![]()
I love Sarah Palin. There, I’ve said it. While I’ve never met her, that is beside the point.
What is right on point however is why I love her. Sarah Palin bleeds American. She is not American simply because of an accident of birth. Rather, she understands what makes America different; she believes that America is exceptional and knows what makes it so; she is passionately pro-American without being jingoistic; she is willing to fight for what she believes regardless of who’s lined up against her; she is willing to put her credibility and reputation on the line to help others who share her views. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, she is a normal, average, regular person.
Sarah Palin did not grow up rich or attend an Ivy League school. She did not spend her life in a courtroom extorting money from corporations or small businesses. She did not spend her life in an ivory tower or in an editorial room pontificating about how the world works in some fantasy universe where government regulations make everyone pure and everything perfect in every circumstance. No, she has lived a fairly normal life, one you might call working class.
I remember back in ’88 or ’92 someone asked George H.W. Bush if he knew the price of milk, and he didn’t. He was of course pilloried for being “out of touch” with the common man. (Frankly it doesn’t bother me at all that the VP or President of the United States doesn’t know the price of milk… let someone else buy the milk, I’d rather him focus on knowing how much of our money government is wasting!) Sarah Palin probably knows the price of a gallon of milk. More importantly, she understands America from where the tire hits the road. She started out her political career at the PTA because she wanted to improve the education her children were getting. From there she spent four years on the Wasilla city council and six years as mayor. Next she was appointed to chair the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission and later defeated the incumbent to become the Governor of Alaska. In every one of those endeavors Palin showed herself to be not only capable, but effective and successful as well. Indeed, the latter two positions found her fighting an Alaska version of Tammany Hall.
She has demonstrated a willingness to fight for what she believes in, even if it is within her own party. She defeated the Murkowski machine in Alaska and she stood side by side with tea party candidates across the country in 2010, often against the wishes of the entrenched GOP establishment. Christine O’Donnell may have been a flawed candidate, but at least the citizens of Delaware had a choice between two distinctly different paths rather than the choice between the liberal and more liberal paths they would have had with Chris Coons and Mike Castle. They may have chosen bigger government, but at least for a change they had a choice, and Sarah Palin helped give them one.
Sarah Palin is also average in another way. She is not polished – or at least she wasn’t when she burst upon the national stage. She is not slick. She does not have a sound bit sized answer at the ready in case she gets asked any questions. Just the opposite, actually, often you can see her crafting an answer on the spot. The interview with Katie Couric was indeed painful to watch. The truth however is that her less than stellar performance in that and other early interviews were not signs that she was a dolt as many suggested, but rather the consequence of being thrown onto the world’s biggest stage with the klieg lights on max. You might say she was… shell-shocked. Many people, including myself, wondered how she could not name a single newspaper she read regularly or give a coherent answer on the Middle East. Knowing the answers and delivering them in front of a world wide audience are two different things. (Example: say the alphabet using nouns to represent each letter: Apple, Barrel, Continent etc. Now imagine having to do it in 20 seconds in front of 1,000 people and your job rests on your success…) Her poor performance communicated more about her interview preparation than her qualification to be President. Indeed a week later she outperformed Joe Biden in their debate, and few lefties would argue he was unqualified to be President. Her early performances were those of someone whose persona was not forged in front of camera. I’ll take someone who is right on the issues but flubs an interview 10 times out of 10…
And the issues are where Sarah Palin shines. Like Ronald Reagan, she understands that government is the problem more often than the solution. She understands that low taxes and fiscal discipline are an absolute necessity as government has no money other than that which it takes from taxpayers. She understands that Barack Obama was right when he suggested the Constitution “Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf…” The difference is that to Obama and the left, that’s the problem whereas Sarah Palin understands that that is why the Constitution exists in the first place. She understands that an unconstrained government will continue to grow and usurp powers until eventually it strangles the life out of its citizens and our republic.
In addition to the issues, Sarah Palin seems to be made of steel. She has undergone a seemingly unending barrage of mocking and criticism to a degree that perhaps no other American politician has had to endure in modern times. Through it all however she has carried herself with grace, good humor and most importantly, she has understood that the issue is not her, it’s the country. The fact that she is willing to stand up and respond to the left – particularly the media – should not be seen as a symptom of being thin-skinned or even petty, but rather a desire to keep the focus where it should be, on policy and Constitutional government.
So the reasons I love Sarah Palin are thus: She knows what it will take to put the country back on solid economic footing. She’s a rabid Constitutionalist who will reign in the federal government. She will let American interests and the interests of the American people dictate American foreign policy rather than looking to international bodies for direction. She understands the importance of free markets, free trade and energy independence. She believes in American exceptionalism, and perhaps most of all, she understands that individual responsibility is the cornerstone of upon which character, community and country are built. Without that everything else collapses.
2012 is going to be the most important election in more than a century. Our nation has been shaken to its very foundations by an onslaught of government encroachment and unprecedented fiscal irresponsibility. In times like these, when those basic fundamental things that made America great in the first place are the very things being undermined, we would be lucky to have a ticket headed by someone who truly understands what it’s like to live and thrive as an average American, someone who didn’t spend most of her adult life in the insulated and unrealistic universe of liberalism consisting of courtrooms, college classrooms and the corridors of power that make up Washington D.C.
See author page

Man are you in for a major, major disappointment. She won’t even be on the ticket. Her 15 minutes is about up.
Alas, Ivan: YOU are the one in for a disappointment. But by all means, please DO continue to underestimate her.
Well said Vince, well said!
Sarah Palin is the real deal, and will be the next President of the United States.
Palin/West 2012. Accept no substitutes.
I had not been active in politics for a long time-since my idiotic idealistic college years-but Sarah’s speech at the 2008 Republican Convention moved me like nothing else has. I spent all of my free time campaigning for HER (and mccain as needed) and have been active since. She has given me the hope that we can change things to what the USA needs to be-smaller government, less regulations, using our own energy sources, etc., etc. I believe in the same things she does and have come to hate the establishment rino Republicans we have so often been stuck with.
GO SARAH IN 2012!!!
Well written.As mentioned Sarah should get to Iowa and N.H ,take some hard interviews,enter debates with the likes of Gingrich and Romney, and see if she can emerge victorious from what will be a long,arduous ,contentious process.
I commend her call to action in Libya.
Sarah is REAL. That’s why I love her and will vote for her. Allen West is REAL. I am hoping he will be sarah’s vice president. These two are among the last true Americans we have in this country. I have faith that they will have the courage to turn us around. Most of the others have no guts! Palin has been through hell due to our state-run media. She is NOT afraid of them. she has been vetted. I’m still waiting for someone, anyone, from state-run media to vent obama.
Palin/West would be good….. and it has NOTHING to do with their sex or race. They are both conservatives but more, they are commited Americans and celebrate and embrace all that is inherently special about America and what about American culture is worth supporting and nuturing.
We need to stop and reverse the policies of the permissive left that has grown like a weed in our country since Wilson, and especially the sixties and seventies.
Dude, she is not going to have sex with you. Ever.
West/Romney
I hate armchair quarterbacks. Sarah and Newt should stick to calling out Obama’s blunders and let someone else deal with the scruntiny of running for Pres.
Besides, Hillary just might doom Odumbo in 2012.
She’s not a conservative, or I don’t know what one is.
Since when is supporting all these job-killing free-trade agreements and illegal immigration “conservative”? And I don’t hear her calling for an end to this unconstitutional war either.
With the Palin sycophants it’s opposite day every day.
She’s a stupid idiot who quit on the people of Alaska.
I love her as well, and hope that she becomes #45. She is not afraid to defend herself, OR attack the Punk. The only thing with which I disagree is about the Couric interview. The campaign allowed CBS SIX hours of tape over which the campaign had no control. THAT was stupid. They should have accepted nothing less than live, unedited airtime. YOU try spending a quarter of a day getting grilled by a moron without becoming exasperated!
I remember when the Republican Party bought Sarah 150k$ worth of clothing for the 08 campaign. The Obama in the tank media went nuts over it. Of course, Sarah was stunning. Now, in Chile, Moochelle, FLOTUS or flotilla for short, is modelling the blue shower curtain ensemble, which is “awe inspiring”. Tomorrow, she will model the collection of Omar the tent maker. Who’s paying the freight for this needless trip?
I’m voting for her.
*Ivan would never vote for a woman.
West is my first choice but I think its important to have a solder in the WH. The Obama cult disagrees with me though.
LOL! It’s really true that the left hates whomever they fear the most.
I’d think she’ll make a fine president. I dread the gauntlet of hate that the media will make her run, though.
Good for you Vince. Now, you have the megaphone so please spread this far and wide.
@Ivan: I think she respects America in general. Like President Reagan call it the “shining city on the hill”. This woman is what America will be again. Sorry that bothers you, but not really. Hehe.
She had me from “Hello” *** At the end of her convention speech, Sarah had 45 million plus. Sarah stands for you and I, this country and all that is right. Why did you not beat Obama ??? “I wasn’t on top of the ticket” (Love that answer) Is it time for a women President ??? How many women in this world, run this world **** How many women in this world run a successful business (Big or Small)
PALIN/WEST 2012 & 2016 Sarah to DRAIN the SWAMP and Allen to tell the world that there is a new SHERIFF in town and all you sheep-get ready for your first hair cut. VERY GOOD ARTICLE
I dunno about the gender approach to Palin defense, jersey. After all, it was three Dem women who suckered the WH into Libya as well.
Has nothing to do with gender. Has to do with quality of the candidate. I like Palin. Would vote for her over Obama in a heart beat. Then again, I’d vote for a dead frog over Obama.
And I’m way far away from Palin on Libya. But hey, no potential candidate is perfect. What are ya gonna do?
@jerseyflash: jersey, I saw this woman with McLame at John Knox Village in Excelsior Springs, Missoura in September of 2008. The crowd didn’t even respond until our “Sarah” entered. It is a sight I will remember always. She has the ability to guide our country back to greatness. Pray for her.
Mata I’m thinking Kermit might actually fare well in the cold of Iowa and N.H especially when you consider the competition.
Be careful of what you say, rich wheeler. The ultimate competition is Obama, who has nothing going for him save a clear front runner in the opposition party. Doesn’t speak much of him and his performance.
But personally, I’d laugh my ass off if the nation elected a dead Kermit over Obama. Frankly, on the paths he’s determined to go, both domestic/fiscally and foreign policy, and it ain’t that far fetched.
But then, you have to remember, as a progressive, your opinions of GOP or conservative (two different critters) candidates is pretty much last week’s garbage. Put more simply, who the hell cares what you think?
I’d vote for kermit except that
NPR seem to be his only campaign contributor. And we all know what that means.
@MataHarley: Why are you comparing voting for O vs Sarah to a dead frog? You are correct that it has nothing to do with gender. It does have to do with what is best for America’s freedom. There is a big difference.
Lighten up, KansasGirl. The point is 2012 will come down to “anyone but Obama” votes by conservatives and the fiscally conscious American voter.
Oh yes… thank you for that “dislike” vote. I do so love to collect those FA instant polls numbers … most especially the “dislikes”. LOL
Mata Ouch Talk about lightening up.
btw I love collecting those dislike votes though I did get 18 like votes on #5.Must be Sarah’s Libyan support.
rich, are you hypersensitive now? The guy who calls me everything from “confused babe” to “crass intellect”? Come on, now. Why on earth would any GOPer or conservative give a whit about who you think would be an opposition candidate? Or is that too simplistic a theory for you?
We simply don’t care. Opine all you want. 1st Amendment and all that. But you’re not new here. Your opinions, as an admitted and proud progressive, about 2012 candidates will be filed exactly where they should be filed. In the trash.
yeah… scary, eh? LOL I like the “dislikes” too. Makes you sure you’re shaking up the echo chamber brain cells.
I may be able to get a few more of those “dislikes” with this … Palin *really* disappoints me with her Libyan stance. Talk about falling for the “humanitarian” media and political hype… I would expect better from anyone wanting to be CiC before they commit our military to action. What’s the reasoning? Is this “humanitarian”? Is this revenge for Lockerbie and Berlin? If so, what are the new boundaries and guidelines for such revenge?
I stand at the ready when the words have left her lips and she tells me it is time. It is by her calendar not mine in which she moves and sets the game in motion. I will not dictate to her what I think she should do at this juncture. She has my vote when SHE is ready for me to pull the lever. I will campaign for her. I have never been so wrapped up in politics until the very world I lived in was shaken to the core of the Obama drumbeat. I dread the days until election time. I have no doubt she will run. And it will be as she has planned it. I don’t have to wonder where she stands on the issues. She stands with me and everyone else who believes in the goodness of this great country. I know more about the players in politics than I know about the players in sports these days. I want my country back, and I know she understands how to do that very thing. So just as everyone is demanding she make a decision, I’m going to sit back patiently and wait for HER.
I’ll pledge you this, Paula… you get her on the ballot as the nominee, and you’ll have my vote.
@Paula: God bless you Paula. We might be twins, separated at birth. I feel EXACTLY the same way!
Mata Pretty sure I didn’t call you a crass babe or confused intellect. As you know I have sent MANY complements your way.
Semper Fi to my 2nd favorite Navy wife My mom is 1st.
Actually, you did, rich. Years ago back when you first started coming to FA. Happened to run across it in the archives, and laughed. ah… time. The consummate healer of all things controversial. No biggie. It was to give you a smile, not make a judgment call. LOL
Sarah didn’t disappoint me with her stance on Libya. She was way in front of everyone else (Feb. 23 for the record) with proposing that America stop Gadaffi from killing his own citizens. Maybe it’s none of our business, but I think it’s a guy thing – John Wayne and all that. Chivalry is not dead among the male sex (girly men on the left excepted). Real men are genetically unable to stand by and watch as the wife of a neighbor is beaten by her husband every night. Even if the conventional wisdom is that “it’s not their concern”.
It’s a moral question, as well as a practical question.
It’s my belief that America has the moral right – but not the obligation – to intervene wherever individual rights are being violated.
So we go to Yemen next, John Cooper? Then Somalia? Tunesia? Rwanda’s way overdue, don’t you think? Or should we head into Iran first? Wait… maybe we should go to Saudia Arabia first… After all we do have a base there. That ought to be a snap, right?
Ah, the clusterf*#k you create when you start making foreign policy/military decisions on “moral right”.
BTW, John Cooper. I want to pose a question to you, and many others here. And please consider it carefully before you respond.
If a segment of US citizens… be they unions, gangs, whatever… decided to go on a rampage and demand the immediate removal of Obama, destruction of the US Constitution, damage buildings, set fires, and generally cause chaos in the streets for the rest of the citizens – i.e. attempt at revolution – what action do you propose US law enforcement authorities take? And why?
Then, when you’re finished envisioning it as the SEIU and AFL/CIO, substitute militia/minutemen… the opposite political spectrum. In other words, leave out your agreement/disagreement with the political agenda.
Mata I”ve only been here about a year.Bugged the guys at ‘This Ain’t Hell” before that.If I said it, it is officially retracted.
@MataHarley: @MataHarley: I’m tired of having to lighten up, but I will no longer question your wisdom. LOL
KansasGirl, never stop trying to lighten up. Listening to news 24/7/365, and being oppressed by the seriousness of it all, will make you miss the simple joys in life. In the scheme of it all, we are but passing thru a moment in time. Generations behind us will adapt, or fight, as they see fit.
But nothing compares to the touch of loved ones, the shared comraderie of friends, the delight of great company and fabulous food, and the celebration of at least one smile a day.
Lose that, and you’ve lost all that is worth fighting for.
John Cooper HEAR HEAR
Mata–
Clearly, America doesn’t have the power to right all wrongs. All I’m saying is that America – the first and only country founded upon the concept of individual rights – has the moral right to oppose tyranny wherever it rears it’s ugly head. It’s not an obligation.
I think we should do what we can to further liberty, wherever and whenever we can. Sometimes, just speaking out would be enough.
Does that make me a neo-con or something?
Naw, John Cooper. Just a conservative dreamer. And no one I’d vote for as POTUS or for a Congressional seat. LOL
Nothing wrong with the emotion and desire. Just the implementation in the real world.
Excellent post. Love to see Ms. Palin in WH in 2013.
Sarah will have the last laugh in 2012.
Mata–
It’s a good question, but it’s past my bedtime. I’ll try and put together a worthy answer tomorrow.
P.S. I’ve read American Apocalypse, which is a treatise on the very same question.
@MataHarley: You tell us Mata, you’ve got it all figured out. LOL
Everyone has their opinions, KansasGirl. But this is a tough one for all of us to consider and may, in fact, be a decision in our future. Who knows. My own wisdom is not found in what I know, but in recognizing what I do *not* know, and learning more to remedy that flaw as much as possible.
@MataHarley: If you tell me one more time to lighten up I think I’ll barf. We can no longer question when society will break down, but when it happens. Me and mine are three hours away from the “hills and hollows” of the Ozarks. There is an abundance of deer, turkey, ducks and fish to sustain us. I will say a prayer for your people.
I believe the Arab League initiated a PR campaign to bring France, England and the US in because they are winning ground on the islamic fight? Islamists have lost the Mosque in NYC, for now. They have bad-mouthed the English military coming home by spitting on them in the streets. And France banned the burqa. This is a strategy to make Qaddafi to look like a victim. He will come out of this with a stronger front from both Arabs and Muslims. And Russia and China will stand with them because they need the oil. BP could lose their contract regardless that they got Magrahi back from Scotland!!!!!
@MataHarley: So Mata, basically you’re saying you don’t trust your instinct. I wouldn’t consider that a good virtue.
Pray tell, KansasGirl, from what do you derive my distrust of my own instincts?
BTW, my comment about you “lightening up” was your rush to defense of Palin and slam at me, as if I didn’t like her. Perhaps you may want to revisit the Palin archives in the right frames. I might add that your instincts about me are totally incorrect. Not that I care.
@rich wheeler @MataHarley:: Yup, he’s right. First comment in Jan of 2010 with this winner :
@Curt, got the phrases right in memory, but not the timing. A little over a year ago.
Here’s where I’m a “confused babe”, plus “crass stupidity”. Jan 23rd…
Like I said, was just something I ran across when I was searching archives for something else, and it made me laugh.
My goldfish has wiser things to say than Sarah Palin — and he doesn’t talk! (that should tell you something…)
I think Sarah will be much more effective in supporting other people. Look how those she supported did in the last elections. I would vote for her if she was nominated!
Can’t disagree with anything you say, Randy. In fact, I think she’d be a stellar WH staffer. Personally, I’d vote for press secretary. Lordy that would be a ball.. watching her torture the WH press corps (or would that be “corpse” in O’speak?) daily. That’s worth the price of admission.
Any number of cabinet appointments would also be right up her alley. The one which comes instantly to mind is Dept of Energy.
But, as I told Paula… if she’s the nominee, she’s got my vote. Anyone other than Obama has my vote.
VINCE very well said for SARAH PALIN, HOPE FOR THE BEST,
and SHE HAS PICKED UP LOTS OF POINTS AND ENERGY TO WITSTAND A TSUMANI,
THANK YOU,
I think department of the interior would do well for her. We are losinng access to our public lands by making them wilderness. That means we can not even remove the beetle killed pines that are all over Colorado. She has a nack for common sense approaches to complex problems. Maybe others just make them into complex problems!
I see many Palin supporters here chastise Obama for his illegal war (when did Libya attack us?), yet never a mention of her support for the war.
She’s an internationalist, not an American first.
Ivan, I think you already see that Palin and I are not on the same page when it comes to Libya. Nor am I the only one on this forum that holds the view that this is a mistake. And this is a conservative forum in it’s base.
However that single issue doesn’t, IMHO, classify her as an “internationalist”. I have a staunch conservative friend with whom I argue constantly on Iraq (he opposed, I supported) and now Libya (he supports, I oppose). He sees no rhyme nor reason in my opinion, and vice versa. Neither of us holds any illusions the other is a “moderate” or one world gov’t type.
I easily separate Iraq because I’m more familiar with the intel, and the subsequent backing up of that intel with the ISG/Harmony documents, confiscated after the deposing of Saddam. He doesn’t believe Saddam had any involvement in 1993 Somalia, nor that he had a history with Zawahiri and turned a blind eye to terrorist groups harbored in his borders… all which, IMHO, warranted US intervention. Nothing new there with many.
INRE Libya, I’m no fan of Qadaffi/Gaddafi. But then I’m not buying into the “humanitarian” bit since that’s an open ended deal. There’s definitely an undercurrent of hidden agenda here… whether by the UN, the Arab League, or even the coalition.
Nor do I swallow the “quest for democracy” bit either, as my post about being duped/”had” by the Arab League states.
But my friend has an argument that holds water with some conservatives… i.e. the Lockerbie and Berlin bombings. Both were attacks against US citizens directly. As he puts it, if we don’t have good reason to take out Qaddafi after these assaults.. no matter how long ago… who does? Additionally, you could have knocked me over with a feather when he announced he thought Obama “played it well”, getting France, Britain and the UN to almost beg him for no fly support. And this guy is no fan of Obama’s.
My point is that, at this time, perception is all over the place on support and viability… in both parties. Certainly Qaddafi’s assault on US citizens holds more sway in persuasion than the “humanitarian” crap passing thru the media now as an excuse. But, again in my opinion (and apparently yours), neither of these events warrants a no fly zone that is not so cleverly disguised as regime change, and is really quiet support for a rebellion of questionable intent.
As for Palin’s personal reasons for support, I’m not really sure. I do know that, according to a Palin support site, she said:
I find this particular part of Palin foreign policy flawed. Qaddafi has already harmed the hairs on American heads in the past, but not necessarily in this current rebellion. Secondly, INRE the “41 years of Gaddafi, he’s got to go” bit – no fly zones, historically, are expensive, and ineffective for regime change, as Saddam showed us in Iraq. Saddam was only shown the door after we put boots on the ground. Were Palin a true internationalist, she’d be prepared to back up the no fly verbally with ground assault. That isn’t the case.
While none of this may change your assertion that Palin is an “internationalist”, it will bring to light that even conservatives disagree… for varying reasons… on US involvement in Libya. And that nuance of difference, mostly based on Qaddafi’s documented assault on US citizens, doesn’t shove her into the obvious position of “internationalist”.
ummm…. Wasn’t Joe Miller a tea party candidate that Palin (in her home state) endorsed and supported, and was beaten by the “defeated Murkowski machine” ?
Yes, blast… that is an error in electoral history. Then again, Palin endorsed 64 candidates in 2010.
10 lost the primary, and 54 advanced to the primary elections.
Of those that advanced, 61.1% won their elections. Even including the 10 who didn’t survive the primary, there was a 51.6% success rate. No record of endorsement by one who the media considers passe to be sneezed at.
Mata,
Are you for her support for illegals having access to US citizenship via the dream act? I assume she is a free trader (she never says she isn’t). Do you support the policy of free trade? Or TARP. Were you in favor of TARP? She was.
My disdain for the woman isn’t limited to one issue, it’s limited to a few critical issues. I don’t think we need another George W. Bush and I know she would just pick up where he left off.
Yvan, keep in mind that there where multiple insinuations said about her in some MEDIASfavoring the DEMS just to discredit her at many levels, I’m sure if she commit to runn for election, she would give her speech straight forward to the people, one thing we’r sure is her and ALLEN WEST ARE NOT LYERS,
so that would be good for you to wait till she show her cards at this time,