Only the left wing media and democrats weep for the murderer of 600 Americans

The outpouring of grief over the death of Qasem Soleimani really is nothing less than astonishing and it’s coming almost entirely from the American left and the American media.

Well, it’s not THAT astonishing. It’s not what any actual American would expect, but when the left does it, it’s sort of (sadly) taken in stride. Aside from the brilliant elimination of a venomous terrorist leader, Trump has also exposed to the full nation where liberal loyalties lie.

When it comes to illegal immigration, liberals side against the US. When it comes to trade, liberals side against the US. When it comes to foreign policy, liberals side against the US. When it comes to national security, liberals side against the US. Only when the US becomes our enemies will the liberals finally side with their own country.

Let us recall that Soleimani was responsible for the deaths of 600 American soldiers and Marines and blew the limbs off thousands more in a country not his own. It is reported that he was making plans that could have resulted in the deaths of hundreds more.

Let us also recall that the left does not possess the love and appreciation for the military that loyal Americans normally do. The left creates in their minds numerous justifications for believing these brave soldiers deserve what they get in attacks, and this makes it possible to sympathize with the terrorists who, like them, hate this country and what it stands for.

One wonders how many American deaths it would take for her to care, although at one time she seemed to care.

Maybe if the carbon footprint of the embassy burnings, IED explosions or rocket attacks could be emphasized to stir up left wing opposition to terrorism.

Democrats make the point that they believe Trump is doing his job in order to distract attention from impeachment. If Democrats think this action is going to provoke war, maybe their pursuit of phony impeachment articles which, they say, led to Trump provoking war was a big, big mistake? Soleimani’s death is the Democrat’s fault.

Another of Soleimani’s poetry:

There once was a general from Iran
Who visited Iraq with a plan
His location was found
A Hellfire was bound
To send you to Hell sans a hand.

Several years ago there was an escalation in suicide bombing in Isreal. Then all of a sudden the number of bombing dropped precipitously. Isreal engaged in selected targeting of antagonists that were responsible for the bombings. If one does not read and understand history the future is doomed. ask whore dog billy about distractions when it came to Monica swallowing chelsie’s brother. the dog’s bombing raids were a blatant attempt to re-direct the lapdog media.

DJ, the flood of disinformation should be expected from the likes of Trump enablers such as Breitbart, Conservativefiringline, Daily Caller, Floppingaces, and such, all of it nonsensical and exploited with partisan rhetoric.

Under the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), Iran agreed to significantly lower their centrifuges and enriched uranium to an amount determined to meet their energy needs but not enough for nuclear arms. Iran also agreed to allow inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to monitor.

In 2016, IAEA confirmed Iran’s compliance and sanctions were soon lifted.

Roughly a year later, Trump abruptly walked out on JCPOA and re-imposed sanctions. The only logical conclusion to his military stratagem seems to be that JCPOA had too much Obama on it.

I realize we disagree on the necessity and I realize you applaud both taking out Soleimani as well as anything to erase any legacy of our previous black president but there is no “weeping for the murderer of 600 Americans” but rather a resentment and protest of a go-it-alone decision of Trump which leads us into an unnecessary ongoing expensive and deadly war.

Indeed, you are cheering for the inevitable slaughter of many American young men in women in uniform due to the reckless decision of the lying and thieving conman you genuflect to.

@Ronald J. Ward: A weak and partisan view of all this, as expected from someone fed by a flood of disinformation including CNN, WaPo, Newsweek, NYTimes, ABCNBCCBS, USA Today, Huffpo, Slate, Salon, etc…

Why do you suddenly have DJ’s balls in your mouth? <3 :()

Roughly a year later, Trump abruptly ended JCPOA and re-imposed sanctions. The only logical conclusion to his military stratagem seems to be that JCPOA had too much Obama on it.

Hardly logical. Go do more research, junior. Learn to do your homework.

I realize we disagree on the necessity and I realize you applaud both taking out Soleimani as well as anything to erase any legacy of our previous black president but there is no “weeping for the murderer of 600 Americans” but rather a resentment and protest of a go-it-alone decision of Trump which leads us into an unnecessary ongoing expensive and deadly war.

When you install a half-black, white-speaking cardboard cutout as a president, the following act has an easy time erasing such cowardly, and foreign, influences.

Obama used his executive privileges in the same ways, and I’m doubtful you took umbrage then.

Trump is doing his job. Take notes, rather than be a useless hater, little dog.

@kitt: Iran was cheating from the beginning.

Iran will not explain why uranium was kept in Tehran warehouse
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-iaea-exclusive/exclusive-iaea-found-uranium-traces-at-iran-atomic-warehouse-diplomats-idUSKCN1VT0L8?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2FtopNews+%28News+%2F+US+%2F+Top+News%29

@Nathan Blue: They are always no further away than the next election. Our enemies hope and pray for a Democrat to be elected, just as al Qaeda supported Obama being elected.

@DrJohn: I’m glad you shut Ron/AJ up. Good facts.

@DrJohn:

The timeline of your links disqualifies your argument. These violations for the most part occurred AFTER Trump walked out of the deal. For the rest, such as Sen Isakson Wapo link which came shortly after the deal, was just more unconfirmed or twisted partisan rhetoric in defiance of of an Obama accomplishment, akin to how all the ailing grandmas were going to rounded up to plead their case in front of some death panel.

First on your very link:

The Pinocchio Test

Isakson’s ad is about the Iran deal and his opposition to it. It claims that Iran is “already violating” the nuclear agreement by illegally testing ballistic missiles. Yet the actual deal did not have restrictions on ballistic missiles testing. Instead, the U.N. resolution that implements the deal contains the language. A range of experts we consulted said that the testing could be argued as violating the Iran deal but that it will be difficult. It’s an important technical distinction that is not reflected in the ad, ultimately misleading viewers. Moreover, it’s a matter of interpretation as to whether the testing is “illegal” under the resolution.

Moving on to the timeline of what was working when:

The Iran Trade Deal Is Working said NTI prior to Trump’s walkout, calling it:

the most comprehensive and restrictive agreement in history – verifiably preventing Iran now and in the future from ever getting a nuclear bomb.

Two Year On The Deal Is Working

The Iran Nuclear Deal Is Working As Intended

The Iran Deal Is Working, Here’s How We Know

According to a quarterly report released on Friday (August 30 2019) by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Tehran is progressively backing out of the Iran nuclear deal or Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
This is in retaliation against Washington’s withdrawal from the deal and the subsequent renewal of sanctions that have weakened Iranian oil sales.

But since the U.S. under President Donald Trump pulled out of the pact last year and imposed new sanctions, Iran has been openly stepping up violations in an attempt to pressure the other major signatories — Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia — to help it economically by such means as facilitating the sale of Iranian oil.

The head of the international organization charged with monitoring Iran’s compliance with the 2015 nuclear deal said Iran is meeting its obligations under the accord and warned against states trying to influence verification activities. Less than three weeks later, the United States imposed sanctions against Iranian officials and institutions that Washington alleges are working to retain nuclear weapons-related expertise in Iran.

Iran has officially broken part of its commitment to the 2015 nuclear deal — following through on its months-long threat and further raising tensions with the United States.
In May, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said his country would stockpile more low-enriched uranium than the 660 pounds the nuclear accord allows. The following month, a top Iranian nuclear official said Rouhani’s wasn’t an empty threat and that Tehran would blow past the limit within 10 days.

Simply put, Trump haphazardly screwed it up, going against any other advice and predictions and believed to be due to spite Obama.

@kitt:

@DrJohn: You forgot https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-call-for-flags-to-be-flown-half-mast-to-grieve-death-of-soleimani

I’m lost on that one. Was that to prod me or were you calling Dr, John’s comment a joke? Or was it a crafty way to the change the subject? Or better yet, do you even get it?

@Nathan Blue:

The pallets of cash was largely their own money, money frozen by sanctions going all the way back to 1979, regardless of what Breitbart or Babaylonbee tells you.

I’d avoid me too, ball-jockey.

Good advice.

This sums it up nicely:

https://pjmedia.com/trending/iran-was-obama-and-bidens-mess-trump-is-cleaning-it-up/

@Ronald J. Ward: #20 it was not to change the subject it was to point out we just need to laugh at you, Point out your foolishness and have a good damn laugh at your expense.
Taking you and the entire lefts insanity seriously? No, not happening. They think you are stupid so you rise to the occasion.
The assassination was a win, win Iran decides to give us the boot we are a little bit further out of the ME, if not we can influence the Iraq politics toward Washington and away from Tehran and its death cult.
The tactical information inside Achmeds head was priceless to terrorism now its gone. Before another rises to his level of power we can off him too.

@Deplorable Me: The article never addresses what caused the stampede. We know it was by government mandate (be there or beheaded) there would be 3 days of sackcloth and ashes for Achmed’s parts Was it many small stampedes to see the casket or just one damn big one?

@Nathan Blue:

@Ronald J. Ward: As I’ve said, you bark a lot…but eventually skulk off into the darkness like a whelp.

That’s powerfully rich considering you and the entire cheerleading staff took a day and a half nap, all returning the same time, as if clocking in.

I don’t read any of the con rags you list

I don’t recall asking you to.

And Iran has ABSOLUTELY NO claim on that sanction money. That’s absurd.

Because you say so?

@Nathan Blue:

Oh, I have no doubt additional education would always be an asset. I just don’t see you as a qualifier in that pursuit.

@Nathan Blue:

Congratulations.

@Ronald J. Ward: That’s right, little bitch. Run.