The Cold Truth About Climate Change

Loading

by The Naked Emperor

I wrote about Martin Durkin’s documentary “The Great Global Warming Swindle”, last month. The film was produced in 2007 and was even allowed to be shown on Channel 4! The shock…the horror!

Clearly that is not allowed to happen in this day and age. How things have changed in less than 20 years!

Durkin has recently released the sequel to his first film – “Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth)”.

It’s a great, informative watch. Professionally produced and full of facts and figures from top scientists. Perfect to show your normie friends for some explosive dinner time discussion!

“This film exposes the climate alarm as an invented scare without any basis in science. It shows that mainstream studies and official data do not support the claim that we are witnessing an increase in extreme weather events – hurricanes, droughts, heatwaves, wildfires and all the rest. It emphatically counters the claim that current temperatures and levels of atmospheric CO2 are unusually and worryingly high. On the contrary, compared to the last half billion years of earth’s history, both current temperatures and CO2 levels are extremely and unusually low. We are currently in an ice age. It also shows that there is no evidence that changing levels of CO2 (it has changed many times) has ever ‘driven’ climate change in the past.

Why then, are we told, again and again, that ‘catastrophic man-made climate-change’ is an irrefutable fact? Why are we told that there is no evidence that contradicts it? Why are we told that anyone who questions ‘climate chaos’ is a ‘flat-earther’ and a ‘science-denier’?

The film explores the nature of the consensus behind climate change. It describes the origins of the climate funding bandwagon, and the rise of the trillion-dollar climate industry. It describes the hundreds of thousands of jobs that depend on the climate crisis. It explains the enormous pressure on scientists and others not to question the climate alarm: the withdrawal of funds, rejection by science journals, social ostracism.

But the climate alarm is much more than a funding and jobs bandwagon. The film explores the politics of climate. From the beginning, the climate scare was political. The culprit was free-market industrial capitalism. The solution was higher taxes and more regulation. From the start, the climate alarm appealed to, and has been adopted and promoted by, those groups who favour bigger government.

This is the unspoken political divide behind the climate alarm. The climate scare appeals especially to all those in the sprawling publicly-funded establishment. This includes the largely publicly-funded Western intelligentsia, for whom climate has become a moral cause. In these circles, to criticise or question the climate alarm has become is a breach of social etiquette.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
99 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The climate cultists claim that man can harness the weather by taxing the bejesus out of every American. This tornado came through my neighborhood 2 weeks ago missing my homestead by 10-15 miles. It was an EP3. Man is not destroying the planet and man can not control the weather.

What an incredible video!
You’re right that no man made effort can control this.
Nothing man made could have prevented it either.
All those taxes do is simply pay the alarmists to scream at the taxpayers for more.

What if Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden tells a tornado, “DON’T! Just DON’T!”?

A hailstorm went and destroyed a a whole bunch of Solar Panels which is good for the Birds

The climate cult is control. That’s all.

Greenland losing 30m tonnes of ice an hour, study reveals – Total is 20% higher than thought and may have implications for collapse of globally important north Atlantic ocean currents

Last edited 23 days ago by Greg

LIES LIES LIES

The first day of spring is Tuesday, March 19, 2024, at 11:06 p.m. EDT. For those of us in the Northern Hemisphere, this was marked by the arrival of the Vernal Equinox (otherwise known as the “First Point of Aries “). Traditionally, we celebrate the first day of spring on March 21.

Greenland, like all the rest of the Northern Hemisphere, enjoys spring.
The ice melts.
It’s great.

From NASA: Climate Change – How Do We Know Climate Change is Real? – There is unequivocal evidence that Earth is warming at an unprecedented rate. Human activity is the principal cause.

The lefts religion. If it is settled science why a trillion a year spent?

Antarctic sea ice is “behaving strangely” and might have entered a “new regime”, the director of the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre … For December overall, 2023 saw the third-highest monthly gain on record, with 2.71m km2 of sea ice extent added throughout the month.
Peddle your cultist religion elsewhere.

The Garbage-Can(Gaurdian)like the New York Slimes(Times)is a very poor source of real news just like most of the leftists propaganda and your the type of Sucker P.T Barnum was talking about

Holy smokes!
I dont want one of these in my garage.

Last edited 23 days ago by kitt

What about NASA? Everything they’re saying is also a lie?

The writing is on the wall, but a major propaganda campaign has been conducted to discredit the message and all of the messengers.

That hasn’t changed what’s written.

NASA, like every other government agency, has become a servant of the DNC.

There is an overall upward trend since data collection began. Global monthly average concentrations of carbon dioxide have risen steadily from 337 parts per million in 1979 (averaged over the year) to 417 parts per million in 2022, an increase of more than 20% in 44 years.

Carbon dioxide is, in fact, a greenhouse gas. Global temperatures have been rising as atmospheric CO2 levels have risen. THIS IS AN ESTABLISHED FACT.

Then why is China and India given a complete pass on their emissions and all the climate zealots travel the world in private jets and yachts? Something doesn’t quite add up and THAT is an established fact.

Global temperatures have NOT been rising.

The website Watts Up With That has been tracking NASA’s lies about weather for years, greg.
Where have you been?
They have been behind the moving of temperature data collectors being moved into “heat sinks.”
The definition of where a data collector should be is AWAY from any un-natural source of heat, like in a paved parking lot, on a rooftop, by an exhaust fan, etc.
And yet, that is where lots of them are nowadays.
All to skew the data to fool people like you.

NASA says if you eat bugs the weather will be gooder. 99% of Nasa scientists dont want to be defunded thats a consensus.
The ones funding them layed off at the Jet Propulsion labratory. Let them stop geo engineering.

What is Geoengineering?

https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/local/2024/03/20/tennessee-senate-passes-bill-banning-chemtrails-what-to-know/73027586007/
Fuck Bill Gates and his dimming the sun brain fart.

Last edited 23 days ago by kitt

Your still aa total Moron still rely upon the M.S Media for your news

Where, specifically, do you get your news?

Not from the three major news networks and CNN. Rosebud

Are you reluctant to to say what you do use for sources?

Planet 4 billion years old, Temperature data >200 years old. CO2 not a pollutant vital for life on the planet. Climate gurus batting zero on predictions of gloom. Still have polar bears and glaciers.
No country has ever survived food riots, why are they engineering them by attacking farmers and ranchers?
https://www.opb.org/article/2024/03/13/oregon-enforces-water-rights-small-farmers-feel-consequences/

CO2 not a pollutant vital for life on the planet.

Why can’t you get through your skull that just because something is good when present in one amount, it doesn’t mean that it’s good at every amount?

Carbon dioxide is necessary for plants to live—and thus necessary for our survival—but it doesn’t mean that you want to be locked in a room filled with nothing but carbon dioxide—not even if you had a potted begonia in there with you.

Sunlight is necessary for life, but neither you nor your begonia would survive being dropped directly into the sun.

Water is necessary for life, but you wouldn’t live very long if I held your head under water in the bathtub.

All true, but CO2 is not currently causing climate change.

The majority of scientists disagree with you.

Even if they didn’t, endlessly dumping more and more carbon dioxide than vegetation can process leads to its own problems—and it’s worse if we continue to eliminate vegetation the way we are.

Last edited 22 days ago by Michael

As we continue to see, the “scientists” are more driven by ideology or a lust for funding than a search for scientific truth. I was once a believer, until the East Anglia emails were leaked. Since then, I study the data and find, without exception, that the “scientists” manipulate their data to fit their desired outcome.

I’ve also read studies of observations of warming/climate change on other planets, far away from SUV’s or gas stoves. But there are no explanations for the repeated predictions of doom (always 10 years off) that never come to pass but are simply recycled without comment.

Actually the scientists know what’s going on, while you’re driven by disinformation and propaganda. That’s a fact, Jack.

You have zero real scientists, just grant whores.

Who’s paying your climate-change denialists to spread disinformation? Every damn one of them has corporate sponsorship from industries with obvious ulterior motives.

Last edited 22 days ago by Greg

Really?
Dude Blackrock is spreading the woke climate social justice cult religion ESG, DEI generally everything then turns to shit.
Do post your evidence of the idiots conspiracy.

Last edited 22 days ago by kitt

Climate change promoters are a cult.

I don’t think the right and the left are on the same page.

Stupid cartoon memes vs. reality…

How liberals like to make their pets look Ridiculous

Is that why they always skew, manipulate and lie about their findings?

Because your skull is do full of mush your Brain is melting from way too many Fake News Programs and phony Save the Earth Campaigns just like the Save the Rain Forest scam back in the 1990’s

What about saving the rain forest is a scam?

comment image

Are you saying that the very fact that scientists received grants for studying a topic makes that topic a scam?

The continued funding depends on desired results.
Im also saying “settled science” is pseudo voodoo bullshit, anti science. If it was settled, why continue to fund it and not real solutions.

Last edited 22 days ago by kitt

If it was settled, why continue to fund it and not real solutions.

Learning more about the problem likely brings a potential solution closer. That’s generally how science works.

Also: people are trying to implement real solutions like alternative energy, but you people are fighting that, too.



Toxic lightbulbs, toxic batteries, toxic solarpanels wind power blades burried in landfills. No solutions just future toxic issues.
Plastic shopping bags were suppose to be great for the environment not long ago.
What alternatives are viable earth friendly or even modern?

World’s oldest windmills may stop in Nashtifan, Iran

https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/thousands-of-solar-panels-in-texas-destroyed-by-hailstorm/ar-BB1kzCS2

Pseudo science, because science is never settled you promote science whores.

Wind turbine blades can, in fact, be recycled.

“‘Windmill blades can be recycled,’ Karl Englund, CTO of Global Fiberglass Solutions and associate research professor at Washington State University, told USA TODAY. ‘We have proven that over and over again.’

“Englund has published multiple papers documenting his wind turbine blade recycling successes.”

Source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/11/30/fact-check-recycling-can-keep-wind-turbine-blades-out-landfills/8647981002/

I would bury them standing upright along our border where the wall hasn’t been built yet.

Last edited 22 days ago by Just Plain Bill

If it’s actually a problem, why do the climate zealots continue to lie about it?

Stupid cartoon memes vs. reality…

And the reality is? Big bucks for Manipulation of data fake narratives and fear mongering for decades. Very little money for engineering solutions.
I post the memes to irritate you, works like a charm, especially if they meme truth.
Hey look your place is about 1/2 way to Mikeys

We are headed to Mikeys house ROAD TRIP.
comment image

And none of those things are ever going to happen. Why are you afraid of the greening of the planet? CO2 levels in past were much higher than today As a point of reference, pre-industrial CO2 levels were around 280 parts per million (ppm) and today, we stand near 420 ppm. The most distant period in time for which we have estimated CO2 levels is around the Ordovician period, 500 million years ago. At the time, atmospheric CO2 concentration was at a whopping 3000 to 9000 ppm! Ocean Life thrived Plants appeared.
CO2 is not poisonous; as a gas, CO2 itself will not hurt you. This is an important fact to remember, as carbon dioxide is a vital part of the environment. The human breathing mechanism actual revolves around CO2, not oxygen. Without carbon dioxide, humans wouldn’t be able to breathe. 
Id worry more about removing plants for toxic solar panel fields.

One of the web sites from which you copied your comment without attribution is for a company with a mission of reducing carbon in buildings because it is dangerous.

From the same page:

Is carbon dioxide harmful to people?

Short Answer: Yes. At certain concentrations, CO2 can harm you.

Long Answer: Yes, but it is far more complicated. CO2 is not poisonous, and it’s even necessary for life on Earth. We used to think that CO2 could only harm people at unrealistic concentrations, but this answer has started to change. [Italic emphasis added]

The other one of the web sites from which you copied your answer without attribution specifically says—on the same page from which you took your quote, mind you—that

The time lag between CO2 emission and their pollution and warming effect is around 50 years, and whatever changes we observe now are only the tip of the iceberg. 

Looking back at the 2 extra degrees of warmth last time CO2 levels were this high (Pliocene era, 3 million years ago), should be enough of a call to action considering the damage two more degrees would cause today.

I could easily tell that the writing was not yours because it wasn’t semi-literate.

You plagiarized your comment, and you plagiarized from two sites that are making points diametrically opposed to the points you portray them as making, and which negate your own argument.

Classic kitt!

Last edited 22 days ago by Michael

Did you happen to notice what the “dangerous concentrations” were? Anything like what we encounter in the atmosphere?

Moron I search, find and present which is much more than you are capable of.

Last edited 22 days ago by kitt

There’s no “darkened text” in your comment, and clicking does nothing.

different browser

So there is weather change inside buildings? No it is science dear poorly ventilated buildings and cruise ships cause disease not the CO2. Mold dust and grunge in the climate control systems. For morons like you heating and airconditioning systems.
https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-08/documents/sick_building_factsheet.pdf

So there is weather change inside buildings? No it is science dear poorly ventilated buildings and cruise ships cause disease not the CO2.

You’re the only one who is mentioning disease.

Ok no the glaciers in the buildings are vanishing causing the oceans to rise.
from your post:
is for a company with a mission of reducing carbon in buildings because it is dangerous.
How is it dangerous does it cause people to become ill?
Could it be caused by filthy vents?

Last edited 22 days ago by kitt

How is it dangerous does it cause people to become ill?

Tell me you didn’t read the web page without telling me, etc….

You are insane, how is CO2 dangerous? Cant answer, go check out typos.

You plagiarized your comment,

You clearly don’t understand the difference between using an article as reference material and plagiarizing.

Why do you never chastise Comrade Greggie as he constantly plagiarizes?

Loonafornia education scraped the bottom of the barrel when they hired you.

Last edited 22 days ago by retire05

Do I get a professorship? 800K to run Harvard into the dirt?

Why do you never chastise Comrade Greggie as he constantly plagiarizes?

Greg indicates that his quotes are quotes, either by using quotation marks or by block-quoting, and he links to his sources. Doing that is the opposite of plagiarism.

You and g are the Tweddle Dee and Tweedle Dum of this Website now parson me while a ready a scary Story to the Jub Jub Bird he likes to hear scary stories at his Bedtime

now parson me while a ready a scary Story to the Jub Jub Bird

Did you have a stroke while typing that?

Oh the genius is back to point out typos, how much more enlightened we all are.

Greg indicates that his quotes are quotes, either by using quotation marks or by block-quoting, and he links to his sources.

Bullshit. Comrade Greggie will link to articles, oft times copying the entire article which is really REALLY stupid but if you think his responses that are not credited to a source are his, you are really, REALLY stupid as well.

Comrade Greggie is dumb. And what he prints on the pages of this forum is simply what he has a) copies from someone else’s words or b) what he has been told to write. His intellectual level probably quaifies him to teach in Loonafornia.

Last edited 22 days ago by retire05

I think Mikey wants to have man sex with greg.

… again.

He supports Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden, the plagiarizer in chief.

From the article you referenced:

If indoor carbon dioxide levels get too high (around 40,000 ppm), your life may be in danger.

At levels we are more likely to experience (1000-5000 ppm), the health effects are more subtle. Around 1000 ppm, a very common indoor level, you will start to experience fatigue, sleepiness, and may struggle to concentrate. You may also find it uncomfortable to sleep, and the air will feel stuffy

At around 1,000 ppm is when people OPEN A WINDOW.
Outside is around 400 ppm so opening a window almost immediately brings down CO2 indoors to a healthy level.
That 40,000 ppm is akin to locking yourself in a garage and running a car.
Nobody does that.
You can’t find examples of homes of businesses in the USA where such levels were ever reported.
If you’re really worried, buy a CO2 in home meter.
They’re cheap and accurate.
They dispel worries as you can easily see the levels are low.

Did you see what happened in Italy yesterday?
A sudden snow/wind storm was really destructive.
150 MPH winds with snow and low temps.
Amazing footage of people on ski lifts that were being buffeted around like playthings.
No lack of snow considering it is already spring.

Last edited 22 days ago by Nan G

We’ve been having 10 years to live since 1980.

A trip down memory lane.

49 NASA Scientists Tell The Truth

Don’t miss this oldie but goodie. Pay attention to NYC disappearing. Last I checked it’s still here.

Obama said he was going to stop the oceans from rising. I guess he did!

NASA needs to Dump the Politics and concentrate landing a maned Expedition on Mars

They cant get to the space station or back to the moon.

Why? It’s just another planet for us to destroy. Let’s leave it in peace.

OK professor, what is on Mars to destroy?

I guess we’ve already been there because Mars is warming like us.

Sending people to Mars will just mark the opening of another planet-wide landfill.

So plasma incinerators that produce power wouldnt solve that? Your lack of imagination is staggering.

So: just pumping pollution into the sky? Let’s not.

Have you even looked up plasma incineration? it doesnt pump pollution into the sky.
Here I guess I have to spoon feed the kid
https://news.mit.edu/2021/inentec-turning-trash-into-valuable-chemical-products-clean-fuels-0106

Last edited 21 days ago by kitt

Why should we go to Mars, anyway? Don’t we have enough shit to do here on Earth?

We supposedly went to the moon look at the the technology that sprung from that venture.
But the democrats would rather give the warpigs big profits.
Also give the technology to the commies in China.

Last edited 20 days ago by kitt

We supposedly went to the moon

“Supposedly”?

I love it I toss out a bone and you go fetch.
Good boi!
Why do we need to catch a ride with the Russians to get to the ISS?
DEI hires?
Rocket scientist shortage?
Laying off from the Jet propulsion Laboratory and not the climate scam arm of NASA?
We cant duplicate 1960s or 1970s technology?
How did Nixon chat with guys on the moon from a landline with no delay?

I love it I toss out a bone and you go fetch.

You try to ridicule me for noticing that you might believe a conspiracy theory and then elaborate, point by point, the conspiracy theory you believe.

Ridicule? I praised your predictability.
NASA recently did a faceplant on a moon shot.
12 (6 crewed and 6 uncrewed) successful moon landings and the f’ups of today cant do a repeat.

The Nixon call was obviously staged for TV, editing out the delay.

How long do you imagine that delay to have been?

More spoon feeding needed? Such a baby. New to the internet kiddo?
Some modern presentations of the moon landing will edit out the gaps created by the communication delay to make conversation sound more natural, but if you look at the timestamped transcripts, you can verify the 2.5 second round trip delay. Note that the timestamps all refer to the time the Earth-side recording occurred, so the radio delay appears when one of the crew members (CMP, CDR, LMP in the transcript) is responding to the Capcom (CC).

Last edited 20 days ago by kitt

We made a deal with the Russians. They’ll keep moving forward with space travel technology and we’ll let NASA pursue the climate scam.

Mars would make a good penal colony for anti-America traitors.

The medical industrial complex comes to mind, just sayin…