Mollie Hemingway:
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes on Thursday stepped aside from the probe of Russian actions during the 2016 campaign, saying he needed to deal with a congressional ethics inquiry into claims he improperly disclosed classified information.
Democrats rejoiced at the news. “The White House made a fool of Chairman Nunes, and he has deeply tarnished his credibility as Chairman and the credibility of his Republican colleagues,” declared Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi. There is no question that this was a blow for the chairman, following his revelation that Obama administration officials had collected information of Trump transition members incidentally, unmasked it, and widely disseminated it. But the victory for Nunes’ critics could be pyrrhic.
For one thing, stepping aside on the Russia inquiry isn’t as big of a deal now as it might have been months ago. That’s because the Russia investigation isn’t really going anywhere. On March 9, BuzzFeed reported that Democrats on the committee are worried that their base is expecting dramatic results that simply won’t be coming.
Even some Democrats on the Intelligence Committee now quietly admit, after several briefings and preliminary inquiries, they don’t expect to find evidence of active, informed collusion between the Trump campaign and known Russian intelligence operatives, though investigators have only just begun reviewing raw intelligence. Among the Intelligence Committee’s rank and file, there’s a tangible frustration over what one official called “wildly inflated” expectations surrounding the panel’s fledgling investigation.
“The Russia narrative has been a sensational marketing effort, but the investigation won’t live up to the hype,” Michael Sainato writes. Glenn Greenwald of the Intercept has a good rundown of the problems caused by Democrats hyping Russian conspiracy theories.
Now, perhaps there will be something that comes out that changes everything, but after the better part of a year involving claims that the end was near for Donald Trump, people seem to have a general idea of Russia’s efforts that’s gone unchanged.
Nunes not having to deal with that part of his duties frees up time to focus on an area of investigation that has proved fruitful: the Obama administration’s leaking against the Trump administration.
Everyone knows that there was leaking, because multiple media outlets published the leaks. These many leaks were sourced to high-level Obama officials, though their identities were kept anonymous by the journalists publishing the information.
Two weeks ago, there was a breakthrough. Nunes revealed that he’d seen dozens of reports of information collected on U.S. citizens close to the Trump transition. Their information had been unmasked despite the lack of intelligence value in the reports. This had nothing to do with Russia, and the information was widely disseminated, according to Nunes. While many in the media immediately attempted to downplay the news or distract from it, earlier this week it was revealed that Obama’s National Security Advisor had requested such unmasking dozens of times. She was not the only Obama official to request the unmasking.
After initially denying knowledge of Nunes’ revelations when he first made them, Rice later defended her requests for unmasked information when it came out she was one of the Obama officials to request the unmasked information. Rice says she “leaked nothing to nobody,” although she is not known for her truth-telling. Still, in order for a leak campaign to work, the leaker didn’t need to also be the person who requested the unmasking of information on U.S. citizens or the person who made sure the unmasked information was distributed widely. But the unmasking would be a necessary first step.
Observers are beginning to see the significance of the news of Susan Rice’s involvement, despite a lack of media coverage of same.
The point is that Nunes was doing the tenacious oversight that enabled this news to be discovered. And he can spend his time focused on getting to the bottom of the Obama administration’s leaking scandal without having to spend time on the Russia portion that was already wrapping up. He’ll need that time to deal with the bureaucracy’s resistance to oversight. Intelligence agencies are “stonewalling” efforts to figure out who leaked protected information to the press:
If anyone would bother to look, this is a pattern within the defunct Obama administration. It started with the IRS targeting, but possibly with Fast and Furious. Like a telegraph vine, liberals are aware that their Leader justifies any means to reach the ends; so no rule or law is too sacred not to be trampled upon.
In fact, the IRS scandal STILL needs to be run to ground; Lois Lerner needs to have her pension revoked and to be in jail, along with Steven Miller and Koskinen. Abusing power to attack political enemies, at the tacit approval of the C in C, should not be encouraged by allowing the perpetrators to walk away with sweet pensions.
Thus it should be with abusing vital intelligence gathering capabilities to attack political opponents. Not only does this illegally infringe upon the rights of those unmasked, it severely erodes public faith in something that is vital for their safety. The intrusive surveillance system has been put in place with safeguards that only work if the administration is not corrupt and we have seen just how corrupt a regime can be, which puts every citizen at risk. No punishment for abusing that trust would be too harsh and every scurrilous slime involved needs to be flushed out.
I doubt Obama will be drawn in; he’s smart enough to get his bidding done by dropping hints and having lots of insulation. Liberals know they have lots and lots of minions to sacrifice for the Greater Cause. Same for Rice, I would imagine, though holding a few useful idiots feet to the fire might connect some dots.
This needs to be pursued to the very end; and exploited to the fullest.
Except in your FOX News fantasy world, it never arrived to begin with.
@Greg: Except it being MSNBC, CNN and NYT as sources you might have something there, and all the “where did you come up with that?” back peddling in the world isnt going to help as it was them reporting all the leaks that shined the light on the Obama administrations spying on a political opponent for political purposes.
We will get to the bottom of this keep looking for Boris and Natasha, we may have found our Benedict Obama.