Twitter Board Adopts “Poison Pill” To Thwart Musk Takeover, Exposing Itself To “Titanic” Legal Liability

Loading

by Zero Hedge

As was widely expected and reported in the aftermath of Elon Musk going hostile on Friday morning, on Saturday morning Twitter adopted a measure that will shield it from hostile acquisition bids in a desperate step to prevent billionaire Elon Musk’s offer to take the company private and make it a bastion of free speech.
 
The board set up a shareholder rights plan, also known as a “poison pill” which as we clarified yesterday for the benefit of the company’s overly dramatic, overly literal and overly snowflake employees, is not literal
 


 
… and which is exercisable if a party – read Elon Musk – acquires 15% of the stock without prior approval, lasting for one year (if the pill had expired the day after the midterms it may have been a bit too obvious). The plan seeks to ensure that anyone taking control of Twitter through open market accumulation pays all shareholders an appropriate control premium, according to a statement Friday.
 
For a company that has struggled greatly with value creation – on Friday TWTR stock closed at $45.08, or 18 cents higher than where it closed on its first day as a public company, or $44.90 – a poison pill defense strategy allows existing shareholders the right to purchase additional shares at a discount, effectively diluting the ownership interest of the hostile party. Poison pills are common among companies under fire from activist investors or in hostile takeover situations.
 
Under Twitter’s plan, each right will entitle its holder to purchase, at the then-current exercise price, additional shares of common stock having a then-current market value of twice the exercise price of the right.
 
Twitter enacted the plan to buy time, Bloomberg reported citing a person familiar with the matter, although it wasn’t clear time for what: at $54.20, Musk’s offer represents a premium to the historical TWTR price since IPO on 92% of the time.
 

 
And since the Twitter board, whose constituents are listed below…
 

 
… is about to get bombarded with a barrage of lawsuits claiming it violated its fiduciary duty, the board also said it wants to be able to analyze and negotiate any deal, and may still accept it (spoiler alert: it won’t).
 
Twitter’s board met Thursday to review Musk’s proposal – which according to the world’s richest man was his “best and final” offer and who had already accrued a stake of more than 9% in Twitter since earlier this year – to determine if it was in the best interest of the company and all of its shareholders.
 
Included in Musk’s securities filing disclosing the bid Thursday morning was a script of text he sent to the company. In it he said, “it’s a high price and your shareholders will love it.” Hilariously, one prominent – and former – investor said the offer was too low and the market reaction appeared to agree. Saudi Arabia’s Prince Alwaleed bin Talal said the deal doesn’t “come close to the intrinsic value” of the popular social media platform. Which is, well, hilarious since as we showed yesterday, it appears the Prince no longer has direct ownership of even one share of Twitter stock.
 

 
Speaking later Thursday at a TED conference, Musk said he wasn’t sure he “will actually be able to acquire it.” He added that his intent was to also retain “as many shareholders as is allowed by the law,” rather than keeping sole ownership of the company himself.
 
After initially surging, Twitter shares dropped 1.7% in New York on Thursday, reflecting the market’s view that the deal is likely to be rejected or to fall through.
 
Musk first disclosed his Twitter stake on April 4, making him the largest individual investor. At the TED conference, he indicated that he has a Plan B if Twitter’s board rejects his offer. He declined to elaborate. But in his filing earlier in the day, he said he would rethink his investment if the bid failed.
 
“If the deal doesn’t work, given that I don’t have confidence in management nor do I believe I can drive the necessary change in the public market, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder,” said Musk.
 
* * *
 
Previewing the poison pilll defense, on Thursday, Cameron Winklevoss, founder of the Gemini cryptocurrency exchange, tweeted (of course) that “Twitter is considering a poison pill to thwart @elonmusk’s offer.” In response, Musk said that a “poison pill” move would be a “breach” of the board’s fiduciary duty and could expose Twitter’s board to “titanic” legal liability.
 


 
Winklevoss alleged in his tweet that, by adopting the poison pill tactic, Twitter was demonstrating its commitment to preserving the status quo even if it has a negative impact on existing shareholders.
 
“They would rather self-immolate than give up their censorship programs. This shows you how deeply committed they are to Orwellian control of the narratives and global discourse. Scary,” he wrote. Twitter has repeatedly suppressed and “shadowbanned” conservative viewpoints, allegations the company has repeatedly denied.
 
Adam Candeub, a law professor at Michigan State University, said that Twitter’s board could face legal consequences if they turn down an offer that’s financially lucrative to shareholders.
 
“Twitter’s owned by shareholders, and the directors have to act in a way that’s in their best interests, not in the way that allows them to keep control of the corporation,” Candeub told The Epoch Times.
 
“If they turn down a very favorable price, there will be dereliction of their legal duty, and there could be lots of legal consequences.”
 
* * *
 
[the_ad id=”157875″]
 
Now that his original plan has been thwarted, Musk has said that he has a “Plan B” in stock for the company although he did not disclose what it is. As Mark Cuban pointed out yesterday…
 


 
… one possible response is for Elon to be joined by one or more like-minded, anti-censorship investors such as Peter Thiel who either build up stakes through the poison pill limit in the process making a management and board replacement by proxy vote the simple outcome, or they just raise the takeover price to a level that even the woke Twitter board can not reject.
 
Or skip the whale investor approach entirely, and open up twitter to a mass investor buyout, in the form of a DAO, where “token holders will get to vote on what’s trending and who gets verified.”

Read more
 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Twitter can’t make money.
Recently, it was begging for a buyer, a sugar daddy, to come along and buy it.
No one bit.
https://www.ft.com/content/2c8cdd72-922c-11e6-a72e-b428cb934b78
http://www.theverge.com/2016/10/14/13287818/no-one-wants-to-buy-twitter
Twitter is perfect for those who need to stay informed about a specific topic, for keeping up with what is going on with any subject… but even if all is important to a lot of people, it’s extremely difficult to find a way to make it profitable.
Elon Musk didn’t care about profit, he wanted to turn Twitter into a a free speech beacon on the web.
Obviously that’s not the kind of buyer the lefties who own it now (at a constant loss) want.

Up the Creek without a Paddle Twitter is in serious trouble and Jack the Jerk Dorsey the Dork

We’d all be better off if Twitter sank. It’s become nothing more than a propaganda tool.

We’d all be better off if Twitter sank. It’s become nothing more than a propaganda tool.

Well, the left turned it into one. If all it is is a left wing propaganda megaphone, I agree: destroy it and sow the earth with salt. However, I think a place where both liberals and conservatives can share their views is ideal.

No idea why Elan wants to try to save the dead bird, where will the sky screamer liberals go unimpeded to vent?

Last edited 2 years ago by kitt

He wanted to make sure a bird wasn’t back there about to shit on him again. That didn’t taste like ice cream.

Now that it’s served it’s part in installing and unelected Biden? How convenient.

If Musk buys twitter, it will be as it was intended: a platform for free and uncensored speech…sharing news and ideas that are not scrubbed, hidden, or distorted by a Leftwing media complex to get their drones to act and vote as they see fit.

Who is afraid of the facts?

Dictatorships.

It will be good to see Trump’s account restored, and along with it, freedom.

If Musk buys twitter, it will be as it was intended: a platform for free and uncensored speech…sharing news and ideas that are not scrubbed, hidden, or distorted by a Leftwing media complex to get their drones to act and vote as they see fit.

Well, hopefully. At any rate, it’s fun watching lying, corrupt, bullying liberals sweat bullets at the prospect that someone might actually allow free thought and speech. Most of all, they fear Trump getting back on Twitter without constraints. Yummy.

Who is afraid of the facts?

A megaphone makes people louder, not more truthful.

A megaphone makes people louder, not more truthful.

So does a mob of liberals shouting down someone with a different point of view. A megaphone also gets the message out farther.

Why does the left fear and try to suppress free speech?

Which is why those telling the truth, like Trump and others, are so quick to illegally ensure they don’t get access to a public and 1st Amendment guaranteed megaphone: freedom of speech.

… is about to get bombarded with a barrage of lawsuits claiming it violated its fiduciary duty, the board also said it wants to be able to analyze and negotiate any deal, and may still accept it (spoiler alert: it won’t).

The lawsuits could delay Musk’s ownership until after the midterms, too. Everything the left does is about maintaining control and restricting free speech.

Saudi Arabia’s Prince Alwaleed bin Talal said the deal doesn’t “come close to the intrinsic value” of the popular social media platform.

That could be true, but the value will never be realized as long as Twitter is nothing but a propaganda tool for the left. CNN should have shown them that.

You have to wonder about people who think free speech is the worst thing that could happen. Liberals would lose nothing and conservatives would gain an open voice in topics. This only threatens the totalitarian-minded.