McClellan Pointing Finger At Bush

Loading

Isn’t it curious how the left constantly wailed about Scott McClellan allegedly lying during his press conferences, but now that he is saying something that smells like trash talk about Bush, he is suddenly a truth teller.

Funny, funny stuff.

Whats the trash talk?  Well, he writes a tell-all book and wanting to ensure it will sell millions he releases a few sentences that he knew would get the left drooling in anticipation.

Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan blames President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney for efforts to mislead the public about the role of White House aides in leaking the identity of a CIA operative.

In an excerpt from his forthcoming book, McClellan recount the 2003 news conference in which he told reporters that aides Karl Rove and I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby were “not involved” in the leak involving operative Valerie Plame.

“There was one problem. It was not true,” McClellan writes, according to a brief excerpt released Monday. “I had unknowingly passed along false information. And five of the highest-ranking officials in the administration were involved in my doing so: Rove, Libby, the vice president, the president’s chief of staff and the president himself.”

And do they ever drool.  Olbermann and Matthews almost orgasmed on camera. 

But I have a question for Scott.  Are you telling me that you lied last March?

KING: Scott, were you lied to?

MCCLELLAN: Well, Larry, I said what I believed to be true at the time. It was also what the president believed to be true at the time based on assurances that we were both given.

Or are you just trying to sell books?

I’m betting the latter.

UPDATE

Jeff Gannon with some interesting facts:

Later in the same interview, McClellan responded to the allegation that the White House sought to gain from ‘outing’ Valerie Plame:

Well, Larry, remember that the person was the one who was the original or primary source for Robert Novak, the column that started this whole investigation really was Dick Armitage, who was the deputy secretary of State, not really a proponent of the Iraq war. And it was certainly not a partisan gun-slinger as Robert Novak said in his article or said later in an interview. In terms of any other involvement beyond that, what came out in this trial is what I learned for the first time. So I don’t know of any effort beyond what we have seen in this trial come out in the media that was going on. I think one of the questions that this gets to is, was the administration trying to discredit or retaliate against a critic? I would say that the administration was trying to set the record straight. Whether or not people were involved in leaking someone’s name and that name was classified, that’s a different matter. I don’t know anything about that.

McClellan indicated that his entire knowledge of the ‘outing’ of Valerie Plame from both his personal knowledge and the public record was complete at this point, yet did not make any claim that high-ranking officials sent him out to “pass false information” about it. McClellan’s meaning in the book excerpt is murky at best and does not necessarily contradict the definitive statements he made to Larry King.

UPDATE II

Just as we figured, it was all a ploy to sell more books:

Former White House spokesman Scott McClellan does not believe President Bush lied to him about the role of White House aides I. Lewis Scooter Libby or Karl Rove in the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame’s identity, according to McClellan’s publisher.

Peter Osnos, the founder and editor-in-chief of Public Affairs Books, which is publishing McClellan’s book in April, tells NBC from his Connecticut home that McCLellan, “Did not intend to suggest Bush lied to him.”

Osnos says when McClellan went before the White House press corps in 2003 to publicly exonerate Libby and Rove, the problem was that his statement was not true. Osnos said the president told McClellan what “he thought to be the case.” But, he says, McClellan believes, “the president didn’t know it was not true.”
Story continues below ↓advertisement

Osnos says the quotes which appeared on the Public Affairs Books website were part of the roll out of the book catalogues for the spring printings. And he says McClellan had not finished the manuscript for the memoir yet and was working under deadline to have the book completed for the April publishing.

Olby and Chrissy are no doubt inconsolable now.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
115 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Mike accuses me of spouting bumper sticker slogans, but when given the opportunity to show his support for the troops,
http://www.stickergiant.com/page/sg/PROD/bf/xrg635

…what do we get?
(Crickets chirping).

Another tactic of the Right: Accuse your enemies of having your faults.
How Rovian!

I got to hand it to you, Mike, your dis-honesty and hypocrisy is breathtaking.
I see a big future in the GOP for you.

Robert: You’re insane!

And still putting out comments with all the depth of a bumper sticker!

You’re starting to bore me.

Mike.
And you’re starting to let everyone who reads this site know you’re full of shit!

I called you on “Supporting the troops”, and you let everyone know you have no interest in doing any such thing.

Robert: As with most of your lefty loon friends your statement reveals just the opposite.

Again, you have all the intellectual depth of a bumper sticker.

And the intellectual integrity of one also.

I noticed that my posts, citing facts and sources have been deleted. I guess they did not pass the Conservative litmus test for “free speech”.

Man your a dim bulb.

Not one of your comments have been deleted, and I find it quite a humorous statement that they were facts…facts! Yeah…sure thing matey. Loosen the tinfoil hat.

Is it possible for a Conservative to make any kind of statement without filling it with venom and personal insults?

Man your a cry baby. Go home to DummiesU, they will welcome you with open arms.

You really are a legend in your own mind Steve.

Apparently not.

But then, Conservatives has become the philosophy of hate. It pervades the very essencs of what it means to be a Conservative.

Without hate, Conservatives would be empty shells, without a purpose for being, or even a reason to go on.

Without hate, Conservatives would not be able to speak, or even express any thoughts or feelings, as all of their thoughts and emotions are focused solely on their hate.

While it must be an intense adrenelin rush to live on hate, what will Conservatives do should they see a day when their hate is not enough? Will they have to make things up to hate? Will they just be empty shells?

What do those Conservatives who are Churchgoing do? Do they spend their time in the pews praying to the humiliation or even death of those they hate? (As a Liberal, I certainly don’t). That is certainly what Conservatives appear to to do in all their other discourse.

It is certainly sad that a philosophy that once included the openness and optimism of Barry Goldwater now reduced to the venom tirades of Ann Coulter.

But that appears to be what Conservatives want.

They have their hate.

They cherish their hate.

They love their hate.

“Conservatives has become the philosophy of hate”

Engaging in transference a bit early in the morning aren’t you Steve?

All we’ve seen from your side is an unending stream of bile and vitriol.

President Bush is worse than Hitler to you folks. And you guys go out and do everything you can to shout down or shut down conservative speech wherever and whenever you can.

I suppose you missed the comment by “Vigilante”

http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/11/26/a-new-ron-paul-fan/index.html#comment-32205

“To hate Bush is to love America.”

You people have taken hate to new heights and now have the nerve to say that WE are doing it?

You’ve poisoned the well with your bile and now complain about the smell.

Get real! You’re living a delusion.

Oh, there are certainly Liberals who engage in hate. No one group is immune from that emotion. However Liberals have not enshrined hate as a centerpiece of their philosophy.

After all, Ann Coulter, the person Conservatives, without exception, revere as one of their greatests heros, is on record as wishing Democratic politicians would die and declaring that “September 11 widows” were enjoying themselves. And for that she is showpieced on FoxNews, the leading Conservative outlet in the country.

If a Liberal did that, Conservatives would scream about how evil that is. However Saint Ann gets, at most, a “tut tut”, and Conservatives just love to hear her hate.

Another Conservative leader, Pat Robertson, has broadcast a plea for his followers to pray for the death of Supreme Court Justices, another item that every Conservative, everywhere, loved to hear.

And, while Revs Pat and Jerry later apologized, they still went on record as saying that the September 11 attacks were deserved simply because New Yorkers did not hate homosexuals as much as they did.

But for Conservatives I sure you will say, “but that is different”.

It always is.

So, while Conservatives have to scour the blogs and remote college professors to find examples of “Liberal Hate”, I can cite leading Conservative thinkers, who dictate what Conservatives think and say on a daily basis. Conservative leaders who are showpieced on the greatest Conservative outlets of our day (FoxNews, The Washington Times, NewsMax, …)

But, of course, it is OK when Conservative hate. After all, as I said, it is at the core of their philosophy, world view and being.

Shorter Mike’s America:

I know you are, but what am I?

Good one about “intellectual integrity”, though.
I laughed so hard at that one, it took me a day-and-a-half just to get off the floor to reply.

When is your next show at Snickers Comedy Stop?

“Liberals have not enshrined hate as a centerpiece of their philosophy….while Conservatives have to scour the blogs and remote college professors to find examples of ‘Liberal Hate’.”

Howard Dean declares: “I hate Republicans and everything they stand for.”

Poor willfully ignorant Steve! Only one step removed from the rock Robert hides under!

More Democrat Hate from the 2004 election:

–Gunshots fired into GOP Headquarters in two states.
–Organized Union gangs invading, and in some cases vandalizing GOP HQ’s in several states.
–Union thugs assaulting a 3 year old girl and tear up her Bush/Cheney sign
–Multiple reports of burglarized GOP offices and thefts.
–Nazi swastikas burned into lawns, spray painted on private property and campaign signs.

Then of course there are reports like this one of an Iraq war veteran SHOT by an antiwar nut.

Who hates the troops Steve?

You people are so soaked in hate you can’t see straight.