Here’s why a Twitter ER doc won’t debate me


by Steve Kirsch

Executive summary
When I try to debate people on the science so we can expose the truth, they will often say that they don’t want to give me “a platform” to spread my views. Or they will say that “science isn’t settled by debates.”
After I successfully counter both of those arguments, then the reason changes to “I see what you are doing and don’t want any part of it” insinuating I’m a grifter.
Well, what I am doing is to find the truth and expose it. I am open to being challenged on my views. But nobody wants to challenge me.
They say misinformation is a problem, but none of them will lift a finger to correct the misinformation spreaders. Censorship and the lack of interest in settling who is telling the truth is the real problem here.

Meet ScholerinED, an ER doctor who posts on Twitter


Here are some of his posts that got my attention:

Actually, a lot of us do know more than doctors about a variety of these topics. Anyone making statements like this poses a danger to their profession and should have their license revoked in my opinion.
So let’s see if he’ll defend his statements…

Here’s what happens when I challenged him to defend his statements (or the narrative)



He replied that he’d be giving me a platform


WTF?!?!?! He has 3,000 followers and I have close to a million on all my platforms. He thinks he’s giving me a platform?! Is that how science works?!

Note how I counter each of his arguments:


I also sent him this to chew on; he blocked me after I sent that



He didn’t respond. He blocked me instead. That’s how science works.


Finally, someone admitting the real reason they won’t debate me…


He finally admitted on Twitter that he thinks my goal is to spread misinformation for personal gain and by engaging with me he’d be participating in the scam.


Finally I get an honest reason! He thinks I’m a grifter and he doesn’t want to help me scam more people.
I left (likely) millions of dollars of founder’s stock on the table when I resigned from because the board forced me to choose between my job and telling the truth about the vaccines. I chose to tell the truth and help save lives. My wife asked me how we will be able to support our family. I said we’d deplete all our savings.
Furthermore, I don’t profit one dime from debating him.
In fact, his argument is nonsensical because if he’s so smart and can bring me down in front of all my followers, he’d destroy my “career” as a professional misinformation spreader. So he wouldn’t contribute to my goal… he’d actually be stopping me by exposing me! And he’d also be doing the world a favor in exposing all the arguments of the other misinformation spreaders as false.
So if you are a critical thinker, you see right through his arguments. They don’t hold water.
I suspect that the real reason he won’t debate me is because he knows he’ll lose. Badly.

Read more

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Mask mandators probably have stock in mask manufacturing.
Germany decided to burn their masks for warmth!
A child’s mask is useless if it doesn’t fit properly and not one mask fits children properly.
The CDC pretended that they never meant for people not to have access to ivermectin, but that’s how pharmacists and doctors understood their orders.
The fewer the vaccinated the fewer the deaths from covid, a disease of the vaccinated:comment image

Last edited 1 year ago by Nan G

So if you are a critical thinker, you see right through his arguments. They don’t hold water.

What arguments? He makes no arguments. Like our own resident leftists, he hides behind the official party line and refuses to debate or answer questions.

This is why censorship is so important to the left; they cannot stand up against the facts.