President Trump stomps Hack Jack yet again—is this the final blow?


by Revolver

Hack Jack’s path to lock up President Trump before the 2024 election is littered with legal hurdles. Instead of seeing the stars aligning in his favor, he’s facing setback after setback. The latest blow could be the final one and comes from Judge Cannon, who refuses to schedule hearings that President Trump can’t attend due to prior court commitments in the sham “hush money” case. This setback could be the final straw for Hack Jack’s fragile plans, delaying his “classified docs” case by another two months and making it nearly impossible to reach a trial date before the 2024 election.

This is what investigative reporter Julie Kelly had to say about the latest massive blow Hack Jack took.

Kelly was commenting on a video wherein Human Events editor Jack Posobiec and attorney Mike Davis recently delved into the legal details surrounding the DOJ’s actions against President Trump and interference in the 2024 election, including how the “hush money” Judge Merchan is now threatening to throw President Trump in jail.


With the “hush money” trial being the only remaining criminal case against President Trump before the 2024 election, all eyes are on Fat Alvin’s spectacle. Meanwhile, President Trump’s Truth Social account continues to thrive, standing as a beacon of defiance in the face of this shameless political hit job.

Despite facing numerous setbacks, the increasingly desperate Soros-linked Hack Jack is now suggesting he may bypass the Supreme Court if they declare his “obstruction” charges aren’t actually real crimes. It begs the question: How does a move like this align with Dems’ supposed commitment to protecting their precious democracy?

Answer: It doesn’t.

The Federalist: 

Democrat hacks have claimed that Special Counsel Jack Smith’s indictments against Donald Trump over the former president’s challenging of the 2020 election are legally sound. So why is Smith grasping at legal straws in his latest court filing?

On Monday, Smith filed a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court urging the nation’s highest judicial body to dismiss Trump’s presidential immunity claims. Citing the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, the special counsel indicted Trump in August over his speech questioning the administration of the 2020 election. This prompted the former president’s legal team to file a motion essentially arguing that Trump “should be immune from prosecution because the conduct he is accused of constituted official acts of the president,” as Fox News summarized.

“The President’s constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed does not entail a general right to violate them,” Smith claimed.

As legacy media rushed to elevate the special counsel’s arguments against Trump’s immunity claims, they ignored a footnote in Monday’s filing that telegraphs how Smith will attempt to have the former president convicted on several counts — even if those same charges are effectively dismissed in a separate case by SCOTUS.


In an apparent attempt to sidestep such a ruling, however, Smith argued in his Monday brief that even if SCOTUS deems the DOJ’s use of 1512(c)(2) unlawful, the related charges filed against Trump should still stand because Trump somehow impaired evidence for use in an official proceeding.

“Petitioner asserts … that the grant of review in Fischer v. United States … suggests that the Section 1512(c)(2) charges here impermissibly stretch the statute. But whether the Court interprets Section 1512(c)(2) consistently with a natural reading of its text or adopts the evidence-impairment gloss urged by the petitioner in Fischer, the Section 1512 charges in this case are valid,” Smith wrote, additionally claiming that “the use of falsehoods or creation of ‘false’ documents satisfies an evidence-impairment interpretation.”

As investigative reporter Julie Kelly explained, Smith is essentially contending that “the alternative electoral certificates” supported by Trump and his election team and submitted to Congress “represent ‘documents’ that were fraudulently used in an ‘official proceeding.’” By arguing this, Smith is attempting to preserve his ability to go after Trump based on subsection (1) of the statute even if his ability to prosecute based on subsection (2) is nullified.

This argument requires Smith to make the case that “Pieces of paper signed and sent by other Americans to protest of a rigged election are now equal to accounting records destroyed in service of covering up a crime,” Kelly explained. It’s worth noting that contingent electors casting votes for their presidential candidate is neither illegal nor unprecedented.

This is what happens when dirty politicians are cornered, desperate to squash a political outsider like President Trump. Suddenly, their precious “democracy” becomes just another casualty in their desperate scramble to maintain control. However, the relentless and over-the-top efforts to obliterate President Trump shouldn’t shock anybody. It’s obvious this political hit job has been brewing for quite some time. In fact, Bumbling Joe’s notorious inability to keep his yap shut or filter his words has made it painfully clear on countless occasions that his regime would do whatever it takes to “stop” President Trump dead in his tracks.

Again, the Dems’ “precious democracy” takes a beatdown.


Jack Smith, Fani Willis, Alvin Bragg, Fani Willis, and Letitia James are all going after President Trump bc Biden weaponized the justice system.

Joe: “We just have to demonstrate that he will not take power if he does run, making sure he…does not become the next president again.”

Nov. 9, 2022, Biden said he will make sure Trump doesn’t take power.

Nov. 18, 2022, Merrick Garland appointed a special counsel to investigate Trump⁉️#TrumpTrial

The left couldn’t knock President Trump off the ballot, so now they’re resorting to this farce “hush money” trial to keep him off the campaign trail. But here’s the thing—it will likely blow up in their faces. Trump’s supporters are rock-solid, and the more they come after him, the more fired up his base gets. Even independents are starting to see through the charade and lean toward Trump.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

One would think, or like to anyway, that we would be able to look at the charges against Trump and argue, “He didn’t do that” or “He definitely did that” instead of arguing, “What the hell are you talking about?”. In every case, the charges are so desperate and tenuous that the primary argument is that they aren’t crimes at all, they absolutely don’t apply to anything Trump did or that it is an ordinance never before prosecuted. All this adds up to blatantly politically motivated attacks on Trump for the sole purpose of trying to prevent Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden from losing to him… again.