Far Left Twitter Identifies Only 7 Approved Outlets to Announce Presidential Election Results — EVERYONE ELSE WILL BE FLAGGED!

Spread the love

Loading


 
By Jim Hoft

Twitter has waged a jihad against conservatives and a jihad against the truth since Donald Trump won the election in 2016.

Since that time, it has been well documented that Twitter has silenced, censored and banned conservative content.

Meanwhile, violent content and threats by radical far left extremists like Antifa and Black Lives Matter goes mostly untouched.

Two weeks ago Twitter censored a report by The New York Post on Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden’s questionable and likely corrupt international business dealings.



On Monday Twitter announced it will only allow seven approved outlets to announce election results. Every other outlet will be flagged.

These tech tyrants are doing their VERY BEST to destroy Freedom of Speech in America!

What horrible people!

Via Axios:

Twitter on Monday provided more details about its policies around tweets that declare election results, and named the seven outlets it will lean on to help it determine whether a race is officially called.

Driving the news: The list includes ABC News, AP, CNN, CBS News, Decision Desk HQ, Fox News and NBC News — all outlets that experts agree have verified, unbiased decision desks calling elections.

Our thought bubble: Some conservatives have alleged that Twitter is biased against them. In the past few weeks, data from the Stanford Cable TV Analyzer shows that Fox News has discussed Jack Dorsey and Big Tech censorship at length.

  • Fox News’ Decision Desk is considered very authoritative and is highly-respected amongst media and politics insiders. By including Fox News’ decision desk in this list, Twitter is saying that it believes its decision desk is verified and legitimate.

Details: Twitter previously said that it would require either an announcement from state election officials, or a public projection from at least two authoritative, national news outlets that make independent calls about the race before letting tweets about the results go by unlabeled.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I won’t believe any reports unless they are approved by Adam Schiff. He wouldn’t lie to us.

It is probably a mistake to put a warning on Tom Fitton and his Judicial Watch site as they are also releasing election results as they come in.

If I recall correctly, the outlets that are OK with Twitter waited hours before reporting some results because they were trying to suppress voter enthusiasm for Trump while some polls, in other states, were still open.
That is A-OK with Twitter, apparently.

The ministry or truth wont allow Trump to declare victory even with an electoral landslide, they have other plans with never throttled accounts.

This is an entirely reasonable precaution, in case someone intends to proclaim victory for one candidate or the other early as a setup for discrediting the real final count result days later. There are numerous fringe “news” outlets and that might do just that.

It’s already known that the final count of absentee ballots submitted timely by active duty military personnel won’t known for days. Our nation has never actually had the final certified count of all votes completed on election day.

When To Expect Election Results In Every State

Some dumb bitch Secretary of State of Pennsylvania said it is common to not know the election results the night of the election. What a complete dumbass and a democrat of course.

@Greg:

This is an entirely reasonable precaution

Actually, it is imposed censorship. But then, we know you Commie bastids fully support censorship.

Social media giants need to be broken up like the Democrats broke up Standard Oil.

You were certainly singing a different tune when the issue was avoiding the domination of huge corporations and powerful special interests by maintaining net neutrality.

But then you never did really figure out what net neutrality actually meant, did you?

@Greg:

You were certainly singing a different tune when the issue was avoiding the domination of huge corporations and powerful special interests by maintaining net neutrality.

But then you never did really figure out what net neutrality actually meant, did you?

If that was meant for me, Comrade Greggie, please provide my statement on anything dealing with net neutrality. VERBATIM.

@Greg:

This is an entirely reasonable precaution, in case someone intends to proclaim victory for one candidate or the other early as a setup for discrediting the real final count result days later.

What possible difference does it make if someone falsely calls one candidate the victor? Until the result is officially certified, there IS no victor. People only set themselves up for disappointment if they believe someone that has a history of political bias (such as ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN, MSNBC). No, all this is is Twitter flexing its totalitarian muscles and controlling what people can say or see.

The only question is going to be the questionable ballots the Democrats will be throwing at every polling place. Democrats have been honing their fraud skills for years and the epidemic provided them a new avenue with vote by mail, where they can create as many votes as they need when they need them. They have insisted that the count just continue indefinitely so they can just keep “finding” boxes of votes, as they tried to do in Florida in 2018.

Why should lies be flagged or removed by social media outlets? Because of b.s. like the following:

November 2, 2020 – Manipulated video of Biden mixing up states was shared 1.1m times before being removed – Twitter tagged the video, which included fake Florida signs as Joe Biden addressed Minnesota, as ‘manipulated media’

A doctored video purporting to show Joe Biden addressing a rally and forgetting which state he was in was viewed more than 1.1m times on social media before it was removed from Twitter.

“Hello Minnesota,” the Democratic candidate says as he bounds on to a stage where signs saying “Tampa, Florida” and “Text FL to 30330” are prominently placed.

The footage was clipped from a campaign stop last Friday in St Paul, Minnesota. The signs, however, were fake, added by digital manipulation, according to an Associated Press fact check that debunked the story.

Late on Sunday, Twitter tagged the video, which was posted on a nondescript personal account, as “manipulated media”. Shortly afterwards, with the video having received more than 1.1m views, the user removed it.

While there is no suggestion the video came from the Trump campaign, highlighting Biden’s perceived lack of mental acuity has been a favored tactic for the president and his surrogates.

In March, Donald Trump retweeted a dishonestly edited video that appeared to show Biden, in an appearance in Missouri, endorsing his rival for re-election. That video, also labeled by Twitter as “manipulated”, amassed 6m views.

In September, hundreds of thousands watched an edited video posted by the Trump campaign to YouTube which falsely showed Biden mixing up the words of the pledge of allegiance.

Last week videos were posted of Biden stumbling over some words and using the name George, which Trump supporters seized on as supposed proof the Democrat thought he was running against former Republican president George W Bush.

The reality was Biden was being interviewed by the actor and comedian George Lopez.

The tactic appears at least in part to be working, according to CNN, which quoted an attendee at a Trump rally in Oregon last week.

“He forgets where he’s at, he forgets who he’s running against, he forgets what he’s running for,” the woman said, referring to Biden.

No, ma’am. Biden doesn’t forget such things. The danger to the nation is your own gullibility and the campaign tactics that exploit it.

@Deplorable Me:

What possible difference does it make if someone falsely calls one candidate the victor?

Because it sets the stage for somebody to denounce the final election results as illegitimate. I have little-to-no confidence that Donald Trump won’t do that if he loses a close election. He was suggesting that any election he lost would be rigged even before voting had started.

@Greg:

Because it sets the stage for somebody to denounce the final election results as illegitimate. I have little-to-no confidence that Donald Trump won’t do that if he loses a close election.

That’s pretty funny, Comrade Greggie. You left wingers have been denouncing the 2016 election since November 2016. How many times have you heard a Democrat call Trump an “illegitimate” President. Now you’re whining that it could happen to your Party. Oh, my, color me shocked, SHOCKED I TELL YOU.

Biden won’t be president for a year before Nancy Pelosi, under pressure from the Squad, determines he is mentally unable to complete his term of office and we have a true Marxist president in Camel-La Harris. I’m sure you would be thrilled at that prospect.

BTW, Democrats have been stealing elections since LBJ showed them how to do it.

@Greg:

Because it sets the stage for somebody to denounce the final election results as illegitimate.

Anyone can denounce anything. An erroneous report is not going to promote any such thing. What will do that will be the widespread reports of Democrat operatives suddenly “finding” boxes of votes in the trunk of their car or in some warehouse where they has been no chain of custody, like 2018 Florida. Or Minnesota and Franken. There are numerous examples. Just saying Trump won and then the votes add up otherwise only means someone was wrong.

Trying to get facts and figures from social media giants is like having to sift thru piles of horse crap to try to find a diamond.
There are much better news aggregators than Facebook, Twitter or Google News.

The Beige Page is neutral.
https://www.beigepage.com/

WhatFingerNews is attempting to become the best news aggregator on earth and tells you which side of the aisle lists of links are on.
https://www.whatfinger.com/

And, of course, there is a state-by-state news coverage done by some sources.
Click on your state, or a favorite state and then real numbers come in as live feeds that are updated automatically.
Why wait until a media outlet “calls” as state for a candidate?
If you can do the math, you know when the numbers are enough to be beyond overcoming.