![]()

The most detestable thing about European-constructed “globalism” is its pretense. It pretends that man-made “climate change” will kill everyone unless we allow bureaucratic busybodies to regulate all economic exchange. It pretends that Russia is about to conquer all of Europe, even though all of Europe has been mocking Russia as a third-world paper tiger for the last thirty years. It pretends that the mass invasion of foreigners from Africa, the Middle East, and Asia is completely natural, impossible to prevent, and that acceptance and toleration is the “humanitarian” thing to do. It pretends that its native citizens are “racists” for wishing to preserve their own cultures in their own lands. Even while it welcomes Islamic civilizational conquest throughout the continent, European “globalism” pretends that its mangled, mismanaged, and misremembered civilization remains the central and paramount expression of enlightened progress in the world.
To outsiders not imbued with a sense of European entitlement or burdened by Europe’s policy delusions, Europe is a mess. It is presently reconstituting itself into a self-hating-Islamocentric-parasitically-pluralistic-historically-illiterate morass of cultural meaninglessness. Europe’s movies and television shows regularly bowdlerize history by removing native Europeans from ancient tales. Europe’s suicide will be complete when every actor is non-white and every storyline reinforces the narrative that Muslims settled all the lands from the North Sea to the Mediterranean. These multicultural historical revisions are preposterous. Yet when native Brits point out that there were no African Celts during the time of Caesar’s invasion or Pakistani lords in the royal courts of the Middle Ages, the dis-United Kingdom sends social media “thought police” to harass and legally threaten anyone unwilling to pretend that history is offensive and must therefore be rewritten.
In matters of personal defense, Europe does nothing but pretend. Big, bad French president Emmanuel Macron, seriously terrifying U.K. prime minister Keir Starmer, and king kraut German chancellor Friedrich Merz rounded up Europe’s “coalition of the willing” in Paris recently to join hands with holdover-president Zelenskyy and stare down Russia’s President Putin with all the glowering determination that men wearing ten-thousand-dollar suits can bear. Although European elites mock us Americans as a bunch of ignorant, hick cowboys, the Paris summit did what it could to convey to the world that Europe’s most serious lawmen had formed a deadly posse that would not relent until every last Russian had been chased out of the European Union’s expanding plantation.
Yet aside from European leaders’ love for bloviation and their penchant for ratcheting up their noses so high in the sky that the rest of the world sees nothing but nose hair, how will they back up all their anti-Russian threats? They can’t. Their militaries are wet noodles, and every European general knows it. It is the U.S. military that allows European lords to prance on stage with the affectation that they possess vestigial spines. It is American troops and their cowboy ways that allow European elites to pretend that their natural state is anything other than supine surrender. You take away U.S. military might from dying NATO, and a contingent of good-ol’-boy Texans could take most of France before mini-mouse Macron changed into his high-heeled loafers.
So why is the Danish prime minister announcing to the world that a U.S. takeover of Greenland would mark the end of NATO? That’s like announcing to an unknown arsonist that if he doesn’t stop setting fires, you’ll disband the fire department. What is the Danish prime minister’s thinking here? She has one rowboat filled with three guys armed with morally indignant words and a flare gun guarding the world’s largest island. If she sends American troops and military hardware back to the Western Hemisphere, then maybe the same Russian army that has spent the last four years trying to tame the Eastern territories of Ukraine really does conquer all of Europe. I mean, how does Denmark’s prime minister Mette Frederiksen plan to defend her Nordic peninsula and surrounding islands from Putin’s Slavic horde? With furrowed brows, legally binding treaties, and stern words?
The truth is that Greenland barely belongs to anybody. It is three times the size of the world’s next biggest island and has nearly thirty percent of Australia’s land area. Yet Greenland has only 56,000 residents — making it the least densely populated country in the world. Although the kingdoms of Norway and Denmark have claimed Greenland for a thousand years, ninety percent of the population today is Inuit. Danes, on the other hand, make up around seven percent. Calling Greenland Danish is like the United Kingdom calling India British.

European-constructed “globalism” pretends that the mass invasion of foreigners from Africa, the Middle East, and Asia is completely natural and impossible to prevent.
Have these globalists even looked at a globe?
Europe is TINY compared with Africa, Europe is smaller than the Middle East, and Europe is TINY compared with just the Pakistani/India part of Asia.
How on earth did they think rolling out the unlimited Welcome mat would end for them?
These imports have little to no interest in serving in a military to keep Greenland Danish, that’s for sure.
J.B. Shurk‘s main point, tho is that Europe cannot defend itself, much less Greenland.
And that’s why Greenland will soon be an American state or territory.
The Europeans were far better when they were separate Nations before the Euroweenie Union and they c had real men and women and no Islam taking over