ABC News spent all of 30 seconds on the first cabinet member to ever be held in contempt:
Shocking right? I mean the there is no MSM bias right?
Imagine if this had happened during Bush’s tenure….the media ran non-stop stories about the desk jockey at the CIA getting outed but the Attorney General of the United States being held in criminal and civil contempt? Yawn.
Pathetic.
The House of Representatives voted to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress Thursday for failing to provide documents relating to the Fast and Furious gunwalking program.
The House took two votes, one on criminal contempt charges, which passed 255-67. The criminal contempt of Congress is likely not to go anywhere as the Justice Department, which Holder heads, is the department responsible for opening a criminal investigation.
The second charge, which passed 258 – 95, was a civil contempt charge, could move to federal court where it could take years to litigate. Though the action puts more pressure on the administration to abide by the subpoenas and provide requested documents.
Meanwhile, meet the 17 Democrats who voted with Republicans:
Candidate District Opponent Mike Ross AR-04 Tom Cotton John Barrow GA-12 TBD Leonard Boswell IA-03 Tom Latham Joe Donnelly IN-SEN Richard Mourdock Ben Chandler KY-06 Andy Barr Tim Walz MN-01 TBD Collin Peterson MN-07 TBD Mike McIntryre NC-07 David Rouzer Larry Kissell NC-08 TBD BIll Owens NY-21 Matt Doheny Kathy Hochul NY-27 Chris Collins Dan Boren Retiring TBD Mark Critz PA-12 Keith Rothus Jason Altmire Retiring – Jim Matheson UT-04 Mia Love Ron Kind WI-03 TBD Nick Rahall WV-03 Rick Snuffer Of the seventeen, two are retiring (one unwillingly), one is currently in the process of losing the Indiana Senate race, three (Kind, Peterson, & Walz) are currently rated as being in ‘safe’ districts… and the other eleven are pretty much scared out of their minds that they’re going to be tossed out on their ears in November. With good reason: every one of these people have been tainted by their willingness to enable House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s radical agenda, and the GOP will cheerfully replace them with actual conservatives – i.e., Republicans – in a heartbeat.
And the funny part? If the Democrats want to even pretend to be trying to get the House back, they’re going to have to support every single one of these candidates who is running for re-election.
It should be humorous to watch as Democrat leadership supports those Democrats who crossed party lines and voted with Republicans. Did they vote their conscious? I doubt it…as Moe Lane illustrated above, it’s because they are soon to be voted out of office. But at least they weren’t being the partisan hacks like Pelosi and the rest of the Democrats who did that walk-out circus act today.
Exit video:
Rep. Trey Gowdy – “For those of you who wanted to negotiate a compromise, an ‘extraordinary accommodation’ to use the Attorney General’s words, for those of you who want to plea bargain my question to you is simply this, would you settle for just 75 percent of the truth? Is 50 percent of the truth enough for you? Is a third?”
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bP-G4Btwp0[/youtube]

See author page
The Mainstream Liberal Media IS a Joke ! God i hope my fellow Americans wake up , see a turd like it really is. Even if Holder is held responsible , you can bet Barry will pardon him whether he wins or loses.
If republican political strategists wanted more coverage of their House contempt vote, maybe they should have had the sense to schedule it for a news day that didn’t coincide with the announcement of the Supreme Court decision on Affordable Healthcare. How obvious was that?
But that’s almost beside the point. The republican House has credibility issues to begin with. It probably wouldn’t help if it became widely known that they were being threatened by the NRA to vote exactly as the NRA dictated, or else. Which virtually all of them did.
So much for voting your conscience.
Meanwhile, as the House finds Holder in contempt, the entire picture that Issa and other republicans have been pitching seems to be unraveling. A lot of people seem to forget that it was never more than hypothetical to begin with.
From The Seattle Times, June 27; ATF agent who started ‘Fast and Furious’ defends operation:
This is in addition to an independent article that just appeared in CNN Fortune, The truth about the Fast and Furious scandal, written by investigative reporter Katherine Eban. From that article:
Elsewhere Eban says:
Allow me to pose a question: Whose job is it to investigate the investigators? Who has oversight over any questionable activities on the part of the House Oversight Committee?
You know you’re in trouble when the conservative National Review turns on you:
From The National Review, JUNE 27, 2012:
Too Fast, Too Furious; Darrell Issa has dabbled in a conspiracy theory.
Long one jere folks. I am beyond mad right now so please bear with me.
Blatant racist who refused to uphold the laws of the land in the Black Panther fiasco. Refuses to uphold the immigration laws of the land at the behest of his master who’s hand he happily licks. Now his master invokes privilege to hide facts that by law should be given to an investigative committee of Congress!
The trampling of our laws and Constitution by these Marxist thugs are beyond anything one could imagine even in the days of the McCarthy hearings. the march to tyranny is real and is headed by some of the most despicable people to have ever held elected or appointed office. And this tirade includes the spineless Rinos as well!
Today with this contempt vote combined with the trampling of the Constitution by the Supreme Court, the outright lies and Anti-American Marxist hard left President and his lackeys mark a sad day in American History. There was another ruling by I believe the 9th Circuit which gives the EPA
unwarranted power and basic control over the economy with more regulations.
Our liberties are being stripped. Today, I see the Obama Truth Squad ordered GoDaddy to close down a site that spoke against Chairman Obama! This is real folks! The loss of Freedom of Speech, Gun Ownership and thought control (Political Correctness is in fact thought control)? All are right around the corner.
This administration along with so many elected officials as like the Attorney General are running over all of us! When is it going to stop? Have we as a people gotten so wrapped up in “what’s in it for me?” that we are willing to give up every basic right to these Marxist bastards?
I have never been as sickened as I am right now as to the shape our country is in! I for one am sick and tired of it and I will rot in hell before I stop criticizing this President or anyone else who feels they can take away everything I and so many others hold dear! The lying piece of excrement known as the Attorney General or for the that matter the joker in the White House and all the others are in fact a symptom of what is wrong with our entire country!
I weep for our country. Today we lost something our forefathers gave their life and blood for. Who in the hell do these people think they are to blemish their memory and in turn destroy the very fabric of this once great country? And who is going to have the balls in the electorate and elsewhere to stand up and fight this tyranny. Someone answer that for me because with the way so many seem to not give one damn about our country, our ideals or personal responsibility, with the cancer that is destroying this country from within I cannot see a light at the end of the tunnel! The greatest country in the world is being destroyed before our very eyes and no one gives a damn. Tell me why
@Greg:
Did Greg even remotely read the very article he linked to? The only issue the National review has with Issa is his argument is a bit muddled and not focused on certain questioned specifics… but then again this article is now old information and Holder is now viewed in contempt to Congress so it really doesn’t matter how bad Greg’s reading comprehension is…
Republican response During Contempt Votes Against Top Bush Staffers Who Refused to Testify Before Congress (Boehner throws a hissy-fit):
http://www.pensitoreview.com/2012/06/28/watch-boehner-lead-republicans-off-house-floor-during-2008-contempt-votes-against-bush-staffers-who-refused-to-testify-before-congress/
The vote was a witch hunt after Pelosi walked out! They couldn’t find her for a while. The walk out represented the typical liberal solution to serious issues. If you can not play by my rules, I am going home! They did it in Wisconsin and Indiana.
the JUSTICE REFUSE TO PROSECUTE HOLDER ,A NEW THING NOW FROM FOX,
@Mr. Irons, #6:
What you don’t get–or won’t get–is that Darrell Issa has never had a shred of evidence supporting his crack-brain theory, and has gone out of his way to avoid questioning any witnesses whose testimony would contradict it. The truth about what went wrong with Fast and Furious isn’t waiting to be found in some filing cabinet in Washington DC, and Darrell Issa damn well knows it. That truth is down at the operational level and managerial levels where operational decisions are made–the place from which Issa quickly shifted all attention.
Issa is a jackass. He has used the power of a position of public trust to attempt to achieve blatantly political ends.
Rather clumsily, as it turns out. People who were actually in a position to know things–people central to the Fast and Furious operation itself–have been coming forward with inconvenient details. That doesn’t look so good, does it?
And then there’s the farce of yesterday’s contempt vote, with republican House majority members being openly threatened by the NRA–the place where Issa’s crack-brained conspiracy theory evidently originated.
Comprehend that.
@Greg: Greg, wrong again! Issa isn’t requesting documents to find out what went wrong, he is requesting documents that date from the point where Holder first lied to the committee. He is looking for the cover-up documents. Learn to read and comprehend what you read!
Darrell Issa Puts Details of Secret Wiretap Applications in Congressional Record
By Jonathan Strong
Roll Call Staff
June 29, 2012, 12:06 p.m.
The wiretap applications are under court seal, and releasing such information to the public would ordinarily be illegal. But Issa appears to be protected by the Speech or Debate Clause in the Constitution, which offers immunity for Congressional speech, especially on a chamber’s floor.
According to the letter, the wiretap applications contained a startling amount of detail about the operation, which would have tipped off anyone who read them closely about what tactics were being used.
Holder and Cummings have both maintained that the wiretap applications did not contain such details and that the applications were reviewed narrowly for probable cause, not for whether any investigatory tactics contained followed Justice Department policy.
The wiretap applications were signed by senior DOJ officials in the department’s criminal division, including Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jason Weinstein, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Kenneth Blanco and another official who is now deceased.
The tactic, which was intended to allow agents to track criminal networks by finding the guns at crime scenes [???], was condemned after two guns that were part of the operation were found at U.S. Border Patrol agent Brian Terry’s murder scene.
So they would track guns….via the crime scene…Well, well, well….Complicent still stands…
@Sua Sponte, #12:
And people are taking swings at my reading comprehension level?
Assuming that any of the above is true–and I never make such assumptions, considering some of the sources commonly cited around here–you’ve just demonstrated that Darrell Issa is willing to blow the cover off of ongoing law enforcement operations in order to further his politically motivated witch hunt, using the Speech or Debate clause as personal protection.
Have I got that right?
Issa reveals wiretap docs from DOJ mole
@Greg:
What was the law enforcement objective of Fast and Furious, Greg? What criminals was the program designed to capture?
Don’t think so.
@Wm T Sherman: It appears that the only on going law enforcement operations in which the justice department is involved is protecting a crook like Holder.
GREG
YOU DON’T NEED TO BE ARROGANT, ISSA KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING, HE KNOW A LOT MORE THAN THEY THINK, HE JUST WANT THE PAPERS TO PROVE IT, HE KNOW THAT HOLDER HAS IT TOO.
ISSA IS SMARTER THAN YOU THINK
Greg, if there is nothing to find, then Issa will be made out to be a fool. I expect that with the high amount of push back from this administration, there is plenty to find! Maybe someone will actually go to jail in this administration for crimes they committed.
@Greg:
Here is a link to the information that Issa introduced into the Congressional Record today.
Kindly cite the sections that “blow the cover off of ongoing law enforcement operations.”
@Aye: It was section about the cover being blown of the doctor who helped finger OBL and the one that blew the cover of the undercover CIA operative that thwarted the plane bombing. Sorry. Different scandal.
@Greg: And people are taking swings at my reading comprehension level?…..Yea, imagine that…Could be due to the fact you haven’t got the first clue about operations, MIL or LE….Well Greg, what exactly was the intent of the LE op?…I’ve asked you on at least three occasions now and you still come up empty…Please enlighten us with your operational experience and planning to fill us in on what the big picture was supposed to be…..But, it doesn’t matter what you make up, the intent matters little when two U.S. persons were murdered….We know what the intent was…..and what do we have here…..Dennis K. Burke, who as a lawyer for the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee in the 1990s was a key player behind the enactment of the 1994 assault-weapons ban, and who then went on to become Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano’s chief of staff, and contributor to Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential primary campaign, and a member of Obama’s transition team focusing on immigration issues, ended up in the Obama administration as the U.S. attorney in Arizona responsible for overseeing Operation Fast and Furious….CNS…….Well, well…What a coinkydink….
Sua Sponte,
you sure have the right arguments, it make it easy to figure it all,
thank you.
@Randy, #17:
The Executive Branch is likely protecting 2 things: The independence of executive branch power, and law enforcement’s ability to conduct undercover operations without having the details publicly revealed.
Does anyone honestly believe that the enormous volume of U.S. guns crossing the border into Mexico is some sort of minor concern? Basically, we’re watching the rapid arming of a hostile, extremely violent organized presence that’s directly across our southern border. One that conducts its business throughout the entire United States. Could anyone in his right mind imagine for even a moment that there are no law enforcement operations currently underway that the DOJ might want to keep totally under wraps?
I consider the tactics Darrell Issa is using for blatantly political ends to be grossly irresponsible, and very likely dangerous to a lot of good people who are putting themselves at risk to protect the nation. That’s about as politely as I can phrase my criticism of the man.
@Greg:
There is no flood of US weapons crossing the border. Only about 12% of the weapons recovered at crime scenes in Mexico are of U.S. origin. The weapons available on the international black market are cheaper, do not require dealing with U.S. laws, and include items like rocket propelled grenades and full auto weapons that are not available here.
I repeat the questions you ignored: What was the law enforcement objective of Fast and Furious? What criminals was the program designed to capture?
@Greg: The executive branch is protecting the executive branch from criminal prosecution. Holder has been dirty for most of his political career. What we are seeing here is Chicago politics and the thuggery that accompanies it. Watch the whistle blowers start blowing now! No one wants to sink with the administration on this issue.
Per who, the NRA?
From FactCheck.org, which accepts neither Obama’s 90%, nor the FOX News 17%, which they dismiss as a clearly faulty interpretation of available statistics:
Common sense and a fundamental understanding of the nature of criminal enterprises should tell us that. Guns are relatively inexpensive and easily obtained in the U.S. border states. There’s an enormous illegal market just across the border, and enormous quantities of readily available cash from drug sales in the hands of people eager to pay a huge mark up. What does the law of supply and demand suggest will happen in a situation like that?
@Greg: Greg, you poor dunce! factcheck.org is run by the Annenberg Foundation. Remember, Obama and his terrorist buddy ran that organization. You really fell for the Democrat’s spin this time again!
It must be great to be able to routinely turn off all logic and disregard each and every inconvenient fact that gets in the way of believing exactly what you want to believe. Sometimes, though, people who routinely do that begin to look like they’ve got more loose screws than a Studebaker.
Nice to @Greg: Nice to see you’re still shilling for individuals responsible for the deaths of two U.S. persons…I’ll go ahead and reference above which still hasn’t been answered…..
ATF: Mexico seized 68,000 guns made in or imported to United States since 2006
Of course, you’re probably not going to believe the ATF either.
What do you suppose the seizure rate in Mexico is? My guess is that only a tiny fraction of the total guns that Mexican drug gangs get their hands on are eventually confiscated by the Mexican police.
@Sua Sponte, #28:
That bogus line of argument is wearing pretty damn thin, also. What poses the greatest threat to U.S. law enforcement? The guns that the ATF lost control of, or the vastly greater number now in Mexico that the ATF program has had absolutely nothing to do with?
@Greg: I was fairly certain you would shirk away from answering, point made and noted..
@Greg:
I repeat the questions you ignored: What was the law enforcement objective of Fast and Furious? What criminals was the program designed to capture?
@Wm T Sherman: Please be gentle with poor Greg. He is in way over his head. His golden idol is starting to resemble a cheap brass plated cupie doll! He has run out of excuses for Obama and his shill, Holder.
Regarding the 12% figure – look at the letter from DHS in this 2009 GAO report on arms trafficking from the US to Mexico – Appendix III, page 69. Even the DHS thinks the methodology that gave a figure 0f 87 % is bogus:
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09709.pdf
The 12% figure:
http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20110209-mexicos-gun-supply-and-90-percent-myth
Wm T Sherman
it might be a possibility the non retrieved guns where given to ALQUADA GROUPS VIA THE CARTELS MEXICO,
oh my, if someone has done that for that real purpose, they sure don’t want to tell, or maybe they destroyed the papers already, but what if ISSA know it already, and ask for those exacts papers they don’t want to give, because they destroyed it, ?
68,000 in six years. 11,000 a year on average. How many total guns were seized in the same period of time, and what percentage of those were traced to the United States? Given that the violence in Mexico has been escalating, I would bet money that the number of guns recovered annually has increased considerably over the same period.
Given all the deception that has occurred so far, you will find that by and large, no, we don’t trust the ATF, or the DOJ. Both these agencies have lied to Congress. They will have no qualms about lying to us.
@Sua Sponte, #31:
What hasn’t had any response is the question I asked in #25 regarding supply, demand, and common sense. I presume that last item is either a commodity in very short supply–unlike U.S. firearms crossing the border–or you simply don’t like the obvious conclusion that common sense leads to.
Re: Mexican gun seizures in the years following 2008. As I suspected, the number of guns seized annually increased: more than doubled after 2008.
From comments to this article:
http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/06/14/where_do_the_guns_in_mexico_come_from_mainly_the_us
Greg,
I’d love for you to explain the basis for Obie’s eleventh hour claim of Executive Privilege.
EP can only be claimed under a very, very narrow set of circumstances and, based on what these people have told us, none of those circumstances can be applied to Fast and Furious and the ensuing Congressional investigation.
So what, precisely, is the basis of that claim?
And how did the very limited set of documents offered just an hour or so earlier suddenly become part of the EP claim?
Sure would love to hear an explanation for how all of that works.
I’ll pop some popcorn and eagerly await your response.
White House national security leaks. Operation Fast and Furious. Out of control debt. Gop fundraising approaching $2 billion before the election. It doesn’t get any better than this.
Mark your calenders…November 6th 2012…NOT election day…Correction day.
Hank Rockwell Jr
you had it figured out early on, congrat to you. for your discerning gift,
yes CORRECTION DAY and more to correct as it get closer. bye
@Aye:
If it became public precisely what information is being protected, there would no longer be anything to protect.
@Greg:
The trouble for you is that Obie has claimed from the beginning that he didn’t know about Fast and Furious. Now, as the heat begins to rise, he’s suddenly claiming EP.
Was he lying to us when he claimed he found out about the operation from media reports?
Or, is he lying now by attempting to exert EP where that privilege doesn’t apply.
He cannot be telling the truth in both places Greg. So, tell us, in which place is your TelePromTer Jesus misleading us?
Here’s some additional information for you to refer to:
AYE
I remember reading from a left side,
that OBAMA want to know everything is going on, in the white house, and insist on it or else.
I heard it a long time ago, that’s why I think he is lying