It’s on! Joe Biden vs. the real President!



In an obsequious interview with the pathetic old CBS flack Scott Pelley, when asked if he was mentally competent, Joe Biden said (mumble, mumble, mumble) “watch me.” Well, we did watch.

When asked about the pandemic, Biden said the pandemic was over.

Biden repeatedly asserted that the pandemic was in the nation’s rear-view mirror while speaking to CBS’ “60 Minutes” at the Detroit Auto Show last week.

“The pandemic is over,” he said.

“We still have a problem with COVID. We’re still doing a lot of work on it. But the pandemic is over.”

Left wingers went nuts

Progressive commentators used social media to lash out at the president over his remarks, with MSNBC host Medhi Hasan accusing Biden of lying to the American public.

“One of the (many) reasons they’re not wearing masks is because people like Biden keep (falsely) telling them the pandemic is over,” Hasan tweeted.

Progressive Democratic Kentucky state Rep. Attica Scott expressed outrage that mainstream members of her party “keep playing these games with our lives.”

“You don’t get to just declare a global pandemic over, Mr. @POTUS,” Scott wrote.

Former Democratic Ohio state Sen. Nina Turner, a senior fellow at the progressive Institute on Race, Power and Political Economy, also rejected Biden’s assertion.

“The pandemic isn’t over,” Turner said.

“We are over the pandemic. The pandemic is not over with us. Big distinction.”

Pay attention to this response:

Dr. Megan Ranney, dean of the Brown University School of Public Health, even used one of Biden’s favorite phrases to rebut him.

“Is the pandemic DIFFERENT? Sure,” she wrote. “But over?! With 400 deaths a day?! I call malarkey.”

The White House (the real President) immediately rebutted that.

But according to CNN, an administration official told the outlet that “the President’s comments do not mark a change in policy toward the administration’s handling of the virus, and there are no plans to lift the Public Health Emergency.”

The left went berserk for a reason. Biden’s order to wipe out student debt and add that trillion dollars of debt onto taxpayers was based entirely on a COVID emergency. With that gone, the order can be rescinded.

Pelley also asked- multiple times- Biden if the US military would respond if China attacked Taiwan and every time Biden said “yes.”

“[W]ould US forces defend the island?” Pelley asked in the interview taped on Thursday.

“Yes, if in fact there was an unprecedented attack,” the president said.

“So unlike Ukraine, to be clear, sir — US forces, US men and women, would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion?” Pelley clarified.

“Yes,” Biden said.

Once again, the real President said to walk that back.

White House spokesman Jake Sullivan walked back President Biden’s vow to send U.S. troops to defend Taiwan.

Now, remember this?

“Is the pandemic DIFFERENT? Sure,” she wrote. “But over?! With 400 deaths a day?!

Over 300 die from fentanyl each day, but that doesn’t rise to the level of an emergency in this regime.

Biden is clearly not in charge, nor is he mentally competent to be President. Biden is the face of this regime, but this event emphasizes that he is being controlled by the real President. So who is the real President? My suspicion is that the real President is a committee of two or three people- Susan Rice, Ron Klain and the pasty-faced liar Jake Sullivan, who gleefully spread the Alfa bank lie all over late night television on behalf of Hillary Clinton. As all are past Obama flacks, the real “Architect” might be Obama himself. This sure looks like Obama’s third term. You also might remember that Obama said he wanted to “fundamentally transform” America.

It’s happening right now.

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The COVID “emergency” will continue and last as long as the Democrats enjoy controlling the minutia of citizen’s lives. If we actually had a COVID “emergency”, would we be allowing 2.5 million illegal immigrants a year into the nation and delivering them throughout the country without vaccinations, testing and screening?

Idiot Biden’s student loan “forgiveness” is illegal with or without COVID. He doesn’t have authority to spend $1 trillion without Congressional approval; his 10% doesn’t come to that much. That was all smoke and mirrors and yet another idiot Biden lie.

This stupid moron child molesting creep is no different than he has ever been; a gaffe machine. The only difference is that now his gaffes are national security gaffes and can cause international catastrophe as he has done in Ukraine.

Joe Biden is a president. He’s our first, and hopefully last, dictator. He was installed by globalists, companies, and the deep state.

Obama was, as well. I disagree that this is Obama’s “third term.” Ever has Obama been a cardboard cutout, a show pony, a puppet install with more elegantly sculpted “election” that Biden.

The pandemic was over months ago. The evil in DC has not wanted to lift the emergency health orders in fact having revised it 11 times

Since the pandemic has been over for more than a year, why has the emergency health orders remained in place?

The evil cabal has an ulterior motive.

I agree with the writer’s conclusion that Obama is the Satanist that is the power behind the throne.

I think Obama is just another puppet, with the real “power” being the cabal of people we all know well.

You may be right. I could be wrong. But as the traitorous Marxist Socialist Obama did everything he could do to destroy and divide the nation when he was in power, it only stands to reason that he’s been directing Biden to finish off what he started. Liberalism is the ideology of the damned… and the insane. It destroys individuals, families, and entire nations.

They are both meat puppets for the overly inbred Rothchilds, Rockefellers and other unelected evil bastids like Schwabb and Soros.

Last edited 1 year ago by kitt

If Joe says something, assume it means the opposite.

09/22/22 – Trump Claims He Could Declassify Documents Just By Thinking About It

Yeah, that’s going to work in court—assuming he’s hoping to be found not guilty by reason of mental incompetence.

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

The removal and taking possession of any documents become personal under the presidential recorded act Any document formally classified by act of possession becomes declassified. That is the law.

Ohio Senate Race Turning on Biden Energy Policies

Last edited 1 year ago by TrumpWon

Any document formally classified by act of possession becomes declassified.

That’s utter nonsense.

09/22/22 0 Top GOP senators reject Trump’s declassification comments and call for proper storage of secret records

Top GOP senators reject Trump’s declassification comments and call for proper storage of secret records

Like Obama?

Then charge Obama. The fact that Obama did it does not negate the fact that Trump did it.

The Obama/Biden DOJ and FBI doesn’t care about Obama so they don’t charge him. Only Orange Man…hence the hypocrisy.

It is well known the documents that the Gestapo/FBI was after were the ones that pertain to crossfire hurricane.

In a presidential memo dated 01/19/2021, President Trump declassified those documents. The FBI has not yet presented those documents to the public.

Hence the Mar a Lago ransack/raid

Why didn’t Trump’s DOJ do anything about all these crimes? Why didn’t Trump indict Clinton? He spent the whole 2016 campaign leading chants of “Lock her up.”

Because it’s NOT a crime. Every President has had classified information for their libraries. Only Orange Man gets singled out by a weaponized DOJ/FBI.

If it’s not a crime, then it will be impossible for Trump to be indicted, correct? For that to happen, the prosecutor would have to cite a specific statute that’s being violated; if a relevant statute doesn’t exist, the judge at the arraignment would presumably throw the case out.

A weaponized DOJ most assuredly will present cherry picked facts to a Grand Jury who will indict. Even may get convicted in a biased DC courthouse where SCOTUS will get involved and throw the whole thing out. The Commander in Chief has the sole authority to classify and declassify information as they see fit. All classification authority derives from the Commander in Chief and to suggest that some bureaucrat has more authority to classify and declassify is absurd.. This is all dirty politics to prevent Trump from gaining the WH in 24′ and will not be successful. The American people see this weaponized DOJ/FBI for what it is. Come November when we gain both houses it will be delicious to see the hearings on these matters.

A load of horse manure. Presidential libraries are secure facilities overseen by the National Archive. The material held there is not in the personal possession of former presidents, nor is classified material available for inspection unless and until it has undergone a page-by-page review by the entity that classified it to begin with. This process continues for years after a president leaves office.

It was legal for Bill Clinton to have highly classified recordings in his sock drawer.

And legal for Obama to have highly classified records in an unsecured storage unit.

Like Obama’s “secure” facility?

I think I’ll go with AP instead of PJMedia and Conservative Tree House…

Obama didn’t keep millions of classified White House documents

LOL…of course you would believe the biased MSM over actual documents from the Obama Foundation to the NARA:

The documents show the Obama Foundation agreeing to the storage requirements of the NATF, and agreeing to pay for the necessary transfer and storage of presidential documents. Why, exactly, am I supposed to be outraged?

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

So classified documents in a unsecured facility is cool now?

The AP works for the Democrat Party.

Not a credible source of news.

Never Trumpers. And cnn, not credible.

Try researching the presidential records act. You are woefully ignorant

Never Trumpers. And cnn, not credible.

What do you consider to be credible sources?

What do YOU consider to be credible sources?

That’s the issue. The average non-Leftist doesn’t think ANY source is credible.

You’re supporting an establishment and their propaganda. We’re suggesting that ALL the “news” we get is corrupted, especially since there’s so much money involved. This includes the nearly-bankrupt CNN and financially successful FOX. They are all liars. You have to glean what you can from all of it.

Arguing your “source” over mine isn’t intelligence, it’s the conformity of a simpleton.

That’s what you Leftists don’t understand. Your ideas are provided, even your rejection of other news sources is provided.

For all your perceived intelligence, you’re just carrying water for who you think is right. You’re not dedicated to democracy, and allowing for vigorous debate.

You also think your simple-shit comments are “taking down” dumb Right wingers…

Like you’ve been programmed to.

You are not arguing for what is true. You are arguing for who gets to report as “credible” without being questioned.

That’s what someone of average or lower intelligence would do.

The “CNN et al are the only arbiters of truth” leads to the beginnings of the Leftwing genocide we all know you people are running towards, unbeknownst to yourselves.

AP Hides Crucial Details About Killing Of Republican Teenager

What do YOU consider to be credible sources?

When I want to learn more about some legal topic, I try to see what lawyers and judges have to say. If I want to know more about history, I seek out historians. If there’s some kind of inside-baseball legislative ruckus going on, I listen to what people with experience in Congress have to say.

You, on the other hand, do what—just make shit up? Just assume that your grasp of legal topics is as firm as a lawyer’s or judge’s? That you know as much about history as a person whose entire career has been devoted to studying history? That you understand everything you need to know about the legislative process because you voted for a lawmaker one time?

Your insistence that there’s nothing to be gained from listening to someone who actually knows something about a topic would be laughable if it weren’t so monumentally depressing.

When I want to learn more about some legal topic, I try to see what lawyers and judges have to say. If I want to know more about history, I seek out historians. If there’s some kind of inside-baseball legislative ruckus going on, I listen to what people with experience in Congress have to say.

There is no doubt you are a Lawrence Tribe, Howard Zinn, Chuck (The Schmuck) Schumer kinda guy.

Last edited 1 year ago by retire05

I’m honestly impressed that you listed real examples of a lawyer, an historian, and a legislator. That’s well beyond what I’d assume you’d be able to do.

A revisionist historian.
Take The People’s History of the United States.
Take the first edition (that Howard used to convince school boards across the country to use his book as mandatory reading.
Compare it to any one of the last editions he created in the last years of his life.
They are totally different.
No footnotes to say why.
But fewer and fewer facts of history made their way into the latter editions.
They are nothing but commie propaganda disguised in a history book.

What about the liberal media ignoring this horrific story or, if they mention it, ignoring the actual motive the killer expressed? That doesn’t require an historian or attorney to formulate an opinion, it require a soul and morality. It requires a rational sense of right and wrong.

Do you actually have to wait for an attorney to tell you that calling for Americans to intimidate, harass, harm or kill other Americans because they don’t share your political views is wrong? And you interact with STUDENTS? Damn, that’s pathetic.

If you can’t actually follow the side discussion, you probably shouldn’t try to get involved, bless your heart.

The discussion is that you cling to notoriously inaccurate and dishonest sources to base your views. An example of such dishonesty was provided, which you neglect to acknowledge. It is your MO.

If you referred to legal experts or historians to form an opinion on the raid on Mar a Lago, you wouldn’t be here because there is no liberal defense of this political attack.

Lawrence tribe. Communist

Howard zinn. Another communist

Schumky schumer. Dirtbag communist as well

Cool! You were able to list the same guys retire05 did!

The discussion is that you cling to notoriously inaccurate and dishonest sources to base your views. 

The big kids rebut the inaccurate information directly by showing how it’s wrong and showing how their own information is correct. Be like the big kids for once.

Does this mean that is an action you are aware of and might begin employing?

Does this mean that is an action you are aware of and might begin employing?

I’m not the one here who habitually dismisses entire sources of information out of hand. That’s you guys.

Nope, unless it’s one of your approved propaganda sources, you discard it. That’s you leftists and how you keep yourselves willfully ignorant.

How have you rebutted anything? Are you not merely fighting for the establishment to sole disseminators of their narrative as “truth” rather than encouraging people to find the actual truth?

You have never done that, so tired of you not adding anything. Of course there are sources we reject out of hand, how long are we suppose to listen to sources that air lies? Then those lies are backed up by “Fact checkers” that lie. They prance out “experts” that are not expert but have some degree in a subject they never applied to anything in real life.
Am I going to hire a guy that has a masters degree in plumbing or wiring that never so much as changed 1 gasket in a faucet or a guy that worked as a plumber for the same time the other person was in a classroom?
comment image

Michael is a waste of time among many other things.

How is he a waste of time?

*snickers…giving you his average dumb-ass response/question*

You don’t like questions that ask you to expand on or justify your thoughts because there is nothing behind them.

Last edited 1 year ago by Michael

I’ve had many, many formerly-homeschooled students come through my classes. Some were meeting grade-level expectations for their current grade—a few even exceeded them. Most were not. Nearly all of the successful ones had been homeschooled by parents who had previously been teachers.

Geeze why would former teachers homeschool?
Moms and Grandmoms home school up to Pre school, you should do a study of moms vs daycare. BTW The little prince is 2 grades ahead in math, and had tested out of pre K, I teased his mom about holding him back by sending him anyway. The first prince is in the Nerds herd has been in G&T since 2nd grade. I am fully unimpressed by grade level expectations. I know how you love to hear about my grands.

China’s Friend in the White House, Joe Biden, Cancelled Trump’s Program to Prevent Chinese Spying

So it wont be long before China has an exact copy of our new fighting jet. They are great at tech theft and copying but their social structure doesnt encourage thinking outside the box for invention.

Last edited 1 year ago by kitt

Even easier when you have the President of the United States* on the CCP payroll.

*not, and never will be

 Joe Biden Wraps His Arm Around Elton John, Then Tells Crowd, “It’s All His Fault We’re Spending $6 Billion on HIV and AIDS this Month”

Sometimes it seems joe really is lost and wanders until a handler comes and redirects him.
But in this video:
joe isn’t lost or wandering.
He’s scoped out a young girl and is making a bee line for her until someone forces him off that course.
He’s our pedophile-in-chief.

Last edited 1 year ago by Nan G