Subscribe
Notify of
153 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Democrats aren’t worried about the Tea Party too much, in about 18 months Tea Party folks will all resign like their leader Sarah Palin did and get a job with Fox News, because they won’t need any “official position” to effect the change they want to bring about. When it comes to having the guts to fulfill her commitment with the voters who elected her, Tea Party folks should all follow the example of their leader Sarah….

And she WILL certainly run as a third party candidate if she does not get the 2012 nomination, but her chances of getting the 2012 GOP nomination look very good in my view at this point. She is already calling down the establishment GOP good old boys who have came out and mentioned how her endorsements have cost the GOP the Senate, Karl Rove being one of those.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/11/palin_v_rove_and_the_battle_fo.html
http://dailycaller.com/2010/10/28/has-sarah-palin-cost-republicans-the-senate/

Some Conservatives are also taking a stand against her 2012 prospects

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Conservatives-against-losing-in-2012-because-of-Sarah-Palin/139053509445203

I’m am glad the Republicans did very well Tuesday, I respect the votes of the people, and we expect the GOP controlled House to offer solutions to problems now that they are in office. I think you have a civil war brewing between the GOP and the Tea Party with the possibility of a third party splitting the Conservative vote of not handled well. The GOP would do best by embracing the Tea Party and allowing Palin to be the nominee if she can earn it and let the chips fall where they may….but somehow I doubt that she really wants to commit to a 4 year job that will be the hardest job in the world…..she is doing well and has a good life and nice family that will go through Hell if she does, and her history indicates that she can be a quitter

The Vote that ‘Saved a Superpower’… and Not a Bad Hand for the GOP in 2012

It hurts, doesn’t it Moosebrain? Suck it. 😆

@ Mooseburger, Thanks for the most inconsequential and irrelevant posting today. Got some news for you Skippy…

Karl Rove = Not Relevent
Sarah Palin = Relevent

“We’ve Come To Take Our Govt Back!”

Allen West Victory Speech

Both Candidates ENDORSED BY SARAH PALIN

Has any US politician who has promised to change Washington actually done so? Such a tired cliche.

GAFFA UK: GET OUT OF HERE.

Here comes the Palinists with the old “quitter” meme. To the sidebar!….. who to believe, Mata’s well researched blogging about the situation or a disgruntled dem? Decisions, decisions. 🙄

If only Pelosi would have quit. One steps down to save her state millions of dollars in legal fees and constant frivilous distractions to the state’s governance, the other steps up to ruin our economy in less than 4 years, spending what? $5 trillion and counting? enriching unions and special interests, mismanaging billions, billions missing, not to forget, paying prisoners and dead people.

How did Palin’s endorsements do?

Palin Emerges with Even More Clout
Large Majority of Candidates She Backed Won;

As CBS News Correspondent Jeff Glor reports, .the former GOP vice presidential nominee backed 43 candidates for the House. Thirty of them won, with races involving nine others still undecided.

Her record in Senate races was closer: She endorsed 12 candidates. Seven won.

~~~~~

Asked on “Entertainment Tonight” last week whether she’d run for president, Plain said she would, if there’s nobody esle to do it.

And on “The Early Show” Wednesday, DeMint was asked if he could see a Palin-DeMint or DeMint-Palin ticket in 2012.

“I agree with her,” DeMint responded. “I would only consider if no one else was willing to do it at this point. Sarah Palin’s done a lot of good for the country. She’s gone out front and taken a lot of the slings and arrows from the critics. When women or minorities get involved in politics as conservatives, they take a lot of hits from the press. And she’s done a lot of good for the Republican Party, and for our country.”

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/11/03/earlyshow/main7017707.shtml

Sarah Palin’s Winners/Losers…couldn’t find Rove’s

.

BONDI, PAM FL ATTORNEY GENERAL WIN
FINDLEY, BRENNA IA ATTORNEY GENERAL LOSS
ABBOTT, GREG TX ATTORNEY GENERAL WIN
ROBY, MARTHA AL CONGRESS (AL-2) WIN
GRIFFIN, TIM AR CONGRESS (AR-2) WIN
GOSAR, PAUL AZ CONGRESS (AZ-1) WIN
CONTRERAS, JANET AZ CONGRESS (AZ-4) LOSS
SCHWEIKERT, DAVID AZ CONGRESS (AZ-5) WIN
MCCLUNG, RUTH AZ CONGRESS (AZ-7)
KELLY, JESSE AZ CONGRESS (AZ-8)
WILKERSON, CHUCK CA CONGRESS (CA-30) LOSS
PARKER, STAR CA CONGRESS (CA-37) LOSS
TIPTON, SCOTT CO CONGRESS (CO-3) WIN
GARDNER, CORY CO CONGRESS (CO-4) WIN
SOUTHERLAND, STEVE FL CONGRESS (FL-2) WIN
WEST, ALLEN FL CONGRESS (FL-22) WIN
ADAMS, SANDY FL CONGRESS (FL-24) WIN
MCKINNEY, RAY GA CONGRESS (GA-12) LOSS
WILLOUGHBY, JOHN HI CONGRESS (HI-2) LOSS
HENDERSON, SCOTT HI CONGRESS (HI-7) LOSS
KINZINGER, ADAM IL CONGRESS (IL-11) WIN
HULTGREN, RANDY IL CONGRESS (IL-14) WIN
WALORSKI, JACKIE IN CONGRESS (IN-2) LOSS
BUCSHON, LARRY IN CONGRESS (IN-8) WIN
YOUNG, TODD IN CONGRESS (IN-9) WIN
BIELAT, SEAN MA CONGRESS (MA-4) LOSS
BENISHEK, DAN MI CONGRESS (MI-1) WIN
STEELE, ROB MI CONGRESS (MI-15) LOSS
BACHMANN, MICHELE MN CONGRESS (MN-6) WIN
HARTZLER, VICKY MO CONGRESS (MO-4) WIN
NUNNELEE, ALAN MS CONGRESS (MS-1) WIN
MARCY, BILL MS CONGRESS (MS-2) LOSS
ELLMERS, RENEE NC CONGRESS (NC-2) WIN
PANTANO, ILARIO NC CONGRESS (NC-7) LOSS
BERG, RICK ND CONGRESS (ND) WIN
PEARCE, STEVE NM CONGRESS (NM-2) WIN
GRIMM, MICHAEL NY CONGRESS (NY-13) WIN
GOMEZ, JOHN NY CONGRESS (NY-2) LOSS
BUERKLE, ANN MARIE NY CONGRESS (NY-25)
RENACCI, JIM OH CONGRESS (OH-16) WIN
JOHNSON, BILL OH CONGRESS (OH-6) WIN
MARINO, TOM PA CONGRESS (PA-10) WIN
KELLY, MIKE PA CONGRESS (PA-3) WIN
SCOTT, TIM SC CONGRESS (SC-1) WIN
MULVANEY, MICK SC CONGRESS (SC-5) WIN
BLACK, DIANE TN CONGRESS (TN-6) WIN
FINCHER, STEPHEN TN CONGRESS (TN-8) WIN
FLORES, BILL TX CONGRESS (TX-17) WIN
CANSECO, FRANCISCO TX CONGRESS (TX-23) WIN
CAMPBELL, DONNA TX CONGRESS (TX-25) LOSS
FARENTHOLD, BLAKE TX CONGRESS (TX-27) WIN
BRODEN, STEPHEN TX CONGRESS (TX-30) LOSS
PHILPOT, MORGAN UT CONGRESS (UT-2) LOSS
FIMIAN, KEITH VA CONGRESS (VA-11)
HURT, ROBERT VA CONGRESS (VA-5) WIN
KOSTER, JOHN WA CONGRESS (WA-2)
MCMORRIS RODGERS, CATHY WA CONGRESS (WA-5) WIN
MURI, DICK WA CONGRESS (WA-9)
DUFFY, SEAN WI CONGRESS (WI-7) WIN
MCKINLEY, DAVID WV CONGRESS (WV-1) WIN
MAYNARD, SPIKE WV CONGRESS (WV-3) LOSS
SCOTT, RICK FL GOVERNOR WIN
BRANSTAD, TERRY IA GOVERNOR WIN
OTTER, BUTCH ID GOVERNOR WIN
EMMER, TOM MN GOVERNOR
MARTINEZ, SUSANA NM GOVERNOR WIN
FALLIN, MARY OK GOVERNOR WIN
HALEY, NIKKI SC GOVERNOR WIN
PERRY, RICK TX GOVERNOR WIN
CHAPMAN, BETH AL SECRETARY OF STATE WIN
MILLER, JOE AK SENATE
BOOZMAN, JOHN AR SENATE WIN
MCCAIN, JOHN AZ SENATE WIN
FIORINA, CARLY CA SENATE LOSS
O’DONNELL, CHRISTINE DE SENATE LOSS
RUBIO, MARCO FL SENATE WIN
PAUL, RAND KY SENATE WIN
AYOTTE, KELLY NH SENATE WIN
ANGLE, SHARRON NV SENATE LOSS
TOOMEY, PAT PA SENATE WIN
RAESE, JOHN WV SENATE LOSS

http://www.conservatives4palin.com/2010/11/midterm-elections-2010-open-thread.html


Republican victory was wide and deep

But while the GOP’s major congressional victories will deservedly be examined closely, serious attention ought also be paid to down-ballot results in the state contests. Republicans took control of at least 19 additional state legislative bodies Tuesday for a total of 26 in which the party controls both chambers, compared with 21 for Democrats and with three still up for grabs. Among these are legislatures in Alabama and North Carolina that had not seen elected Republican majorities since the Reconstruction elections of 1876 and 1870, respectively. Those that argued just two years ago the GOP was in danger of becoming a Southern regional party were proved resoundingly wrong as state legislative chambers in New Hampshire, Maine, Wisconsin and Minnesota flipped to GOP control. Republicans even made major inroads and could end up on top of legislative bodies in Oregon and Washington. Republicans won 16 of 30 races for state attorney general, taking five such offices away from Democrats, pulling within four of their opponents’ total. The GOP also won 17 of 26 secretary of state races, a gain of six, giving the party a 25-22 edge (three states don’t have such offices).

These developments have national implications, especially for redistricting. According to the Republican State Leadership Committee, Republicans now will play a role in redrawing the boundaries of a whopping 314 congressional districts. And lots of new Republicans in power in major swing states — such as Ohio, Pennsylvania and Colorado — will undoubtedly help foster a favorable climate for the 2012 GOP presidential contender.

Perhaps the most important takeaway is that while the Tea Party started out as an anti-Washington movement, the outcome of Tuesday’s local elections shows that the GOP grass roots is now serious about positive engagement in the political process. With large numbers of political neophytes filling the party’s ranks, the GOP’s bench of potential candidates could end up as deep as the Marianas Trench, dominating elections for a generation. But Republicans must not forget that, as Florida Sen.-elect Marco Rubio said, “Tuesday’s election was not a mandate, it was a second chance.” An enduring Republican revival will only happen if these new leaders remain steadfast to the principles of limited government, fiscal responsibility, and accountability and transparency that motivated voters to elect them.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/Republican-victory-was-wide-and-deep-1442653-106640883.html#ixzz14JpPEfBn

The GOP also won 17 of 26 secretary of state races

Throws a monkey wrench in the George Soros plan to flood the Sec/State offices with democrats to oversee/manipulate recounts…… Minnesota. 8)

Somebody is in serious pain …

MISSY, SUCH A SMART GROUP, and they are energize fully to tackle the numerous issues ,TOGETHER
with INTELLIGENCE and hearth and soul, THEY will want to settle problems as fast as they come,
they know AMERICA is watching as they keep patiently at the solving it to the end,
each one after one: THEY have the support of their country to live with and take
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO 2012. I am confident .

So early hath the GOP and Tea Party made Obama a moronic LAME DUCK!

What was it someone said? there’s no one more dangerous than those who want you to do something “for your own good”???

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1326035/Speed-camera-checks-insurance-tax-wearing-seatbelt.html#ixzz14KC1KVtv

By the 2012 elections the GOP will be able to change its name to the “Conservative Party”. RINOs will be weeded out or become irrelevant. Trent Lott, John McCain and Graham beware.

minuteman26: hi, you where right before, and you most likely will be right again.
bye

Obama has a workaround to his supposed ”lame duckness.”
He grew the federal government by more than had ever been done.

And he can and will use non-legislative means to get his agenda accomplished.

For example:
Look at the EPA.
A judicial ruling allowed the EPA to set prices for CARBON emissions.
Obama does not need ”cap-and-trade.”
He can use the EPA to make it an extravagance to shower, or to commute to work, or to use too much electricity, or to this or to that.
He even hinted this when he was asked about carbon cap-and-trade during his news conference yesterday.
He said, there is more than one way to skin a cat.
Yup he still intends to impose extreme restrictions on America’s businesses and homes.
He has no need to go through Congress to do it.

Nan G, if he continues down this path, he will be considered a tyrant and he will need to be treated in an appropriate manner. What is a tyrant? A leader who ignores the will of the people.

Now the work begins to castrate the tyrant and impeach him.

Skookum–Impeach and Deport. And Soros with him. Soros could buy them a Greek island and they can start their own country.

Missy: Truth is, many folks on both sides of the isle see her as a quitter. Hillary had some very bad negatives too, and overcame them, but only because she was no quitter and people came to respect her toughness. Sarah whines too much and responds to any and every negative thing said about her with snark and whine.
She can dish it out but she can’t take it.

Here is Politico’s tally of wins and losses for Mama Grizzly’s House and Senate endorsements:
Under 50% gives you a big fat F in the real world, in her world you take a victory lap and post a video……she’s gonna run I think

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/44696.html

Palin endorsed 34 candidates for the House, only 15 of whom won Tuesday. In Senate races, just five of her 12 picks were victorious.

She has every right to endorse folks, but whether she is good for the GOP or not remains to be seen, many feel she cost the GOP the Senate. I still think she will go rouge and run as a third party, for the Tea Party if the GOP stiffs her.

Poor, pathetic Moosehole.

Suckered in by Politico.

Sux to be you, eh?

“Most of the candidates Sarah Palin endorsed chalked up victories Tuesday. And that scorecard leaves pundits wondering whether she’ll now train her sights directly on the Republican presidential nomination in 2012. As CBS News Correspondent Jeff Glor reports, the former GOP vice presidential nominee backed 43 candidates for the House. Thirty of them won, with races involving nine others still undecided. Her record in Senate races was closer: She endorsed 12 candidates. Seven won.”

Now, for those who are math challenged ’round these parts, that puts her average at 67% minimum and in the neighborhood of 84% maximum.

Sorry Moosehole, you’re full of crap.

Again.

Exit Question: What is the win/loss endorsement record of “The Won”TM?

I LOVE when leftists try to tell Conservatives what they think or how they view someone. Especially when that someone is Sara Palin.

Hard Right: hi, they will be even more worried, now with what she accomplish,
with the effort she put in. bye

MISSY:, HOW is that beautiful daughter, we are praying for?TELL her we think about her.
bye

I wish I could find a list but Obama was a BIG loser in this election
He backed the Democrat who was running to fill his old Senate seat in Illinois which went to a Republican, and statewide candidates he campaigned for lost in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Ohio and other important Electoral College states.

I was terribly pleased by the winning Republicans of minorities…..
like Hispanic governor-elects Susana Martinez in New Mexico and Brian Sandoval in Nevada;

Indian-American governor-elect Nikki Haley in South Carolina;

Cuban-Hispanic Sen. Marco Rubio in Florida;

and the first black House Republicans since former Rep. J.C. Watts of Oklahoma retired —

Tim Scott in South Carolina and Allen West in Florida.

I voted for a black woman, Star Parker, in my Congressional district but the majority went with a white woman named Laura Richardson.
Can’t win them all.

Bill Ayers is parsing.

He wrote a book called, Prairie Fire.

He dedicated it to a passel of radicals, assassins and what Ayers calls political prisoners.

One of those listed was Sirhan Sirhan.

But today Ayers says:
“….any suggestion he dedicated a book to the man who assassinated Robert Kennedy was fiction invented by right-wing bloggers.
There’s not a shred of truth in it…”

The book was “dedicated to some very weird people, starting with John Brown and Harriet Tubman,” he said. “Sirhan Sirhan’s name is listed with dozens of others on a page in the book, which also reads “To All Who Continue to Fight” and “To All Political Prisoners in the U.S.””

Gee, I can see how we lesser souls (including Chris Kennedy RFK’s son) could be confused.

NOT!!!!

@ilovebeeswarzone:

Just got back from the hospital. I want to thank all for the prayers, she can walk now and I can understand what’s she is saying. Her face is pretty colorful, lots of yellows and blues and the head wound is now looking like it isn’t going to leave a very bad scar and the wounds on her cheek are healing nicely. No internal injuries, such a miracle!

MISSY, thank you, take care, bye

MISSY, 2 years ago, I trip on my dog and fell and hit a rock on the side of my forehead,I touch it, and I tought, OH MY GOD, I am disfigure for life, and I ran inside and shower it with cold water,
I checked it every day until I forgot about it, IT disapear after a month just about approximation,
AND I’m back with my beauty. bye

I’ve been waiting in vain to see some reaction on this and other conservative blogs over the decision by Ben Bernanke’s Federal Reserve Board to print $600 billion in new currency (printing money out of thin air), to inject this money directly into the economy (which is what essentially happens when the Fed redeems this money for T Bills). This is almost the size of Obama’s much criticized “stimulus” (which was, in fact, only $250 billion more than the GOP’s counter-proposed “stimulus”). Bernanke is a Republican, who was appointed by a Republican (GWB).

Why did the Fed decide to print more money? According to economic pundits, it’s because Bernanke felt that more dollars needed to be injected into the sluggish economy and he knew that there was no political possibility for another “stimulus” round, which would have been the preferred first option, were this not politically impossible.

Does everyone understand that there is no difference between adding $600 billion to the debt load by selling more T Bills, versus paying off $600 billion in debt by printing more money? Both actions weaken the dollar and weaken the future position of the US to be able to borrow money (through the sale of T bills) to finance debt. Already, investors around the world are bailing out of dollars to buy euros and commodities.

If Obama had had the power to do what Bernanke just did, Obama would have been crucified by conservative pundits. But don’t let anyone fail to understand that Bernanke’s actions have basically been an endorsement of Obama’s approach to the management of the financial crisis: (1) purchase of hundreds of billions of dollars of toxic assets (precisely the same as the Wall Street bailouts) and (2) artificial injection of hundreds of billions of dollars into the economy through slight of hand (printing T bills to sell, compared to printing dollars to buy T bills).

I am waiting for Bernanke to be labeled a “Marxist” and for the Federal Reserve Board to criticized with the same colorful language used to describe members of the Democratic Party.

– Larry Weisenthal/Huntington Beach, CA

Sarah has class, thats for sure, like I said, she can dish it out but she can’t take it:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/11/palin-retweets-photo-that-clai.html

Larry, I agree.
It makes me wonder why pump 75 billion extra dollars into the market monthly will do anything IF we already have banks sitting on huge amounts of cash they are just not lending.

Right after this was announced almost all commodities rose in price.
(We hardly create any commodities here at home anymore.)
Oil is headed back to $100/barrel territory.

Companies that SOUND ”American,” like McDonalds, but that really make most of their money outside the USA, did well on the stock market today.

I hope we are properly diversified for what is coming.

There was a neat Sunday funny here a couple weeks ago about how Obama and his policies were preventing home buyers/sellers from finding the bottom yet.

This looks like more of the same.
Obscuring where the bottom will be is not the same as changing/improving where it is.

@Moose

Let’s hope Palin runs against Obama in 2012 – then we can see an even bigger reenactment of the Sharron Angle vs Harry Reid or Christine O’Donnell vs Michael Castle fiascos where defeat is clutched from the jaws of victory thanks to the teabaggers:D

Looks like even Alaskans don’t want teabaggers representing them in the Senate if Lisa Murkowski wins as a write in.

I see. Even tho Berneke has made bad decisions, then obama isn’t a Marxist? Nice (lack of) logic there Larry. It’s amusing you think that his actions are an endorsement of obama’s policies or that we are leaving him alone because he’s a Rep. Need more straw?
I’m starting to wonder if you have looped a clip of him coming out of the ocean on your PC.

Gaffe, I LOVE hearing 3rd world leftists like yourself squeal.

Palin is smart to appeal to the very lowest base emotions of Humanity, that will continue to get her fame, income, followers and defenders. She is always a victim, she is good at that because she is smart manipulator that way. There is no way the folks who defend her tweet link about Obama would not go banshee screaming Apesh*t over her being the recipient of the same from a hypothetical Democratic leaders tweet.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/11/palin-retweets-photo-that-clai.html

No way that she can sway the majority of the country to follow her lead if this is what she promotes, but the GOP will not be able to say a word against the Tea Party or Sarah and are helpless to speak against her or the nutty fringe. Palin and her followers can and will be a force that the GOP will not be able to disagree with in public, lest they get a primary challenge, 3 hours of hate from Rush Limbaugh and a big Rino like a Scarlet Letter pasted to their foreheads.

@ #29:

“I’ve been waiting in vain to see some reaction on this and other conservative blogs over the decision by Ben Bernanke’s Federal Reserve Board to print $600 billion in new currency (printing money out of thin air), to inject this money directly into the economy (which is what essentially happens when the Fed redeems this money for T Bills).”

Once you’ve mentioned that Bernanke is a Republican who was appointed by a Republican, I believe you’ve pretty much explained why conservative blogs are leaving the matter alone.

@Nan:

Thanks for the thoughtful reply.

I’m not trying to, to use the words of Obama in his press conference, “re-litigate” the past, but I’d like to — purely from a theoretical point of view — explain why I think the very best thing that we could do, if we actually wanted to stimulate the economy, is not to give (or maintain) tax cuts and not print money to buy treasury debt, but, instead, to borrow a trillion dollars and put it all into infrastructure — roads, bridges, railroad tracks, sewer lines, gas lines, power grid, ports, tunnels and so on. Number one, it’s all stuff that we desperately need. Number two, all the jobs are American jobs. Number three, it puts money into the hands of people who are actually going to turn around and spend it, providing a multiplier effect.

The moral virtue of borrowing money to spend on infrastructure is that it, at least, provides continuing benefit to those generations of American who are stuck with the debt (as opposed to borrowing their money to relieve ourselves of the unpleasant necessity of paying for our own government, in real time).

Businesses don’t need tax cuts. They are sitting on a hoard of cash. Wealthy people certainly don’t need tax cuts; they aren’t going to go out and spend the money on things which create jobs, either. I’d argue that the rest of us ought to forego our tax cuts, also, but, were I to extend any of the Bush tax cuts, it would just be for the people at the low end of the income curve.

– Larry Weisenthal/Huntington Beach, CA

FDR agreed with you Larry and his policies EXTENDED the misery. So you’ll excuse me if I and others here disagree.
Greg, your hypocrisy is showing.

Larry, look into the way Obama adapted the Davis/Bacon Act to ruin our stimulus.

A little-known Act that made prevailing union wage a requirement for a few construction jobs paid with federal dollars was widely applied to EVERY PENNY of federal money once Obama signed a law expanding its application.

We simply cannot build such needed projects under that Act’s onerous weights.

If you think a proposed budget for a high-speed rail is under what we later find out is the true cost without Davis/Bacon, look at some of the early attempts to do actual work with stimulus money once folks realized they were constrained by Davis/Bacon!
Yikes!

I recall a hoped-for weatherization of hundreds of thousands of homes ended up being the weatherization of only a few hundred homes at the wage rates required by Davis/Bacon.

You wouldn’t think you’d need to pay a man who is laying down that spongy weather stripping $53/hour with a 4 hour minimum…..but under Davis/Bacon….you do!

openid.aol.com/runnswim. I remember reading BERNANKE ‘s name on a BILDENBERG
GOOGLE search he was a guess with other,and the GROUP is known for plannings
THE WORLD ORDER, WHERE UNIFICATION OF AMERICA WITH the WORLD COUNTRYS TO REDISTRIBUTE THE WHEALTS AND TAKE THE POWER OF ALL THE WORLD
AND ALL THEIR ASSETS, IN OTHER WORDS ruin THE UNITED STATES, and
replace it by them. power.
MATA made a post quite a while ago maybe a year, in the archive now, but I don’t remember the name of the post she wrote.
this would be better than my comment poorly explain. bye I heard OBAMA’S agenda is same

MOOSEBURGER, THAT’S the way she appeal to you, but the sane people see her qualities,
and SHE has a right to try her chance for the HIGHEST COMMAND JOB among OTHERS
VERY gifted person already won their seats in GOVERNMENT,
A free AMERICA is open to may the best win, nothing to do with electing a good looking guy with no knowledge of the basic dutys

@Hard: Infrastructure was only a small part of the New Deal. I’ve never read where the infrastructure portion of the New Deal was accused of prolonging the Great Depression. Perhaps you can point me to a reference?

My criticism of “the stimulus” was that too much of it went to tax cuts and not nearly enough to infrastructure.

Here’s a guy who agrees with me (or with whom I agree, to be deservedly modest):

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/business/july-dec08/infrastructure_12-22.html

@Nan: I agree with your positions in # 38

– Larry Weisenthal/Huntington Beach, CA

@Moosehole:

So, help me understand this one….

Ann Coulter sent Sarah Palin a tweet which was basically a picture of the sign for Atlah church.

The leftists in this country have now reached the point that if someone sends you a picture that means that you agree with what is depicted in that picture and the person behind it?

Is that right?

Please explain to me the message that you’re trying to get across here…

@Mooseburger:

My goodness, you are just miserable, aren’t you? Tough week?

No way that she can sway the majority of the country to follow her lead if this is what she promotes,

How is that sway working out for your party? What just happened?

but the GOP will not be able to say a word against the Tea Party or Sarah and are helpless to speak against her or the nutty fringe.

How long has Pelosi reigned over the dem party? Evidently the majority of your elected members have not made too much of an effort to “say a word against her” which resulted in what?

Palin and her followers can and will be a force that the GOP will not be able to disagree with in public, lest they get a primary challenge,

YEEEEHHHHAAAWWW, rumors are floating about that Howard Dean is crawling out of the swamp, things aren’t as lieberal as he likes. Perhaps you might want to be concerned with what’s going on in your own backyard? It’s always so nice that those that are so opposed to everything the Tea Party movement represents wants to give advice. Yet, they seem to ignore problematic issues going on within their own, right under their nose. Like the debt Pelosi, Reid & company amassed since 2007. Lovely number isn’t it?

3 hours of hate from Rush Limbaugh and a big Rino like a Scarlet Letter pasted to their foreheads.

Schultz, Olberman, Maddow, Matthews, Rhodes, etc……if your guys didn’t stink, someone might be listening to them. Credit to Rush, after all these years, he’s still there making gazillions and the competition seems to always have a short shelf life.

Just ran across this – very revealing. No longer relevant except for planning for the future…

http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2010/10/revealed-daily-kos-astroturf-program-to.html

suek
44Reply to this comment

Just ran across this – very revealing. No longer relevant except for planning for the future…

http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2010/10/revealed-daily-kos-astroturf-program-to.html

You reminded me that, there was a time when Markos, founder of DailyKos was 0 for 11 on his backing of candidates.

His site meter is also astroturfed.
He has some people pop on and off his site over a thousand times a day each just to make him look popular.

Leopards just don’t change their spots.

What a shock. Larry cites someone who believes in the same historically disproven Keynesian theories he does. Larry likes to throw out the “appealing to authority card.” It’s where he cites someone HE thinks is an unimpeachable expert and if you disagree with that “expert”, then you are a blind partisan.

As for FDR, you really need to brush up on what he believed in because you two are practically peas in a pod. That isn’t a compliment.

Here’s a ref for the extension of the depression by FDR.

http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409.aspx

Another reason why I will refuse to affiliate with Any Party. Courtesy of Michelle Malkin.

Dear GOP: What not to do at Obama’s common ground Kabuki theater

http://michellemalkin.com/2010/11/04/dear-gop-what-not-to-do-at-obamas-common-ground-kabuki-theater/

It was nauseating.

Republicans including John McCain and Eric Cantor joined Democrat tax cheat Charlie Rangel and spendocrat Henry Waxman, along with Obama corrupto-cronies such as the SEIU’s Andy Stern in a boot-licking session with Dear Leader.

He gathered them all in a press conference setting and called on them as if they were journalistic stenographers.

Obama paid lip service to bipartisanship. They paid lip service to bipartisanship. Obama declared the need to fix health care. They declared the need to fix health care. Obama said we had budget problems. They nodded their heads and bemoaned our budget problems.

Dear GOP: What not to do at Obama’s common ground Kabuki theater
By Michelle Malkin • November 4, 2010 10:34 AM

So, the newly chastened, humbled, introspective, reflective President Obama will hold hyped-up meetings with GOP and Democrat leaders in a few weeks to show his commitment to Common Ground.

And the MSM will lap it up as evidence of Obama’s post-election maturity.

What a steaming load of you-know-what.

Obama has held plenty of make-believe Kumbaya sessions with Republicans — after which, he turned around and rammed his partisan legislative boondoggles and government expansions down our throats anyway.

Go back and refresh your memories of the blowhard-a-thon at Blair House in February 2010 on Obamacare.

Or the barrel-of-monkeys fiscal responsibility suck-up summit in February 2009:

It was nauseating.

Republicans including John McCain and Eric Cantor joined Democrat tax cheat Charlie Rangel and spendocrat Henry Waxman, along with Obama corrupto-cronies such as the SEIU’s Andy Stern in a boot-licking session with Dear Leader.

He gathered them all in a press conference setting and called on them as if they were journalistic stenographers.

Obama paid lip service to bipartisanship. They paid lip service to bipartisanship. Obama declared the need to fix health care. They declared the need to fix health care. Obama said we had budget problems. They nodded their heads and bemoaned our budget problems.

I have etched in mind one of the most cringe-inducing moments of that summit. It starred House GOP Whip Eric Cantor, who is now in the running for House Majority Leader.

If this is the kind of olive branch-swallowing “leadership” he will bring to the job, God help us all:

White House says the upcoming session “is not just going to be a photo-op.” We know. It’ll be a four-hour, ego-stroking bull session to boot.

There you have it. Lip Service and bullshit. The DC Elites that just don’t “Get It”, from either Party. Kubuki Theater pretty keenly sums it up. In short, my confidence has not been reinforced for those that created this mess or failed to properly Represent their Constituents as Stewards of the Republic or failed to heed the call for Fiscal Prudence are indeed part of the problem and equally clueless on a solution. Elections do have Consequences and Lip Service is no alternative to Leadership.

Don’t fret over QE2. It’s quite necessary to use monetization of our debt to spark rapid inflation. They’re betting they can control it. It’s the only way they can cut Social Security without admitting that’s what’s going on.

Remember that the only people hurt by inflation are the ones on a fixed income. That’ll take care of a lot of underfunded pensions too! Lots of huge problems solved at one fell swoop! Hmmm, housing prices will eventually rise… Damn! the economy’s fixed.

Of course the official government-calculated inflation rate will need to be kept low in order to keep all COLA’s out of the picture… I wonder when they’ll start tinkering with that… Oh wait!

The other people affected by this tactic will be overseas creditors. They’ll need to strike a deal to accept the devaluing of their holdings… That’ll be tough… Taiwan?? :mrgreen:

Meanwhile, rich currency traders can short the dollar just in time to multiply their fortunes. Nice! Can you say “Secretary of State Project” times ten! 😆

Politicians will need to accept this solution to cut the value of Social Security checks by half and cause our GDP to double. All problems solved with the cooperation of the major players in the new “State-Capitalist” economy of America. Watch for prices to double while COLAs are small or zero.

The politicians of both parties did this… They spent all the money that they took from us at gunpoint on their friends. 😈 Just hope things don’t go wrong with the plan… That could be very, very scary. 😯

Also, emoticons can be fun.

DaNang67: hi, you look like you know what your talking about;
AND the hope is starting to show around, bye

@ Larry #36. Very well said. Sir.

@HardRight

Larry likes to throw out the “appealing to authority card.” It’s where he cites someone HE thinks is an unimpeachable expert and if you disagree with that “expert”, then you are a blind partisan.

Larry posted a link and merely said he agreed with it. He also, not so incidentally, made his point in his own words in a prior post. How does posting that link meet the criteria you ascribe to it? Also, can I assume you’ve never posted a link to a so-called expert to expand upon a point of your own? Perhaps, unlike Larry, you’ve even failed to make the point and just lazily posted the link?

Here’s a ref for the extension of the depression by FDR.

http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409.aspx

Wow. Hypocricy isn’t always so conveniently packaged.

“I see one-third of a nation ill-housed, ill-clad, and ill-nourished. The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.”

(FDR; Second Inaugural Address, January 20, 1937.)

1 2 3 4