Obama identified Americans as enemies [Reader Post]



How many times has it been said about whoever occupies the White House

“No matter what, he is our President. We must respect him”

Some people carry this a bit far.

The president of the United States should be treated with respect for the following reasons:

Whether we like him or not, he was selected by the majority of our peers. Their opinions matter and should be regarded as important.

Whether we like him or not, he is the most powerful person in the world. That power must be acknowledged.

Yeah, well, my Dad always said respect is a two way street.

Barack Obama is not my President. I am his enemy, and Obama’s the one who decided that.

In a interview with Univision, Obama said

“If Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, ‘We’re going to punish our enemies and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us,’ if they don’t see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think it’s going to be harder and that’s why I think it’s so important that people focus on voting on November 2.”

“We’re going to punish our enemies”


I can’t take my eyes off of that.

And we don’t have any core American values.

“Those aren’t the kinds of folks who represent our core American values.”

As one of the readers here noted, Obama is speaking about his version of American values, and not the values of normal Americans. Those of us who would like to see American law upheld do not share the same values as Obama.

We are the enemies of the United States. The President of the United States has declared us enemies.

This is the bastard guy who promised to change the tone in Washington.

I guess you could say that he has changed the tone. Obama has made Washington and politics absolutely toxic.

I think Barack Obama has hastened the process by which America’s political debate is becoming utterly poisoned — and he has done it not accidentally, but willfully.

If there is a motto on the exit to the Democrats’ locker-room under Coach Obama, it is this:

The other guy is lying
The other guy has bad motives
And the other guy is the one playing nasty

While those who oppose Obama are enemies, Obama describes illegal aliens as “us.”

“Now, unfortunately, right now this is getting demagogued,” Obama said. “A lot of folks think it’s an easy way to score political points is by trying to act as if there’s a ‘them’ and an ‘us,’ instead of just an ‘us.’ And I’m always suspicious of politics that is dividing people instead of bringing them together. I think now is the time for us to come together.”

(As enemies, presumably)

This is the President whose adminstration no longer says “radical Islam” but insists Republicans are “domestic terrorists.”

“All 50 States are coordinating in this – as we fight back against our own Right-Wing Domestic Terrorists who are subverting the American Democratic Process, whipped to a frenzy by their Fox Propaganda Network ceaselessly re-seizing power for their treacherous leaders.”

We’re not just enemies, we’re treacherous enemies.

This is the President who ended the “Global War on Terror.” The phrase, that is.

This is the President who claims the Chamber of Commerce is a threat to democracy.

Obama sees more enemies inside the United States than outside. United States citizens are now “enemies.”

The tone in Washington sure has changed.

One thing that absolutely has to change in two years is the occupant in the White House. It’ll be nice to once again have a President who doesn’t think Americans are the enemies of America. This is despicable behavior on the part of any President of the United States.

I don’t just miss George Bush, now I miss Richard Nixon too.

nixon miss me yet

This is the real Barack Obama. People who voted for Obama were stooges. They were had in a big way. Voting for him again would prove beyond any doubt that they are stupid.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

rich wheeler, you think there is a hell of a lot like you who will vote like you;
WELL, when they finish looking the links which are coming in the light every day,
they sure will vote with OUR CONSERVATIVES and be happy too.
NOT everyone is blind in your group of MARINES, and I don’t think the MARINES like COMMUNIST in power.

yippie 21, yes SR,the most important in history, the young children will grow up and will
some day tell their own children how it was fought and WON.

@DonaldBly #39: 😆 If they keep their genes on, they won’t pollute the gene pool.

This is why conservatives have no credibility:

Care to know what that particular meeting was about on that day?


Afghanistan. That meeting was an update on Afghanistan, and the President of the United States, the Commander in Chief, could give a -expletive-.

Were you actually there to witness this?

No, I was long gone from the White House by then. It was told to me though by someone who was.

So there you have it — the “source” tells a story about Obama “not giving a sh*t” about a meeting concerning Afghanistan. The “source” has all sorta color. Only he was NOT AT THE MEETING that he is popping off about! But from this anonymous “source”, who has another “source” about the meeting, we are supposed to believe that Obama did not give a sh*t about a meeting about Aghanistan — a country that HE HIGHLIGHTED IN HIS CAMPAIGN? Really?

It’s funny — in reading “Obama’s War” by Bob Woodward (I am about 2/3 through it), the one thing I have NOT read is any commentary about Obama being disengaged on this issue; just the opposite, when he is ready to give the military the “marching orders” for Afghanistan, he sits down and types out a six page , single spaced “term sheet” explaining what the military was going to do in Afghanistan and why. Far from being disengaged, Petraeus remarked that that is what STAFF should have been doing!

So who should we believe — Petraeus, Admiral Mullen and the other people interviewed by Bob Woodward — people who were there for every meeting of any import — or the “source” who was not there and his “source” who he claims he was there for this one supposed meeting?

Hey Bees I fought real commies N.V.A. and V.C. in and around Khe Sanh in 1968. Your commies are in your very imaginative mind.

Anticrocks Thanks but I’m sure you realize the reason I fought is so I CAN SPEAK FREELY.

This kind of distortion is really pathetic. Read the sentence carefully. He was saying Latinos should show up to vote to punish “their” enemies. He did not call people who disagree with him his enemies.

@rich wheeler: #54 Why do the democrats call those who diagree with them “enemy?” Over the years I have noticed they have used this word a lot. Has any republican called any democrat their “enemy?” I’m not saying they haven’t, I just can’t remember any republican calling a democrat the “enemy.”

Edward Ayres
55Reply to this comment

We’re going to punish OUR enemies and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us,’ if they don’t see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think it’s going to be harder and that’s why I think it’s so important that people focus on voting on November 2.”

Referring SPECIFICALLY TO REPUBLICANS such as Senator John McCain, who formerly supported an overhual but now are stressing border security and supporting strict immigration laws like Arizona’s anti-illegal immigration measure, Mr. Obama said, “Those aren’t the kinds of folks who represent OUR core American values.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/10/25/obama-tells-latinos-to-punish-our-enemies-the-gop/#ixzz13uy02bJ1

@Edward Ayres: #55 If Robert Gibbs leaves the office of Press Secretary, you might want to apply. You are as good as he his at explaining what the president “meant” to say.

I have mentioned before that when a liberal doesn’t use their teleprompter or follow a script of any kind and speaks on their own, they either babble on and don’t say anything, or they tell the truth. Remember Pelosi’s “We have to pass the bill before you can find out what is in it?”

“Those aren’t the kinds of folks who represent OUR core American values.”

OK. What core American Values is He referring to?
How about Honesty for starters?

7 Lies In Under 2 Minutes

@Old Trooper 2: #59 What he meant was, “Those aren’t the kinds of folks who represent MY core American values.” In other words, what HE wants the USA to be.

B-Rob, LET ME TELL YOU, the source come from a DEMOCRAT directly involve in GOVERNMENT,
HE start to talk to the journalist who is very credible and decide to go public with the remarks with the consent of the DEMOCRAT which also described behavior not normal from a president out of touch with the meeting, and pursue to say that in his conscience as an AMERICAN, he will not vote for him
and others like him working there also say the same thing. that he is not fit for continuing the job he seek for without the skills to carry the issue to serve AMERICANS AND the CONSTITUTION of AMERICA.

SMORG In 1887 Lord Acton said “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.Great men tend to be bad men.”A case for sharing of power as Repubs. take House on Tues. but Dems hold Senate and ofcourse Presidency till at least 2012.

Blood is on the hands of most all with too much power be they Dems.,Repubs.,Conservs. or Libs. Term limits should be the rule.To think one party holds a higher moral groud is naive.

@ilovebees – You are right, Obama’s admin is depopulating itself like rats leaving a sinking ship.

@rich wheeler – Your views are very, very far left for someone who purports to having taken an oath to uphold the Constitution.

ANTICSROCKS “PURPORTS”? Yes I proudly took the oath when commissioned a 2nd Lt. in the United States Marine Corps in 1966.I’ve done nothing to dishonor that pledge.What say you?

@rich wheeler: #63 We agree on one thing: There should be term limits.

I don’t belong to either party because when one party defeats the other party the machinery just switches gears. The ones who just took control still have to vote for whatever the ones who donated to them want or they won’t get the money again. This is one reason why an HONEST politician can go bad. If they stick with their values, they don’t get the big bucks donations from the ones who have the money earlier.

I call today’s republicans “republicrats” because they have taken on a lot of the democrat’s agenda. I don’t capitalize democrat, republican, or congress any more because I find it hard to capitalize something I don’t respect any more and they have lost my respect.

I can’t put the word “Obama” and the word “president” together because the title should be earned and not bought. It has been proven many times to any OPEN MINDED person that Obama let anybody in the world give any amount they wanted.

This election we need to put republicans in office, but the next election we need to throw the entire congress out and start over. I can’t be any worse than it is now.

Republicans will be on notice after Nov 2….. we can do this to EITHER party now, so, do you GET IT NOW??? Get it RIGHT, or WE”LL GET YOU!! Only 24 months until the NEXT election boys, and you can BET we’ll be watching!! Demoncrats need not EVEN APPLY!! LOL!!!!

Okay, you took the oath to uphold the Constitution yet your posts show that you are in the far left. That ideology favors big, intrusive government, socialistic programs designed to keep poor people on the government dole and a weak national defense.

I don’t know your views on national defense, but on the other two issues, you seem to go against the Constitution.

What say you?

@Rich Wheeler,

You won’t vote for the “far right,” so is the “far left” that much more appealing? How about voting for the most qualified candidate, regardless of political party affiliation?


I am just curious as to the demographics of the readers of this blog. Any chance of getting that?

Ratgurl, I don’t think so, but if you want to take my word for it as a person who has published over a hundred articles here and conversed with many of these people, I can assure you that this is a diverse demographic from nearly every facet of North American life, (including Canada) with two common binding ingredients, a love of Liberty and faith in the Constitution. I can only speak for myself; however, there will be almost no dissent on those two factors. Our resident Liberals might even agree with me on those two issues. 😉


To the Jews in the early 1940’s: Hitler is your ruler. Get over it!

What claptrap!

Obama shouldn’t be criticized because he’s our President? I thought it was patriotic to criticize the President, or does that just apply to Republican Presidents?

Statements like that don’t add to the discussion, and they don’t help you make your other points more salient. If Republicans regain control of Congress, you’ll be welcome on this forum to criticize their actions, and I seriously doubt the conservatives and libertarians here will say to you “It’s your Congress; get over it!” We have more class than that.


ratgurl… how much info are you looking for?? Location??
Hankster58 = Central (Rural) Missouri

I am 3 foot 2, 780 pounds, bald and I have 37 piercings.

No wait, that was the description of Barney Frank’s former campaign manager… 😛

I am a 47 year old father of 8, grand father of 3. I am a disabled American who has a degree in Psychology focusing on Child Development – and I am a Constitutionalist. I believe in adhering to our Founding documents and I do not look at the Constitution as a “living, breathing” document.

anticsrocks: I must say to you, that you are a GIANT for us here at FA,
and everyone will think the same in the group, I say a person bigger than life,
yes you are a true AMERICAN.

What Palin may lack in “gravitas” (Rove’s opinion not mine,) She definitely makes up in cojones.

Thank you ilovebees. You are a great American as well – regardless of where you live!

anticsrocks, hi, yes, when AMERICANS have an itch. well CANADIANS scratches. bye