A New Declaration for American Citizens Empowered by an Old Constitution

Spread the love

Loading


 
In America, January 3rd, 2021

In this, the Declaration of the seventy-five million Americans who sought to have their votes count, who sought to be governed by the United States Constitution, who sought to live free in a nation of laws, we borrow from the words from our Founding Fathers:  When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.



We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long-established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Citizens; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present Government of the United States is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over American Citizens.

To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

Certain members of the United States Congress, current and former members of the Executive Branch and sympathetic members of various agencies of the United States Government did impede the good working order of the United States government and undermine the respect of law among American Citizens by spending years and precious resources proffering a known fiction of treason against the American President and in doing so inhibiting his ability to govern the Nation in good order.

Government officials from across the United States have exaggerated and exploited the threat of a virus to eviscerate the natural right of American Citizens to live their lives as free men and women and pursue the ability to provide for their families and serve their communities.

The American Government has expanded its control over American Citizens far beyond anything for which it was rightly empowered in the Constitution of the United States.  By establishing an ever-growing unaccountable bureaucratic leviathan which seeks to control the lives of Citizens the Government has eliminated the accountability which is inherent in a Government that derives its just powers from the consent of the governed.

And most destructively of all, enemies of freedom, along with their Press brethren and tyrannical Social Media enablers did conspire to deprive the American Citizens of their right to keep their government accountable by thwarting the honest and fair election for the President of the United States of America, thereby rendering all future elections moot, rendering toothless all procedures for limiting Government, rendering the Constitution of the United States to the dustbin of History.

A government no longer accountable to those whom it governs has become by definition a tyranny.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by ridicule, repression and indifference unworthy of a government empowered by its citizens.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Government overseers.  We have warned them from time to time of their attempts to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of the Rights and Freedoms enumerated in the Constitution of the United States.  We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the freedom revering Citizens of the United States of America, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do solemnly publish and declare, That a Government of the United States headed by an interloper is not representative of the will of the People, is illegal and against the Constitution of the United States and therefore all political connection between them and the free citizens of the United States ought to be totally dissolved.

We beg that this dissolution be remedied before it ever comes to fruition by an honest accounting of the most recent Election for President of the United States of America by the Congress and the inauguration of the rightful victor as the next President of the United States. Senators and Representatives swear an oath that begins:  “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;” They have sworn to defend the Constitution and the Republic from enemies who would usurp the power of consent of the Citizens of these United States.

We Respectfully beg they do that which they have sworn and remedy this usurpation before calamity befalls the Nation and the Freedoms endowed by the Creator and guaranteed by the Constitution become mere historical anomalies in the long march of Human Civilization.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
81 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

@Ronald J. Ward:

Chase Elliot doesn’t have to prove he was the 2020 NASCAR champion nor do the Kansas City Chiefs have to defend their Super Bowl victory or even as controversial as it was, that Authentic took the roses at the Kentucky Derby.

So you want to compare events that had millions of people watching on TV, not to mention the thousands in the stands, to election tabulations that are closed to the general public?

How lame can you get, Ward/AJ? I think you have just grasped your last straw with that one.

@retire05:

Your weak tea rebuttal doesn’t disqualify the reality that the voting process was monitored and overseen by both parties and neither are supporting the baseless accusations Team Trump is making.

Plus we’ve been able to witness the baseless accusations playing out in court and that time again, have come up empty.

Team Trump has had adequate time to argue their cases. Millions of people are indeed watching this as well and other than seeing Trump profiteering from it, aren’t seeing any indication his baseless claims have legs.

The burden of proof is on Trump to back up his claim. He’s obviously coming up short. If he can’t back up what he’s saying, looks like he’ll soon be behind bars in New York.

@Ronald J. Ward: The burden of proof is with the election officials, they hold all the election materials that were paid for by the taxpayers. Why do they hold it back? Why are they not fully transparent?
There is NO PROOF that Biden legally won.

@Ronald J. Ward:

Your weak tea rebuttal doesn’t disqualify the reality that the voting process was monitored and overseen by both parties and neither are supporting the baseless accusations Team Trump is making

That’s really funny, Ward/AJ. You’re saying I should except your comparison which uses the same logic as saying a fire engine is like an apple because they are both red. Talk about weak tea.

Plus we’ve been able to witness the baseless accusations playing out in court and that time again, have come up empty.

List the cases where actual evidence has been allowed to be presented to the court. I’m sure you have a list of all of them, right?

@retire05:

We could get into the argument of a boxer never taking a dive or a horse racer never holding the gate or the many other hand-quicker-than-eye moves but this is all a distraction from the reality that team Trump has failed to make a credible case.

He saids and she saids and “I saw it on Facebook” don’t fly in court. You can follow bogus claims and Deplorable can insist on out of context videos but at the end of the day, Trump comes up legally empty handed.

This all falls back to the cultists unable to distinguish truth from fiction, kinda like how not a single cultist here can admit Trump lied when he said we were rounding the curve or that Russia never hacked us or that Trump built a thriving economy or how Trump had the election in the bag despite the obstacles I’ve argued for months.

Trump lost.

@Ronald J. Ward:

We could get into the argument of a boxer never taking a dive or a horse racer never holding the gate or the many other hand-quicker-than-eye moves but this is all a distraction from the reality that team Trump has failed to make a credible case.

Again, you want to compare fire engines to apples. Name one case where Trump has been allowed to provide actual evidence in a court of law. I asked you that before, and as ususal, you evade with ridiculous comparisons. You really are not very bright, it seems.

He saids and she saids and “I saw it on Facebook” don’t fly in court.

Sworn affidavits ARE evidence. Damn, you’re as dumb as Comrade Greggie.

@retire05:

Sworn affidavits ARE evidence. Damn, you’re as dumb as Comrade Greggie.

Obviously, the courts weren’t much impressed with what Team Trump construed as evidence.

@Ronald J. Ward: @Ronald J. Ward:

Obviously, the courts weren’t much impressed with what Team Trump construed as evidence.

Again, list the cases where actual evidence has been allowed to be presented to the court. I’m sure you have a list of all of them, right?

@retire05, #56:

Sworn affidavits ARE evidence. Damn, you’re as dumb as Comrade Greggie.

Only if the Court determines that there is good cause for entering them into evidence and specifically orders that they be accepted as such. This is because accepting a sworn written statement eliminates any ability to cross-examine the witness, or to make any informed judgement regarding the credibility of the witness or of the allegations being made. To be considered evidence, statements from witnesses must be presented in person, in the courtroom, and under oath. Except for the verification of simple factual details by knowledgeable parties that are not a matter of belief or opinion, affidavits are generally considered hearsay.

Look it up if you don’t believe it.

@Greg:

And just how many of these cases that the left keeps saying “Trump lost” have accepted any affidavits or any evidence at all?

Name them so you can get your buttbuddy Ward/AJ off the hook.

The reason they didn’t make it to trial was because the cases were without merit. They had no credible evidence to present. All they had were allegations and affidavits. If they had anything more, they would have made it to trial. The first thing you have to do is establish that you have something meriting the court’s time and attention. You’ve got to make reference to the credible evidence you have supporting your case. They didn’t.

When Rudy got into a courtroom, he wouldn’t even assert that fraud was involved. He actually denied that fraud was an issue.

@retire05:

Again, list the cases where actual evidence has been allowed to be presented to the court. I’m sure you have a list of all of them, right?

Until Team Trump has actual evidence to present, there is no list. Again, he said/she said Facebook memes evidence usually doesn’t make its way to the bench.

This really isn’t that hard to grasp, unless one refuses to grasp.

@Greg:

The reason they didn’t make it to trial was because the cases were without merit

OK, that’s your claim. Now name the case, the court and the reason for dismissal.

You think you are such a legal eagle, prove it. Prove the cases that made it to court were dismissed for lack of merit.

OK, Comrade, show us what you’ve got.

@Ronald J. Ward:

Until Team Trump has actual evidence to present, there is no list. Again, he said/she said Facebook memes evidence usually doesn’t make its way to the bench.

Bullshit response from someone who has no answers.

@retire05, #63:

Sorry. Your repeated demands lack merit.

@Greg: Your repeated allegations lack evidence of any knowledge.

@Greg:

Sorry. Your repeated demands lack merit.

translation:

I cannot answer your question without embarrassing myself so I am just going to ignore you and give some bullshit answer that I think will work.

Love, Comrade Greggie

@Ronald J. Ward:

Chase Elliot doesn’t have to prove he was the 2020 NASCAR champion nor do the Kansas City Chiefs have to defend their Super Bowl victory or even as controversial as it was, that Authentic took the roses at the Kentucky Derby.

Of course, they didn’t kick out anyone watching that may support the opposing teams, as Democrat operatives did in the State Farm Arena. Also, if there was a photo-finish or a questionable touchdown play, everyone agrees to review the evidence instead of hiding all the data and saying, “We won. Trust me.” Maybe even someone such as yourself can see the difference.

Plus we’ve been able to witness the baseless accusations playing out in court and that time again, have come up empty.

Where? What has there been a court hearing where the evidence was presented? All we have seen is judges refusing to see the evidence.

Until Team Trump has actual evidence to present, there is no list.

So… you lied. Again.

He saids and she saids and “I saw it on Facebook” don’t fly in court. You can follow bogus claims and Deplorable can insist on out of context videos but at the end of the day, Trump comes up legally empty handed.

None of the evidence comes from Facebook and explain how Biden openly admitting they were planning fraud (HIS WORDS) was taken out of context. WHAT was the other context?

@Greg:

Only if the Court determines that there is good cause for entering them into evidence and specifically orders that they be accepted as such.

No, only if a court will set its political bias aside and hear the case. Refusing to hear the case is refusing to examine the evidence and that doesn’t mean the evidence is bad.

o be considered evidence, statements from witnesses must be presented in person, in the courtroom, and under oath. Except for the verification of simple factual details by knowledgeable parties that are not a matter of belief or opinion, affidavits are generally considered hearsay.

How about that. And these judges will not allow that to happen, just rejecting the case without giving the merits any consideration.

@Greg:

He actually denied that fraud was an issue.

That’s a direct mis-framing and mis-statement.

Try again.

@Ronald J. Ward:

This really isn’t that hard to grasp, unless one refuses to grasp.

Yes. The Democrats cheated and are about to complete a coup. You’re fine with this, but unfortunately, no longer American.

@Nathan Blue:

Yes. The Democrats cheated and are about to complete a coup. You’re fine with this, but unfortunately, no longer American.

The only logic you’ve presented to justify that statement is that you define a loss as being cheated, that the legitimacy of a win can only be if you are the one victorious.

@Ronald J. Ward: Your idiot puppet candidate Biden AMITTED they were rolling out massive fraud. As usual, even if someone admits they extorted a foreign government or was going to commit election fraud, you will still support them.

@Deplorable Me:

Your silver bullet vid has been debunked and dismissed as taken out of context by even conservative outlets. It ranks up there with Biden groping a girl because a photo shows his hand on her shoulder or that Biden sexually abuses puppies because he accidentally tripped over his dog.

You can try to sell your half baked QAnon talking points to me all you like and you and Nathan can make your elementary insults here on an unhinged rabidly partisan infested blog but it doesn’t go anywhere with the courts or in the real world.

Trump won, bilgly. He has no credible case to contest it other than Trumpland/QAnon fiction and lies.

Trump will be your duly elected president in 15 days and sworn in by a Supreme Court Justice after a lengthy embarrassing denial from a sore losing egomaniac and his Clorox swigging cultists.

Wail and gnash.

@Ronald J. Ward:

Your silver bullet vid has been debunked and dismissed as taken out of context by even conservative outlets.

It’s not “debunked” unless you can tell me what the actual context was. You can’t because what that video is is Biden stupidly blurting out the truth about what the Democrats were going to do. This video has been around since October 24 and only just recently did the left figure out they have NO defense or explanation of it, so they just say, “Oh, that was out of context.” WHAT IS THE F**KING CONTEXT, THEN?

No, there are numerous videos of Biden groping numerous little girls, an actual credible accusation of rape, at least 8 accusations of sexual harassment, reports of him walking around female Secret Service agents naked and him forcing his daughter to shower with him. But, Democrats love pervs.

Not one of my comments come from Qanon, but they are far more credible that the NYT, WaPo, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC or PBS, all serving China, afraid to lose their market share there.

Indeed, even if your candidate admitted to extortion to protect corrupt bribes or massive election fraud, you would still support him. You confirm it again. But, then again, you would vote for Hitler, Stalin or Mao.

@Ronald J. Ward: I encourage you to watch on CSPAN see a little of the evidence presented in congress that your media does not want you to see.
It begins at noon, and isnt about Trump. its about stopping the long term corruption in our elections.
Only criminals hide evidence and the State election officials dont welcome you to confirm the election.
The Patriot Act allowed them to spy on us, its time citizens turn the tables and check out their data.
Send the States delegates that are in dispute back to the State legislatures demand a response in 10 days.

@kitt: 400 intelligence officers band together to investigate 2020 election fraud

Over 400 Former Intelligence Officers are Forming a Network to Investigate Election Fraud

Let us hope these people are in positions and have the motivation to leak every bit of damaging evidence they can find on Biden, Kamala, Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff, Nadler, Bernie, AOC and get it out to the public. We know Democrats approve of leaking, even classified information. So, let the games begin.

@kitt:

It begins at noon, and isnt about Trump. its about stopping the long term corruption in our elections.

One has to wonder if you are intentionally being politically ignorant or are you indeed this politically ignorant.

The Senators involved in trying to overturn the election on Trump’s baseless claims all share the same political aspirations. Trump is the most popular man in the Republican Party and this is no more than appealing to his base. They know they have no shot in hell but feel it’s politically advantageous to stay on the good side of his rabid QAnon indoctrinated base.

While they may succeed on shining for this basket of gullibles, Trumps claims still have no merit and Biden will be sworn in on the 20th.

I’m sure GatewayPundit and welovetrump.com don’t tell you about things such as these but you really should try to expand your political knowledge.

@Ronald J. Ward: If you will recall, Biden clearly stated they were going to commit fraud. The ensuing fraud and evidence is abundantly clear. You simply support fraud.

@Nathan Blue, #69:

Credible evidence of significant election fraud has not been submitted by Trump’s lawyers or by anyone else in any courtroom. In fact, such allegations have not even been presented to a judge in a courtroom. They have only been made in public forums where there are no direct legal consequences for lying. When directly questioned on the point in courtrooms, lawyers representing the Trump campaign have specifically denied that fraud is being alleged.

The whole “massive election fraud” stink has arisen from a massive disinformation campaign. It’s nothing but a political scam. Nothing has been proved in court because there’s nothing there to be proved. In the vast majority of sixty-some cases, there wasn’t even enough specific evidence mentioned in the filings to warrant a trial. Credible evidence for significant irregularities that affected the outcome of the election exists only as fabrications and in the imagination. It’s all specious tabloid fodder, not credible courtroom evidence. Judges make that distinction. Even Trump-appointed judges.

@Greg: Tell us… what do you consider a “legal vote”?

You can’t even explain the State Farm Arena theater of fraud, what the hell do you know about there being no evidence? Biden even announced the fraud in advance, then it happened, wide spread and massive.