We Read All 4,400 DEI Grants So You Don’t Have To – Spoiler: It Was Worse Than You Think

Spread the love

Loading

The Left is suing to reinstate Biden’s DEI grants, claiming it’s “discrimination” to stop funding race-based, woke research. But here’s the truth:

What the NIH actually shut down was a pipeline of radical, discriminatory pseudoscience disguised as academic research — and funded with your tax dollars.

We reviewed all 4,400 grants. Here’s what was really going on:


  • $740,000 went to NYU for a project called ADEPT: Assessing Diversity Effects Post Affirmative Action Restrictions in Medical Schools.

    • The stated purpose? Study how med schools can preserve racial preferences after the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions decision.

    • The real goal? Keep race-based admissions alive under the cover of “equity and inclusion.”

This wasn’t scientific inquiry. It was government-funded resistance to a lawful ruling.


  • $2.1 million was awarded to Emory University to study methamphetamine use among Black gay and bisexual men who have sex with men (GBMSM).

    • The goal: “generate knowledge” about how racism, homophobia, and “health inequities” supposedly cause meth addiction.

Drug use is now rebranded as a symptom of oppression — not a personal or medical issue.


  • $2.3 million funded a study claiming that “structural racism” is the primary cause of disparities in kidney disease outcomes.

    • The solution? Implement race-based interventions that would alter how patients are prioritized for treatment and organ transplants.

Identity would override medical urgency or need.


  • $2.2 million was spent to explore alcohol use among sexual minority adolescents of color, focusing on “intersectional minority stress.”

    • This six-phase study aimed to document the daily effects of oppression on teenage drinking.

They’re calling this science. It’s social activism with a lab coat.


  • $6 million was funneled into the University of Michigan to recruit and promote “underrepresented” PhD students in biomedical sciences — based explicitly on race, sex, and ethnicity.

    • It was part of the university’s $85 million DEI infrastructure and promoted as a racial representation pipeline for science.

The Trump administration terminated it — rightfully so.


  • $348,000 funded a study on how stigma and relationship problems affect alcohol use in trans and nonbinary young adults.

    • The real goal? Help the researcher launch their career by running a gender-affirming therapy program called Whole Selves.

This is careerist identity politics masquerading as research.


  • $1.1 million supported a study tracking whether people drink more when their sexual orientation changes over time.

    • That’s right — NIH wants to correlate “sexual fluidity” with alcohol abuse.

This is social engineering, not science.


  • $262,704 paid for a peer-led “gender-affirming” therapy program for transgender women (i.e., biological men).

    • It used Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to instill “pride in one’s gender identity.”

    • The researcher openly stated that the goal was to build a career in transgender health and pursue more federal funding.

You’re funding their résumé padding.


  • $26 million went to Emory University for the FIRST program — an identity-based academic pipeline designed to recruit and promote women and “underrepresented minorities” in STEM.

    • The program embeds race and sex preferences into academic systems from top to bottom.

Qualifications optional. Identity mandatory.


  • $2.1 million (since terminated) was given to the University of Washington to apply Critical Race Theory to addiction treatment.

    • Researchers argued that COVID-era policies were “structural interventions” that had to be re-engineered through a CRT lens.

Again, ideological indoctrination dressed up as science.


  • NIH also gave millions to Vanderbilt University to hire 18 tenure-track professors — but only if they were:

    • Black

    • Latinx

    • American Indian

    • Pacific Islander

White and Asian candidates? Explicitly excluded.

Pulling this grant wasn’t “discrimination.”
Funding it was.


The Left insists that cutting these programs hurts minorities and LGBTQ+ Americans. But the truth is clear:

What’s truly discriminatory is funneling billions in federal funds into “inclusive” identity-based pseudoscience that deliberately excludes everyone else.

It’s not research.
It’s institutionalized bias — branded as “equity” and paid for by you.

LINK

4.2 5 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Who even APPROVES these disgusting wastes of money? How many libers are living off “grants”?? Oh, so THAT’s why the left is so upset about stopping all the BILLIONS!!! Way passed the time to stop TAXPAYER funding of unemployable idiots!

Who Approves this BULL SCHIFF ???

WELCOME to…..The DEMAGOGUE Party…..Where the LUNATIC LEFT…..Rules !

You read 4,400 DEI Grants…..THANKS for “Taking One for the Team” ! ! !

So all those spam penis enlarger ads were wholy funded by USAID?

We used to attend School to be Educated not Indoctrinated/Brainwashed by the UN/Globalists