Ahem. She’s speaking of why the Tea Party supports him, she claims.
But she clearly thinks he “knows his place,” too.
Here’s a very odd bit of “analysis.” The black man we’re talking about has been director of a Federal Reserve Bank, a CEO, and now aspires to be President.
That’s the “place” he knows he’s supposed to be in? He’s internalized racism so much, his ego has been so reduced by white racism, his sense of self-worth so diminished, that he now sees himself as the President of the United States of America?
Black men who “know their place” in our society know that place to be Commander in Chief?
I guess we must be doing something wrong, then.
This is why I attribute the belief to her (rather than follow her in ventriloquizing her beliefs into other’s mouths). It makes no sense.
She wants to call him an Uncle Tom and/or “uppity” — incompatible, yes, but she wants to hang some racial slur on him. And she finds that in her own fucking mind.
Not in the Tea Party’s mind. And not in Herman Cain’s mind, either.
So let me get this straight: The left now feels it can resort to racial slurs against black men it doesn’t like by simply claiming the black man’s supporters — you know, the people who like him — are thinking these obnoxiously racist retrograde thoughts.
As I have said many times before; project much?
Me? I’m a “Conservative” so, I KNOW she is not putting words in my mouth or thoughts in my mind….Ms. Karen Finney is sadly, a simpleton, much like the company she most likely keeps…. this woman needs to stop “thinking” so much for others…
Liberals/Progressives/Democrats [all the same these days] have never achieved the art of listening or observing or hearing…or even coming to the understanding that, yes, as much as they try to use it as an argument for their own race driven agenda’s, or to indenture other’s into real [political] slavery, there is no one on this green earth who brings up the subject of “race” more then “them”….
GO HERMAN CAIN!! GO HERMAN CAIN!!
When will these racists allow a man to be a man. Liberal bigots, quit with the racism, you are doing great harm to this country.
It’s this kinda liberal BS that makes my friking head nearly explode! How can any adult with an ounce of maturity, and a thimble of intelligence believe these liberal idiots? Cain has been handicapped by the GOP, the talking conservative heads/pundits, the democrats, and the liberals, yet he is still running high in the polls against all odds!
Why? Simple answer really, he appeals to the Americans out here in whats left of the real world who are still intelligent and still have common sense, and who are sick to our stomachs of professional doubling talking, smooth looking politicians who never say what they mean, and never mean what they say! God how I wish that Cain would win! Just so over half of these ivory tower liberals, and Rhinos, and the so called pundits little jello brains would spill out of their friking ears when they heard the news.
Just so we have this straight, according to MSNBC (and other MSM & others from the far-left):
(1) The Tea Party and Republicans who do not support Barack Obama are racists. (Obama being of mixed, 1/2 Caucasian genetically and the other 1/2 Negro ancestry.)
(2) The Tea Party and Republicans who do support Herman Cain are racists. (Cain being to the best of our knowledge 100% of Negro genetic ancestry.)
So, to work-out and expand on this logic:
If Obama was of 100% Negro genetic ancestory, it would then be racist to support him and conversely if Cain was not a full-blooded individual of Negro ancestry it would be racist not to support Herman. I.e. it is therefore racist to support those candidates who are 100% black. ….no?
The only other consideration is that one is a Democrat and the other Republican.
But wait, there have been other candidates for office of both pure black ancestry and those of mixed ancestry, of both parties, where there was no claim of racism for those who did not vote for them. But then again there have been other “African-American” Democrats who have claimed that they lost due to racism.
However, that doesn’t resolve it either, because there have been other Democrats of other ethnic ancestry heritage (Hispanic, Asian, etc) who have also declared that their appointment to or campaigns for office were opposed due to racism. Then again, there have been cases where Republican appointees and candidates were opposed by Democrats because of their racial or religious affiliation, yet Democrats failed to recognize the bigotry behind their opposition. Nor with Democrats is it racist to vote against a candidate because they are Caucasian.
Added to this: Democrats consider it racist to oppose voting for a Muslim candidate. It is expected to vote against any candidate who declares a Christian religious affiliation, because by stating their Christian religious orientation they must be a fanatic. If the candidate is Jewish or of any other religious affiliation, the may be voted for only if they are also Democrat. Declared and loudly vocal Atheist Democrats shall always be supported.
The only logical conclusion is:
(1) It is racist not to support the appointment or election of a Democrat of ethnicity, unless they are mostly of Caucasian ancestry or declare themselves devoutly pro-life Christians.
(2) It is racist to support the appointment or election of a Republican of any ethnicity, especially if they are Caucasian and Christian.