OK, here’s the game. I’ll supply you with a partial list of countries that donated to the Clinton Foundation. You get to locate them on the list of The Best and Worst Places for Women as posted by the Daily Beast.
The list is here.
Ready?
Algeria
Morocco
Saudi Arabia
Qatar
Haiti
Kuwait
Brunei
See what’s really important to the Clintons- women’s rights or money. OK? Go!
Golly, could it be she’d ignore the abuse of women in exchange for donations and steer foreign policy accordingly?
Is there any doubt?
DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 40 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 45 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter who is in the field of education.
DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed.
Except for liberals being foolish.
*Algeria
*Morocco
*Saudi Arabia
*Qater
*Haiti
*Kuwait
*Brunei
The Clintons shame those of us grateful for being born in the USA.
By taking the cash of such horrid kleptocrats they put the lie to being even vaguely interested in women’s rights, human rights or the poor.
(All above quotes from World Factbook)
It can’t be doubted but it WILL be ignored.
but she has to pay her bills. when the clinton’s left the wipe house, he/she transfer over 29 million to AK. in two vans.
HEY !! these are all allies of the USA in its war on terror (except Haiti)
Nan seemed to have no problem with Bush (!&2) both invading Iraq to help Kuwait Saudi Arabia Qatar et.al. or unnamed Afghanistan. What binds the USA to these Islamic countries? Most often it is oil/gas. And fossil fuel companies are the main political contributors to which political party ?
@mos 8541: MOS 8541 could you cite a source that the Clinton’s shipped 29 million in a van to Alaska? That whole thing just seems too weird. How is it that YOU have this special knowledge of what the Clinton’s do?
Alaska ? wtf? Are you implying that Palin is involved? Your post is just too funny, it even calls into question your nic
@john:
Apparently left wing blind partisanship is a brain fungus that eats away at the logic centers of the brain.
Heh. President Clinton. Get use to it losers.
@Msefgeee:
So you are on record supporting a known liar that sells US influence to foreign entities and someone that would rather see an Ambassador killed than take politically unpopular actions. Got it.
@Bill: i’m on record as NOT supporting HRC for Prez
We all know of Bill’s inclination for the ladies
What the heck is in the water Conservatives are drinking–adulteres like Sanford,.Ensign,Vitter,and Gingrich–boys will be boys.
But how bout your Conservatives who LIKE BOYS–guys like Craig. Foley and now Hester. “Family value ” preachers like Swaggert and Haggard.
To name a few–your thoughts on this Conservative “gene”?.
@rich wheeler:
I guess they are adulterers like Kennedy, Kennedy, Kennedy, Edwards, Hart, Clinton, etc…. except, to our knowledge, none of the Republicans being naughty got anyone killed… then went on to continue a successful (in that he got reelected multiple times) political career.
Yet, what exactly does that have to do with selling US influence? Grasping at straws due to a weak field, like Hillary going after Rubio’s driving record, for God’s sake? How weak, frightened, paranoid and slimy is THAT?!? Particularly from someone who can’t even DRIVE a car (gets chauffeured everywhere… you know, a real person of the people) and someone who is herself mired in multiple deep scandals?
You may want us to believe you won’t support Hellary, but unless you back the Republican (which you have not the common sense to do), you WILL back Hellary.
Dr.J, “a partial list of countries “ — no kidding, partial list.
Just look at the deal that set Clinton and Giustra into the financial stratosphere. The multi-billion dollar deal they did in Kazakhstan, a nation under the iron fist of an opressive and ruthless dictatorship, under the full control of the military and Nazarbayev, . . . filled Clinton’s and Giustra coffers better than any deal either had ever done.
Not a soul on the “Street” didn’t know that as former President of The United States, Clinton’s business card opened any and all doors around the world that controlled valuable raw materials.
Guistra had made his money as a “Howe Street” (Vancouver) broker. He knew what he was doing when it came to flipping resource deals. Clinton didn’t have to do much, other than enjoy traveling in some of the best private planes money could buy, and indulging in whatever side benefits were made available to him PLUS adding hundreds of millions of dollars to his piggy bank called a “foundation.” It was brilliant. Almost.
Greed seems to have a way of pushing abusers into overdoing it, particularly when no one is questioning the game, or looking into it with diligent, inquisitive probes.
And that was only one deal, of many.
The absence of MORALS and PRINCIPALS that propped-up dictators in countries like Kazakhstan, enhancing their standing in their countries and on the world stage, plus making them even richer as they abuse their people, is applauded by too many on the left because they believe the END justifies THE MEANS.
You can connect your dots later and try to figure out how they led straight to the White House.
@James Raider: Kazakstan is your example? Borat should initiate a coup.
@Jeff D: Only a complete moron would elect a corrupt, proven liar, incompetent, money-whore to the Presidency.
@Bill: And that’s why Sarah Palin will never be POTUS—Thanks Bill.
@rich wheeler: Yeah, Rich. Right. Look, no amount of diversion is going to mask the fact that the Democrats have one huge joke of a field of candidates. Even the ignorant Palin-bashing can’t do it.
Perhaps you should try calling people racists? Don’t you think that always works?
@Bill: Why doesn’t Palin have the guts to take on HRC .Pls don’t use lamestream media excuse.
Bashing? lol You’re the best,
@rich wheeler:
Why are you worried about Palin? Why don’t you worry about why Hellary doesn’t have the guts to face the media? Is she afraid to get a question about the millions of dollars she took in from foreign governments and businesses, then granted favorable treatment and decisions to their interests? Is she afraid she’ll have to answer questions about why she knowing lied about the Benghazi attacks or did nothing to prevent them? Is she afraid she might be asked about her illegal email server and deleting emails without anyone other than her staff seeing them?
BULLETIN!!! Palin ain’t running. You’d best worry about the miserable array of nothing you have lined up against the Republicans if you want this liberal utopia of failure, debt and foreign policy disasters to continue.
@Bill: Repubs will once again self destruct in their circular firing squad. HRC is in— unless Webb decides to run.
I’ll say again Rubio (who the Dems do fear) / Kasich ticket has best chance of beating her—-albeit small.
@rich wheeler:
Once again, I would suggest you worry more about the big bag of nothing you have for candidates than what the wide array of competent choices the Republicans have to choose from.
Hellary is currently getting away with dodging the media and questions about her corruption, scandals and lack of any qualifying accomplishment whatsoever, but how will she be able to avoid facing questions if she wins the nomination and participates in debates? Avoid debates?
Liberals have no problem at all, as we have seen, electing an un-vetted, relatively unknown question mark to the most powerful position in the world. It remains to be seen if you are content with being afraid to demand the answers to pressing questions of improprieties before you elect your next President.
Webb has the chance of a fart in a whirlwind of ever becoming a Presidential candidate for Democrats as long as they lean as far left as they do. You liberals prefer celebrity over capability. If you seriously want Webb as a leader, the entire Democrat party has to drastically change its fabric.
@rich wheeler:
Gerry Studds