“Whistleblower” Eric Ciaramella has been plotting against Trump for a long time



A report by Paul Sperry at Real Clear Investigations has provided more clarity into the plotting by the CIA to oust Trump. Specifically, it focuses on the handiwork on “whistleblower” Eric Ciaramella, a CIA analyst.

We learn a little here

Federal documents reveal that the 33-year-old Ciaramella, a registered Democrat held over from the Obama White House, previously worked with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan, a vocal critic of Trump who helped initiate the Russia “collusion” investigation of the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.

Ciaramella contacted Schiff’s staff and the “huddled” with Schiff to plot against Trump

Also, Ciaramella huddled for “guidance” with the staff of House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, including former colleagues also held over from the Obama era whom Schiff’s office had recently recruited from the NSC. (Schiff is the lead prosecutor in the impeachment inquiry.)

Then comes the big one

And Ciaramella worked with a Democratic National Committee operative who dug up dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, inviting her into the White House for meetings, former White House colleagues said. The operative, Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American who supported Hillary Clinton, led an effort to link the Republican campaign to the Russian government. “He knows her. He had her in the White House,” said one former co-worker, who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.

Documents confirm the DNC opposition researcher attended at least one White House meeting with Ciaramella in November 2015.  She visited the White House with a number of Ukrainian officials lobbying the Obama administration for aid for Ukraine.

You might remember Chalupa. She sought dirt on Trump from the Ukraine

In its most detailed account yet, the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington says a Democratic National Committee (DNC) insider during the 2016 election solicited dirt on Donald Trump’s campaign chairman and even tried to enlist the country’s president to help.

In written answers to questions, Ambassador Valeriy Chaly’s office says DNC contractor Alexandra Chalupa sought information from the Ukrainian government on Paul Manafort’s dealings inside the country in hopes of forcing the issue before Congress.

Chalupa later tried to arrange for Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to comment on Manafort’s Russian ties on a U.S. visit during the 2016 campaign, the ambassador said.

Chaly says that, at the time of the contacts in 2016, the embassy knew Chalupa primarily as a Ukrainian American activist and learned only later of her ties to the DNC. He says the embassy considered her requests an inappropriate solicitation of interference in the U.S. election.

“The Embassy got to know Ms. Chalupa because of her engagement with Ukrainian and other diasporas in Washington D.C., and not in her DNC capacity. We’ve learned about her DNC involvement later,” Chaly said in a statement issued by his embassy. “We were surprised to see Alexandra’s interest in Mr. Paul Manafort’s case. It was her own cause. The Embassy representatives unambiguously refused to get involved in any way, as we were convinced that this is a strictly U.S. domestic matter.”

“All ideas floated by Alexandra were related to approaching a Member of Congress with a purpose to initiate hearings on Paul Manafort or letting an investigative journalist ask President Poroshenko a question about Mr. Manafort during his public talk in Washington, D.C.,” the ambassador explained.

She was able to torpedo Manafort and set fire to the Russian collusion hoax. Ciaramella is also said to be the creator of the “Putin fired Comey” narrative. Ciaramella is supposed to be an analyst but it’s clear that he is a DNC/Brennan operative tasked to undermine and sabotage Donald Trump- and Schiff is an integral part of that cabal:

Earlier this year, Schiff recruited two of Ciaramella’s closest allies at the NSC — both whom were also Obama holdovers — to join his committee staff. He hired one, Sean Misko, in August — the same month the whistleblower complaint was filed.

During closed-door depositions taken in the impeachment inquiry, Misko has been observed handing notes to the lead counsel for the impeachment inquiry, Daniel Goldman, as he asks questions of Trump administration witnesses, officials with direct knowledge of the proceedings told RealClearInvestigations.

This plot has been in the works for some time. It’s no wonder why Schiff is refusing to allow Ciaramella to testify, but as a precaution Schiff has instituted Soviet Union type rules effectively gagging Republicans from any meaningful participation. In fact, dems have written the rules so they they can and will absolutely deny all exculpatory evidence from being presented.

Democrats on the House Rules Committee rejected all 17 Republican amendments to the proposed resolution on the “impeachment inquiry” against President Donald Trump — including one that would require the other investigating committees to hand over exculpatory evidence to the House Judiciary Committee.

Unlike previous impeachments, there are several committees — not just the House Judiciary Committee — being used to investigate the president, especially the House Intelligence Committee.

As currently written (entirely by Democrats), the resolution says that the chair of the House Intelligence Committee, who is Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), is authorized, but not required, to make depositions public. He is required to prepare a report for the House Judiciary Committee, which will consider articles of impeachment, and is given wide discretion over the contents of that report. He is also required to transmit dissenting views.

Other committees are merely “authorized,” but not required, to hand over “records” or “materials” to the House Judiciary Committee. The (Democratic) chairs of those committees must consult with the ranking member of the (Republican) minority, but seem to have wide discretion over what they transmit.

Many, including Tom Brokaw, do not believe democrats have ‘the goods” to ram an impeachment through so for now it appears that they are settling for a Salem witch trial bloodletting in hopes of visiting as much damage as possible.

Ciaramella is not a whistleblower. He is a DNC spy, needed to make the effort to impeach Trump. democrats know they cannot win at the ballot box.

Rep. Al Green:

“I’m concerned if we don’t impeach this president, he will get re-elected.”


0 0 votes
Article Rating
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

the actions of the house have now set in stone the future tactics for the next election. the house has officially divided this country, they are completely unaware of the consequences that will follow in the next 12 months. the demorats wanted an impeachment, they now have a war.

Chalupa isnt that a #6 on the Taco Bell menu? Chalupa primarily as a Ukrainian American activist. Is Ciaramella the mysterious Charlie in the lovers text messages?

The Soviets at least codified their rules of evidence that prevented accused persons from the right to cross examine, the right to see all evidence (including exculpatory evidence), the right to counsel, the rights we all took for granted in the USA….until now.
But the Soviets were not the only ones whose pattern is being followed by these Dems and Schiff.
The communist Chinese find people guilty in a one-sided “trial.” Then they are tissue typed. Whenever an elite needs a kidney, lung, liver, some skin, etc that they match, their sentence (of death) is carried out.
Che Guevera had favorite crimes that he simply acted as cop, judge, jury & executioner for. One favorite was being a female college student (elitist). He killed them right on campus. Today their counterparts wear T-shirts sporting his image! (How many people realize simply wrongthink is a capital crime? Yet isn’t that the only “crime” President Trump is being accused of?)
Wrongthink, like Trump’s is why about 1 million of Cambodia’s 9 million were executed by PolPot.
Wrongthink is NOT a crime at all in the USA as of today.
But if Schiff gets his way, it will be.

Chaly says that, at the time of the contacts in 2016, the embassy knew Chalupa primarily as a Ukrainian American activist and learned only later of her ties to the DNC. He says the embassy considered her requests an inappropriate solicitation of interference in the U.S. election.

Yeah, but, see… when Democrats do this, it’s not the same. It’s righteous because it’s Democrats doing it for their agenda. I’m sure AJ and Greg will agree.

I wonder if Democrats will accept the kind of “fairness” they are affording Trump and the Republicans when they find themselves in the minority?

Doesn’t …or didn’t…the White House require CIA officers to notify anyone in the new administration who they were working for?

Wasn’t this whistleblower’s name known and stated on Twitter back on Oct. 13? Why is this just now “breaking news” or important “new” information. Come on folks, do your own research and know the facts BEFORE you write.

“Get this out to patriots”?

Why, Mr. Krupp? What are your intentions?

It’s on… The Dems didn’t win the last one, and the have no chance winning this Civil War.

Don’t be naive, Patriots.



Thanks DrJohn – you reinforced my point about this being known for 3 weeks now…and yet the current ‘articles’ and ‘breaking news’ make it seem like it was just announced/outed in the last couple days. Whether the 13th or the 10th (I’ll let the Twitter gnats argue that point) it doesn’t really make a difference – but it DOES make a difference if you’re a ‘supposed’ informed writer and you leave out (or are ignorant to) the actual facts and timeline.

Of course, I do completely understand that as a “news source” here, floppingaces is not exactly a go-to locale for most of those following these developments.

@FRED: It wasn’t “known”; it was speculated. Indications pointed towards Ciaramella but it was a guess at the time.

Now we know. We also know who has been doing the leaking out of the White House.

@FRED: Wow…that’s quite the redirection, eh?

We see the whistleblower is illegitimate and the whole thing a hoax…

…but let’s attack FA and Dr J…?

Your calling out of dates is irrelevant.

You’re conceding this is all a farce.

Thank you, Fred. Glad you did the right thing. Good luck to your party in 2024.

@Gregh: It seems like his motive might be to open a can of raid on you cockroaches. Lie your way into an early grave, ask me how!


You prefer the Jeff Bezos owned WAPO to get your talking points? Notice I did not say “News”. The difference is this person is trying to share information, not propagandize. The 13th was only a guess, no proof, and today is only a slightly more substantiated guess, which has some elements to confirm. You’re on the wrong side of history on this, as you will see in the coming days.

All those involved in the witch hunt need to suffer public backlash that costs them their political careers

@FRED: Again, it was journalists putting 2 and 2 together and speculating. Now it’s more clear.

It isn’t difficult to understand for most. Unlike liberals we don’t go nuts over the first rumor we hear. We like facts.

@Spurwing Plover: This is true coup that is decades in the making…

@Deplorable Me:

It wasn’t “known”; it was speculated.

Okay, you’ve got me stumped. For a FA Trump boot licker, what’s the difference? I mean. is there some new policy here or something?

@Ronald J. Ward: There you are, stalking again. Was I talking to you? I’ll get around to answering your question… soon. As soon as you answer mine. If you weren’t so racist you would know the answer. If you don’t know, I can’t explain it to you.

There, I think that’s most of your patented responses.

@Deplorable Me:

Let’s review that one more time. You said:

It wasn’t “known”; it was speculated.

I said:

Okay, you’ve got me stumped. For a FA Trump boot licker, what’s the difference? I mean. is there some new policy here or something?

So I really didn’t need an answer. It’s what’s called rhetoric, perhaps mixed with a bit irony with a splash of an accusation of hypocrisy. It also highlights the inconsistencies in your overall arguments and debating skills or what you construe as facts or opinions.

Most understand the difference even if they don’t know the definitions.

@Ronald J. Ward: Is it some sort of gay obsession you have with stalking me?

Eric Ciaeamekia has another name:
and Wgist;e Blower # 2 is known as MISS DEMEANOR,
and she’s likely a wannabe BLONDE