We should have listened to crazy Maxine. She warned us about it.
Earlier this year, in an interview with TV One, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) praised President Barack Obama for putting together a campaign database that “will have information about everything on every individual.”
“And that database will have information about everything on every individual in ways that it’s never been done before,” Waters told “Washington Watch” host Roland, referring to Obama’s “Organizing for America,” which was changed from a campaign organization to a 501(c)(4) called Organizing for Action.
Martin had asked her about Obama’s agenda in his last term.
“The inauguration represented the beginning of his second term, but it also represented the countdown to the end of his presidency. And the reality is, like anything else, you better get what you can while he’s there because, look, come 2016, that’s it,” Martin said.
“I don’t know, and I think some people are missing something here,” Waters said.
“The president has put in place an organization that contains a kind of database that no one has ever seen before in life,” she added. “That’s going to be very, very powerful.”
Martin asked if Waters if she was referring to “Organizing for America.”
“That’s right, that’s right,” Waters said. “And that database will have information about everything on every individual in ways that it’s never been done before.”
Waters said the database would also serve future Democratic candidates seeking the presidency.
“He’s been very smart,” Waters said of Obama. “I mean it’s very powerful what he’s leaving in place.”
And that’s largely what happened. Not long after taking office, Obama set things in motion:
In a stunning defense of President George W. Bush’s warrantless wiretapping program, President Barack Obama has broadened the government’s legal argument for immunizing his Administration and government agencies from lawsuits surrounding the National Security Agency’s eavesdropping efforts.
In fact, a close read of a government filing last Friday reveals that the Obama Administration has gone beyond any previous legal claims put forth by former President Bush.
Responding to a lawsuit filed by a civil liberties group, the Justice Department argued that the government was protected by “sovereign immunity” from lawsuits because of a little-noticed clause in the Patriot Act. The government’s legal filing can be read here (PDF).
For the first time, the Obama Administration’s brief contends that government agencies cannot be sued for wiretapping American citizens even if there was intentional violation of U.S. law. They maintain that the government can only be sued if the wiretaps involve “willful disclosure” — a higher legal bar.
“A ‘willful violation’ in Section 223(c(1) refers to the ‘willful disclosure’ of intelligence information by government agents, as described in Section 223(a)(3) and (b)(3), and such disclosures by the Government are the only actions that create liability against the United States,” Obama Assistant Attorney General Michael Hertz wrote (page 5).
Senior Staff Attorney Kevin Bankston at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which is suing the government over the warrantless wiretapping program, notes that the government has previously argued that changes to the Patriot Act protected the government from lawsuits surrounding eavesdropping. But he says that this is the first time that they’ve made the case that the Patriot Act protects the government from all surveillance statutes.
Problem is, it wasn’t about keeping the country safe. Using government resources to visit damage on political opponents became standard fare for Barack Obama. And so is spying, which actually started back in 2011, with the 2012 election looming:
The Obama administration secretly won permission from a surveillance court in 2011 to reverse restrictions on the National Security Agency’s use of intercepted phone calls and e-mails, permitting the agency to search deliberately for Americans’ communications in its massive databases, according to interviews with government officials and recently declassified material.
In addition, the court extended the length of time that the NSA is allowed to retain intercepted U.S. communications from five years to six years — and more under special circumstances, according to the documents, which include a recently released 2011 opinionby U.S. District Judge John D. Bates, then chief judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
What had not been previously acknowledged is that the court in 2008 imposed an explicit ban — at the government’s request — on those kinds of searches, that officials in 2011 got the court to lift the bar and that the search authority has been used.
There was an uproar when Trump lashed out at Steve Bannon, but the media conveniently forgot when Barack Obama called out Romney donors by name, and publicized private information on them during his campaign. Call them out is not all he did. He put the IRS to work on Romney donors by painting targets on their backs:
Nixon’s private “enemies list” was bad. Barack Obama’s public “enemies list” was arguably worse. Obama had used 2010 to alert and sic the IRS on Tea Party groups. But by calling out private citizens by name on his website, he was alerting and siccing every part of his government on Republican donors. The message from the man who controls the Justice Department (which can indict people), the SEC (which can fine people), and the IRS (which can audit people) was clear: Donate money to Romney, and you are fair government game. The posting was also an APB to every liberal group and activist in the country to target those donors.
One donor was audited three times. Obama made a joke about using the IRS in 2009.
Obama also set the IRS to work targeting conservative groups. Once they were caught red handed, Lois Lerner refused to testify and the Obama regime learned to use a tool that they would later use repeatedly: they “lost” emails. When you recall what happened to Christine O’Donnell and Lois Engelbrecht you know why:
Speaking of questions: Can anyone identify a Democratic Senate candidate whose tax records were leaked, as Christine O’Donnell’s were when she was the Republican candidate in Delaware in 2010? Is it a coincidence that in January 2011, after Catherine Engelbrecht requested tax-exempt status for two conservative groups she founded in Texas — King Street Patriots and True the Vote — the Engelbrecht family business was notified of its first IRS audit?
Does James Comey wonder why (this was before he became FBI director), five months after Engelbrecht’s tax-exemption request, FBI agents appeared seeking information about attendees at the King Street Patriots meetings? Were five subsequent FBI contacts “checking in” for “updates” on the group’s activities really necessary?
Why did the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives show a sudden intrusive interest in the Engelbrechts’ business, which has nothing to do with alcohol or tobacco or firearms or explosives?
By September of 2012, Obama and Holde had quadrupled the number of warrantless wiretaps. Romney and his campaign staff were likely among the targets. He and his minions painted Romney as a felon, murderer and tax cheat. Nothing was too low. Once he secured his second term, obama set about making sure the next GOP candidate would lose the race for the Presidency and he procured the tool he needed- the FISC Court. The FBI shenanigans are about to blossom. Watch as the corruption of FBI evolves. Naturally, there was an email loss.
Clinton
March 4, 2015: The Benghazi committee issues a subpoena requiring Clinton to turn over all emails from her private server related to the incident in Libya.
Between March 25-31, 2015: The Platte River Networks employee has what he calls an “oh s—” moment, realizing he did not delete Clinton’s email archive, per Mills’ December 2014 request. The employee deletes the email archive using a software called BleachBit.
April 2015: Hilllary announces candidacy for President
June 10, 2015: Immunity deals for two top Hillary Clinton aides included a side arrangement obliging the FBI to destroy their laptops after reviewing the devices, House Judiciary Committee sources told Fox News on Monday. Sources said the arrangement with former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills and ex-campaign staffer Heather Samuelson also limited the search to no later than Jan. 31, 2015. This meant investigators could not review documents for the period after the email server became public — in turn preventing the bureau from discovering if there was any evidence of obstruction of justice, sources said.
June 2015: Padding the way, $675,000 from Hillary and Terry McAulliffe pours into the campaign of Jill McCabe, wife of Wayne McCabe. McCabe is soon after promoted to #3 at the FBI and within a year is Deputy Director
July 2015 – FBI opens the Clinton email investigation in response to a referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector General.
Some time after that, Loretta Lynch directs Comey to describe the Clinton investigation as a “matter.”
March 2016: Asked by Page who he planned to vote for, Strzok replied: “I suppose Hillary.”
March 4, 2016: Strzok writes to Page of Trump: “Omg he’s an idiot.” He says that a Trump victory in the GOP primaries will be “good for Hillary.” “God Hillary should win. 100,000,000-0,” Strzok writes.
May 2016: A draft of a statement that then-FBI Director James Comey was preparing to release at the conclusion of the Clinton email probe was circulated among top FBI officials, including Strzok. “Please send me any comments on this statement,” wrote FBI chief of staff James Rybicki.
May 4, 2016: Page wrote: “It’s going to be a Clinton Trump race. Unbelievable.” “Now the pressure really starts to finish MYE…,” Strzok wrote.
June 10 (approx), 2016: Strzok rewrites the memo to allow Clinton to escape legal jeopardy:

DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 40 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 45 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter who is in the field of education.
DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed.
Except for liberals being foolish.
I like the way the FBI hard-nosed those Hillary aids. “OK, we’ll take your immunity, but only if you destroy all the evidence for us.” It was this tough negotiating style that secured splendid Iran “OK, you can build your nukes and build your missiles, but you damn well better take this $150 billion.”
Now would be a good time to mention that Obama said his administration was going to be the most honest, transparent and trustworthy ever to be seen by the eyes of mankind. That Obama… whatever else you say about him, at least he had a sense of humor.
So, from the moment Trump became one of the 17 Republican candidates, Obama was spying on his organization. Once he became the candidate, Obama was picking up his every move and informing the Hillary campaign of what Trump was doing and was going to do.
AND HILLARY STILL LOST!!! BWA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA!!!!!
My main fear was Hillary getting ahold of the Supreme Court. Little did I know…
We had an idea, I was on the Pedicord site looking for the best ex-pat place to immigrate to, big push on Belieze at that time. Caymen up the retirement funds ect.. looks like I wont be wasting away in Margaritaville.
Mad Madame Maxine is becoming totaly unglued i tell you or as Speedy Gonzalas would say MOOCHO LOCO IN THE CAPASSA a typical liberal demacrats out of their minds totaly
We really dodged a bullet!
?w=622&h=425
Liberal demacrats are dunb eniugh to beleive everything their told and everything they read in the New York Pravda(Times)and everything they hear from Al Bore Dan Blather and Tom Brokejaw
Who the heck is going to read through all of this?
@Gary Miller: You DON’T read it at your own peril.
@Gary Miller:
I would. Didn’t know what to leave out. It is a complex story.
Reading all that, is like listening to fingernails on a chalk board. I need a drink!
@Gary Miller: hey I read the obamacare law so there are people out there that will
Hearing a liberal whining high pitched voice is like fingernails on a blackboard like the whining animal rights idiots who oppose using any kind of animal products i just wish they would keep their stupid opinions to themselves instead of blabbering it out to the whole world
@Gary Miller:
There’s an easy way to get through all of the information in the article: Imagine every dirty, evil, underhanded, corrupt, illegal thing that the Dems in power could conceivably have done in the past nine years, and then realize it’s happened, and continues to happen.
The article does not even touch on Hillary’s Russian collusion in the Uranium One deal, election sabotage at the DNC, Wasserman-Schultz’s collusion with the criminal Awan family, and on and on. People “died mysteriously” over the Trump dossier per Fusion GPS’s Glenn Simpson (Seth Rich?). Donna Brazille said she was in fear of her life after Rich’s murder. We are only seeing the very tip of a gigantic iceberg of leftist Dem corruption and sabotage of America and its citizens.
@Angel Artiste: An even easier way is to listen to what the Democrats are accusing the Republicans of. THIS is what they themselves are committing.
I realy cant stand whining animal rights activists who whine we should’nt use any animal based products at all just proves a study that claimed strict vegans have shrinking brains