The proof is in. Biden is an illegitimate President.


You hear it on cop shows all the time. There is a difference between what you know and what you can prove. Finally, there is proof. The Biden campaign, together with the Twitter, Facebook, the FBI and a hyper partisan media altered the outcome of the 2020 election. The proof was furnished to us by Elon Musk, who had promised to be transparent about Twitter’s abuse of the truth. Musk wisely chose a left leaning journalist- Matt Taibbi- to post the evidence on Twitter. I asked the Threadreaderapp to put it together and it can be seen here.

There are several key passages in the thread. It began with this

3. The “Twitter Files” tell an incredible story from inside one of the world’s largest and most influential social media platforms. It is a Frankensteinian tale of a human-built mechanism grown out the control of its designer.
4. Twitter in its conception was a brilliant tool for enabling instant mass communication, making a true real-time global conversation possible for the first time.
5. In an early conception, Twitter more than lived up to its mission statement, giving people “the power to create and share ideas and information instantly, without barriers.”
6. As time progressed, however, the company was slowly forced to add those barriers. Some of the first tools for controlling speech were designed to combat the likes of spam and financial fraudsters.
Then Twitter began to evolve into a political weapon. The Biden campaign asked Twitter to “review” accounts and tweets
7. Slowly, over time, Twitter staff and executives began to find more and more uses for these tools. Outsiders began petitioning the company to manipulate speech as well: first a little, then more often, then constantly.
8. By 2020, requests from connected actors to delete tweets were routine. One executive would write to another: “More to review from the Biden team.” The reply would come back: “Handled.”
Handled, as in deletion and suspension.
This is how James Woods was gotten rid of (as well as your author)
9. Celebrities and unknowns alike could be removed or reviewed at the behest of a political party:
Although both parties had access to the tools, one side dominated the issue as Twitter was overwhelmingly populated by one side
11. This system wasn’t balanced. It was based on contacts. Because Twitter was and is overwhelmingly staffed by people of one political orientation, there were more channels, more ways to complain, open to the left (well, Democrats) than the right.…
The most egregious crime was blocking the Hunter Biden laptop story, which was published on Oct 14, 2020.
18. Twitter took extraordinary steps to suppress the story, removing links and posting warnings that it may be “unsafe.” They even blocked its transmission via direct message, a tool hitherto reserved for extreme cases, e.g. child pornography. 
Twitter went so far as to lock the account of White House spokesperson Kayleigh McEnany for simply tweeting about the story
19. White House spokeswoman Kaleigh McEnany was locked out of her account for tweeting about the story, prompting a furious letter from Trump campaign staffer Mike Hahn, who seethed: “At least pretend to care for the next 20 days.”
Someone in the system asked why this happened and got this response
21. Strom’s note returned the answer that the laptop story had been removed for violation of the company’s “hacked materials” policy:…
They knew this was garbage
25.You can see the confusion in the following lengthy exchange, which ends up including Gadde and former Trust and safety chief Yoel Roth. Comms official Trenton Kennedy writes, “I’m struggling to understand the policy basis for marking this as unsafe”:
But they stayed the course
This is where former FBI General Counsel James Baker weighs in and advises continuation of the bad policy
To his credit, only democrat Congressman Ro Khanna seemed to care a wit about free speech and the First Amendment
The research firm “NetChoice” polled some members of Congress from the House Judiciary Committee and sent a warning
34.NetChoice lets Twitter know a “blood bath” awaits in upcoming Hill hearings, with members saying it’s a “tipping point,” complaining tech has “grown so big that they can’t even regulate themselves, so government may need to intervene.”
Then boom, democrats let the cat out of the bag- they want MORE, not less, censorship
36.Twitter files continued:
Szabo’s letter contains chilling passages relaying Democratic lawmakers’ attitudes. They want “more” moderation, and as for the Bill of Rights, it’s “not absolute”
Shockingly, Jack Dorsey wasn’t even aware of what was transpiring.
An amazing subplot of the Twitter/Hunter Biden laptop affair was how much was done without the knowledge of CEO Jack Dorsey, and how long it took for the situation to get “unfucked” (as one ex-employee put it) even after Dorsey jumped in.
He even tried to “unfuck it.”
There are multiple instances in the files of Dorsey intervening to question suspensions and other moderation actions, for accounts across the political spectrum
The problem with the “hacked materials” ruling, several sources said, was that this normally required an official/law enforcement finding of a hack. But such a finding never appears throughout what one executive describes as a “whirlwind” 24-hour, company-wide mess.
Taibbi himself made clear the problem two years ago
Here’s where I disagree. This election interference cost the country an election outcome.
This lack of information proved crucial: One of every six Biden voters we surveyed (17%) said they would have abandoned the Democratic candidate had they known the facts about one or more of these news stories. A shift of this magnitude would have changed the outcome in all six of the swing states won by Joe Biden, and Donald Trump would have comfortably won a second term as president.
Fully 79% of those aware of the Hunter laptop scandal believe the election outcome would have been different had the truth be told and I am one of them. Had the full story of the Hunter Biden laptop and general Biden family corruption and depravity been properly exposed there is no way the corrupt lying pervert Biden is President today and the country is far better off. Biden is an illegitimate President.
And as to the above action? Elon Musk himself put it best:
Elon Musk is saving Twitter and quite possibly, free speech in this country.
Try to find this story anywhere in the left wing media
4.9 7 votes
Article Rating
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The FBI had the laptop for a year. They would have definitely known if it was a Russian fake or legitimate evidence of a cache of crimes. So, when they told Facebook to suppress the stories emitting from the laptop because it was “Russian disinformation”, they were either grossly incompetent or lying. Either one requires a thorough, top to bottom shake up of the FBI AND the DOJ.

Aside from the fact that leftist media reports on plenty of hacked material and Twitter and Facebook never have a problem allowing that to be spread around (just as long as it denigrates the right), there was no reason to assume this was hacked material; it was made clear the FBI had it and how the information was derived. The one and only purpose and focus was to suppress bombshell (actual bombshell) information that could harm the Democrat campaign.

17% of the votes attributed to idiot Biden would probably be all the actual votes cast for him. If this story had been covered, there wouldn’t have been enough fraud possible to provide the outcome we got. Yeah, corruption of this magnitude hurts faith in our elections and system, but look at the damage to the country and world it has brought.

Prision is not harsh enough for those responsible. Is there a Nobel Prize for courage and defending the world? Musk has earned it.

Election interference on the part of Twitter, Google and Facebook

Elon Musk: It Is Likely Twitter Interfered in 2022 Brazilian Election

Twitter acted at the behest of biden. Dirtbag biden had to wake up from a nap to congratulate lula

I suppose as a conservative; I don’t give too much weight to social media. I put the blame for the whole debacle on a group, some of which were working along with social media and some, seemingly independent. The FBI obviously, MSM (ala, Fake News), and an indoctrinated younger generation along with always vote DNC crowd held over from the Kennedy era.

Google, Facebook, and Twitter are incapable of interfering with the election process, as they aren’t part of the election process.

They can be used to manipulate the minds of people who have only a limited ability to distinguish truth from lies, however. A totally perfect election system won’t save America from tyranny if enough voters become too stupid or too delusional to recognize it when they see it.

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

When Google makes it more difficult to search for conservative information while flooding the user with leftist propaganda, that can influence the vote. When Twitter suppressed information that clearly showed idiot Biden was compromised through his son’s influence peddling, THAT influenced the vote, polled and measured to have been a 17% reduction in idiot Biden’s votes. You yourself put a great amount of stock in the unbelievable story that $4,000 worth of Russian ads on Facebook turned the 2016 election in Trump’s favor; so what if they suppressed those as they now suppress conservative posts?

Was it a lie that the laptop was “Russian disinformation”? That was disinformation the leftist propaganda media spread while suppressing the TRUTH. Explain how that doesn’t affect elections. The “Russian disinformation” lie was supplied by the FBI; explain how that didn’t affect the election. The Democrat controlled government and the leftist propaganda media absolutely conspired to keep the truth from the public so that the Democrats could get close enough in the 2020 election to use fraud to push them over the top.

As I said above, the FBI had the laptop for almost a year; how did they possibly make the “mistake” that it was likely “Russian disinformation” after 10 months of examination? Is that how incompetent the FBI is or did they intentionally lie about “Russian disinformation”? If you can admit it was a lie, WHY would they promote such a lie that clearly benefits only idiot Biden?

Speaking of a manipulated mind incapable of distinguishing (or simply not caring about) the difference between truth and lies… why don’t you answer my questions?

Do you think Google has made it impossible to find the website where the clear and convincing evidence of massive election fraud is presented?

I wouldn’t know. After my experiences of trying to find articles that I have seen before, only to get directed to leftist propaganda, I make it a point to save the links I might need later. But, my best guess is, yes indeed, they do.

I have provided you ample evidence. Though you can refute none of it, you continue to deny it exists. But, we KNOW the FBI intervened to influence the election, don’t we?

Why don’t you answer my questions?

What dose that rag Time think of their Person of the Year now? providing to the fact they did the same for Hitler back in 1938

Do you understand that “Person of the Year” doesn’t mean “*Greatest* Person of the Year”?

Both of them belong to the NAZI party.

I don’t rely on Fb, Gurgle, or Twitter for news and anyone who does is as big a fool as those who depend on the news networks.

Keep in mind that for the better part of around 10 years or so, for a younger generation shows like the Daily Show and the Colbert Report were the sources of all their news. And they took comedy as serious journalism.

Last edited 1 year ago by Empty

And the comedy stunk on these shows the only thing funny was the way they looked.

Yes, Jon Stewart was very instumental in showing you could brainwash people into voting for the Democrats with fake news.

Biden is not the president.

He is a dictator puppet.

Everyone knew the election was fraudulent the day after Election Day
We didn’t need Musk to tell us
The proof was evident and abundant
Same with 2022
The question is, “what are you going to do about it ?”

What’s *your* answer to your question?

The answer is to impeach the senile fraud and the vice slut. Throw them out!

That’s your answer.

Without a 2/3 majority vote of the Senate, there is NO, “Throw them out!”. The answer is the second amendment.

You aren’t suggesting violence, are you?

No. I pray that violence does not become necessary, but when tyrants destroy the only way for people to have legitimate representatives through honest and fair elections, the second amendment becomes the only remedy. That’s why it was included in the Bill of Rights. In a 1787 letter written by Thomas Jefferson, Jefferson writes “…And what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure.” You tell what recourse the people have when the electoral process no longer has meaning and you have leaders who say they will not abide by judicial decisions, including those of the Supreme Court?

You’re absolutely advocating violence.

Oh, go fuck yourself, you total idiot!!!

Provide the comment where he is advocating violence. He is advocating vigilance. You leftists don’t want people paying attention and reacting to what is being done; you prefer ignorance.

“Provide the comment where he is advocating violence”


“Without a 2/3 majority vote of the Senate, there is NO, “Throw them out!”. The answer is the second amendment.”


“He is advocating vigilance.”

Then there’s no need for the gun.

If you would notice, I questioned that. I wondered if this was one of your trolls trying to bait someone into making a stupid comment. The comment was clarified.

There IS a need for the gun. Democrats are releasing more and more criminals from jail and prison and will not prosecute crimes. Democrats promote and support political terrorism.

We see the left weaponizing the FBI and DOJ. They weaponize the IRS. They conspire with leftist media to censor free speech and the truth. There can be little doubt that the left is capable of anything to take absolute power.

Our own self defense is all we have that we can rely on. But that doesn’t advocate violence, only vigilance. Don’t want trouble, don’t start none.

Then there’s no need for the gun.

Yes. The Federal Government should be disarmed, then.

They don’t get guns if the rest of us don’t. That’s tyranny.

That’s what you people hope for so you can then use violence against everyone else.

The Left LOVES guns much more than the Right.

Everything you people want and do takes place at the barrel of a gun held by the government.

What is ‘whom’ going to do about it? It’s not Elon’s place to repair anything other than Twitter (I use the nice and correct term now that it’s under new management)

Why nothing that anyone in their right mind would speak of openly. You?

watch this video and see 19,958 votes flip from Trump to Biden in the 2020 election.

Keep your eyes on Pennsylvania! In this clip PA has Trump at 1,690,589 & Biden is at 1,252,537 at the beginning of the clip.. then at the end when Pennsylvania pops up again, Trump magically is then down to 1,670,631 & Biden has gone up to 1,272,495.. what happened was 19,958 votes FLIPPED right before our eyes! Biden’s number went UP by the EXACT same amount Trump’s number went DOWN! again, watch Trump (1690…) goes down to (1670…) while biden (1252…) goes up (1272…) There’s been machine “glitches” similar to this one reported in several different areas.. some have pointed out its a program that is designed to do exactly what you’ve seen here smh #trump #biden #votes

The 2020 election was rigged in favor of senile, little girl fondling Joe Biden.

The FBI is a corrupt Criminal Organization, it must be disbanded and prosecuted under RICO by a special prosecutor. The DOJ must be looked at under the same law.

We now have solid proof that Biden is incapable of doing his job as POTUS!!!!

We have it ‘now’? We had it two years ago. We had it during his term as VP. We had it during dozens of years as a Senator.

We had it from the beginning of his career but nobody does homework before voting!!!!!!


Wait… what? I don’t remember any of the tweets mentioning actual official warnings of potential hack. In fact, they were discussing if it was or not internally.


If there’s REAL proof of Trump’s Big Lie, why has it NEVER been presented in ANY courtroom?

Why hasn’t it all been clearly laid out on ANY website for all the world to see?

The answer is simple and obvious.

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

You wouldnt accept it if it was. They made a documentary 2000 mules, What has the Court said to Kari Lake?
Hey Greg….
comment image

That’s not an answer. It’s an obvious evasion of logic and reality.

Just like the moronic assertion that Biden isn’t President, which is being planted in the heads of the gullible by the classic propaganda technique of endless repetition.

It’s a brain-washing methodology of cults.

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

Yes it is, the Legacy media is controlled they only let you see what they want you to. While praising you for ignoring evidence that counters their projected reality.
You were told that Russians put out propaganda on the internet that swayed an election you believed it with zero proof.
It is illegal to have election equipment connected to the internet, yet the tabulators have modems, can be hacked by children in minutes.

Last edited 1 year ago by kitt

Everyone lies but our leader and those who repeat what he says? I don’t think so.

That’s exactly what you are doing. The evidence came out the night f the election, before the race was called. Its in the machines instruction manual.

OH BTW I have no political leader, thats a commie way of thought.

Last edited 1 year ago by kitt

If there were real evidence, Trump would be in the White House instead of the subject of multiple criminal investigations.

That’s what all usurping dictatorships say, greg. Including Putin.

“OH BTW I have no political leader”


“OH BTW I have no political leader”

All of America is saying that right know.

Just fukk off troll. The evidence has been presented everywhere. It is massive and irrefutable, but because the global criminal mafia has infiltrated every institution in this country….nothing happens. You are a scumbag.

No, it HASN’T been presented ANYWHERE—which is why NO ONE CAN PROVIDE A LINK TO IT, and why every lawsuit filed in court FAILED.

Right. Our buddy Zuck has nada to do with any of that.
“Link”, was the black undercover cop working along side Julie and Pete in the 60’s tv series, The Mod Squad.,and was portrayed by the truly fine (& no/sarc), actor Clarence Williams III.

Last edited 1 year ago by Kai Savage

Yes it has. The evidence has been provided ad nauseam.
The Twitter documents just add to the file

Biden won nothing.

So post a link to it.

If it can’t be displayed to the public, then it doesn’t exist.

If it can’t be presented in court, then it doesn’t exist.

There’s no damn evidence.

Nothing else logically explains its mysterious absence from the nation’s courtrooms and from public view.

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

You are an ignorant slutt. Evidence abounds. Your constant denial only makes you look like the pile of dog shit you are.

If it can’t be displayed to the public, then it doesn’t exist.

It has been displayed to the public

If it can’t be presented in court, then it doesn’t exist.

Who says it must be presented in Court?

The 2020 election was rigged. Biden is not the president.

It’s plain, evident, and the majority knows it.

Covid, rigged election, government/social media fascism.

You people are illegitimate and no need do anything you say.

Biden has no authority.

“Yes it is, the Legacy media is controlled they only let you see what they want you to.”

All media does that. All. Media.

Yes yes it does. Find out who owns them, does the article or news item follow basic journalistic standards. Can you research the source.
comment image

It’s funny how the Left sells a narrative, then says everything is “false” when they get caught committing treason.

Letting you see what they want you to doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s a lie.

That’s how “plausible deniability” works for you and the Deep State…until filed come out where there’s no denying anything.

Are you aware of any lies the left wing media (MSNBC, CNN, PBS, ABC, CBS, NBC, NYT, WaPo) has provided you as fact?

All media does that. All. Media.

Not true.

Incorrect. All media makes decisions about what they will present to the public. No media outlet is able to show everything about everything.

Well, we aren’t talking about not covering saving the dog from the frozen pond because of time limitations. The laptop wasn’t shelved because there simply wasn’t enough time to discuss it, now was it?

biden announced his run in April 2019. The FBI obtained the laptop from Hell in December 2019. biden did not emerge as the front runner in the democrat party primary process until winning SC in March 2020.
The FBI suppressed internal investigation of the laptop and began surveilling Rudy Giuliani;

CHRIS WRAY NEEDS TO RESIGN: FBI Began Covertly Surveilling Rudy Giuliani One Month After He Was Hired as President Trump’s Personal Attorney
In addition, the FBI began surveillance of Stev Bannon, Bob Costello, Miranda Devine and Emma Jo Roberts, both of the NY Post.

The FBI was aware of the upcoming story to be released by the NY Post and as we now know, gave Twitter et al a heads-up with a suggestion it would be Russian disinformation.

Many democrats who have been polled since the 2020 election have said had they known of the laptop it would have affected their vote, some 17+%.

But we are told that,

Google, Facebook, and Twitter are incapable of interfering with the election process, as they aren’t part of the election process.

Suppression of information that has a consequence is the ability to interfere in an election. To say otherwise is complete ignorance born of partisan ideology.

Last edited 1 year ago by TrumpWon

Told that by the same guy that said the Russians turned the 2016 election with a few thousand dollars of ads on Facebook. Hypocrisy knows no bounds with them.

The belief in that story may have lasted 5 minutes or less, yet the ignorant slutt greg believed it so much that he uses it to accuse Trump of election fraud in 2016. It would appear he is a victim of his own device.

They can be used to manipulate the minds of people who have only a limited ability to distinguish truth from lies, however. 

Twitter Is STILL Disabling Kari Lake And Other Republicans’ Like-Retweet Feature On Rigged 2022 Election Tweets – After Katie Hobbs is Linked to Censorship of AZ Republican Accounts

FBI Covertly Surveiled Rudy Giuliani for Years While Ignoring Hunter’s Laptop – Now Ignores $24 Million in Donations to Sen. Warnock in GA from Unemployed “Campaign Finance Mules”

Letting you see what they want you to doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s a lie.

It’a a lie by omission. It is also failure to report the news.

All media makes decisions about what they will present to the public. No media outlet is able to show everything about everything.

All media outlets are capable of showing what is important to the public. But we have a history of journalism that hides news to protect/pimp for their preferred Party.

Walter Duranty, of the NYSlimes, hid the truth about Holodomor, going so far as to write ” Any report of a famine in Russia is today an exaggeration or malignant propaganda.” For that, he was awarded the Pulitzer Prize. Again, the NYSlimes failed to report on the plight of European Jews not only in Germany, but all across Europe. The Slimes, and all other publications, downplayed FDR’s refusal to give admittance to the Jews of The St. Louis.

Walter Cronkite told the world that the U.S. had lost the Tet Offensive in Vietnam. That was not true. Again, he was an “award” winning reporter who told lies he knew were not true.

For over a century we have had the Walter School of Journalism (Walter Lippmann, Walter Duranty, Walter Cronkite) which is ‘tell them what you want them to hear, not what is fact’ reporting.

I’m sure, in cases like the laptop from Hell, you are in full approval.

“You wouldnt accept it if it was.”

Cop out.

I am sure you watched 2000 mules, you wouldnt accept any proof either.

greg, Trump didn’t say anything. WE watched the traitor Democrats and the Deep State rig the election before our eyes.

The only Big Lie is that Biden is our president.

He’s an illegal dictator who is illegally sitting in our WH.

For now.

Why hasn’t it all been clearly laid out on ANY website for all the world to see?

The internet is a compromised propaganda space, Google and other companies scrubbing facts and posting their lies. From Eric Coomer to igloo coolers to ballot mules to FBI/Tech company fascism….

The answer is simple and obvious.

The 2020 election was rigged and we have no president.

Denial doesn’t magically make reality go away. It just makes people less competent to deal with it.

Haha. Yes. Like Steele.
You fools we’re in denial, so you wahed a coup and now we no president.

Are you drunk? The last few comments you’ve posted have been off-kilter.

Musk isnt done theres lots more to come deep corruption. He bought a damn crime scene.

Which the deep state is now trying to cleanse…

Censorship by surrogate: Why Musk’s document dump could be a game changer

“Handled.” That one word, responding to a 2020 demand to censor a list of Twitter users, speaks volumes about the thousands of documents released by Twitter’s new owner, Elon Musk, on Friday night. As many of us have long suspected, there were back channels between Twitter and the Biden 2020 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to ban critics or remove negative stories. Those seeking to discuss the scandal were simply “handled,” and nothing else had to be said.

Ultimately, the New York Post was suspended from Twitter for reporting on the Hunter Biden laptop scandal. Twitter even blocked users from sharing the Post’s story by using a tool designed for child pornography. Even Trump White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany was suspended for linking to the scandal.

Twitter’s ex-safety chief, Yoel Roth, later said the decision was a “mistake” but the story “set off every single one of my finely tuned APT28 hack and leak campaign alarm bells.” The reference to the APT28 Russian disinformation operation dovetailed with false claims of former U.S. intelligence officers that the laptop was “classic disinformation.”

The Russian disinformation claim was never particularly credible. The Biden campaign never denied the laptop was Hunter Biden’s; it left that to its media allies. Moreover, recipients of key emails could confirm those communications, and U.S. intelligence quickly rejected the Russian disinformation claim.

The point is, there was no direct evidence of a hack or a Russian conspiracy. Even Roth subsequently admitted he and others did not believe a clear basis existed to block the story, but they did so anyway.

Musk’s dumped Twitter documents not only confirm the worst expectations of some of us but feature many of the usual suspects for Twitter critics. The documents do not show a clear role or knowledge by former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. Instead, the censor in chief appears to be Vijaya Gadde, Twitter’s former chief legal officer who has been criticized as a leading anti-free speech figure in social media.

There also is James Baker, the controversial former FBI general counsel involved in the bureau’s Russia collusion investigation. He left the FBI and became Twitter’s deputy general counsel.

Some Twitter executives expressed unease with censoring the story, including former global communications VP Brandon Borrman, who asked, “Can we truthfully claim that this is part of the policy?” Baker jumped in to support censorship and said, “It’s reasonable for us to assume that they may have been [hacked] and that caution is warranted.” Baker thus comes across as someone who sees a Russian in every Rorschach inkblot. There was no evidence the Post’s Hunter Biden material was hacked — none. Yet Baker found a basis for a “reasonable” assumption that Russians or hackers were behind it.

Many people recognized the decision for what it was. A former Twitter employee reportedly told journalist Matt Taibbi, “Hacking was the excuse, but within a few hours, pretty much everyone realized that wasn’t going to hold.”

Obviously, bias in the media is nothing new to Washington; newspapers and networks have long run interference for favored politicians or parties. However, this was not a case of a media company spiking its own story to protect a pal. It was a social media company that supplies a platform for people to communicate with each other on political, social and personal views. Social media is now more popular as a form of communications than the telephone.

Censoring communications on Twitter is more akin to the telephone company agreeing to cut the connection of any caller using disfavored terms. And at the apparent request of the 2020 Biden campaign and the DNC, Twitter seems to have routinely stopped others from discussing or hearing opposing views.

The internal company documents released by Musk reinforce what we have seen previously in other instances of Twitter censorship. A recent federal filing revealed a 2021 email between Twitter executives and Carol Crawford, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s digital media chief. Crawford’s back-channel communication sought to censor other “unapproved opinions” on social media; Twitter replied that “with our CEO testifying before Congress this week [it] is tricky.”

At the time, Twitter’s Dorsey and other tech CEOs were about to appear at a House hearing to discuss “misinformation” on social media and their “content modification” policies. I had just testified on private censorship in circumventing the First Amendment as a type of censorship by surrogate. Dorsey and the other CEOs were asked about my warning of a “‘little brother’ problem, a problem which private entities do for the government that which it cannot legally do for itself.” In response, Dorsey insisted that “we don’t have a censoring department.”

The implications of these documents becomes more serious once the Biden campaign became the Biden administration. These documents show a back channel existed with President Biden’s campaign officials, but those same back channels appear to have continued to be used by Biden administration officials. If so, that would be when Twitter may have gone from a campaign ally to a surrogate for state censorship. As I have previously written, the administration cannot censor critics and cannot use agents for that purpose under the First Amendment.

That is precisely what Musk is now alleging. As the documents were being released, he tweeted, “Twitter acting by itself to suppress free speech is not a 1st amendment violation, but acting under orders from the government to suppress free speech, with no judicial review, is.”

The incoming Republican House majority has pledged to investigate — and Musk has made that process far easier by making good on his pledge of full transparency.

Washington has fully mobilized in its all-out war against Musk. Yet, with a record number of users signing up with Twitter, it seems clear the public is not buying censorship. They want more, not less, free speech.

Medicare is central to fixing health care and the federal budget The Russian oil debacle

That may be why political figures such as Hillary Clinton have enlisted foreign governments to compel the censoring of fellow citizens: If Twitter can’t be counted on to censor, perhaps the European Union will be the ideal surrogate to rid social media of these meddlesome posters.

The release of these documents has produced a level of exposure rarely seen in Washington, where such matters usually are simply “handled.” The political and media establishments generally are unstoppable forces — but they may have met their first immovable object in Musk.

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. Follow him on Twitter @JonathanTurley.

These documents show a back channel existed with President Biden’s campaign officials, but those same back channels appear to have continued to be used by Biden administration officials.

We’ve seen those back channels still open in getting the FBI to persecute parents that don’t want their children indoctrinated to become racists or believe in transgender myths and oppose the abortion death cult. The anti-Constitution left have been emboldened and enabled by the protection of the corrupt liberal media.