The Invasions of the United States and Europe – Why Start A War When You Can Sign Up For Welfare?


Last Monday I wrote a piece about immigration here at home and a changing face of Europe abroad. It was inspired by a trip to Europe and Ann Coulter’s Adios America. With all of this on my mind I tuned into Rush’s show on Friday for my normal dose of Excellence in Broadcasting. And in a moment he crystallized exactly what was going on… both in Europe and here, although he was specifically talking about the refugee crisis / chaos in Europe. In a moment he completely changed my perception of the issue – or at least made sense out of what I am, and many others are, seeing.

He was talking about the immigrants who were in Hungary and were trying to get to Austria and Germany. The papers are full of heart wrenching pieces of Syrians escaping persecution. Of dozens of Libyans drowning as their overcrowded boats seek out the Greek or Italian coasts. Of families not wanting to be sent to refugee camps. Of Iraqis seeking to escape the ruthless ISIS killers of men, women and children. All of those are true, and it is heartbreaking. The underlying current of all of this coverage is that if Europe doesn’t take in these people, they are heartless and probably racists.

Many of the people who are making up this refugee crisis are indeed escaping terror of one sort of another. But Rush points out something interesting. If it was just terror or repression these people are escaping… why don’t we see them stopping in Turkey, where, the leader may be an Islamist, they’re not shooting people in the street. Or why aren’t they stopping in Greece where they would expected to be beyond the reach of most of the hated repressors they are escaping from? He points out that no, they are heading to Germany and Sweden where they can expect to receive generous benefits from the government. He puts it quite well: It’s not immigration, it’s an invasion.

If this was about helping refugees, Turkey and Greece could set up camps to provide food and shelter and the rest of Europe could fund them.  It would cost much less than new welfare recipients spread across the Continent.  But the refugees have no intention of staying in either of those countries or in camps in Hungary.  It’s Germany or Bust!  I’m not familiar with many situations where refugees enter a place illegally and then demand where they want to stay and what kinds of accommodations they will accept.

Basically the Europeans are inviting Muslims to finish what Umayyads couldn’t accomplish in the 8th Century and the Ottomans couldn’t do in the 15th and 16th. Already Muslims make up between 5% and 10% of most major European countries – and upwards of 20% in many of the largest cities… and the numbers were expected to grow rapidly, even before this refugee problem.

This poses an interesting juxtaposition… and a bit of irony. For 50 years American leadership kept much of Western Europe free in the face of a Soviet menace that was constantly seeking to enlarge its empire. Because of the security provided by the United States those same European nations were able to spend billions of dollars a year on welfare programs. Now, today, after six years of American failure of leadership AKA “leading from behind” it is those welfare programs themselves that are acting as a magnet to those who more often than not have no use for the freedoms that the United States spent half a century defending… Why fight a hot war against the Crusaders when you can simply sign up for their welfare programs and help them collapse from within?

The same holds true for the United States and the influx of illegals from Latin America. Just as the welfare programs of Europe have been drawing and supporting Muslims for a quarter century, American welfare programs have been doing the same for immigrants – both legal and illegal – from south of the border for even longer. Just as Europe’s crisis is coming to a head, so too one is here in America, where La Raza seeks to create its own empire called Aztlan… but thankfully Donald Trump has put that crisis front and center.

If only the Soviets had been smarter, they could have conquered both the United States and Europe without firing a missile. Just as ISIS has promised to put sleepers in amongst the refugees flooding into Europe, Gorbachev could have recruited Manchurian candidates from the Middle East and Latin America to invade Europe and the US respectively. Unlike the character Frank Sinatra investigates in the movie however, these Manchurian candidates wouldn’t have had to actually assassinate anyone. They could have just gone forth and multiplied and continued to receive their welfare checks. Eventually the Russian Bear would have been able to walk right into both after their economies and the cultures were obliterated. Perhaps it’s only fitting that all of this is occurring just as a leader formed in the kiln of the Soviet Union’s KGB is reasserting Russian military might at the very time the West is so vulnerable. Russian vodka, Mexican tequila and the Koran… that might make for some interesting interactions.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The invisable invasion of soviets post russia came first
now its a matter of repalcement.
good thing feminists exterminated themselves or there might be opposition from the never born

This his Homs, Syria, formerly the home of over 1 million people.

Vince many of those “Muslims” are really only semi Muslims when they arrive they drink and smoke and watch porn just like you and me !!
The real radical hardline Muslims would stay behind. And rejoyce in ISIS
Look at immigrants from the Mid East in our own country
They earn more than natives and are usually better educated. And their kids do better in school
They are socially conservative too!! Just like you.

The population of Europe is 750 million
Pls tell me of your fears if 7.5 million refugees came
Conservatives also warned us about letting in Jews in the 30s and 40s

EXCLUSIVE: First picture ‘proof’ that Russia has troops on the ground all over Syria helping dictator Bashar Al-Assad – and they’ve been there since APRIL

their history is legendary for its brutality and using such to control the population… then one also should look to george habash… and a bunch of others…

In December 1967, a Lebanese Christian, George Habash, who had been a Pan-Arabic national socialist, had broadened his field by founding the PFLP, a Palestinian organization. Although it split already by the next year, the PFLP remained the most pro-Soviet Palestinian terrorist group, with widest global ties. It caused the Central Committee of the Soviet Communist Party to adopt the Palestinian cause in 1968. In July 1970, Andropov allowed the first direct Soviet arms delivery to the PFLP. From that on, both the KGB and – perhaps even more so – the Russian military intelligence, GRU, provided Palestinian terrorists with arms and training. (Segaller, p. 126-127; Livingston & Halevy, p. 140; Lunev, p. 80; Kuzichkin, p. 206; Andrew & Mitrokhin, p. 381) From 1972 on, this was co-ordinated by Habash, who had close connections to Japanese and Latin American terrorist groups. (Livingston & Halevy, p. 208-209)

Vince many of those “Muslims” are really only semi Muslims when they arrive they drink and smoke and watch porn just like you and me !!

actually not… the Quran says that if muslims find themselves in non muslim lands they can pretend to be like the residents.

Like communists, they state that lying and trickery in the service of their cause is ok, and straight from allah through the mouth of mohamed

particularly this behavior when not from an apostate is covered under Qur’an (3:28) and of course Qur’an (9:3), and Qur’an (40:28) and Qur’an (3:54) “allah is the best of schemers” (i always thought that was the purview of the lord of flies)

there is a lot more in the hadith…

oh john i left this one out, sorry

“Speaking is a means to achieve objectives. If a praiseworthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to accomplish through lying because there is no need for it. When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible (N:i.e. when the purpose of lying is to circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible), and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory… it is religiously precautionary in all cases to employ words that give a misleading impression…

and like soviets the best lies are the lies of ommission, or Kitman, where the ignorant are fooled BECAUSE of their lack of knowlege, and so are solid and staunch in following the lie. after all, would greg want to prove to the world he been played? so he has great interest after the fact to side with the con artists to protect his ego. this is the point of kitman, and lying by omission… what person with a leftist ego would admit to being had? they know everything, and so on and so on.

You should look closely at the pictures of the “refugees”. The vast majority are young men in their 20-30s. These are not families escaping war, this is an invasion of Muslims designed to flood a country to crush it. Ask Swedish people about their city Malmo, a place that has become inhospitable to Swedes, especially women and police. And why now, when all these people have been safely ensconced in refugee camps in Turkey ? I see a jihad in the making. Byebye Europe.

Socialist Europe is no different from socialist America. They both avoid resolving issues and always select the worst possible solution available.

First, Obama creates this problem by supporting the overthrow of Assad without taking any action to fulfill that goal (though it was NONE of the business of the US). Obama thought for certain that the overwhelming power of his awesome personality (which works so well controlling the mindless masses here) would compel Assad to just surrender. Simultaneously, against all intelligent advice, he pulled all US forces out of Iraq which absolutely opened the door wide open to ISIS to ply their brutal trade throughout the region.

Now, to the utter surprise of all, there are hundreds of thousands of refugees fleeing the brutality (notably, instead of fighting for their own homeland). How is this to be resolved?

Europe, like the US, has been largely ignoring the problem of ISIS, dropping a few bombs here and there. Now, due to the results of their wishful thinking they are faced with all these refugees… MUSLIM refugees. No doubt, ISIS and al Qaeda is way ahead of the curve and have infiltrated hundreds of terrorists. But, the only solution these governments can see is to just let them all swarm in.

Like the Iran deal, once the entire situation is thoroughly f***ed up, the options are limited. However, immediately, much more determination needs to be applied to wiping out ISIS and removing the threat to the rightful residents of that region. We will be forced to deal with the ongoing terror threat as a result of these bad decisions, but unless we want to face millions on our borders begging to come in and starving in the process, we have better deal with the problem that is driving them here.

Obama is, of course, completely unequipped to even begin to deal with the problem. This WILL get much worse before it gets even a little bit better. Thanks, Obama and your supporters.


Pls tell me of your fears if 7.5 million refugees came

Do you know how many guys it took to carry out the 9/11 attacks? Are you even AWARE of the 9/11 attacks?

According to Islam’s sharia Muslims who have conquered realms have a particular relationship with their underlings (the ”dhimmi.”)
We have already seen these new conquerors throwing food away for having a Red Cross label on it, for being non-halal, for being too Italian.
They have also required girls to cover up in Germany because they otherwise WILL rape them.
Here are the rest of their demands:
The Jizzya tax: that’s their welfare checks, housing allowances, free healthcare.
The silencing of church bells.
The conversions of other-than-Muslim religious buildings into mosques.
The right to their own law within their territories (no-go zones) where no one can have alcohol, music, sports, or pork.
No new non-Muslim religious building projects.
The ”right to rape,” non-covered females.
When John writes:

@John: Look at immigrants from the Mid East in our own country
They earn more than natives and are usually better educated. And their kids do better in school

Is he as ignorant of Islam as he appears?
These are mostly Muslims-in-name-only.
Add to that you are averaging in the oil-rich immigrants with the rest and you get that ”they make more money that we do” garbage. If ISIS threatened these very Muslims they would drop all their assimilation and get in line behind their powerful new leaders.
We already saw well-assimilated Somali Muslims do this in the Minn/St Paul area when they began suddenly insisting on prayer rooms, refusing cab fares for alcohol, dogs or improper dress (females).

@John: Yes, and that well-known conservative FDR kept the Jews out for as long as he could. Damn you, Republican icon FDR!

@Artfldgr: No that is incorrect Muslims can never have permission to deny the tenants if their faith
You are an idiot who has novel lived in Muslim lands
You have no personal experience
Everything is second hand knowledge

This cargo container FILLED with WEAPONS was sent as ”Relief Supplies” for those Islamists who are invading Greece.
Marked ”Aid for Syrian Refugees,” I guess they need weapons in Europe.
The“Black Rifle” looking ones with the handle on top look like Anakon AK-101 semiautomatic shotguns.
Those are manufactured by Derya Arms in Konya City/Turkey.

The US’s Muslims are also trying to get into the act of arming these invaders, uh, refugees:

Four members of a Cedar Rapids family conspired to hide caches of guns and ammunition bound for Beirut among boxes of goods collected in a company’s clothing drive for Syria and Lebanon, authorities said Tuesday.

Federal officials said they intercepted two shipments that had originated in Cedar Rapids, seizing more than 152 guns and ammunition.