Weekly Open Thread

Loading

floppingacesopenthread

FYI…Trying out a new spam addition. If your comment is marked as spam you will be sent a Captcha screen where you can enter the words shown to get the comment through the spam filter and back out into the wilderness. Email me with any problems you encounter as we try it out.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Beautiful picture.

And a good picture for me to fish for some comments from other Flopping Aces members. Super Liberal Dem Barney Frank has introduced HR 2267 which, despite my loathing for its auther, seems to me like a great bill. HR 2267, also known as the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act of 2009, would repeal the UIGEA regulation that are scheduled to be enacted later this year and would pave the way for the legalization of online poker in the United States.

Here is a short post with a focus on what this means particularly to the GOP written by someone more skilled with words than I:
http://poker.blogtownhall.com/2009/07/25/limited_government_and_internet_freedom.thtml

One amazing thing to me about internet poker legislation is that unlike basically all other topics being discussed there are not clear party lines being followed. I also love the fact that the typical poker player does not fall into a political stereotype. Some of the very most heated debates I’ve seen on healthcare, with multiple participants for both sides, has been on a internet poker forum I follow. It is a topic that really seems to transcend party lines and I would love some feedback from people here.

I’ll leave you with the response I received from my Dem congressman about Frank’s bill:
[quote]
Thank you for contacting me to voice your opinions on online gambling. I appreciate your comments, and I welcome this opportunity to share my thoughts.

As you may know, the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, H.R. 2267, was introduced on May 6, 2009. This legislation attempts to create a system to license and regulate internet gambling. It would give states and Indian tribes the right to decide whether to allow internet gambling within their borders and how to regulate it. It would also require internet gambling operators to create security measures to help combat identity theft and money laundering. Finally, this bill would require federal regulators to establish safeguards to ensure that children cannot gamble online. H.R. 2267 is currently being considered by the House Financial Services Committee and may change substantially before I have the opportunity to cast a vote.

While I do not believe the government should create undue burdens on American citizens, I do have concerns about online gambling. I am particularly worried about the dangers this activity creates for children. Please know I will continue to examine this bill as it continues through the legislative process and is considered by the House. I hope we can continue our dialogue as the legislation progresses through Congress.

Thanks again for taking the time to share your views with me. If you would like to learn more about my positions on issues important to you or receive regular updates on developments in Congress, please visit my Online Office at http://www.ellsworth.house.gov and sign up for my e-Newsletter.

Sincerely,

Brad Ellsworth
[/quote]

If you are looking for some more information or responses from other congressmen you can check out:
http://theppa.org/
http://www.pocketfives.com/poker-forums/poker-legislation

Curt,

Already emailed you about my comments on the 8/25 daily distraction thread, but didn’t hear anything…

To the Congress-persons who love Fidel Castro SO MUCH…answer me this…how many Americans swam from USA to Cuba for asylum in the last 60 TEARS vs Cubans trying to come here? Why is the feet on land provision so specific?

Did Ted Kennedy go to Cuba for health care — or Chris Dodd? Really…US solutions?

Will the Congressional fans of Castro speak out in Miami? or are you too busy trying to let Chavez run over Honduras…? Shame on you!

Just had a look newsbusters.org

Play the video with Jodi Miller. How embarrassing that she needs a laughter track. Either get a live audience or better still can the awful fake laughter.

I’d think that this new captcha thingy is for unregistered comments.

Nigerian e-mailer’s delight …

Scammers pumping out emails that try to trick recipients into parting with large sums of cash are getting a helping hand from the Democratic National Committee.

According to a researcher with anti-spam company Cloudmark, 419 fraudsters have been relaying a “significant” amount of messages through the democrats.org domain name. The abuse, which dates back at least to the beginning of this month, helps evade filters that internet service providers employ to block the messages.

Pocket bullets are diamonds if you’re playing poker. They’re lumps of coal if you’re playing with novices – somebody will “luck out” with a straight or a flush.

I always respond to the Nigerian scams. I send my info, which is really just the phone/address for the FBI. They always send me pictures ‘proving’ their scam is legit. In one photo it said ‘Iowa State Lottery’ in the background. Below the picture they said, “see these pictures are proof of real people getting checks from their african box of clothes” (thats always how they refer to the secret check they are sending me for 9 million dollars). One guy also told me he was a ‘knight in his church’, thats how I knew he was really legit, he said.

I always see how long they will stay on the line – kind of like a game. I figure the more time they waste with me, the less time they have to spend scamming vulnerable people. Right now I have 2 on the line. One is going to give me 16 million from the Irish national bank and another one from Nigeria which is 6 million after they get their cut. Funny how fedex always uses a gmail account. Also they send me ‘official certificates’. Of course I need to pay my 250 dollar processing fee. But then again, they never take me up on the offer to just take it out of the 9 million. I actually told one one of them to take out 1,000 and give the rest to the round table at his church (since he was a night).

I should make a post with all this stuff. I almost die sometimes at their responses. Nothing short of comedy gold.

Cuba health care are the left sure they want to go there??

Cuba quarantines their people with AIDs

http://www.aegis.com/news/Lt/1988/LT881104.html
LOS ANGELES TIMES (LT) – FRIDAY November 4, 1988
NEW YORK – A member of the first U.S. delegation to visit Cuba’s quarantine center for people infected with the AIDS-causing human immunodeficiency virus Thursday described the detention facility as “pleasant” but “frightening in its implications.”
The first detailed picture of what the Cuban government calls its “sanitarium” for all identified HIV carriers was painted by Ronald Bayer, associate professor at Columbia University’s School of Public Health, in an interview with The Times.
Cuba is the only nation in the world that has mandated universal HIV testing and enforced isolation of all virus carriers. Bayer said he was told by Cuban health officials that one-third of the nation’s 10.2 million people have been tested so far and that 240 Cubans–171 men and 69 women–have been placed in the camp, where they are required to spend the rest of their lives. They are removed from their jobs but continue to be paid.
“We were shown groups of nondescript apartments that looked like typical Cuban suburban housing,” Bayer said. “It was neither barracks-like nor dungeon-like

[But you say they don’t do that anymore well gusse again]

http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/211/44946.html
December 2003

When the first cases emerged, the government treated HIV/AIDS as a public health emergency: HIV patients were quarantined indefinitely and their sexual partners traced and tested; Cubans who had visited Africa were tested, as were pregnant women; HIV positive women were given drugs to prevent transmission to their unborn children, their babies were delivered by caesarian section

[SO is this what the left really want for the American people?]

Catherine

Frank Welcome, this site is an excellent theraputic in an age of bipolar Obamamaniacs.