WEF’s deep involvement in a nefarious LGBT agenda


By Rhoda Wilson

“Working together, restoring trust” was the theme of the 52nd annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (“WEF”) held in 2022. Ironically, during this meeting, GLAAD CEO Sarah Kate Ellis verified WEF’s deep involvement in a nefarious LGBT agenda.

Ellis is proud to be part of WEF’s Power of the Media task force which aims to “help media organisations use the power of their platforms” to find ways to “build back better,” and enhance “diversity” and “social cohesion.”  Her organisation GLAAD is also a very proud partner of WEF’s Partnership for Global LGBTI Equality (“PGLE”), she said during a panel discussion at WEF’s 2022 annual meeting.

She went on to say that “PGLE is a project of WEF and the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.  “We work with news, business, entertainment, faith leaders, sports governments and individual activists from around the globe to educate public people on LGBTQ issues and move policy forwards,” she said.

The following year, at the 2023 WEF annual meeting, Ellis admitted GLAAD aims to “infiltrate” media and has “worked really closely with Hollywood” on “normalising LGBT folks, including us in all stories.”

The strategies that GLAAD employs have never been a secret, LifeSite News wrote.  They were laid out long ago in a gay manifesto published in 1989:

We have in mind a strategy…  calculated and powerful… manipulative… It’s time to learn from Madison Avenue, to roll out the big guns. Gays must launch a large-scale campaign – we’ve called it the waging peace campaign—to reach straights through the mainstream media. We’re talking about propaganda…

After the Ball: How America will conquer its fear and hatred of Gays in the 90’s, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen, 1989, Pg. 161

In 2022, Ellis also admitted that by changing the parameters of polls, for example adding the “Q” to the acronym and expanding the age range, they could demonstrate a higher number of youngsters that identify as LGBTQ.  We can probably assume they use other tricks as well.

The clip above was taken from a session titled ‘Driving LGBTQI+ Resilience through Equity’.  You can find the full session on Twitter HERE or on WEF’s website HERE.

Time has named Ellis as one of the 100 most influential people of 2023.  Under Ellis’ leadership, GLAAD has been transformed from a media watchdog organisation to one of the most powerful cultural change agents across industries. Apart from its other forms of activism, GLAAD has “trained” over 10,000 people including employees of P&G, Dow, Google, Netflix, Delta, Hilton and more on LGBTQI terminology and issues.  The longer “LGBTQI” is not our creation, it is according to Ellis’ biography on WEF’s website.  Since 2022 the letter “I” has been added.  Are they simply adding letters so that more people tick “Yes” in their polls?

Not only has Ellis been an agenda contributor at WEF but in 2020 and 2021 she spoke at the Milken Institute, a Californian economic think tank. Like WEF, the Milken Institute has annual Global Conferences which have been called “Davos with Palm Trees.” And like WEF’s Young Global Leaders, the Institute has its Young Leaders Circle.  Another similarity is that both receive money from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

WEF’s PGLE is Equity, Not Equality

The Partnership for Global LGBTI Equality (“PGLE”) was announced at WEF’s annual meeting on 22 January 2019. It is part of WEF’s Centre for the New Economy and Society which takes a “holistic and integrated approach to diversity, equity, inclusion and social justice.”

What WEF has done is created a word salad to confuse the public.  It has included the word “equality” in the name of its initiative and speaks of equality in its description of it however, the underlying agenda is diversity, equity, inclusion (“DEI”) and social justice. “Equity” is not the same as “equality” and “social justice” is not the same as “justice.” We address the difference in a later section.

PGLE’s founding members are multinational companies including Accenture, Boston Consulting Group, Cisco, Deloitte, Deutsche Bank, Edelman, EY, Mastercard, Microsoft, Procter & Gamble, PepsiCo, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Salesforce, Scotiabank and The Coca-Cola Company.

In 2020, WEF published a shocking propaganda piece to push its PGLE agenda.  Titled ‘Great Reset: Why LGBT+ inclusion is the secret to cities’ post-pandemic success’ it showed how the ideology permeates Globalist organisations:

The connection between resilience and inclusion is widely accepted by policy-makers. The World Bank describes “inclusive communities” as a key dimension of sustainable, resilient cities. The OECD identifies “inclusive society” as a driver of resilience in a city. The IMF contends that an economy is “more fragile and less resilient when it is not inclusive”. A report by UN Habitat finds that inclusion is required for a “successful urban resilience agenda.”

It’s not just cities WEF has in its sights.  The ambitions of the unelected, self-appointed elites are far more reaching.  There is a section dedicated to “LGBTI inclusion” (no “Q”) on WEF’s Strategic Intelligence platform.  The map links the agenda to national legislation relating to, for example, education and values; corporate governance; health and healthcare; global health; behavioural sciences and human rights.

Source: World Economic Forum, retrieved 22 December 2023


Human Rights vs Inalienable Rights

When a Globalist organisation speaks of “human rights” it’s important to remember that human rights are not the same as inalienable rights.  Human rights are changeable whereas inalienable rights are not.

Inalienable rights are not bestowed upon us by any governing authority. Rather, they are innate to each of us. They are immutable. They are ours in equal measure. The only source of inalienable rights is Natural Law, i.e., God’s Law.

Human rights, according to the United Nations (“UN”) Universal Declaration of Human Rights, are created by certain human beings and are bestowed by those human beings upon other human beings. We are only allowed to exercise our alleged “human rights” subject to the diktats of governments, intergovernmental organisations and other UN “stakeholders.”

Human rights are not inalienable rights or anything close to inalienable rights. Under the UN’s system of “human rights,” human beings are not considered to have any inalienable rights.

Read more: UN SDGs implant “human rights” and attempt to override our inalienable rights

Equality vs Equity

Whenever we hear Globalists refer to “equity” we should be concerned; for example, WEF’s Centre for the New Economy and Society’s “holistic and integrated approach to diversity, equity, inclusion and social justice.”

We hear about equity all the time but are rarely told that it’s shorthand for “social equity,” or even “critical social equity.” We also hear all the time about “social justice,” which is sometimes referred to as “critical social justice.”  In Woke Marxism, they are the rebranding of socialism (social equity) and communism (social justice), meant to be achieved through Critical Theory.   Listen: ‘Equity and Justice’, James Lindsay (10 mins).

“Equity” is often conflated with the term “equality”, as WEF has deliberately done with its PGLE initiative.  But they are not the same.  Equality means that citizen A and citizen B are treated equally and equity means “adjusting shares in order to make citizens A and B equal.” Equity is the intentional redistribution of shares but not necessarily along lines of existing economic disparity but to adjust for and correct current and historical injustices – it can be described as “social communism.”

New Discourses: Equity: A Translation from the Wokish, James Lindsay, 21 September 2021 (2 mins)

Equity is the goal of all DEI programmes.  DEI programmes exist to force captive audiences of people to achieve “equitable” redistribution of resources, status, and wealth according to neo-Marxist identity theories such as Critical Race Theory, an example of which is the Black Lives Matter movement.  Equity is an administered political economy in which shares are adjusted so that citizens are made equal, including shares of social and cultural capital. In other words, it’s an expansion of socialism.   Watch: ‘The Marxist Roots of DEI – Session 1: Equity’ James Lindsay (163 mins).

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Time to end all support of these Globalists Groups and we start with the United Nations then WEF CFR Open Society(George Soros) Etc.

Just an effort to suppress population growth.

Why do you want population growth?

Why do you assume I do?

“Human rights are changeable whereas inalienable rights are not.”

Interesting headcanon!

About two years ago the elites, including those who head the WEF, were lamenting the lack of confidence they had in their own security arrangements.
Sure, you could buy an island, live on a super-yacht at sea, own loads of farmland and bunkers in the USA, but it all boiled down to who do you trust when the SHTF.
They realized men, straight men, could not be relied on because they would all want to bring in their significant others, their children.
And, if they tried to prevent that, these same well-paid men would murder them and take their riches for themselves and their loved ones.

So, what’s the solution?

Ancient Greece, Rome, China had all reached the same solution: eunuchs.
Modern elites are creating a DRUG-RELIANT army whose loyalty can be bought with hormone shots and meaningless sex (with others of the servant class.)
That’s what this is all about.

This is the craziest rant I’ve ever read.

Just because you’re oblivious to what’s been happening (and history) doesn’t mean the past is not prelude and the shortages are going to be planned to control a eunuch slave class.

The CEO of a brokerage house explained that he had nearly completed building his own underground bunker system, and asked: “How do I maintain authority over my security force after the event?” The event. That was their euphemism for the environmental collapse, social unrest, nuclear explosion, solar storm, unstoppable virus, or malicious computer hack that takes everything down.

This single question occupied us for the rest of the hour.

They knew armed guards would be required to protect their compounds from raiders as well as angry mobs. One had already secured a dozen Navy Seals to make their way to his compound if he gave them the right cue. But how would he pay the guards once even his crypto was worthless? What would stop the guards from eventually choosing their own leader?

The billionaires considered using special combination locks on the food supply that only they knew. Or making guards wear disciplinary collars of some kind in return for their survival. Or maybe building robots to serve as guards and workers – if that technology could be developed “in time”.

AI might be “smart,” but it lies almost recreationally.
So, robots are out of the question.

Stockpile hormones and hire “trannies,” who can still be strong, can be loyal, and can be controlled by simply withholding their shots.
When the SHTF those people will be totally dependent on whoever has their meds.

The majority of Islam’s royal slaves were eunuchs.
A large minority of the Roman and Greek slaves were, too.
In ancient China it was mandatory for all house slaves in the palaces of the emperor, the district lords and the local leaders to be castrated.

Let’s get you off to bed, Meemaw.

Is that your solution to getting your ass kicked? Not even an, “Oh, I see. I wasn’t aware of that.”?

mike doesn’t even realize only 37 countries have a growing population.
The rest, have a zero growth (2 countries) or a negative population rate (137 countries).
The masses at our border aren’t there because of overpopulation. They are there because of political decisions that make the lives of the non-elites a living hell.
We need to sideline the elitist rulership and go to a populist leadership like has been happening in recent elections worldwide.