Lawmaker Estimates FBI Had 200 Undercover Assets at US Capitol on Jan. 6

Loading

by Rob Bluey

A member of Congress investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, protest at the U.S. Capitol estimates the FBI had 200 undercover assets both inside and outside the building.

“We believe that there were easily 200 FBI undercover assets operating in the crowd, outside the Capitol, embedded into groups that entered the Capitol or provoked entry of the Capitol,” Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., said.

Higgins appeared on the Tucker Carlson Network for an interview that aired Saturday, the third anniversary of the day now commonly known as J6. He’s among the few elected Republicans still questioning the official media narrative about the day’s events.

“Given the scope of the operation and the number of doors where entry was allowed or even encouraged—and the number of people that were actually outside the Capitol and that entered—we believe 200 [is a] conservative number,” Higgins said of his estimate.

Carlson reacted with alarm.

“It’s shocking what you’re saying and confirms everyone’s worst suspicions about this,” Carlson told Higgins. “It’s clearly true.”

Based on the evidence he’s reviewed, Higgins said FBI assets worked with the local Washington, D.C., Metropolitan Police Department and U.S. Capitol Police. The assets were dressed as supporters of then-President Donald Trump inside the Capitol, “because those were the guys that knew their way around the Capitol.”

FBI Director Christopher Wray has refused to answer questions about undercover FBI assets on Jan. 6, telling Higgins at a congressional hearing, “You should not read anything into my decision not to share information on confidential human sources.”

In remarks about the Jan. 6 anniversary, Attorney General Merrick Garland boasted Friday that more than 1,250 individuals have been charged for their involvement, with more than 890 convicted.

“Since the Jan. 6 attack, the Justice Department has engaged in what has become one of the largest and most complex and resource-intensive investigations in our history,” Garland said. “Our work continues.”

President Joe Biden used the anniversary of Jan. 6 to attack Trump in his first campaign speech of 2024.

“It was on that day that we nearly lost America, lost it all,” Biden said Friday at a speech in Valley Forge, Pennsylvania.

Carlson opened his interview with Higgins by criticizing “professional liars” who have presented a one-sided narrative about what happened on that day. Higgins, who worked in law enforcement before his election to Congress, has led the charge after being frustrated by the official congressional committee that investigated Jan. 6, which was stacked with anti-Trump lawmakers. Ever since Republicans reclaimed control of the House in 2023, members like Higgins have pressed for answers.

For example, as a member of Congress familiar with the U.S. Capitol, Higgins said it’s unfathomable to believe that everyday Americans in Washington, D.C., would know how to navigate the building without help.

“There’s no way they can come in some random door that gets opened and then get their way directly to Statuary [Hall] or the House chamber or the Senate chamber. It’s just not possible,” Higgins explained. “The FBI assets that were dressed as Trump supporters that were inside the Capitol were there, I believe, and evidence indicates that they were there to specifically wave in the Trump supporters that had gathered outside the Capitol.”

Higgins told Carlson these undercover assets guided protesters “directly to the areas where the FBI, the DOJ, and the Deep State actors” would later be able to implicate them for arrest and prosecution.

When pressed on who could have orchestrated such a massive operation, Higgins put the blame on not on a single person but rather a combination of anti-Trump actors working in cahoots with Democrats.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
44 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The carefully crafted democrat narrative of January 6 is falling apart. benny thompson had to know that it was imperative he destroy any and all evidence that might be exculpatory in nature. January 6 was an intelligence community operation designed to stop the constitutional process of counting the electoral votes.
A prior House rules change allowed pelosi following the adjournment and reconvening to put in place emergency rules that forbade any opposition challenges to the process.
There was no effort to overturn the 2020 election. Rather, it was a course correction given the degree of fraud that actually happened. President Trump would have been certified by the House of Representatives, Constitutionally and would have continued as President. Imagine how different the Country would be today.

The House would just send the electors home and let their legislators sort it out a delay in counting.
Imagine PA clerks trying to prove they sent out as many ballots as they got back.
GA clerks showing chain of custody
AZ re-examining signitures
WI having to decide if cured ballots were valid.

I would like to see phone records or radio coms to this prick
Officer Jimmy Crisman identified as the dangerous cop who fired munitions on the Trump crowd on Jan. 6 without warning.

Last edited 1 month ago by kitt

MPD Officer Jimmy Chrisman , suspected of:
insurrection,
assault with a deadly weapon,
inciting a riot,
and murder.

All the questions should have been resolved (instead of just ignored) long before January 6th. The riot was the culmination of all those efforts to suppress any and all investigation of a fraudulent election.

destroy any and all evidence

Evidence was not destroyed. Any video depositions that were deleted have full transcripts available.

Prove it. And prove the transcripts perfectly match the video.

There was no effort to overturn the 2020 election.

There was a Democrat effort to conceal the disruption of the 2020 election that, through fraud, put the corrupt, treasonous criminal pedophile, Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden, illegitimately in office.

He also says he saw a video of FBI agents going into a room and emerging disguised as Trump supporters.

Yes he did and I find a congressman that openly says things more credible than “those familiar” and reliable sources say…
Oh dont forget the ghost busses Greggie.

Last edited 1 month ago by kitt

The video has been locked away in Al Capone’s vault for safe keeping.

For Pelosis sake you better hope Gerlado is the one looking.

 I find a congressman that openly says things more credible

Really? I have seen MAGA congressmen say absolutely insane shit over the years.

Such as?

Meanwhile, Trump’s lawyers argue Biden can order him shot without fear of prosecution, because presidents have total immunity.

Seriously, that’s how absurd their argument for dismissal is. It would set all presidents totally above the law.

Psst greg, hey you are posting to yourself again, this is about FBI assets planted in the J6 crowd.
Entrapment, and Biden/Obama political prisoners.
FOCUS

Last edited 1 month ago by kitt

Little greg gets so upset when other post off thread topic. He does it because he wants to steer a conversation. Fuck him and his lunatic comments.

It’s odd that you’re ignoring the the most consequential news story of the day:

On Tuesday, the DC US Circuit Court of Appeals will hear arguments by attorneys for Trump and special counsel Jack Smith over the same two claims of immunity, a hearing Trump himself is set to attend.

Yes we heard, now get the knot out of your thong. Its only your choice of Media screeching this above the law shit. You suck it up like Kamela looking for a job advancement.

Last edited 1 month ago by kitt

This entire clown train is headed for a derailment. The GOP will be in charge of sweeping up the noses.

Last edited 1 month ago by Greg

Yeah, especially when all the engineers are AWOL.

Calm down, Trump will use his powers as responsibly as this admin has, arrests with no trial, kangaroo courts, endless made up charges to punish political rivals, but all legal cause the government is doing it.
Especially registered democrats to be targeted.

Last edited 1 month ago by kitt

No he wouldn’t. He has publicly stated what he’d do. Either you haven’t been listening, or like what he’s said.

Last edited 1 month ago by Greg

What did he publicly state he would do? Provide the EXACT QUOTES, including the context.

As soon as you provide evidence of the “MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION” that justifies “the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.”

What did he publicly state he would do? Provide the EXACT QUOTES, including the context.

Last edited 1 month ago by Greg

As soon as you provide evidence of the “MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION” that justifies “the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.”

See Democrat election fraud, November, 2020.

Now, the quotes.

Seriously, that’s how absurd their argument for dismissal is. It would set all presidents totally above the law.

Aren’t they? In the outside world, corruption, influence peddling, stealing classified documents, mishandling classified documents, murder, tax evasion and dereliction of duty are prosecutable. Seen any such charges brought against Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden?

Ask Richard Nixon.

Aren’t they?

Wow needed a pardon, again focus

As long as Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden and the Biden Crime Family gets away with their crimes, they are.

So, you’re OK with the SCOTUS giving Biden carte blanche to do whatever he wants without fear of prosecution?

Last edited 1 month ago by Greg

Provide that argument.

That’s what you’re paying Trump’s lawyers to do. They’ve done a fine job.

Trump’s lawyers argue Biden can order him shot without fear of prosecution

Where is this argument in there?

Blanket presidential immunity from prosecution even after you leave office would allow anything. Trump’s lawyers are arguing that such blanket immunity exists. No way in hell will the Supreme Court of the United States rule in favor of such nonsense.

Where is this argument in there?

Last edited 1 month ago by Greg

That bullshit came from jack shit.

Jack Smith Goes Off the Rails, Claims Trump Immunity Argument Would Allow Him to Order His Supporters to Murder Opposing Lawmakers

Last edited 1 month ago by TrumpWon

That would be covered by blanket immunity from prosecution. He’s pointing out how absurd immunity from prosecution would be.

Last edited 1 month ago by Greg

It seems strange that anyone that actually believes January 6th was an “insurrection” and a “threat to our democracy” is not intensely interested in the accusation that hundreds of FBI assets were there in the crowd guiding it towards violence and chaos. Apparently, they believe it was neither an insurrection or a threat to the government and only want to fulfill the Democrat mission of exploiting the protest to destroy Trump and his supporters. In truth, no thinking person thinks this was in any way something that could be described as an “insurrection” and, as such, the LAST thing they want is the ultimate truth.

“I wonder how many Americans realize that the LIKELY truth is the government planned and coordinated January 6th to use it as a Reichstag Fire excuse to send the American Cheka after their domestic political opponents.

Just digest what that means…”

January 6 and the GOP’s war on women’s rights will result in a landslide victory for Democrats in November.

The only war on women’s rights is carried out by Democrats.

How do you figure?

RAY EPPS Sued By January 6th Defendant for CONSPIRACY! LAWSUIT FILED IN UTAH! “Ray Epps Acted Under the Color of Law as a FEDERAL AGENT to Deprive Me of My Constitutional Rights.”

RAY EPPS Sentencing Hearing Today Changed to a SECRETIVE Zoom Hearing after GP Receives Tip! D.C. Kangaroo Court BREAKS THE LAW by Hiding Sentencing From Public! “THIS IS PATENTLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL!”

file:///var/mobile/Library/SMS/Attachments/51/01/249D34CE-C908-46ED-A598-E63A42D7FDF9/image000000.jpg