27 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

When you’re primary mode of achievement is claiming you are victim, and you’ve been rewarded for it for decades, you’re not going to change.

The “Narrative” worked. In order to get votes, the Left successfully indoctrinated enough of the population to believe the exact opposite of what is statistically and verifiably true:

We the LEAST racist nation and society on the planet, and in history.

You know why we never hear a word from either blm or antifa anymore?
Sugar daddy Soros stopped paying them.

But there are still plenty of useful idiots out there, like this coach Dawn Staley, who swallow the narrative whole and regurgitate parts of it back whenever it suits them.

It’s grandly egotistic to think that anyone really gives a damn what a bunch of spoiled kids think. 

…Writes the guy who just penned a screed on that very topic and posted it online for the world to read.

Last edited 2 years ago by Michael

Did that make sense in your head?

You’re attempt at a “gotcha” looked more like you shitting your pants.

^^^^^

But there are still plenty of useful idiots out there, like this coach Dawn Staley, who swallow the narrative whole and regurgitate parts of it back whenever it suits them.

Well said.

looked more like you shitting your pants

If anybody knows about pants-shitting, I reckon it’d be you, old-timer. If you stock up on Depends, you should be all right.

I’m afraid there’s a shortage on Depends, given their need for Joe “I just got my butt wiped” Biden.

Seems to be only one of many other shortages:
Food
Dollar-value
Gas
Hope
Democracy

We’ll get this sorted out, and give the minority of Leftists an education in how our country works, and what that means to the world.

the minority of Leftists

By that, do you mean Democrats, or do you mean the extreme left wing?

Look out Nate its the, I know you are but what am I, tactic from the Professor.

Hungary is a nice nation its re-elected President is OK.

This Human, “The majority of our players has sat during the playing of the national anthem every game this season – a decision made by our players to bring awareness to racial injustice in our country.”
I dont think it brings awareness to what he thinks it does, other than real shitty grammar. Perhaps March madness teeth, down to the final 4.

Honestly, I think Michael is sincere. He’s parroting an ideology, however, and it’s about 20-30 years old and not accurate.

The Left is taught that they are smarter than other people, so when they have an idea, they think they are the first to have it and attack “conservatives” because those mouth breathing, white, working-class brutes can’t possibly understand.

I can destroy almost every Leftwing race argument rather easily, but they just don’t understand where this all goes.

Equality of the law has been achieved. They are using outliers to say things are “systemic.” The average Leftist doesn’t understand how rare it was for a Black man to be killed by the police without a cause (only 2 the year before Floyd), and those two had ZERO indication of any racist conduct.

To say because Chauvin was “white, he’s racist” is actual racism. (no accusation of racism were brought up in the trial, by the way)

This end in a genocide against white Americans. That’s been the Globalist plan for decades, as a way of destroying or at least weakening the United States.

The false claim of “racism” to stoke division is right out of Mao’s little red book.

Last edited 2 years ago by Nathan Blue

Oh he is entirely sincere, doesnt seem well informed, nor have the capacity to do research.
Today is election day for our school board, 8 running, after the primary in Feb, for 2 seats. After a brief scan it was simple to eliminate 4, 1 so flaming he got 2 ! behind his no, another wants masks and vaxx for the kiddies, she wants her seat back. My daughter had to take her kids out of district to find an open school The other 2 are obvious CRT victims they happen to hold Master degrees.
1 is an easy choice, he coaches, is an engineer that wants STEM pushed harder, also share the budget with building repairs. None of the others really stand out for good or bad, milk toast standard I dont want to offend election and facebook pages.

They are using outliers to say things are “systemic.” 

They use events like Floyd dying of fentanyl overdose while restrained by a white cop as the catalyst for their claims. They claim Floyd was murdered because he was black. Reasonable people wait for details, then provide the facts that disproves their accusations. The DENIAL is the “proof” of systemic racism. The refusal to use racism as a political weapon is used to accuse racism and, of course, every reasonable person objects to this ridiculous assertion, so it becomes “systemic”.

I wish these purveyors of the “systemic racism” trope would examine where and how this appears to demonstrate itself; it’s always in Democrat controlled areas. Perhaps THERE is your problem, not the character of the United States.

it’s always in Democrat controlled areas

Please tell me more about this idea.

Please tell me more about this idea.

Well, let’s take Minneapolis, “systemic racism central”, for example. Minneapolis, where George Floyd died of a massive fentanyl overdose while in police custody, was the designated center of systemic racism. But, what have we in Minneapolis in the way of government that might be significant? Well, a Democrat mayor. Democrat city council. Democrat police chief. Want more?

Well, to go all Kamala on you, Minneapolis is a city. It is in a state. The state is called Minnesota. Minnesota is bigger than Minneapolis. It’s also got a Democrat governor, Democrat Attorney General and a Democrat-controlled legislature. It also has two Democrat Senators and 5 of 8 Representatives are Democrat.

Rinse, repeat for San Francisco, LA, Austin, San Antonio, Chicago, NYC, Baltimore… etc, etc., etc. If systemic racism exists there, who happens to be in control of the system?

It’s not an idea; it’s a disease.

Now you are officially smarter.

Last edited 2 years ago by Just Plain Bill

You seem to be misunderstanding a few things here.

First, nearly all the largest cities in the United States have Democratic mayors because cities are where the people are, and people generally like Democratic leadership at the city level.

Second, systemic racism is not confined to individual cities; it’s systemic. It’s in the name.

There is no systemic racism.

It’s empirically non-existent. That’s why even you can’t define what “racism” and “systematic” are in this context.

and people generally like Democratic leadership at the city level.

More like Democrats are good at harvesting votes from poor people and Black people the way they had them harvesting cotton in ages past.

Slavery, by any other name.

The push to make white Christian straight men the new “Jew” isn’t a good idea.

The push to make white Christian straight men the new “Jew” isn’t a good idea.

What are you trying to say here?

What are you trying to say here?

Collectivist guilt is what was used in Nazi Germany and in Soviet Russia. It’s endgame is genocide.

The new Leftist policy of “kill whitey” is just like “kill the Jews” or “kill the Kulaks.”

Anytime you moronically blame a race/class for all the ails of the world, you get genocide.

Being “white” is the new “Jew.” The strange thing is that it’s rich white atheistic elites promoting it (or those who think they are “elite” because of their lesbian dance theory degree).

As we saw in Waukesha, a black man named Darrell Brooks Jr. committed a racist massacre of white people.

It’s not dismissible because of slavery or Jim Crow in ages past.

From Whoopi Goldberg to Nick Cannon, claiming it’s okay to just kill white people (as those white people quietly chuckle behind them) is manifesting as the beginnings of actual genocide.

That’s why even you can’t define what “racism” and “systematic” are in this context.

Have you asked me to?

Wow. Rarely does someone make my point for me so clearly. The system is controlled by Democrats and there is, you say, systemic racism. So, the answer would be to eliminate the Democrats from the system… right?

Democrats are inherently racist and without them using racism as a political weapon, there would be far less of it.

Democrats are People are inherently racist and without them using racism as a political weapon, there would be far less of it it’s very difficult to root it out of society for anyone of any political party.

Nice effort at deflection, but you are not fooling anyone. Indeed, racism, especially when confronted with a group one is unfamiliar with, is almost instinctive. Democrats, however, cultivate it. They promote it. EVERYTHING is racist to them, when they have no actual answers to their failures. Take the Supreme Court nominee, for instance. Democrats intended that her gender and race would be a shield against scrutiny, for ANY doubts of her suitability would automatically be deemed “racist” (and, indeed, that has been the play). But, expecting her race to negate any and all questions about past decisions and judgements is racist in and of itself. Do Republicans exploit this despicable trait? Nope… only Democrats.

Nice effort at deflection

It’s not a deflection; it’s addressing the topic. Hatred and suspicion between races is, it seems, deeply ingrained in our society. It’s not as bad as it once was, but it’s still a problem. It’s part of the system because it’s part of people, and people make the system.

But it is useful for the totalitarian Left to use a dehumanizing term (Racist, Russian, Rapist, whatever) that you can change the meaning of at will, just like Nazi’s and Soviets did, effectively, to take down anyone you want by concocting any crime you want.

You’re on a dangerous road, but we’re thankfully not letting you near the steering wheel.

Reparations.