Clinton partisan hack Maggie Haberman pulls a hit piece out of the recycle bin for the NY Times

Loading


 
democrats swooned when the latest Maggie Haberman NY Times hit piece was posted:


 
democrats wet their collective pants over this “breaking” piece of information.

We also learned that, according to the New York Times, in March—two months before Trump fired Comey—he ordered White House Counsel Don McGahn to stop Sessions from recusing himself. When McGahn was unsuccessful, Trump reportedly erupted in anger, saying he needed Sessions to “protect him” and “safeguard” him, as he believed other attorneys general had done for other presidents. These are very odd statements by Trump that Mueller could argue indicate that Trump wanted Sessions to impede or even end the Russia investigation to “protect him.”

The problem is, this isn’t a new story. Back in June, CNN ran this story by Chris Ruddy:

Washington (CNN)One of President Donald Trump’s friends said he believes the President is considering dismissing special counsel Robert Mueller, who was appointed to lead the FBI investigation into Russia’s potential ties to the 2016 election.

“I think it is a consideration the President has had because Mueller is illegitimate as special counsel,” Christopher Ruddy, the CEO of Newsmax Media, told CNN’s Chris Cuomo on “New Day” Tuesday. “Chris, remember there is no evidence of wrongdoing, there’s no evidence of collusion, there’s no evidence of obstruction.”

He added that he believes it would be a mistake to fire Mueller, but said the “the basis of his investigation is flim-flam.”
Ruddy first made the bombshell assertion that Trump was considering dismissing Mueller to PBS’ Jody Woodruff on “PBS Newshour” Monday night.

Nowhere in Haberman’s article is any attribution given to Ruddy. There is also considerable difference between the two. Ruddy stated that Trump was considering firing Mueller. Haberman claims Trump ordered Mueller fired. That Haberman would frame Trump in the most negative manner is to be expected. Haberman is a partisan Clinton hack:

Haberman has a history of doing this. There is no need to wonder why this story was “broken” now. Trump is killing it in Davos, the stock market has added $7 trillion since Trump took office and the text messages between the FBI adulterers Peter Strzok and Lisa Page continue to demonstrate a conspiracy to keep Hillary Clinton from accountability and frame Donald Trump for non-existent wrongdoings.

When Haberman and the NY Times have to reach into the recycle bin in a desperate attempt to make something stick to Trump you know it’s not going well.

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

When Haberman and the NY Times have to reach into the recycle bin in a desperate attempt to make something stick to Trump you know it’s not going well.

All part of the effort to distract from the memo release. Even IF it’s true, it means absolutely nothing because nothing happened. The lefties are also jumping for joy because Wolff is now claiming Trump and Haley had an affair. Again, the desperation is setting in over the memo. What would you Dr. J attribute this mass psychosis to?

The New York Pravda and All the Lies that’s fit to print this leftists rag allowed for and covered up all the crimes Stalin Mao and Castro commited against their people and helped Castro to stay in power until Satan claimed his soul last year

The President has the authority and power to fire that assclown, this is a non-story.
Did they need a distraction because the texts were located. They think he shouldn’t pardon anyone or clean the partisan leakers out of our intelligence and law enforcement agencies. Obstuction of justice hey look no further than Hillary has not taken residence in a womans prison.

Once again, we see Trump’s foresight. He COULD have fired Mueller because, for all their wishing and hoping, the investigation has only revealed that there is not basis in fact for all the liberal lies about Trump, collusion and obstruction. The only valuable revelation out of the investigation is how Obama had corrupt the intelligence agencies, DOJ and FBI. That’s probably worth the cost of the investigation.

Frankly the only realy good use of the New York Pravda is as Birdcage lining

@Bill… Deplorable Me:

The only valuable revelation out of the investigation is how Obama had corrupt the intelligence agencies, DOJ and FBI.

Sara Carter, who has been neck deep in exposing all of this, is saying that the sources behind the memo are FBI whistleblowers and believes that the documents the memo is based on will be released albeit in redacted form.