More from the Anti-American Film Festival

Loading

And the fun from the Venice Film Festival continues….

Here’s Paul Haggis on his film, "In the Valley of Elah" (based upon a Playboy article, "Death and Dishonor", by Mark Boal, regarding the stabbing death of a soldier by his fellow soldiers):

Haggis said he had tried not to allow his personal opinion about the war in Iraq to influence "Elah" too heavily.

"We set about to make a political film certainly, but not a partisan film," he told a news conference in Venice, where the film has its world premiere on Saturday.

Um…yeah….kind of like how Bill Moyers, Dan Rather, and Helen Thomas don’t let their personal feelings color their journalistic reporting.

"When we started on this project, our president had an 80 percent approval rating, everyone was driving around with flags on their cars and our president was telling us that it was unpatriotic to even question what was happening in Iraq.

Can someone please, please, tell me where has President Bush ever told his critics that it is unpatriotic to question "what was happening in Iraq"? This is another one of those strawman talking points that BDS sufferers like to make. As Scott Malensek recently remarked,

When the President reaffirmed time and again that there was no intelligence connecting Saddam to the 911 attacks, his opponents still claimed he was misleading and connecting the two unjustly. When the President repeatedly said that the expected vast stockpiles of WMD were not found, his opponents chose to continue their “Bush Lied” rantings rather than reply with similar “grace and humility.”

This movie has Charlize Theron and Susan Surandon.  Of course, the star is Tommy Lee Jones (who, incidentally, if you were wondering whether or not he was as politically cuckoo to the left as his co-stars, maybe not; but having contributed 10,000 to the Kerry campaign in 2004, I’d say it’s a safe bet he’s politically in alignment with the film’s message).

Theron said U.S. troops in Iraq were doing a "serious and important" job, but added: "I’d like to see them come home, to be looked after, be nurtured, and nothing would give me more joy than to see them here back in America."

Oh? It wouldn’t have anything to do with her feelings that the troops in Iraq are part of an "unjust war", would it? Naaaaah….perish the thought. And don’t even think she is anti-American for expressing anti-American opinions. Funny how she said "there’s a lack of freedom in America" and affirmed a parallel between the lack of freedom in Cuba with the U.S., when she’s making multi-million dollar salaries on anti-American films (and yes, I do consider this another anti-American film- not just a protest film, critical of the war).

The Reuters piece concludes

In the case of Iraq and Afghanistan, at least six films on the topic are due out soon as the operations continue.

Haggis, whose 2005 film "Crash" was an Oscar for best picture, said this was partly because journalists were failing.

"During the Vietnam war, we had terrific journalists doing their job, reporting on things that we didn’t want to hear … Now we don’t have that. I think that when that doesn’t happen, then it’s the responsibility of the artist to ask those difficult questions."

Good grief!

0 0 votes
Article Rating
5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I gotta wonder if these people will protest against President Bush when:

President Obama continues to keep US forces in Iraq
President Clinton bombs Iran
President Edwards raises troop levels in Iraq (surge II) to quell violence

Take away the Bush Deragement Syndrome from the left, and the anti-war movement collapses. People will still be “against” the war (as if there are people out there going, “WOOHOOO!!!! KILL EM ALL!!!!”), but without Bush hate as a binding agent, the anti-war movement instantly decays into nothing but common, every day American frustration with war-any war.

It’s odd to me that with the President a lame duck, and with a Democratic Party controlled Congress, there are still more protests against President Bush than there are against the Democratic Party controlled Congress. Could it be (jaw drop) that the crux of the opposition to the war for so many is opposition to the President? If they really wanted to end the war, they’d protest against Congress more with signs that said, “Give Bush Anything, just bring the troops home.”

But that won’t happen for the same reason they all of a sudden aren’t demanding impeachment like they used to. They want their agenda. They want their agenda: first, foremost, and finally.

So it is that the left gets nothing. They won’t let their anti-leaders (Reid, Pelosi, others) trade agenda for a premature evacuation, and they themselves won’t be silent as the Democrats’ Congress loses all power.

18% approval ratings
3% approval for handling of the Iraq War
support for the decision to invade rising
support for the war rising (56% and going up now)
support for withdrawal at any cost (Dem’s new direction plan) falling

Yep, the Democrats’ Congress has actually managed to do a worse job leading than President Bush. Amazing. At this point they’d do better to let James Traficant out of jail and make him speaker (yes, he was MY former congressman-jailed for bribes, ran from jail).

“I gotta wonder if these people will protest against President Bush when:

President Obama continues to keep US forces in Iraq
President Clinton bombs Iran
President Edwards raises troop levels in Iraq (surge II) to quell violence”

Scott: When Bush is long gone, Dems will still be blaming him for whatever a Democrat President has to do that they don’t like. Hell, they blamed Bush for the Intell that Democrats used to make their statements on WMD’s in Iraq when Bush was still GOVERNOR of Texas!

Hate Bush is all these people have. Why anyone should care what the likes of the Hollywood “luminaries” spew on the media escapes me since the general education level of these ‘tards is less than GED.

Hey Curt, Semper Fi, bro.

USMC 1967-71 Viet Nam 1968-69 Ugly Angels HMM362
Now in The Town of the Cow, Texas

Ooorah

Tommy lee Jones is a pretty great actor in my book. I think he was also roommate with Al Gore back in some college Gore was flunking out of, fwiw.

Tommy Lee Jones doesn’t bother me, because to my knowledge, he is not a Hollywood political activist using his celebrityhood as a platform to bloviate from.