to do with this. He may have been a little thug, but in this instance the salient point is, what was he doing? And did it warrant a citizen (not a cop) pursuing him.

If everybody has the right to chase down anyone they deem suspicious, we would have near anarchy.

Neighborhood watch is a right, as is bearing firearms. Chasing someone down is over the line unless it is a blatant life or death situation.

@Dr John: If Martin was the one screaming and calling for help before Zimmerman fired, then Mr Zimmerman is in trouble. All the rest is bla bla.

@ MataHarley
Your time and distance studies are truly well thought out. But the gap between the last call and the first witness’ visuals is the fly in the ointment. The time can be fairly well accounted for as you have done. The actual movements of both men can be inferred but only to the point of the first witness’ visual. That witness statement tracked with GZ’s. That gap is most likely why SPD did not arrest and charge GZ that night. SPD spoke to ASA Kelly Jo Hines, a capius warrant for manslaughter was sent and Hines had moved to impanel a Grand Jury.That jury was scrubbed when the case was given to ASA Corey. SPD could have charged GZ at any time without having to clear the arrest with the State Attorney’s Ofc., with the caveat that they would have to show probable cause and bring those charges within the time allowed by the state. It is interesting that Det. Serino was asked on Mar.17 about the case and he stated to the local media that the State Attorney’s people were working closely with SPD as per the norm. That a capius was sent would probably mean that SPD had concluded its investigation minus the toxicology results. That would track with a scene that was compromised by rain and foot traffic. As to stalking TM with weapon drawn. In Texas brandishing a concealed handgun is considered aggravated assault. If you cannot show that perceived threat was genuine you can be charged. Bottom line is a CHL is not a blank check, I would imagine that Florida has a similar statute. It will be very instructive to see just what the forensics yield, GSR etc. Castle Doctrine will be tested here. And as has been stated by others Obama seeks to neuter the SCOTUS, sell out Israel and stuff green energy down our collective throats, while we are focused on this case and its racial implications. This case would have been handled routinely if only politics and greed had been checked at the door.

@The Strategic MC:

Learn the laws about self defense and the use of lethal force, then come back and comment. The youth had done nothing wrong and he had no business confronting him. Again, had Zimmerman not pursued and gotten out of his vehicle, the shooting would never have happened.
Considering I came to the same conclusion the lead investigator did (Zimerman should be charged), even before I knew he had recommended it, I’d say it isn’t me that’s wrong.

Right or wrong you are held to a higher standard of behavior and forethought when carrying a gun. Zimmerman did poorly in those areas and this is the result.

@Hard Right: If Trayvon is NOT suspended from school in Miami.
Then Trayvon is in school in Miami instead of in Sanford.
If Trayvon is in school in Miami and NOT in Sanford.
Then Trayvon would still be alive.

Notice a pattern here.

It all started with Trayvon.

Decisions have consequences (sometime deadly)

End of story.

Hard Right
hi,
you know the laws and you are right on it,
but on the other side as being humans , is in it how all things happen in life?
for anything we do, anything we decide, any road we take, any one we meet, any one we love, any one we dislike, any vacation we take,
we are confronted all the time with the UNSEEN FORCES OF GOOD AND EVIL,
are we to think they are the one dictating the humans every moves or just some of it ? or, are we dictating our moves ourselves,
what about our decision taken on our gut’s feeling, good or bad?
would those decisions to take a certain road or else, be influence by our leaning on good or leaning on bad ? if we lean on the wrong side, would we tend to take a road leading to destruction?
or if we are doing bad move against the laws, it come to lead you in decision by itself automatic following the mind of the bad person without the person noticing? so,
how can we have a choice to take that road or the other if we are not aware of the what is at the end of the road?
just one more thought; it’s well known we learn from our mistake,
but why do we have to do the mistake first?

just me thinking
bye

Here is an interesting post that I have not seen any where else! http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/211753.php Does this fit the profile everyone is creating?

@Mannie: @Mannie:

Thank you Mannie.

I did not have time to respond to Aye’s distasteful reply to my post at #4, and so I appreciate your response. One would expect that any gentlemen participating in civil society would understand that a free citizen has no such right to “deliver a beatdown” to a neighbor engaged in “non-contact surveillance” or for that matter to anyone else unless that “free citizen” were to be engaged in self-defense when there is reasonable belief of a threat. In other circumstances if one were to “deliver a beatdown” to a neighbor it would most likely be a felony.

One may note at the earlier post #43 Mr. Aye accepts that Trayvon Martin may not have felt threatened. Given the fact that both Zimmerman and Martin had approximately the same weighed and the fact that Mr. Martin was substantially taller than Mr. Zimmerman and Trayvon had a substantially longer arm for boxing, perhaps Mr. Martin was duly confident that he could indeed “deliver a beatdown” to a much smaller Hispanic man. Young Trayvon Martin seems to have been in the habit of making poor choices. Were racialist bragging rights involved? Why did Trayvon Martin call his girlfriend and not 911? Why didn’t Trayvon call his dad for help? Was Trayvon concerned that his dad would suspect that he Trayvon was out and about in the neighborhood casing it for burglary? Why didn’t Trayvon Martin not make good his evasion of the neighborhood watchman and return safely home just some 150 feet away? Why did Trayvon Martin approach and confront a retreating watchman from behind? Why did Trayvon Martin respond to Mr. Zimmerman’s reasonable question by throwing the first punch at a much smaller man? Did Trayvon Martin feel confident that he could “deliver a beatdown” and then quickly escape 150 feet to the safety of his dad’s girlfriends house?

It puzzles me why Tracy Martin, Trayvon’s father, did not under the circumstances place Trayvon Martin on strict grounding. Why didn’t Trayvon’s girlfriend call Trayvon’s family: mother, father or half brother after she could not reach Trayvon after the fight. Why did Tracy Martin, Trayvon’s father, fail to call Trayvon’s girlfriend and Trayvon’s cousin later that evening?

I don’t know. Perhaps Trayvon’s family had been exhausted by a young man who was dangerously out of control.

The SYG law wouldn’t matter to someone who was on the ground being beaten. If you are in a situation where you can’t just walk away and you are in danger, then you may protect yourself regardless of whether a SYG law exists or not. I know the police cited this law as a reason for not arresting him, but I can only guess they mean that law raises the burden for what they can arrest someone for in this type of situation. If Zimmerman wouldn’t have had injuries to his face and back of his head and a witness saying he was on the ground being beaten, then the SYG law would not have prevented him from being arrested.

Mike O’MALLEY
HI, VERY INTERESTING QUESTIONS,
here I go again and will reconstruct the case to see where
your questions will
be answered, by the way, there are no MANNIE HERE
bye

@Hard Right:

Considering I came to the same conclusion the lead investigator did (Zimerman should be charged), even before I knew he had recommended it, I’d say it isn’t me that’s wrong.

Yet, the opinion of the lead investigator did not prevail, did it?

Learn the laws about self defense and the use of lethal force, then come back and comment.

I notice that you willfully ignore the very credible possibility that the physical confrontation was initiated by T.M. Verbal harassment / confrontation, which at best is what Zimmerman can be credibly accused of doing , does not invoke the right of self defense.

Specifically, what applicable part of the Florida statue on self-defense am I missing? This part?:

776.012 Use of force in defense of person.–A person is justified in the use of force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against such other’s imminent use of unlawful force. However, the person is justified in the use of deadly force only if he or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony.

Or, this?:

776.041 Use of force by aggressor.–The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
(1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
(2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
(a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.

Zimmerman claims that Martin was beating his head against the sidewalk after initiating the confrontation with a strike to the face and knocking him to the ground. Any chance that Zimmerman believed that he was in danger of suffering “death or serious bodily harm?”

If you want to have a discussion about laws and their applicability to a situation that is, from a public information standpoint, very fluid and fraught with a high level of uncertainty, then let’s do that.

@Hard Right:

Again, had Zimmerman not pursued and gotten out of his vehicle, the shooting would never have happened.

He was already out of the vehicle when the dispatcher asked him to stand down. And if you’ll look at the SPD statement, it does say “non-contact surveillance.” I believe that’s what Zimmerman was doing. He could follow to see where Martin was headed.

@ilovebeeswarzone:

Thank you.

Some years ago Dr. Christopher Lasch identified the emergence of narcissism as a cultural factor in American society. Today many teachers experience the ill effects of such narcissism when parents of troubled and special education students engage in denial. Those parents shift responsibility and blame for out of control behavior of their children to others. On the other hand working class families have limited resources to deal with behavior such as Trayvon Martin’s now that the old neighborhood parental networks and norms have disappeared. I am disquieted by what appears to be unduly lax parenting on the part on Trayvon’s father, Tracy Martin. Trayvon’s half brother also seems to be attracted to thug-life. Generally this paints a picture. Is that picture fair? The unspoken story here could well be that Tracy Martin has been exhausted by his son’s out-of-control behavior and the Trayvon succumbed to the attractions of much celebrated and much commercialized thug-life. I expect that guilt, denial and psychological displacement underlay this tragedy.

@drjohn:

I believe that’s what Zimmerman was doing. He could follow to see where Martin was headed.

And if Zimmerman succeeded then Trayvon would have reason to expect that he would be answerable to his father, Tracy Martin. Was Zimmerman getting too close for comfort, but not to the person of Trayvon Martin, but to the location and identity of the residence at which Trayvon was staying? If Trayvon was not up to no good why did he not go home and call his dad or describe his misadventure to his dad when his dad returned. Trayvon’s behavior is unreasonable for a reasonable person but not for a teenager up to no good or at least making very poor choices.

Are there neighborhood watch signs posted in the neighborhood?

@Mike O’Malley:

“And if Zimmerman succeeded then Trayvon would have reason to expect that he would be answerable to his father, Tracy Martin.”

Three weeks into this hysteria and a most credible hypothetical finally comes to the fore.

Btw, what was T.M. actually carrying the night of the shooting? A baggie and a pipe, perhaps? Dad would not have been happy to hear about this , I’m sure.

Still waiting to hear more about the skittles and iced tea that are not mentioned in any police report.

Mike O’Malley
hi,
again you mention an important factor, yes the sign of neighbor watch,
was there suppose to be one? It would have been a very good deterrent to have one,
they had so many break in, and that’s why ZIMMERMAN WAS THERE,
bye

The Strategic MC
yes there was a telling about the teabag and the pipe, from the beginning of the first POST,we are on the second or third and there is another 4 rt beginning with WORDSMITH, HE SIDE UP WITH TRAYVON, TO CREATE A BALANCE FOR THE SIDE OF TRAYVON.
THE FIRST ONE POST HAS OVER 300 COMMENTS AND CURT DIVIDED THEM IN 50 COMMENT SHOWING EACH ONE AFTER THE OTHER IF YOU CLICK ON OLD ONE ON THE LEFT UPPER BLACK BAR
YOU WILL HAVE THE FIRST 50 SET AND CLICK AGAIN LEFT FOR THE NEXT SET ON AND ON, AND THE NEW ONE IS THE LAST SET OF COMMENTS, AGAIN ON THE UPPER BLACK HORIZONTAL BAR ON THE RIGHT JUST IF YOU WANT TO CHECK IT, I don’t remember exactly where, but it is on that one
bye

@ilovebeeswarzone:

yes there was a telling about the teabag and the pipe, from the beginning of the first POST,we are on the second or third and there is another 4 rt beginning with WORDSMITH, HE SIDE UP WITH TRAYVON, TO CREATE A BALANCE FOR THE SIDE OF TRAYVON.

Thanks. I know that there has been a lot of discussion about this, but I would like for the “skittles and iced tea” narrative to progress from it’s current urban legend form into something factual and definitive.
Right now, it’s being used as place-holder symbology in an attempt to establish T.M.’s innocence and benign intent. Just like the years old photos.

@Mike O’Malley:

I did not have time to respond to Aye’s distasteful reply to my post at #4, and so I appreciate your response. One would expect that any gentlemen participating in civil society would understand that a free citizen has no such right to “deliver a beatdown” to a neighbor engaged in “non-contact surveillance” or for that matter to anyone else unless that “free citizen” were to be engaged in self-defense when there is reasonable belief of a threat.

A person who is going about his or her daily life (e.g. walking home from the 7-ELEVEN) and is being trailed in the darkness by an armed stranger does indeed have every right to “stand his ground” and has “no duty to retreat” in the face of such an event.

The person being stalked does indeed have the right to meet force with force ie “deliver a beatdown” on such an individual up to, and including, the use of deadly force.

The law is clear and specific.

One may note at the earlier post #43 Mr. Aye accepts that Trayvon Martin may not have felt threatened.

One may need to go back and read what I actually wrote because your representation is not anywhere close to accurate.

I’m quite sure that blatant and inaccurate misrepresentation was unintentional because, if a gentleman were to purposely misrepresent the words of another gentleman in a blatant and inaccurate manner…well that would be ungentlemanly would it not?

I find your claim that you “did not have time” to respond to what you found “distasteful” in #4 rather odd considering that you made time to, once again, engage in a fact free attempt to smear and sully the reputation of Trayvon Martin’s parents and their son.

You don’t really know what went on within the Martin family household, (unless of course you actually lived there with them and haven’t told us) yet you gas off endlessly, and without any evidentiary support, about how you are “disquieted” that the parents’ presumed behavior doesn’t meet your approval standards.

Talk about distasteful and shameful.

Of course, if you actually had all the right answers about parenting you likely would have written a book or three by now and would be spending more time on the speaking circuit earning money from that advice and less time on the Interwebz commenting for free.

But you’re not the guy who has all the right answers are you?

You are, instead, the guy who makes a concentrated effort to put your foot on the necks of those parents so you can grind them (and their dead son) into the ground all while goofing up on the very basic details of this matter.

Yes, distasteful indeed.

Exit Question: Which of the Martin’s parental decisions led directly to Mr. Zimmerman violating Neighborhood Watch policies when he a) carried a weapon on patrol and b) pursued Martin through the neighborhood?