Comey is finally terminated. Now before you lefties go nuclear…

Spread the love

Loading

 

By now you know that James Comey has been fired by Donald Trump. It was the right thing to do. I had been waiting for this day since last July when I wrote a couple of posts about Comey. First, Comey established a two tiered system of law– one for the Clinton’s and one for the rest of us. Second, Comey destroyed the integrity of the Justice system. He boggled the minds of everyone when he publicly recommended against the prosecution of Hillary Clinton. That was not his call. He made a clear-cut case for why Hillary Clinton should be prosecuted and then demurred. Brett Stephens, then of the WSJ:

“In any normal political season this would destroy her candidacy,” Stephens declared, “because the evidence that James Comey laid out shows that she has been telling untruths consistently for fifteen months. This ought to play into Trump’s sweet spot, his view that the system is rigged, except that in a week when he should be gaining strength he’s talking about Saddam Hussein being terrific in the war on terror.” Stephens also accused James Comey of being less than principled, saying, “This was a purely political decision.”

Yes it was.

But there’s more to remember about Comey. He’s presided over a number of scandals.

1. Before he bombed the Boston Marathon, the FBI interviewed Tamerlan Tsarnaev but let him go. Russia sent the Obama Administration a second warning, but the FBI opted against investigating him again.

2. Shortly after the NSA scandal exploded in 2013, the FBI was exposed conducting its own data mining on innocent Americans; the agency, Bloomberg reported, retains that material for decades (even if no wrongdoing is found).

3. The FBI had possession of emails sent by Nidal Hasan saying he wanted to kill his fellow soldiers to protect the Taliban — but didn’t intervene, leading many critics to argue the tragedy that resulted in the death of 31 Americans at Fort Hood could have been prevented.

4. During the Obama Administration, the FBI claimed that two private jets were being used primarily for counterterrorism, when in fact they were mostly being used for Eric Holder and Robert Mueller’s business and personal travel.

5. When the FBI demanded Apple create a “backdoor” that would allow law enforcement agencies to unlock the cell phones of various suspects, the company refused, sparking a battle between the feds and America’s biggest tech company. What makes this incident indicative of Comey’s questionable management of the agency is that a) The FBI jumped the gun, as they were indeed ultimately able to crack the San Bernardino terrorist’s phone, and b) Almost every other major national security figure sided with Apple (from former CIA Director General Petraeus to former CIA Director James Woolsey to former director of the NSA, General Michael Hayden), warning that such a “crack” would inevitably wind up in the wrong hands.

There are five more at the link. And he never put hillary clinton under oath.

A nano-second is a billionth of second. That’s the amount of time it took for democrats to blow the dog whistle and they all have come running.

Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., a Senate Intelligence Committee member, made a more direct connection. “President Trump’s dismissal of FBI Director Comey smacks of President Nixon’s Saturday Night Massacre. If this is an effort to stop the investigations into Russian collusion with the Trump campaign, it won’t succeed,” he said.

But it was Senate Minority Whip Richard Durbin, D-Ill., who made the biggest impression, going to the Senate floor about an hour after the announcement to clearly outline the stakes..

“Any attempt to stop or undermine this FBI investigation would raise grave constitutional issues,” he told colleagues.

Trump’s sudden action “raises the question as to whether Russian interference in the last presidential campaign by the Trump campaign will also be investigated by the FBI,” Durbin said.

He demanded “clarification by the White House as soon as possible as to whether this investigation will continue.”

“Emergency hearings!” screams Elijah Cummings.

Nixonian! Constitutional crisis! the left wails.

The friable Robbie Mook is “terrified.”

Sorry to burst the balloon, but there are a couple of things to remember.

1. Who at DOJ is running the Trump-Russian investigation?

That would be one Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstine. Rosentine penned the letter recommending that Comey be fired.

The first count against Comey, according to Rosenstein, was his July 5, 2016 announcement during which he alleged Clinton and her colleagues were “extremely careless” in handling classified material on her personal email and server but also said the FBI would not recommend charges.

The memo said Comey was “wrong to usurp” then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s authority.

“It is not the function of the Director to make such an announcement,” Rosenstein wrote, adding that Comey “at most” should have said the FBI had finished its investigation and presented findings to prosecutors.

The memo said Comey compounded “the error” by holding a press conference to “release derogatory information about the subject of a declined criminal investigation,” suggesting he did so “gratuitously.”

The memo said: “The Director laid out his version of the facts for the news media as if it were a closing argument, but without a trial.” Rosenstein called it a “textbook example” of what prosecutors and agents are “taught not to do.”

The second count against Comey concerned his Oct. 28, 2016 notification to Congress that the bureau was taking another look at the Clinton case in light of newly discovered emails. While Comey has said he did not want to conceal information, Rosenstein said simply refraining from publicizing “non-public information” would not have been concealment.

Comey’s firing was not abrupt. He has been under study for some time. And…

Sally Yates, the current poster girl heroine for the left, has expressed full confidence in Rod Rosenstine:

Former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates expressed confidence in the Justice Department official overseeing the investigation into ties between the Trump campaign and Russian government, undercutting calls from some Democrats for the appointment of a special prosecutor.

“The current deputy attorney general, Mrs. Yates, do you have confidence in him?” South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham asked Yates at the tail end of a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing on Monday.

“Yes, I do,” replied Yates.

2. To whom does the FBI fall right now? Wayne McCabe

Wayne McCabe is the Deputy Director of the FBI. You might remember him. I wrote about McCabe in October:

By now you know that long time Clinton confidant and Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe used $467,500 of his PAC money to “help” Jill McCabe, the wife of FBI agent Andrew McCabe in her bid for Congress. The Virginia Democratic Party, virtually controlled by McAuliffe, tossed in another $200,000. The money began flowing into the McCabe campaign coffers, in another one of those galactic coincidences, at the same time the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton was initiated in July 2015.

Right around the same time, FBI Agent McCabe was “unexpectedly” promoted from heading the Washington DC office to the number 3 position at the FBI. Within a year McCabe was Deputy Director of the FBI.

So to summarize:

So let’s recap with my untrained eye. Hillary Clinton does a fundraiser for Common Good VA to raise money that is given to the campaign of the wife of the head of the FBI Washington DC field office who is unexpectedly promoted to Number 3 person at the FBI who after his wife’s loss in the election is promoted to Number 2 at the FBI and placed in charge of the Hillary Clinton investigation who then finds no reason to prosecute her.

Does anyone think the investigation into Trump is going to get shelved?  Who’s going to cover up anything? A Clinton BFF?

For all the whining democrats have done since July one would think they would be grateful that Donald Trump fired the guy they all blame for hillary clinton losing the Presidency. Nothing seems to make them happy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
137 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

@Curt: am now getting comments regularly, thanks very much for getting that to working.

@Richard Wheeler: Damn, now your math skills have gone to hell also. More justification for tuition refund. Do you think a majority of Americans voted on election day? How many Americans are there? How many voted? is that over 50%? I’m trying to help you out here RW, but you really need to insist on that refund.

That would be T.R. the guy you didn’t recognize on Mt Rushmore–you’re home schoolin Mom missed that lesson.

Now you’re talking out your ass again. I knew who was on Mt Rushmore before Mom got to that lesson.

Did you know Shep Smith is the Managing Editor of Fox News

one of about 20. Actually he’s only Managing editor for breaking news. Tom Lowell is ‘Managing Editor for Fox News’
Yeah, but Webb had 3 wives at the same time, didn’t he?
RW, ask yourself. If you wanted to be in the Marine Corp and you were told you did not qualify because you had a deformed bone in a foot. Would you be happy or disappointed? If you consider it an honor to serve in the US Military and got rejected, wouldn’t you be disappointed? Why do you think DT would not be also? I would have certainly been very disappointed had I been rejected. Does not make me a less patriotic American. Does it?

@Redteam: I said a majority of Amertcans–didn’t mention voters. Though a majority of those who voted rejected DT.

Are you saying Trump WANTED to serve but a bad foot kept him out???
That’s Marine Corps DT.

Still nothing Curt it could be Windows 8 For better security and operating my sweet love is thinking about Linux with Brave browser I tire of the Microsoft tyranny now in outlook they sort emails into 2 folders by what “they” think you want to see. Grrr its my spam dammit.

@Richard Wheeler: What do you think of the name Lee floated for FBI director?

@kitt: Interesting that Lee wants Merrick Garland. Agents want Mike Rogers.

@another vet:

You stated, as fact, that Trump is under investigation. You need to provide evidence or admit to one of the following:

He won’t do either, he’ll try to dodge the issue.

@Richard Wheeler: :What you said was: “

and a MAJORITY of Americans knew it on election day and know it today”

Oh, so now since you admit that you don’t know if it was a majority of Americans (over 160 million would be a majority) you are back to ‘everyone has one’ syndrome.

Are you saying Trump WANTED to serve but a bad foot kept him out???

Are you saying he didn’t?

How did you come to serve in the Marine Corps? Was it voluntary or as an obligation for an education? Were you drafted in or volunteer?

Curt, I am still receiving notifications by e mail as of this am.

@kitt: Who is “Lee”? And who gives a damn what “Lee” wants.

@Redteam:With no incentives I joined the Marine Corps PLC Program as a freshman in College. Graduated as 2nd Lieutenant–finished Active Duty as 1st Lieutenant–promoted to Captain in The Reserves.

My opinion is DT was glad to get out of military service and a V.N tour.

I said a majority of Americans, many who did not vote, were against Trump on election day—an opinion. You think otherwise

@Richard Wheeler: I

t is my opinion that Trump and his cohorts are under investigation’

Now we are getting somewhere. You made the statement as a matter of fact not as a matter of opinion just like when you told us Hillary was going to be President and that the Minnesota cop executed the black motorist. Had you have made the statement as a matter of opinion, we wouldn’t be having this conversation. This goes back to a thread I believe Brother Bob wrote about how whereas conservatives start with facts and then formulate opinions, liberals start with opinions and then present them as facts.

Now I will present some facts. After Trump praised Comey, he sent out tweets questioning why he hadn’t opened an investigation into the Obama spying allegations. During this time, Dennis Montgomery, a whistleblower, provided Comey (along with others) mounds of hard drives etc. He claims that contained in the dump was hard evidence that Obama spied on Trump and others for political reasons. It is my OPINION that he may have well been the source who told Rand Paul that Obama spied on him. It is a FACT that Paul also revealed today that another senator approached him telling him that he was spied on by Obama as well. It is my OPINION that Comey’s inaction on this was the reason for the timing of his firing. If Montgomery’s dump proves that Obama spied on political opponents using national security assets, then in my OPINION we have a scandal on our hands that makes Watergate pale in comparison. It’s just that everyone is focused on the wrong President.

@Richard Wheeler:

I said a majority of Americans, many who did not vote, were against Trump on election day—an opinion. You think otherwise

Since we’re expressing ‘opinions’ and not talking facts, I’d guess a ‘majority’ of Americans could not name the two presidential candidates last year. I will say that a ‘majority’ of electoral college electors, which is the official way to elect a US President, voted for Trump. Other polls are rather meaningless as they only show what the person conducting the poll wants to show.

With no incentives I joined the Marine Corps PLC Program as a freshman

No incentives? No tuition assistance? When I was in college, after I had gotten out of the Navy, I still could have entered the NESEP program and gotten my college paid for. As it was, I was eligible for GI Bill and did get that assistance.

My opinion is DT was glad to get out of military service and a V.N tour

I’d guess that’s likely but he did nothing ‘dishonorable’ to avoid it. Took his induction physical and failed it. Sounds entirely legit. So now give us your opinion of Bill Clinton and his military service. Felony draft dodger, pardoned by Carter, Went to Soviet Union for 3 months to dodge draft. Only pardoned felon to have served as president. And a democrat.

@Redteam: What don’t you understand about NO incentives? I considered it an honor and a challenge to become a Marine Corps Officer That was incentive enough.
Talk about uninformed–you should know who Mike Lee is..

AV and RT—It seems all Repubs. can do now is bring up the real and imagined sins of Obama and The Clintons.
Understandable when there is nothing positive to say about DT.

Politics as usual.

@Richard Wheeler: I can understand what ‘no incentives’ means, let’s see if you do. Here is a partial list of things the Marine Corps does for PLC :

Travel costs, meals, textbooks, uniforms and lodging, during the summer training sessions are provided by the Marine Corps, and students are paid for their time. Additional financial assistance may be obtained for participation in active duty. Participants may receive tax-free financial assistance of up to $7,000 for Platoon Leaders Class participation. In addition, participants earn up to $2,985 during the training. Most colleges will grant academic credit for the summer training.

Upon completion of the first summer training session, applicants may begin receiving a $150 per month (tax free) stipend. Upon completing their 4-year degree, applicants are commissioned as 2nd Lieutenants in the United States Marine Corps. Unless one accepts tuition assistance under the program, there is no obligation to join the United States Marines after completion of the course.

So you ‘re saying you received none of the above?

Talk about uninformed–you should know who Mike Lee is..

Who mentioned Mike Lee? Which comment is that in? And why would I know or care who Mike Lee is? I know a Sam Lee and a Wollard Lee? Do you know who they are, if not, why don’t you know? Are you just ‘uninformed’?

It seems all Repubs. can do now is bring up the real and imagined sins of Obama and The Clintons.
Understandable when there is nothing positive to say about DT

Let’s get that corrected. “It seems all democraps can do now is bring up the real and imagined sins of Donald Trump.
Understandable when there is nothing positive to say about any living, breathing democrap. ” There, that’s what you were trying to say. I’m still lobbying for that refund for you.

@Redteam: #110 you asked Kitt “who is Lee”–pretty clear who she was referring to..
Incentives.—Travel–got to spend 2 miserable summers training “boot camp” in the heat of Quantico Va. I was lower than a private.
Pay Probably around $3-5 an hour for the privilege-You say today they get $2985 about 250 a week for 60-70 hours of hard training that sounds like about $4 an hour – .-I accepted no tuition assistance no financial “assistance”

It was never about the money or the benies–It was about the pride and confidence that comes from being a Marine Corps Officer. Priceless

You have a habit of stating your opinions–that’s fine
Rewriting other’s opinions? That’s stupid.
What say you AV.

@Richard Wheeler:

#110 you asked Kitt “who is Lee”–pretty clear who she was referring to..

So you automatically put “mike” ahead of Lee? How about Robert E. Wouldn’t that name come to mind sooner than Mike? I don’t try to keep up with the Mormon population.

It was about the pride and confidence that comes from being a Marine Corps Officer. Priceless

I can certainly understand that. I was born before WWII and grew up wanting to be a sailor in the US Navy. I couldn’t imagine anything more honorable. Why ‘Navy” ? I don’t know, maybe it was all the Navy films I was seeing in Movies and tv in late 40’s-50’s. I suspect had it been any of the US Military forces and their dress uniform, it would give the same feeling of honor and pride. My starting pay was $68 a month in the 50’s.
So, in this same country, where people are mostly subjected to the same experiences, how does someone, such as Bill Clinton become a person that would rather commit a felony than to serve in that very same military? I mean, it’s not like they couldn’t volunteer for the Navy or Air Force if they didn’t want to live in foxholes, etc.

@Richard Wheeler:

You have a habit of stating your opinions–that’s fine
Rewriting other’s opinions? That’s stupid

Are you saying you never ‘restate’ someone’s opinion? How about my opinion of lee, didn’t you just restate it? You think that when you expressed an opinion of the subject above that it was an original. No one had ever said anything similar? I’m sure your opinion was just a restatement of many stated prior to you. If we followed your guidelines on that, no one could ever have a debate. Just so you know, that is when one persons makes a statment on a subject and then another person makes another statement on the same subject, then each tries to defend their statements. You make a dumbass statement, I turned it around and you take offense. Then don’t make dumbass statements that others may have a different opinion of.

Hey RW, serious question. Accepting your feelings about military service back at the time and place you served and thinking back on the situation. Who do you blame for the fiasco that was Viet Nam? JFK? LBJ? RN? Dimocrats or Republicans?

@Richard Wheeler:

It seems all Repubs. can do now is bring up the real and imagined sins of Obama and The Clintons.

So we should give them a free pass and only focus on the real and imagined sins of Republicans. Got it.

@Redteam: I blame the media for showing the daily carnage to the American people who gave up..I blame Johnson and The Congress for not bombing Hanoi which would have brought a Hiroshima like ending. We lost very few military battles but we lost the political battle.

I didn’t restate your opinion of Lee–obviously Mike not Robert E. in the context of the discussion–you had no opinion–didn’t know who he was.

If you disagree with a statement I make that’s fine but please don’t rewrite mine. You do that often. I don’t do that.

V.N At best a draw at worst a loss changed young Americans thinking– Understand your Navy pride My dad was a Navy Officer JAG I used to love Victory At Sea and the great Naval battles. He didn’t understand my Marine Corps choice but respected it. We’ll talk more on this–AV just paged–look out lol.

@Richard Wheeler:

I blame the media for showing the daily carnage to the American people who gave up..I blame Johnson and The Congress for not bombing Hanoi which would have brought a Hiroshima like ending. We lost very few military battles but we lost the political battle.

excellent response. The big difference, from WWII,,etc was the ‘instantaneous’ coverage of the battles. Many gross pictures and films were shown of WWII, but much later,after the facts. And the press was not in favor of the war and tended to show the worst side of America to the world. It also showed the lack of dedication of the administration to win the war. I think many, rightfully so, saw it as mostly a huge money making operation on the part of the Military -Industrial complex. The US never did fight to win the war. battles, yes. War-no.

He didn’t understand my Marine Corps choice but respected it. We’ll talk more on this–

I do, I think the Marines was my second choice. I had a couple friends (still teen-agers) just home from basic that couldn’t wait to show me their dress blues. Beautiful uniform. And I admire the esprit de corps. One of those guys is still around and still a Marine.

So you lay most of the blame at LBJ and Dimocrats along with the press. I guess that sounds about right. I don’t think the US should get involved in things like that if there is no ultimate goal to win.

@Richard Wheeler: Looks like you, RT, and I agree on VN.

@Redteam and AV: I believe the country was behind the war 65-67–We could have ended it then with a massive strike on Hanoi,
Westmoreland was giving Johnson phony numbers claiming a ground victory in sight if he just put in more troops–and more troops.
The Tet Offensive Feb 68 brought to light that fallacy.I was at Khe Sanh expecting a defining battle with Giap who had beaten the French in 54 at Dien Bien Phu. The Marines were ready–arty and air support zeroed in. He didn’t fight–instead NVA went into Cambodia and moving South attacked lesser defended bases and as all watching TV saw—got inside the walls of the U. S embassy.
Americans at home said how could that happen–our Prez had said we’re close to victory—-all downhill from there. We blew up Khe Sanh and pulled back. War dragged on-a televised war of attrition–we continued to win battles and inflict heavy casualties–NVA had no value on life–they knew they were winning the political battle–Giap,a great strategist wrote about it latter.
Johnson decided not to run in 72—Nixon too little to late with bombing of Haiphong Harbor—peace talks more political fodder for NVA
You know the rest.
Best book I know on V.N The Matterhorn GREAT READ Thank you both for your service.
I wish we had more warrior Presidents like JFK and Bush I—probably won’t happen

@Richard Wheeler: I also believe the bastards who decided to use Agent Orange should be made to shower in it. That shit will probably end up costing more American lives than hostile fire did.

@another vet: I have friends who have died from it—I still can’t be 100% certain it hasn’t infected me.

@Richard Wheeler: Everyone I know who was exposed to it either died from some form of cancer or has some form of illness. How anyone could have possibly thought that a chemical that could defoliate a jungle wouldn’t have have an adverse effect on humans is an idiot. Either that or they knew making them murders of U.S. military personnel.

@Richard Wheeler:

Ibelieve the country was behind the war 65-67–We could have ended it then with a massive strike on Hanoi

I agree “the country’ was behind winning the war until about 67, but the Military Industrial complex was still about making money.
Thanks for the info about Khe Sanh, I may have heard some of it before . Way back then I read everything written about it. Ever read the book, The Best and the Brightest”. about the great team JFK had put together and how such a best and brightest team could have gotten the country into the mess they did in Viet Nam. I suppose, had the war been run at the direction of the Generals and Admirals, it would’ve ended about 67. Note. LBJ did not run in 68

@another vet: I hope that they honestly didn’t know how bad agent Orange was when they used it. It sure has proven to be a deadly chemical. And the ways it affects people is terrible. I guess it’s totally banned now. I haven’t heard about it in a long while.

AV, sounds like some of the same things that can be said about some of the vaccines being given to new borns and children now. One vaccine contains chemicals that if the chemical is spilled in a hospital, the hospital has to be evacuated. And they inject that into newborns to prevent hepatitis B an illness that newborns don’t even get.

@Richard Wheeler: Thanks for the reminder–correction Johnson basically gave up soon after Tet offensive of Feb-March 68 and decided not to run. I was with his son in law Chuck Robb when he made the announcement
Last night I saw an interview on CNN where Jerry Brown—of all people–was talking about how “the best and the brightest” assembled by JFK–still got us into V.N under the direction of LBJ–not a particularly smart or studied POTUS.
Would like to think that JFK , a student of history, would have steered a different course—we’ll never know.

@Redteam:

I hope that they honestly didn’t know how bad agent Orange was when they used it.

We’d like to hope that to be the case (them being naive about its effects) but given by the time it was used they had already figured out the ill effects of DDT and smoking, it makes you wonder. I used to think very badly of Ambrose Burnside (and still do) and the way he wasted troops at Fredericksburg until someone pointed out that those were the tactics of the time and that we shouldn’t look it at by modern standards. I still believe he was one of the worst generals of the CW but have a different perspective on why he did what he did. Not the case with AO. Exposing our troops to AO to me was the same as dropping a 155 round on them, the difference being is the 155 round will kill them on the spot as opposed to killing them slowly over the course of time. Perhaps Rich can shed some light as to how effective it was or wasn’t in aiding their mission. For some reason, I don’t think it made a damn bit of difference.

@another vet:

We’d like to hope that to be the case (them being naive about its effects) but given by the time it was used they had already figured out the ill effects of DDT and smoking, it makes you wonder

i suspect you’re correct. I did some reading up on it. It was known to be a bad thing at the time. It took the approval of the president, Kennedy in 1962 to authorize the use of it. I don’t know how effective, over a short time it was, but reading up says that some areas that were laid bare are still that way. So certainly must have lots of long term effectiveness.

In 2005 a court ruled: concluded Agent Orange was not considered a poison under international law at the time of its use by the U.S.; the U.S. was not prohibited from using it as a herbicide; and the companies which produced the substance were not liable for the method of its use by the government.[

Seems as if they ‘thought’ that even though it was deadly to plants, they didn’t think so much to humans. But still requiring that the president had to sign off on it must have been a big clue.

RT AND AV——In very distant hindsight I’d say the govt./military brass didn’t want the troops to know much about the use or negative “collateral damage” of what became known as agent orange, For most of my 13 month tour I was in northern 1 Core moving east to west and back between Dong Ha- Vanderbilt-Khe Sanh. generally 5-20 miles below the DMZ.
Although deployed in my area it seemed to be used much more in the dense jungle areas to the South

IMO whatever effectiveness it may have had in defoliation was more than offset by the long term damage to our military and the exposed V.N civilians

Thanks guys for for your studied input
For many years I put my V.N service out of mind—but discussions like this bring back many memories–some foggy-some vivid.

Things may soon begin to unravel. From the NYT, about an hour ago:

Comey Memo Fallout: Senate Committee Invites Comey to Testify

â–  The Senate Intelligence Committee invited the former F.B.I. director James B. Comey to testify on reports that President Trump asked him to scuttle the investigation into Michael T. Flynn, the former national security adviser.

â–  Representative Justin Amash, a Michigan Republican, said that if the allegations were true, they constituted grounds for impeachment.

@Richard Wheeler:

IMO whatever effectiveness it may have had in defoliation was more than offset by the long term damage to our military and the exposed V.N civilians

i certainly agree with that. It’s not like defoliation was instantaneous, likely by the time the bushes were dead and cleared the need for the cleared area had already moved elsewhere. And yes, the damage to humans was much slower but much more permanent. It was a very bad form of chemical warfare.

@Greg:

Comey to testify on reports that President Trump asked him to scuttle the investigation into Michael T. Flynn,

how can that be worse than obozo silencing Comey of Hillary’s many criminal activities?

Besides, if it’s a crime to ask someone to stop an investigation or to drop charges, etc all the lawyers, attorney generals and judges in the world would be in prison. Consider someone is charged with first degree murder and the defense lawyer asks him to drop it to manslaughter. That would be a crime. Trump has now cured all the problems in the world so the dumbocraps are still trying to find something.