by Sharyl Attkisson
Each time a news reporter, media commentator, or judge refers to Trump as an “insurrectionist,” or claims he’s guilty of “insurrection,” it’s another blatant case of defamation. Same with the other January 6 attendees and participants.
Insurrection is a serious federal crime punishable by up to ten years in prison under Title 18 U.S. Code 2383. Even with Trump’s enemies in charge at the Department of Justice and other law enforcement bodies, and with all of the scheming and operations they’ve mounted against him, nobody has convicted him of “insurrection.” Under our system of governing, no judge or election authority has the power to unilaterally accuse and convict any American of a crime, let alone with the accused denied any opportunity to present a defense or to appeal. Yet that’s just what’s happening when courts and officials in Maine and Colorado remove Trump from presidential election primary ballots for “insurrection.” It’s the ultimate defamation. And many are supporting it because, well, they don’t like Trump.
Looking at the evidence today, it is reasonable to hypotheisize that, among all the other consipracies Trump’s enemies have proven to devise, they also conspired in advance to set up his January 6, 2021 rally as an “insurrection” that could serve as their insurance policy to provide grounds to keep him from ever running for president again.
Such hypotheses might have once far-fetched, but no more. Let’s not forget that then-FBI agent Peter Strzok and his alleged lover, FBI attorney Lisa Page, texted each other in 2016 that they could not permit Trump to be elected president. According to their messages, discussions about the threat of a Trump presidency had taken place with the FBI’s then-assistant director, Andrew “Andy” McCabe. “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office – that there’s no way [Trump] gets elected,” texted Page, “but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before 40.”
The theory that Trump’s enemies set the stage for January 6 to be called “an insurrection” as a spoiler for his 2024 run could help explain why all of the law enforcement agents and informants planted in advance and among Trump supporters on January 6 didn’t serve their usual purpose of preventing crimes and de-escalating events. Instead, by many accounts, they observed and even took part, let crimes happen, and declined to separate the instigators and organizers as they would ordinarily do to defuse tensions and control the crowd. The agents and informants served the odd role of standing down during the event, and identifying alleged perpetrators after-the-fact.
Yet, in the end, there was no insurrection – at least according to prosecutors, who would be the ones to charge such crimes and haven’t.
And Trump helped destroy the chance to officially charge him with insurrection by specifically directing his followers that day to “peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”
Trump’s opponents, found in both the Democrat and Republican ranks, are so delighted to see him persecuted, they are so utterly threatened by a repeat performance of a Trump presidency outside the traditional power and money interests, they are encouraging of the defamation and other acts against him. With few exceptions, like Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., those who would normally criticize actions like the ones being mounted against Trump, remain silent for fear of being called a Trump supporter in an environment where that opens them to ostracization and worse. The media and those who control our information are so conflicted by their respective biases, nobody is left to stop the madness.
The real meaning of what’s being done to Trump is: They think he’s going to win.
He’s like Christmas and his enemies are like The Grinch.
Despite the impeachments, improper wiretapping, censorship, intel agency conspiracies, criminal charges, civil lawsuits, and turncoats operating against him on the inside – Trump’s popularity increased.
They haven’t stopped Trump from coming to the fore in 2024. He came! He came without Twitter. He came without Facebook. He came without Snapchat or Discord or Stripe. Somehow or other, he came just the same!
Pulling Trump off ballots is the establishment’s latest attempt to censor a candidate that they clearly believe will win – if the people are left to decide. We’ve reached a dangerous and scary point when so many are willing to look the other way because their preferred candidate isn’t the one under attack.
To end where we began – Trump potentially has actionable defamation claims against all those who continue label him an insurrectionist.
That includes judges on the Colorado Supreme Court and Maine’s Secretary of State Shenna Bellows.
But it’s likely not a battle he could win. The 2024 race? That’s another matter.
[wptelegram-login button_style=”large” show_user_photo=”1″ corner_radius=”15″]LINK
It isn’t that “they think he’s going to win,” but that they KNOW he’s going to win beyond the realm of reasonable cheating to switch his win into a loss.
If even 1/4th their lawfare charges were used against them they would all be out of office.
If every dem who encouraged this palestinian rioting, congressional office takeovers, commuter impinging (gluing themselves down, taking over train stations, etc.) were charged like Trump has been, our courts would be full.
Hell, if we didn’t have a DoJ run by the DNC that serves only the DNC, the Democrat National Convention would have to be held in a prison.
Trump has been the target of every unconstitutional attack the left can dream up, yet he is accused of being the wannabe dictator. We already have a dictator and a dictatorship and it will be up to Trump to reverse this.
Revoke the Citizenship of George Sors Evict the United Nations, CFR, Globalists Investigate Gates and Microsoft closed the Borders return all illegal aliens arrest all those involved in this witch hunt pull America out of the United Nations and move the whole rotten lot to Moscow or Bejing
The effort to disenfranchise millions of voters by preventing President Trump the opportunity to appear on any primary ballot along with any general election ballot in any state is a fools errand. The use of section 3 of the 14th Amendment, though not applicable given he has not been charged or convicted of insurrection, 18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu)renders any democrat political operatives attempt by the state in which they have jurisdiction, null and void of constitutionality.
Sates can rule all day on the basis of their interpretation of section 3 of the 14th Amendment but at the end of the day their rulings do not amount to a hill of beans. Those who adopt this approach with the belief that it is just, just legal definition – Search (bing.com) are irrational and stupid people.
Virginia Federal Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Intended to Keep Donald Trump from Virginia Ballot
Dems cite the 14th Amendment, Section 3: no one who “shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion…” However, Section 5 states: “The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.” Thus, these states’ attempts to keep Trump off the ballot violate the very amendment they (falsely) claim to uphold.
Desperate Democrats don’t care about how preposterous their attempts to prop corrupt Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden up and compensate for Democrat failures are. They have no other options.
The Planriffs should be made to pay back double the original lawsuit to the defendant fee
Fine them like Rudy and Alex.
Happy New Year
So you are implying Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden has two terms to go?
If you people are to taken at your word, Trump has already been elected twice. You’ve been very emphatic.
He wasn’t sworn in twice. AWWWW…. weak attempt dunked on and embarrassed.
It doesn’t say anything about being sworn in. It specifically reads, “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.”
According to you, he was elected twice. Ah, Constitutional literalism: sometimes it comes around and bites you in the ass.
This is no more absurd than the whole “he was acquitted in his impeachment, so charging him criminally is double jeopardy” argument that I’ve seen here several times.
At what point do they become elected? Eh, scooter? Isn’t it when Congress certifies the election? Now, how many times what Trump certified the winner? Has there ever been a President that wasn’t sworn in? What say, scooter?
Impeachments for crimes that never happened don’t have much bearing on anything anyway. But, you leftists don’t want to be restrained by facts or truth.