Once again, the media and the Democrats are trying to intimidate the American people into allowing the disqualification of Trump for President. They are insisting that Russia swayed our election, working for the Trump presidency. To fulfill the progressives agenda of delegitimizing the Trump presidency, all of the mainstream media and most of the progressives in Congress, including McCain and Graham, have spent the weekend pursing a narrative that is inconsistent at best, and a total lie at worst. It is a murky story from “senior Administration” officials who are not named and won’t go on the record, but the American people are being told to accept the non-details that can’t be verified and do not rely on evidence.
The narrative that is being promulgated by the mainstream media and progressives is full of holes. The main narrative as being told by the New York Times and the Washington Post, both progressives sycophants has been that the RNC was hacked by the Russians as well. No evidence, but a narrative that will be foisted on the American people from now until the inauguration. To make the narrative appear more compelling is the New York Times claiming that 17 intelligence agencies have agreed that the Russians were compelled to influence the election in favor of Donald Trump.
Many on the progressive side have even claimed that Trump is a Russian agent. Those that are screaming the loudest about the Russian connection are in fact, not intelligence agents but people such as Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, John Podesta, Michael Moore, John Podesta, and Soros affiliated groups such as Media Maters and Think Progress. Not on the list are any real sources from the intelligence agencies. Those in the intelligence field have not come forward or even identified who it is in these intelligence agencies that have made this claim. It is the political operatives of the progressives, pundits who are working for those same progressives, and the progressive media that continue to attempt to find a way to invalidate the Trump election.
Both the Times and the Washington Post have no idea what the Russians thought about our elections, with even the Washington Post, the same newspaper making these claims now, admitted that they could not come to a conclusion about the scope nor the reason for Russian hacking. This is the same newspaper that hired over 20 reporters for no purpose other than to discredit the Trump campaign. Throughout the campaign the Washington Post, working with John Podesta, a Soros flunky, printed allegations without source or any facts that a fact checker could easily refute.
If the story was true, and this administration had actionable intelligence that proved this fallacy, why has no one been arrested? Why are these intelligence agencies allowed to remained faceless and nameless? It may be as simple as the intelligence agencies have allowed the narrative to be crafted by Podesta, the Soros-Hillary crime syndicate, and this administration. Once again, if this is fact based, let the American people see the facts, and show the evidence that these intelligence agencies supposedly have.” Trust me” will not work this time the fiction and lies being perpetrated is of a part of the “fake news” that the mainstream media has been loudly proclaiming to the masses. Or was the fake news meme just a precursor for this story, as fake as it is.
Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus challenged NBC’s Chuck Todd on “Meet the Press” to name a source, any source that could show evidence that the RNC was hacked as stated in the New York Times and other progressive websites. It was later pointed out that the Washington Post had changed the story, again through “unnamed sources” and reported to be inconclusive. RNC spokesman Sean Spicer made quite clear to Michael Smerconish of CNN, that after working with intelligence agencies, that the conclusion that no one at the RNC was hacked. This proof was offered to the New York Times but, as usual, the Times ignored any facts that did not fit the narrative.
Those who claim Russia was behind the hacking in the CIA have yet to explain why the FBI and Republican and Democrat members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence disagrees with this CIA “Unnamed sources” conclusion. The FBI has gone so far that they called the CIA report “fuzzy” and “ambiguous”. And even veterans from the CIA have declared the story a “rush to judgment”. One veteran of the CIA has claimed that this story has been extremely politicized.
The Washington Post also claims that out intelligence agencies have proof and the individuals with connections to the Russian government who initiated these cyber attacks. It also states that this presentation made by the CIA fell far short of an actual formal assessment, and far short of agreement among the “17 agencies” who were supposedly all in agreement.
For almost a year now, The progressives/Socialist of the Democrat party have been asking Obama to release all the details that are available on the information that the intelligence agencies are in possession of. Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and National Intelligence James Clapper stated that “ the Russian Government has directed recent compromises of US persons and institutions, including US political organizations. Once again, no names, no evidence, and information that could help the public to make an informed decision.
In the final conclusion, according to everyone, there is no actual evidence of direct Kremlin involvement in the hacks or that the hacks has as an agenda to assist Trump. It is the FBI that is basing comments on facts, and it is the CIA that is attempting to discredit the election.
It is informative that the mainstream media is all atwitter about the supposed Russian hacking, but not about the corruption that the leaks made clear to the American people. Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks has already stated that the information that they received from Russian hackers, but a leak from an insider. Why is the CIA not looking at the murder of Mark Rich? Perhaps an investigation into his murder would shine some light on the real evidence.
Craig Murray, once UK ambassador to Uzbekistan has claimed to know how this information was leaked and given to Wikileaks. It was an insider, not a hacker, and the leaker is not Russian.
The issue of where the Wikileaks information came from is no more than a attempt to sway the Electoral College votes on December 19th. Obama, Hillary and the Democrat congress have a reason to make this an issue in the next few weeks. It is just one more attempt to invalidate the election of Donald Trump as our next President.
It is still not clear if the Progressives will ever admit that they did not lose the election because of supposed Russian hacking. They lost because of Obamas unconstitutional policies and the crimes committed by Hillary. They lost because the American people were tired of the progressive dynasties of Obama and Hillary.
Retired military, 20 years of service, retired last April from a warehouse position at NEOPOST. I live is So, California with my wife, two dogs, and one anti social cat. I am a veteran, entrepreneur, writer, and write on the subjects of race, terrorism, the economy, and climate change.
John Veliseks’ new book “One Patriots Opinion- for the Forgotten Men and Women of America” is now available on Kindle. 330 pages that any patriotic conservative would consider a must read and enjoy.
Putting aside all the fake news about Russia ”hacking” the election.
It didn’t.
Money from anti-progressives flowed into the Clinton Foundation and SHE, Hillary, would have been beholden to them.
http://www.newsbusters.org/s3/files/styles/blog_body-80/s3/images/clinton_anti-lgbt_donations.jpg?itok=tXoQ3DIi
Between $25 MILLION and $61 MILLION is a lot of money from gov’ts that punish liberals of the LGBT persuasion.
What does Russia want that we also want?
An end to Islamic terrorism? Check.
And end to ISIS? Check.
An end to al Qaeda? Check.
And end to Muslim terrorists inside Russia? Check.
An end to Muslim terrorists inside the USA?* Check.
*Who remembers how the RUSSIANS warned us about the Boston bombers? http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-explosions-boston-congress-idUSBREA2P02Q20140326
The Russians did not hack and alter the election results. Nor did they hack the DNC. That was an inside job. The leaker gave the HRC data to an intermediary associated with wiki leaks.
The Russians along with several other unfriendlies most definitely haced into the HRC unsecured server. There is no dispute there.
Time to do some serious tail twisting and make that stupid jackass take notice the elections over
I too believe it was an inside job, probably the NSA. There are many true patriots in the government and those people knew what would have happened if hillary was elected. Anyone who doesn’t believe this type of activity occurs are a bit naive. I could tell you some stories (and not fake) about the ex, but don’t want the MIB to be knocking on my door.
Truly the idiocracy has arrived.
Here’s a quick visual intelligence test. Think very carefully, because some people might find coming up with the correct answer a bit tricky.
Of the four individuals pictured, the arrival of which one in the White House suggests a fundamental shift in traditional American values?
Russian hacking is not “fake news.” The right’s response to it also signals a fundamental shift. A foreign power has meddled with our nation’s internal politics in a very serious way, and supporters of the fool that will be taking possession of the White House as a result really don’t give a doodley damn—because they’re patriots, you know.
@Greg: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/15/forget-russia-hillarys-campaign-conspired-elevate-trump/
lol LOL LOL!
Hillary tried to get Trump as her opponent!
She thought she’d have a chance against him.
What a fool!
Too bad you omitted HER photo in your group.
But of the ones you did have, it was Michelle Obama who, as you put it, “suggests a fundamental shift in traditional American values.”
Michelle never thought America was anything good.
She was never proud of this country.
All she wanted for it was to change it into something else.
There’s nothing fake about it. George Will had it figured out back in July:
In search of a restoration of national power, Russia seeks to meddle in an American presidential election.
Also from July; Franklin Foer, on the left, sees the same thing unfolding that conservative George Will observed:
Putin’s Puppet: If the Russian president could design a candidate to undermine American interests—and advance his own—he’d look a lot like Donald Trump.
Two guys with very different political orientations, both seeing the same thing… What do they have in common? They’re both unusually well-informed, and very smart. People should listen closely when the same observations and warnings are suddenly being made by people having opposing political views. When that happens, it isn’t partisan politics talking.
Donald Trump appoints Fox News’ Monica Crowley to his national security team
His national security team? This would be a news parody site, right?
Unfortunately, no, it’s a real news story. It only sounds too absurd to be true. We’ll be lucky to have an intact country after 4 years of this guy.
@Greg:
With your immense insight(/sarc), do you think it possible for the US to survive the last eleven days in January 2017?
With the Obama gone, surely the Country will fold like a huge sinkhole into the center of the earth to never be seen again. The Obama kept the oceans from rising, will those now rise and cover North America?
Are our best days behind us now that the Obama has had to relinquish his power grab?
@Greg: Lets says for arguments sake Russia did hack something. What did they actually hack and where?
What is your proof of it? Don’t give me anonymous sources. Voting machines are not networked so they could not have hacked them. So what percent of voters do you believe either changed how they voted or didn’t vote due to the alleged hacking? What is your proof of that? I saw no reports of Russians at polling places trying to influence voters. Did you?
It appears to me it was leaking that perhaps on some very small level may have hurt HRC. I know John Podesta did fall for a phishing scheme and his emails were published. Those emails showed us what the HRC’s campaign thought of Bernie Sanders and Catholics among other things. We also learned of debate questions being given to HRC prior to a debate. So it looks like what we got was more truth not something fake or a smear. So the Dems are upset that we saw more truth and what they really were doing. The conventional wisdom prior to the election was that HRC was a lock for winning the presidency. It was going to be a landslide for her. Instead it wasn’t really a close election. Trump worked for it and went where he needed to go, she didn’t. Also I know you think Obama has done a wonderful job and HRC would continue that legacy. The country disagreed and wanted a change. That is the bottom line.
Some extra food for thought.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/white-house-hackers-election-recount-231849
Michelle Obama has been an exemplary First Lady.
I’ll never understand how people can be blind to that, nor will I ever understand how people can be totally blind to what Donald Trump so obviously is, and is not.
I don’t judge Melania Trump. It seem obvious, however, that the conservative obsession with propriety and traditional family values has never been anything more than a sham, serving as a means to judge others when the need arises. In reality they place no more importance on traditional values or on the propriety and decorum of the presidency than they do on telling the truth. Barack Obama, in their view of the world, lies constantly; Michelle Obama is some uppity, unpatriotic black woman who doesn’t belong in the White House. Donald Trump, on the other hand, is everything we could want in a president.
@Greg:
She said all hope is gone, the ape in heels has no idea how much hope there is or is not.
I supose were one a failed alt left liberal and just had her huge ass handed to her, her hope is gone.
An exemplary first lady, my ass.
@July 4th American: Your classless.
Easy to see why you’re a worshipper of Trump and his buddy Putin
@July 4th American, #9:
The right remains obsessed with Obama. It might be worth taking a look out the windshield rather than watching the rear-view mirror.
FOX is funny. Today Cavuto grudgingly acknowledged that yes, the economy has greatly improved on Obama’s watch, and continues to recover, but that doesn’t count, because the Fed kept down interest rates, which was apparently some form of cheating. If Obama hadn’t cheated, there wouldn’t have been any recovery! And if a republican had cheated in this fashion, the economy would have been much, much better!
And now we have The Trump Rally! The market is getting better because Trump was elected! He doesn’t even have to have done anything yet to have made that happen! That’s how much better than Obama he is!
@July 4th American, #12:
I have very little hope that the right is going to become either smarter or kinder spirited anytime soon. They’re clearly headed in the other direction.
@Greg:
Project much?
The left has cornered the market on meanspiritedness for decades:
1. Derogatory comments about Trig Palin, including the claim that Sarah Palin faked the pregnancy to cover for one of her daughters being Trig’s real mother.
2. The recent leftist “journalist” implying incest between Trump and his daughter Ivanka.
3. The moron leftist “journalist” who claimed Trump was hospitalized for mental instability last night on Tucker Carlson’s show.
4. The arrogant leftist meme that Trump voters are all racists.
5. Harty Reid complaining about the smell of DC tourists.
6. Obama calling people “bitter clingers”.
It is another example of leftist hypocrisy and arrogamce to be complaining that Americans were so stupid that alleged Russian propaganda swayed the vote for Trump, while ignoring the brazen deployment of American leftist campaign advisors and money in the failed attempt to defeat Netanyahu’s re-election in Israel.
@July 4th American, #12:
There is no such thing as an “alt left.”
If you believe there must necessarily be such a thing, as some sort of opposite of the alt right, perhaps you could define it for the benefit of those who suspect you haven’t got a clue what you’re talking about.
Russian propaganda did, in fact, sway the vote for Trump. Without their meddling we would not be awaiting the inauguration of the most dangerously clueless, temperamentally unsuited individual ever to be elected. The votes of his equally clueless supporters—a demographic highly susceptible to manipulation—were empowered by a peculiarity of our electoral system; the man will become president despite the fact that 2.8 million more people voted against him than for him.
@Greg:
Hey moron, how many states voted against her…..
So Greg posts pics of the wives and down the rabbit hole he goes, gives no proof of hacking the election zip as usual, the electors will not be briefed on hacking or Russia because there is nothing to brief them on. Vladd is no ones friend, what he does is strictly for Russia and gaining power for himself and Russia. Any election irregularities have only been in the Democrats favor dead people voting illegals voting, and they still lost, sure the blue fungus on the map of the USA on the coasts in large population areas should be audited, but they go for the Rust belt for the pathetic recount failure, so recount failed they go into “Duck and Cover” death threats to the electors, you will just fail like Obamas policies failed, we read Alinskys book and know., Rabbit holes rabbit holes, gimmie the garden hose. Merry CHRISTmas, you filthy animals.
Our local media is pretty liberal (for Utah).
But, in the 2 weeks before the election, our local news channels covered one story OVER and OVER again.
It was the horror story of Health Care Premiums going UP.
Family after family, business owner after business owner were paraded onto TV to discuss their ” rate increase letter.”
There was no discussion of whether these people were registered as R or I or D.
But, one thing was obvious, Hillary was for more of the same while Trump was opposed to keeping ACA after a ”sunset” period.
Dems, especially, seem to want to find the One Thing that cost Hillary the win.
I don’t think it was One Thing.
I think it was many things.
Her agreement with keeping ACA was one of them.
@Greg:
There is zero proof of that. The alt left is unable to come to terms with the fact that their candidate was a horrific candidate. Her post election behavior is embarrassing.
@Greg:
Black, Feminist, Sanders Supporter: ‘I Need A Job More Than I Need A Woman In The White House’
Via Daily Caller:
Kim McKinney Cohen was a Democratic Party precinct captain who supported Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders in the primaries, but on election day she voted for Donald Trump instead of her party’s nominee, Hillary Clinton.
“It was my primal scream,” Cohen told Politico Magazine about her protest vote. “I wasn’t gonna take it anymore.”
Cohen should have been a reliable Clinton voter, but, like thousands of other liberals across the country, she decided it was better to bring down her party than hand it over to the former secretary of state solely in the name of having a woman in the oval office.
@July 4th American, #22:
There is no such thing as an “alt left,” but I suppose it can still be your new Secret Word of the Day. I was getting tired of seeing the word “snowflake.”
@Greg: As Alt right is the new term for conservatives, alt left must be the new term for morons, we want balance you know. oh did the term “trigger” you? Best check your liberal privilege. check out this map the blue areas voted Hillary.
Hacking? hacking/
@Rich Wheeler:
Perhaps you are not aware. The West Virginia county official who coined the phrase, “ape in heels”; Is returning to her job on 23 December….
What is refreshing is to speak freely devoid from political correctness…..
@Greg: #24
au con·traire; here you are, “snowflake”
http://media.townhall.com/townhall/reu/ha/2016/262/6887a62a-3a18-4652-bf1d-79a8d01321d1.jpg
@July 4th American, #28:
Katie Kieffer is an airhead. Alt right is term describing an identifiable subset of the political right that embraces a particular set of political and social views that positions them much farther to the right than the conservative mainstream. It’s a particular thing.
The term alt left has no such specific meaning or currency. Kieffer and others are trying to invent one, in an effort to counteract or neutralize the effect of a label that makes it a little too easy to refer to the complex of negative, corrosive views that increasingly afflicts traditional conservatism.
Extremists don’t take over by coming up and saying “Hello, we’re the extremists, and we’re taking over.” They present themselves as normalcy, and claim that the other guys are the extremists. The alt right is such a fringe element. They’re trying to appear to be the new conservative mainstream, using the Trump administration as a vehicle, but if you closely inspect their underlying ideology, it will be seen to be something other than traditional or mainstream.
@Greg: your description is spooky close to the description of O an H
awesome content ever.
Birthday Greetings