Dominant Obama/Clinton Memes – You Are Racists and Sexists

Posted on by ( 22 comments already! )
Spread the love

Loading

Obama/Clinton
 
In a continuation of her need to create division and hate within the Nation during Monday’s debate, Hillary Clinton blanketed all of America’s justice system and police departments as being infected with the mythical blight of racism.  Then she went on to claim that the affliction was systemic nationwide, so apparently we’re all racists.

Clinton’s persistence with personal insults on Trump throughout the debate were tiresome, but her “racist” perpetually sustained constant is one we are daily served-up by the socialist media across North America.

This incessant droning meme is stimulating the rioting and looting of communities which have been left behind by their political masters — abused, used and then ignored.

During the Obama Presidency the left took the Obama defence strategy of pasting ‘racist’ accusations on foreheads of anyone who disliked his policies. It worked in deciding the Nation and Clinton, along with her media, is continuing the meme.

Hate, Divide, Fuel, Repeat.

Instead of doing his job, today Obama did fundraising and stumping for ‘his legacy’, continuing with absurd notions meant to divide America, claiming that people don’t like Clinton because she’s a woman.

Hate, Divide, Fuel, Repeat.

Denial by this Administration knows no bounds.  His arrogance pretends that the doubling of the National debt doesn’t exist, and yet as it nears $20 trillion, its acceleration is increasing alarmingly. Don’t like it? . . . Racist, Sexist!  Obama and Clinton pretend to care about kids and grandkids, yet they have championed the explosion a burden of spending and debt that our grandchildren cannot ever repay.  They seem proud that there are more business closures today than ever, and fewer businesses being formed today than a decade ago.  They applaud themselves for having lied to a majority of African Americans who continue to support them, even though we stand at a labor force participation level which has steadily declined for 20 years with the highest unemployment having destroyed the lower income neighbourhoods.  Don’t like it? . . . Racist, Sexist!

In this narcissistic Obama/Clinton fantasy economy, it is apparently progress that 1 of 5 young adults are living with their parents and almost two thirds of America cannot pull $1,000 in cash together in an emergency. These two can, however, feel very proud that the top percentage of the elite which controls them, now has greater control over life in America than it has ever had.

As we await an economic earthquake, the Obama/Clinton memes become evermore destructive, disintegrating  the moral, social and economic fibres of American life.  That demolition is accelerating and becoming even more pervasive as it is amplified dramatically by almost 100% of the media.

California, which for years advanced the notion that affirmations could provide positive energy to personal progress, has become an expanse of the Obama/Clinton hate memes. So effective has this hateful meme PR campaign become, that much of California’s white population now vocalizes hate of white men, with the minor caveat ‘old white men’ — old white men being the source of the world’s ills.

Hate, Divide, Fuel, Repeat.

No one is surprised to see the outcome of this hateful, hypocritical, political methodology play-out on the streets. The fuelled hate is potent. The memes are working.

Meanwhile, they pretend, ‘inclusion’.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
22 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

After decades of a steady decline of violent crime, we now see them increasing under Obama. Obama inspires crime, lawlessness and anarchy. One must be really proud of their choice if they voted for this anti-American failure.

0

@Bill… Deplorable Me: B.S.

0

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/28/us/pepe-the-frog-hate-symbol-trnd/index.html
Yes, Pepe the frog is now a designated hate symbol!
Pepe, who only once appeared in a cartoon book as peeing while saying, ”Feels good, man,” has earned a spot in the Anti-Defamation League’s database of hate symbols.
Pepe the frog images include him doing EVERYTHING.
A few even show him with a swastika.
But to call ALL Pepe the frog images ”hate symbols is an attempt by the Left to stop people from having fun.
The Left is a humorless lot.
They want everyone dependent.
And they want everyone thinking alike.

@Bill… Deplorable Me: Correct:
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/09/26/495460107/fbi-violent-crime-rose-slightly-in-2015-murders-up-nearly-11-percent
See also:

Murders Rose At Their Fastest Pace In A Quarter-Century Last Year

and:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/09/09/murder-rates-soar-25-nations-big-cities/
Some of those big cities:
Washington D.C.
Baltimore, Maryland,
Chicago, Ill.,
Cleveland, Ohio;
Milwaukee in Wisconsin,
Nashville in Tennessee and
Houston in Texas.

0

They are Alinsky Liberals: this is what Alinsky Liberals do. Without turmoil, hatred, and anger Alinsky Liberals have no traction.

0

@Skook: True.
And the Left really hates it when the rules for radicals are used against them!
Here’s a guidebook:
http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2012/04/13/12_ways_to_use_saul_alinskys_rules_for_radicals_against_liberals

#4A Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.
Conservatives have a tendency to try to win every debate with logic and recitations of facts which, all too often, fail to get the job done because emotions and mockery are often just as effective as reason. The good news is that liberals almost never have logic on their side; so they’re incapable of rationally making the case for their policies while conservatives can become considerably more effective debaters by simply adding some emotion-based arguments and sheer scorn to their discourse. This has certainly worked on Twitter.

0

Obama opens the border brings in so called refugees want to disarm all law abiding americans lies 24/7 abuss the power of office and rubs elbows with terrorists dem nounces america to t he Usless Nations and the World and runs off the play golf while the world burns and Hillary is even more worst the demacrats are the lowests lifeforms on earth BEHEAD THE JACKASS

0

@Richard Wheeler: Really? Cite me ONE instance where the left, including Obama, has cited racism being behind a police shooting, resulting in protests and riots, where that turned out to be the fact. Just one. Cite me where their accusations of racism of a conservative was based on fact.

0

The democrat party has been a bastion of racism since its inception and especially in a post civil war America.

The DNC Web site section labeled “Party History,” linked here, is in fact scrubbed clean of the not-so-little dirty secret that fueled Democrats’ political successes for over a century and a half and made American life a hell on earth for black Americans. Literally, the DNC official history, which begins with the creation of the party in 1800, gets to the creation of the DNC itself in 1848 and then–poof!–the next sentence says: “As the 19th Century came to a close, the American electorate changed more and more rapidly.” It quickly heads into a riff on poor immigrants coming to America.

In a stroke, 52 years of Democratic history vanishes. Disappeared faster than the truth in the Clinton administration. Why would this be? Allow me to sketch in a few facts from those missing 52 years. For that matter, lets add in the facts from the party history before and after those 52 years, since they aren’t mentioned by the Democrats’ National Committee either.

* * *

So what’s missing?

*There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms supporting slavery. There were six from 1840 through 1860.

*There is no reference to the number of Democratic presidents who owned slaves.
There were seven from 1800 through 1861.

*There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms that either supported segregation outright or were silent on the subject. There were 20, from 1868 through 1948.

*There is no reference to “Jim Crow” as in “Jim Crow laws,” nor is there reference to the role Democrats played in creating them. These were the post-Civil War laws passed enthusiastically by Democrats in that pesky 52-year part of the DNC’s missing years. These laws segregated public schools, public transportation, restaurants, rest rooms and public places in general (everything from water coolers to beaches). The reason Rosa Parks became famous is that she sat in the “whites only” front section of a bus, the “whites only” designation the direct result of Democrats.

*There is no reference to the formation of the Ku Klux Klan, which, according to Columbia University historian Eric Foner, became “a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party.” Nor is there reference to University of North Carolina historian Allen Trelease’s description of the Klan as the “terrorist arm of the Democratic Party.”

*There is no reference to the fact Democrats opposed the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution. The 13th banned slavery. The 14th effectively overturned the infamous 1857 Dred Scott decision (made by Democratic pro-slavery Supreme Court justices) by guaranteeing due process and equal protection to former slaves. The 15th gave black Americans the right to vote.
There is no reference to the fact that Democrats opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1866. It was passed by the Republican Congress over the veto of President Andrew Johnson, who had been a Democrat before joining Lincoln’s ticket in 1864. The law was designed to provide blacks with the right to own private property, sign contracts, sue and serve as witnesses in a legal proceeding.
There is no reference to the Democrats’ opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1875. It was passed by a Republican Congress and signed into law by President Ulysses Grant. The law prohibited racial discrimination in public places and public accommodations.

*There is no reference to the Democrats’ 1904 platform, which devotes a section to “Sectional and Racial Agitation,” claiming the GOP’s protests against segregation and the denial of voting rights to blacks sought to “revive the dead and hateful race and sectional animosities in any part of our common country,” which in turn “means confusion, distraction of business, and the reopening of wounds now happily healed.”

*There is no reference to four Democratic platforms, 1908-20, that are silent on blacks, segregation, lynching and voting rights as racial problems in the country mount. By contrast the GOP platforms of those years specifically address “Rights of the Negro” (1908), oppose lynching (in 1912, 1920, 1924, 1928) and, as the New Deal kicks in, speak out about the dangers of making blacks “wards of the state.”
There is no reference to the Democratic Convention of 1924, known to history as the “Klanbake.” The 103-ballot convention was held in Madison Square Garden. Hundreds of delegates were members of the Ku Klux Klan, the Klan so powerful that a plank condemning Klan violence was defeated outright. To celebrate, the Klan staged a rally with 10,000 hooded Klansmen in a field in New Jersey directly across the Hudson from the site of the convention. Attended by hundreds of cheering convention delegates, the rally featured burning crosses and calls for violence against African-Americans and Catholics.

*There is no reference to the fact that it was Democrats who segregated the federal government, at the direction of President Woodrow Wilson upon taking office in 1913. There is a reference to the fact that President Harry Truman integrated the military after World War II.

*There is reference to the fact that Democrats created the Federal Reserve Board, passed labor and child welfare laws, and created Social Security with Wilson’s New Freedom and FDR’s New Deal. There is no mention that these programs were created as the result of an agreement to ignore segregation and the lynching of blacks. Neither is there a reference to the thousands of local officials, state legislators, state governors, U.S. congressmen and U.S. senators who were elected as supporters of slavery and then segregation between 1800 and 1965. Nor is there reference to the deal with the devil that left segregation and lynching as a way of life in return for election support for three post-Civil War Democratic presidents, Grover Cleveland, Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt.

*There is no reference that three-fourths of the opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Bill in the U.S. House came from Democrats, or that 80% of the “nay” vote in the Senate came from Democrats. Certainly there is no reference to the fact that the opposition included future Democratic Senate leader Robert Byrd of West Virginia (a former Klan member) and Tennessee Senator Albert Gore Sr., father of Vice President Al Gore.

*Last but certainly not least, there is no reference to the fact that Birmingham, Ala., Public Safety Commissioner Bull Connor, who infamously unleashed dogs and fire hoses on civil rights protestors, was in fact–yes indeed–a member of both the Democratic National Committee and the Ku Klux Klan

.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB121856786326834083

0

POLITICIANS ARE THE LOWEST FORM OF LIFE ON EARTH LIBERAL DEMACRATS ARE THE LOWEST FROM OF POLITICIAN . GENERAL PATTON

0

Laughing at the little liberal weenies squealing “Show me just one!” as if the rest of us have to prove it to them (they’ll deny ANY proof as “That’s not the same thing…”). They have no argument for this disgraceful pitting of people against each other to reach their silly, stupid Utopian goal. The folks who’ve been called names while doing the heavy lifting have simply reached the point where they know ANYTHING they say or do will be called “Racist!” by some leftist asshole, so they’ve decided, “We’ll die waiting for the perfect candidate, we’ll take this deeply-imperfect one because you people have to be stopped before we all go under.”

0

@John S Walsh: the little liberal weenies squealing

That’s a perfect image of what we’re seeing, John.

The New York Times executive editor, Dean Baquet, said during a visit to Harvard in September that he would risk jail to publish Donald Trump’s tax returns.
Federal law makes it illegal to publish an unauthorized tax return:

It shall be unlawful for any person to whom any return or return information (as defined in section 6103(b)) is disclosed in a manner unauthorized by this title thereafter willfully to print or publish in any manner not provided by law any such return or return information. Any violation of this paragraph shall be a felony punishable by a fine in any amount not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/02/the-new-york-times-risked-legal-trouble-to-publish-donald-trumps-tax-return/

Ironic that the NYTimes has also not paid any Federal Taxes in some recent years.
Just something that is the LEGAL price of doing business.
You take risks.
Sometimes you lose.
The tax codes, as they stand each year, allow you to spread your loss from your risk over time.
If they didn’t, who would bother trying anything new?

0

@Nanny G:

The tax codes, as they stand each year, allow you to spread your loss from your risk over time.

Nanny G, and given that Trump is audited every year,. . . which means he’s followed the law, it matters little what his taxes look like.

It’s a distraction from the fact that the 6%-Clinton Foundation is a fraudulent organization — and was so right from the start, with satellite ‘foundations’ for cash collection such as the one which Bill-buddy Giustra runs in Canada.

0

@Nanny G: Of course, they know they risk nothing. This corrupt administration is not about to prosecute anyone that violates the law to support the liberal agenda. Obama’s use of the IRS, DoJ and allowing Hillary to skate on lying to Congress (under oath) and lying to the FBI proves that.

0

Four Years of Tax Returns All Show Donald Trump Did Not Pay Federal Taxes (Turns out it might actually be as many as 18 years.)

“He’s an absolute genius,” says Rudy Giuliani.

In which case the rest of us—working hard, paying our debts, and paying our taxes when smarter, wealthier people figure out how not to do so—are apparently stupid.

Oh, and by the way:

“The roads and sidewalks, airports and bridges, are perfect in Dubai. Everything looks clean & strong. In U.S., everything is falling apart!”

You know…all that stuff paid for with tax dollars. It’s all looking pretty shabby.

0

@Greg: @Greg:

In which case the rest of us—working hard, paying our debts, and paying our taxes when smarter, wealthier people figure out how not to do so—are apparently stupid.

Yeah, that’s the message we get from Buffett, Sharpton, the MSNBC “personalities”, Soros, Zukenburg, Bono, Springsteen, Kerry and Gore all send, for they are liberals that have always supported raising taxes yet don’t just take legal breaks, but actually neglect to pay what they owe.

But you don’t have a problem with that, do you? Just like you don’t have a problem with Hillary ducking taxes on $1 million by donating it… to herself.

Nothing Trump has done has been illegal, has it? When people suffer losses, they get to deduct them. However, donating a million dollars to your own charity… which pays your expenses… is a bit shady. But, much of what Hillary does is shady; and that’s just the up-front, transparent stuff.

It also doesn’t bother you that Trump’s taxes were illegally released and published. I guess Pelosi’s request that hacked material not be exploited by the Republicans is a dead issue now, huh?

0

It also doesn’t bother you that Trump’s taxes were illegally released and published.

You’re upset about 2 pages?

Is this not the guy who publicly called for Russia to illegally hack and disclose Clinton’s e-mail?

You didn’t seem to be bothered much by the illegal hacking and disclosure of DNC documents, either.

If Trump stiffed any accountants, tax consultants, or office underlings who have handled his paperwork over the years, he may have plenty to worry about. It wouldn’t require a Russian hacker. An angry girl who ran a photocopier might be enough.

0

“Now we know: Donald J. Trump racked up losses so huge in the early 1990s that he wouldn’t have had to pay federal or New York State income tax on nearly a billion dollars in income.

“None of this seems to have made the slightest dent in Mr. Trump’s opulent lifestyle over the years. At the nadir of his personal financial crisis in the early 1990s, his lenders put him on an annual “budget” of $450,000 in personal expenses — more than enough to sustain his lifestyle of lavish homes, private jets, country clubs and golf courses — even as he was using the tax code to avoid paying any federal income tax.

“It’s hard to imagine a starker contrast with the vast number of Americans who struggle to both pay taxes and make ends meet, or a more damning indictment of a tax code that makes that possible.”

How does a “genius in business” rack up a billion dollars in losses? What’s the difference between this sort of “genius” and a scam artist?

To my mind, it’s just a variation on the financial sector shakedown, where those who nearly crashed the U.S. economy walked away with untold billions, leaving the taxpayers to take care of the disaster they created.

0

@Greg:

Is this not the guy who publicly called for Russia to illegally hack and disclose Clinton’s e-mail?

uh… no. It isn’t. You should probably actually READ the words he said, or hear them. Trump sarcastically implied Russia probably already had Hillary’s “missing” emails, as do Iran, N. Korea and anyone else that bothered to look.

You didn’t seem to be bothered much by the illegal hacking and disclosure of DNC documents, either.

Hey, it wasn’t MY sock-eyed leader that begged Republicans not to use the hacked emails… that would be Pelosi, YOUR rep.

How does a “genius in business” rack up a billion dollars in losses? What’s the difference between this sort of genius and a scam artist?

I realize that, as a leftist, you believe everyone has the benefit of making risky investments then just printing more money if they go south. But, see, in the real world, where people invest and risk their OWN money, sometimes the money is lost and it just goes away. It can’t be just reprinted or taken from other people.

0

@Bill… Deplorable Me, #18:

Hear his words for yourself. The language seems to be English. Personally, I want a president to say what he or she actually means. Presidents don’t get to say one thing and mean another. If the subtle nuances are ambiguous to a person when words are heard in their own native language, they sure as hell are going to get lost in any translation.

I realize that, as a leftist, you believe everyone has the benefit of making risky investments then just printing more money if they go south.

He can continue to play Risky Business in the business world, for all I care, but I don’t believe a high tolerance for risk with other people’s money is an asset in the world of geopolitics. That game isn’t being played with money. If you screw up, you don’t get to declare bankruptcy, move right along to the next game, and write off any lives lost against future gains. Business doesn’t open your eyes and widen your perspectives. It narrows things down to dollars, and often elevates the importance of dollars to the point where values get lost. This is a fundamental truth, at the root of much which is seriously wrong with the world.

0

“The man’s a genius,” Rudolph W. Giuliani, a former New York mayor and a close adviser to Mr. Trump, said on Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “He knows how to operate the tax code for the people that he’s serving.”

If he’s “operating the tax code” in such an exemplary fashion, why is he afraid to let anyone see what he’s been doing in that regard?

Why can’t we see where the money is going?

Why aren’t we allowed to know who “the people that he’s serving” are?

Are they a collection of Russian oligarchs? A who’s who list of disreputable Middle Eastern investors? A host of highly-placed conservative figures, such as Giuliani himself?

0

@Greg: I fully understood his words. Thanks to Hillary’s secret, private, unsecured server on which she illegally stored thousands of classified documents, at least 110 of which were clearly marked as classified PRIOR to being illegally stored on her secret, private, unsecured server, the Russians probably already have her emails BEFORE she employed Bleachbit to destroy emails that were UNDER SUBPOENA.

He never implores Russia to hack anyone; that is simply another stupid liberal myth.

e can continue to play Risky Business in the business world, for all I care, but I don’t believe a high tolerance for risk with other people’s money is an asset in the world of geopolitics.

Oh, don’t you? How many billions of taxpayer dollars have been squandered in Obama’s green industry/contributor pay back schemes? How many billions of taxpayer dollars simply came up missing in Hillary’s State Department? Almost a trillion taxpayer dollars was flushed down the toilet in Obama’s “stimulus” union pay-back. How many millions of taxpayer dollars have been spent trying to squeeze the truth about the IRS, Fast and Furious, VA, Benghazi, Obamacare and email scandals that Obama and Hillary stonewall? No liberal alive gives one goddamn thought to squandering taxpayer money. None, nowhere. Don’t give me that crap.

You also don’t care much about Hillary’s indebtedness to the foreign contributors to the Clinton Bribe Repository, aka the Clinton Foundation, which Hillary gobbled up as SECRETary of State. I consider her influence peddling far more worrisome than an legal real estate enterprise. But, then again, I am not desperately trying to justify and validate the most corrupt, inept and dishonest person ever to seek the Presidency, Hillary Rotten Clinton.

0

@Greg:

Hypocrite: Hillary Used Same Method Trump Did To Not Pay Taxes

http://www.weaselzippers.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Screen-Shot-2016-10-02-at-10.08.27-PM.png

She used the same legal method to carry forward a loss. The difference? She’s a hypocrite trying to fault him for what she herself did.

Via Zero Hedge:

Well this is a little awkward. With the leaked 1995 Trump tax returns ‘scandal’ focused on the billionaire’s yuuge “net operating loss” and how it might have ‘legally’ enabled him to pay no taxes for years, we now discover none other than Hillary Rodham Clinton utilized a $700,000 “loss” to avoid paying some taxes in 2015.

The Clinton Campaign was quick to jump on the leaked Trump tax filing with Robby Mook tweeting [above].

And Hillary following up, adding Trump “apparently got to avoid paying taxes for nearly two decades—while tens of millions of working families paid theirs.”

However, a look back at Hillary Clinton’s tax returns from 2015 (here), proudly displayed by the campaign proving she has nothing to hide – shows something awkward on page 17…

http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2016/10/01/20161002_hillarytax_0.jpg

While not on the scale of Trump’s business “operating loss”, Hillary Clinton – like many ‘wealthy’ individuals is taking advantage of a legal scheme to use historical losses to avoid paying current taxes.

As Bloomberg notes, this federal tax break is among the wealthy’s most used avoidance schemes…

Those 1.1 million folks in the 1 percent, as measured by the TPC, have annual income that averages a little less than $700,000. The top one-tenth of that group, some 110,000 households, average about $3.6 million, according to Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the TPC.2

The middle of the pack, some 33 million people, have pretax income ranging from $45,000 to $80,000. The lowest one-fifth of taxpayers, a universe of about 47 million Americans, have income up to about $24,000.

Among the biggest of these givebacks, courtesy of the Internal Revenue Service (well, really Congress), are capital gains and dividends—these are the biggest way the wealthiest benefit.

In the words of Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager, “this bombshell report reveals [Hillary Clinton’s] past business failures… and may show just how long [Hillary Clinton] may have avoided paying taxes.”

* * *

Finally, as we noted previously, the NYT itself is also perfectly happy to take advantage of the US tax to minimize the amount of money it pays to the government: in 2014 the company got a tax refund of $3.6 million despite having a $29.9 million pretax profit, an effective negative tax rate for 2014, which it explained was favorably affected by approximately $21.1 million for the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions due to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.

http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2016/09/20/NYT%20tax.jpg

0