Forget the Vaccine – Let’s Blame Teens’ Colorectal Cancers on Video Games and Avocado Toast!

by Jeff Childers

Fortune confirmed a tragic trend in a woefully unsurprising article headlined, “Why have colorectal cancers tripled in teens and jumped by 500% in kids?” Haha, of course the article never answers that headline question

First it came for the young adults. Back in January, young adults reeled from a surge in colorectal cancers, as the horrifying disease topped causes of death for men under 50, and surged to second place in working-age women. Now don’t laugh, but scientists blame the sudden metastatic spike on obesity and alcohol consumption. Headline from Fortune, in January:

Most doctors nowadays couldn’t find their colorectums using both hands and a flashlight. Take a look at this paragraph from the article headlined above. Note the unexpectedly honest date range:

 
Gosh. A trend researchers first noted in 2021? What could have happened to working age adults in 2021? According to Fortune, they suddenly got fatter and started drinking more, that’s what. And more than any other cohort. (And, somebody tell San Fransisco know, sinceright now overpaid nurses dressed as waitresses are pouring free beers for bums. I bet they don’t tip well.)

If drinking too much is somehow causing colorectal cancers in young adults, what will doctors claim now about the new under-18 group? The younger kids are drinking too much? Fortune explained that adolescent colorectal cancer rates (kids between 10 and 14 and teens from 15 to 19) have skyrocketed by five times and three times, respectively.

As usual, the study authors were paralyzed at the 2020 data cutoff, for some reason, and only analyzed cancer rates between 1999 to 2020. But we all know why the article is appearing now.

We can observe some interesting things about the proffered theories of cancer causation. All the theories — obesity, lifestyle, drunkenness — they all blame cancer victims for making bad choices. It’s not pharma! Or government! Or big food! You did it to yourselves.

Surmounting Everest-high peaks of hypocrisy, the very same public health professionals who always instantly squeal “correlation doesn’t equal causation” like hungry pigs whose trough just got bumped over whenever someone tries to attribute a new adverse event to a vaccine, turned around and did that exact same thing when blaming kids for getting cancer more often. It’s downright vexing.

It feels worse than hypocrisy. Through repeated overuse defending mega-profitable vaccines, public health professionals showed they clearly understand the correlation-causation fallacy. They’re the first ones to arrogantly invoke logic, whenever it’s needed to dismiss a painful new adverse event cropping up right after introducing a profitable new drug. But then they turn right around and wield the correlation-causation fallacy like a club, battering unsuspecting cancer victims with wholly unproven causative-agent theories.

The current public health establishment is critically underqualified. Maybe we should fire them all and start over.

Remember, the jabs were definitely not gene therapies; that’s misinformation. But another new study poking a hole in that exhausted refrain appeared this month in the journal Methods and Protocols, titled “Methodological Considerations Regarding the Quantification of DNA Impurities in the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Comirnaty®.”

 
According to the researchers, it turns out that Pfizer may have slightly under-reported the amounts of DNA contamination in its magic spike protein elixirs. Behold my shocked face: . And by slightly under-reported, I mean by orders of magnitude. Their conclusion included the alarming determination that contaminant DNA enters patients’ cells. In the study authors’ own words:

The available information and data indicate that the ready-to-use mRNA vaccine Comirnaty contains DNA impurities that exceed the permitted limit value by several hundred times and, in some cases, even more than 500 times, and that this went unnoticed because the DNA quantification carried out as part of batch testing only at the active substance level appears to be methodologically inadequate when using qPCR.

Further, DNA impurities in Comirnaty® are apparently integrated into the lipid nanoparticles and are thus transported directly into the cells of a vaccinated person, just like the mRNA active ingredient. What this means for the safety risks, particularly the possible integration of this DNA into the human genome, i.e., the risk of insertional mutagenesis, should be a secondary focus of the discussion required, which must go far beyond what could have been considered years before the so unexpected introduction of mRNA pharmaceuticals into the global market.

Haha, “unexpected introduction of mRNA” into the global market. Nice one. Unexpected is one way of putting it.

See, what you really don’t want in a vaccine is a cellular delivery system for random bacterial DNA. What could go wrong? One thing that could go wrong is cancer, or ‘oncogenesis’ in public health’s dialect.

But forget about contamination! Follow the science. Let’s keep looking at obesity and alcohol consumption instead. Except in downtown San Fransisco, that is, where the government-funded booze train must keep trundling down the addiction tracks.

Read more