Left-wing climate report claims Trump’s policies will kill millions — facts tell a different story


Justin Haskins:

In perhaps the most outlandish accusation made against President Donald Trump by radical environmentalists yet, the left-wing Natural Resources Defense Council has claimed Trump’s decision to pull the United States out of the Paris climate agreement on June 1 will result in the deaths of millions of people over the next 100 years.

According to a report published by the NRDC, the number of “dangerously hot summer days” will skyrocket over the remainder of the 21st century, as man-caused climate change continues to worsen. NRDC predicts nearly 14,000 Americans will lose their lives every year by the mid-2040s, and more than 29,000 will die each year by 2090. From 1975 to 2010, the average number of deaths related to hot days was 1,360.

NRDC says Trump’s decision to pull America out of the Paris climate agreement, which aimed to prevent the global temperature from rising by more than 2 degrees Celsius by 2100, is largely responsible for these deadly predictions.

“President Trump’s plan to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris climate agreement could seriously harm public health for decades, worsening summer heatwaves that could kill 13,860 Americans each year by mid-century, and as many as 29,850 a year by the end of the century,” an NRDC press release issued on Thursday stated.

“Enormous human misery could be avoided, the report says, if the U.S. remains in the Paris Agreement and fulfills its commitments to the global agreement to address climate change and accelerate a transition to clean energy,” the statement continued. “For the United States, that means adhering to — not undoing — former President [Barack] Obama’s climate action plan that would reduce carbon pollution from the nation’s largest sources: power plants and vehicles.”

These claims are unquestionably dire, but are they true?

To calculate their death rates, NRDC relied on numerous assumptions, including many that are apparently false. For instance, NRDC assumes it can predict what global temperature will be 30 to 65 years into the future, even though scientists have failed miserably over the past 30 years to make accurate predictions.

As Roy Spencer—who earned his Ph.D. in meteorology from the University of Wisconsin in 1981 and previously served as the senior scientist for climate studies at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center — wrote in 2014, greater than 95 percent of the climate models through 2013 “over-forecast the warming trend since 1979.”

A second assumption is that NRDC can predict what population growth and urban development will look like in the United States over the next century, a virtually impossible task.

Third, even if climate change is being caused by carbon-dioxide emissions, how can NRDC know if humans will still be using fossil fuels 50 years in the future? It’s entirely possible other technologies will develop over the next century that don’t emit carbon dioxide. After all, 30 years ago, almost no Americans had access to computers in their homes. Today, the majority of people carry super-computer smartphones around in their back pockets.

Fourth, NRDC assumes the Paris agreement would have accomplished its goal of keeping temperature rise from expanding in a meaningful way, even though there is absolutely no reason to believe it would. China, India and many other nations are increasing their CO2 emissions at rates so high the United States’ reductions under the Paris agreement would effectively be meaningless several decades in the future.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I dont beleive a darn thing said by these idiots from the various eco-wacko groups like GREENPEACE,NRDC,EDF,AUDUBON SOCIETY,SIERRA CLUB, and not anything that spews from the pieholes of DiCaprio or Gore i mean these stupid enviromentalists wackos will say anything do anything to keep their money flowing in or muck that Sucker Money from the granola munchers and tree huggers

@Spurwing Plover: Well said. I noticed that it was a lot hotter at 2pm today than it was when I got up at 9, so the climate does change. But strangely, it’s as cool now as it was at 9 this morning so it has continued to change today. I’m expecting a rise and fall in temps tomorrow also, so yes, the climate does change. It has been much much hotter in the past than it is this century and yet, people still arrived on the earth and are still here.

Oh, and Algore does not have one single solar panel on his house nor a windmill in his yard.

The left is becoming more and more desperate to establish the money-making, control scheme of global warming as fact. More and more evidence arises proving the fallacy of global warming and the left is more shrill in their fear mongering tactics.

More evidence of the failure of the liberal ideology.

Global Warming/Climate Change is the biggits hoax ever perpatraited on the public sense the Trojan Horse

@Spurwing Plover: Well Spurwing, I just don’t see no relief from this constant climate change. The temp seems to go up during the middle part of each day, but then, it seems to change back to cooling later in the day. I wonder if this is a new phenomenon or has it been going on for a while. Seems like it was kinda like that when I was a young guy. So they may have something on this thing, it does seem to change most days.

Why is this subject never a part of the climate debate?
It is not illegal to spray toxic chemicals all over the USA as long as you say its research.
Climate control is not new they were firing sulfer from cannons to make it rain, so cavalry charges were less effective. Does that sound like new science?

And Professor Ball just got his long awaited victory over climate scammer Mann of hockey stick infamy.

Amazing how leftists never want to have their data questioned, and now the Canadian courts are on the verge of bringing the richly deserved smackdown on the climate liars.