A Great Screen Play, If Only It Were So Trivial


Obama’s existence is an ongoing euphemism waged by the apologists of American Media. Using the crude format of argument best described by the Greek term epiplexis (using shame and the threat of being labeled a dunce if you don’t accept the argument) we are in a constant barrage of nonsense designed to confuse and humiliate us for not grasping the illogic of Obama logic.

The Benghazi Debacle is the latest and perhaps the most flagrant example. For instance, we know Obama is fascinated with the mysticism of the enlightened east, not that he really wants to live under the tyranny and oppression of the Islamic State, but he is definitely lost to an adolescent romantic illusion of the dogma.

Thus he can be at war with al-Qaeda and supply them with weapons, he can decide on a whim that Ghaddafi needs to be deposed and send our most technical war machine to help with the assassination and anal rape of the ruler who once called Obama his son.

Now that the Muslim Brotherhood’s dream of a caliphate throughout the Middle East is nearly complete, with Syria the next secular state scheduled to fall; Obama is basking in his dreams of being a statesman for the Muslim State, facilitated by the Muslim Brotherhood, but for him, it is the grand spirituality of the process that compels him to be statesman for the Muslim Brotherhood. The fact that they are homicidal psychopaths is immaterial to Obama; they are mystical Islamics and the approaching climax of a dream that for Obama that is emotive and irresistible.

Like many religious figures who have had less than pristine private lives, the act of convincing others to seek an enlightened path is far more rewarding and much easier than a true self-journey of enlightenment. The romance of the spirituality is the focus for the leader.

Obama, like the fundamentalist Muslim, sees Americans leading a decadent lifestyle, a lifestyle he happens to enjoy, but feels the ever-present emotion of guilt for living this immoral lifestyle of the West. To relieve these feelings of guilt, he weakens America by catering to the soft belly of sloth and corruption. To those disaffected members of society who won’t or can’t participate in the American dream, he awards power and the result is a weakening of the moral fabric and a corrosion of the American spirit.

Working as an equation that must retain equilibrium, while weakening America, he must build strength among our enemies with weaponry and technology. Mysteriously, our most technical drone flies to Iran and makes a perfect landing. A great strategic advantage has now been sacrificed to one of our most virulent enemies, now Iran boasts of drone capabilities. Presumably, only a select few people have access to this drone arsenal and fewer still have the ability to fly the drone over international borders, but we can’t seem to locate the perpetrator.

Iran is four years closer to building their nuclear capabilities and our comedic Vice President Biden assures us that they don’t have a delivery system and it is silly to worry over the possibility. However if we have traitors willing to fly a drone into Iran, it is logical to assume we will allow the same traitors to hand over a delivery system. In Obama’s unimpressive intellect, they are “the good guys”; therefore, it is righteous to help them with Jihad, especially with their hostility toward Israel and the U.S., for they are mystical and we are decadent.

Not that he is an active Muslim, but like the American Christian who gives money to the church but doesn’t participate, relying instead on the assumption that it is better to maintain a relationship with God and church, just in case things become grim.

In other words, Obama could do a great service to Allah by delivering the Western people for conversion and still enjoy life until he too had to convert fully; since the destruction of Western decadence is essential to spiritual enlightenment.

Would Obama ever admit he was an agent for Islam? Hell no, literally, his life is based on lies.

If Obama is reelected, we can expect to see a repeat of the last four years with renewed energy and no pretenses of traditional American loyalty. Our military and economic resources, will be primarily exhausted on the establishment of an Islamic Caliphate controlling the Middle East and branching out to “evangelize” the rest of the world.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

To suggest the Obama administration was responsible for the safe landing of a drone in Iran—for the purposes of stealing US secrets to building one, is either a lie or a mistake. Here’s my evidence that it didn’t happen that way: “Iran tricked U.S. spy drone into landing in country, report says.” http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9222728/Iran_tricked_U.S._spy_drone_into_landing_in_country_report_says

Where’s yours that it did?

Well said Skook. He (Obama) has contributed to a fine mess in the Middle East.

Thanks Serviens.

Lib, yes your source is fairly conclusive; about as conclusive as me.

The U.S. RQ-170 Sentinel spy drone that was recently captured and displayed by Iranian authorities may have been tricked into landing in that country after being electronically ambushed.

An unconfirmed report in the Christian Science Monitor Thursday quotes an unnamed Iranian engineer as saying that electronic warfare experts in the country were able to cut off the drone’s communications links and reconfigure its GPS coordinates to trick it into landing in Iran.

It is the phrases: “may have been tricked” and “quotes an unnamed Iranian engineer”. Dealing with reality or in Obama Speak, a continuing Omega type investigation that has no beginning (as far as were concerned) or no ending; unless, you want the government to say conclusively that, “Yes, we lost our most advanced drone technology to the Iranians, but damned if we know how or why. If we look at these vague references in the Christian Science Monitor, we have clues.”

Yes, than you Lib, you are slightly less helpful than the Obama Administration.


This is becoming a liberal/progressive theme here at FA, Skooks. Dismissing any stories with an “unnamed” source that colors Obama negatively, while accepting those stories with an “unnamed” source that reflect positively, or neutral, on Obama.

Greg is famous here for accepting Reid’s “unnamed” source on Romney’s taxes, while being vociferous in his defense of Obama against FoxNew’s “unnamed” sources. To the point he demands those “unnamed” sources be outed. Probably so that he and his liberal/progressives can attack the person, or persons, behind the sources. Another tried and true lib/prog tactic.

So, getting back to Lib1, are we to believe his chosen news story and it’s “unnamed” Iranian engineer?

Double standards. Where would we be without them?

Good read, Skook.
It reminded me that there was a time in the UK (way back when Elvis Costello wrote ”London is full of Arabs…”) where freeness to express what Brits saw about Arab behavior was not so scary.
Way back then the blatant hypocrisy of the Arabs who came to London was laughed about.
Alcohol! (haram!)
They took (and sometimes murdered) homosexual lovers! (also haram)
They gambled (also haram.)
They borrowed money with an INTEREST RATE! (also haram)
The smuggled the best alcohol and Israeli products back into their high-walled private compounds when they went back home.
Behind those high walls they lived like rich INFIDELS.
But when their needy Muslim neighbors and subjects got restless they blamed all their poverty on the infidels and Israelis.
Excellent scapegoats …. until the internet.
One thing about the Arab Spring: it has forced all these high-living two-faced leaders to actually live like good Muslims.
They don’t really like it any more than Obama would.
But they are all sporting that ”head raisin” that bruised and raised spot on the forehead created by fervent head-banging prayer. (Or by banging one’s head on a wall regularly.)

Obama is showing the same naivety that got Ambassador Stevens killed.
Why do so many infidels believe they will be the last ones killed?
Islamic Kitman (telling only part-truths) and Taqiyya (lying for Islam) must have a lot to do with it.

In light of your photo of the London Muslims for ending freedom of expression and more:

A recent (late October, 2012) poll of 600 American Muslims found these things:

When asked, “Do you believe that criticism of Islam or Muhammad should be permitted under the Constitution’s First Amendment?, 58% replied “no,” while only 42% affirmed this most basic manifestation of freedom of speech, i.e., to criticize religious, or any other dogma.

12% of this Muslim sample even admitted they believed in application of the draconian, Sharia-based punishment for the non-existent crime of “blasphemy” in the US code, answering affirmatively, “…that Americans who criticize or parody Islam should be put to death.”

43% of these US Muslims rejected the right of members of other faiths to proselytize to adherents of Islam.

This is a right that has been taken to the Supreme Court and protected up until now.

32% of this American Muslim sample believed “…Shariah law should be the supreme law of the land in the US.”

Because that’s what they are being taught at their Mosques.
The Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America (AMJA) regularly trains imams from throughout North America.
AMJA issus rulings sanction the killing of apostates, “blasphemers,” (including non-Muslims guilty of this “crime”), and adulterers (by stoning to death); condone female genital mutilation, marital rape, and polygamy; and even endorse the possibility for offensive jihad against the U.S., as soon as Muslims are strong enough to wage it.

Finally, it should be noted, 81% of this sample of Muslim Americans were either “definitely for Obama,” or “leaning Obama.”