by EDDIE SCARRY
After patting herself on the back at length for allegedly co-producing a musical about women voting — gag — Hillary Clinton finally got to the real reason she was once again disturbing America’s inner peace: She wanted to tell everyone how they don’t really need to watch the debate Thursday between President Biden and the man she lost to eight years ago.
In a wince-inducing op-ed for The New York Times this week, Clinton declared herself singularly knowledgeable about how the face-off between Biden and former President Trump should go. “I am the only person to have debated both men (Mr. Trump in 2016 and, in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary race, Mr. Biden),” she wrote. “I know the excruciating pressure of walking onto that stage and that it is nearly impossible to focus on substance when Mr. Trump is involved.”
She went on to inadvertently humiliate herself, writing of Trump, “It’s nearly impossible to identify what his arguments even are;” “He starts with nonsense and then digresses into blather;” and, “[e]xpectations for him are so low that if he doesn’t literally light himself on fire on Thursday evening, some will say he was downright presidential.” Again, this is the person Clinton lost to, against all odds, with all of the media, all of Hollywood, and all of Washington at her back. If Trump is really so incoherent, the op-ed should have been headlined, “He is the stupidest person on earth and he kicked my a–.”
In any event, the thrust of Clinton’s argument was that if voters pay attention to the “substance” of the debate, they will inevitably conclude that Biden won, even before the event has taken place. “This election is between a convicted criminal out for revenge and a president who delivers results for the American people,” she wrote. “No matter what happens in the debate, that’s an easy choice.”
This is another way of saying there’s no need to watch the debate; don’t.
Hmm… Now why might one of the most prominent names in Democrat politics tell voters to skip what will likely be just one of two times that the major party candidates for president directly face one another? It’s a mystery.
Kidding. It’s because Clinton herself performed terribly against Trump and there’s a significant risk that Biden is about to do the same — not just including but perhaps especially on substance.
It Take a Village(Of Idiots)to raise a mind controlled servant to big Bother like Greta Thunberg
Sounds like panic in the democrat party. Don’t watch the incompetence of biden displayed before our very eyes.
Hillary gets one vote.
Here she goes beyond the lefty trope: “Don’t you believe your own eyes,” to her new line,”don’t give your eyes a chance to make you reconsider.”
Ha. I’ll bet she votes early and votes often.
McConnell breaks with Trump on vilification of Biden –
But, as we can all see, Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden is incompetent, corrupt, treasonous, a liar and a pedophile. That doesn’t sound like a “good guy” to me.
Hillary is another one with zero credibility, both in any expectation for a truthful comment or in any accurate, intelligent observations or predictions. The vast majority of America just wishes she would Epstein herself. But of course she would prefer for the lemmings to not watch the debate live (as alive as Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden is likely to be) and just accept the propaganda from CNN.