Obama Takes Ownership of the Ground Zero Mosque [Reader Post]

Loading

The NY Times reported that Barack Obama “strongly” supports the building of a mosque at Ground Zero:

Obama Strongly Backs Islam Center Near 9/11 Site

WASHINGTON — President Obama delivered a strong defense on Friday night of a proposed Muslim community center and mosque near ground zero in Manhattan, using a White House dinner celebrating Ramadan to proclaim that “as a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country.”

He understands

“I understand the emotions that this issue engenders. Ground zero is, indeed, hallowed ground,” the president said in remarks prepared for the annual White House iftar, the sunset meal breaking the day’s fast.

But….”

He just doesn’t care what Americans feel.

Aides to Mr. Obama say privately that he has always felt strongly about the proposed community center and mosque…

The White House itself sought immediately to distance itself from Obama:

President Barack Obama’s decision to make public comments Friday that further stoked an already brewing controversy over the construction of a mosque near ground zero was “purely” his own, an administration official said Saturday.

70% of Americans oppose the building of this mosque. Obama is in favor it. “Strongly”

This is the President who does not believe in the exceptionalism of America.

“I believe in American exceptionalism, just as I suspect that the Brits believe in British exceptionalism and the Greeks believe in Greek exceptionalism.”

In other words, we’re kidding ourselves. America isn’t special (and it won’t be if Democrats are left in power much longer)

He even thinks America ought to be taken down a peg:

No world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will succeed. No balance of power among nations will hold.” It is difficult to see how a US president who holds these views and does not even accept America’s greatness in history can actually lead the world’s only superpower with force and conviction.

As has been pointed out here repeatedly, Feisal Rauf and his cohorts do have a right to build that mosque, but it doesn’t make it right. It’s no more right than would be the building of a Nazi museum in downtown Tel Aviv, legal or not.

The families of 9-11 victims were outraged:

We are stunned by the president’s willingness to disregard what Americans should be proud of: our enduring generosity to others on 9/11–a day when human decency triumphed over human depravity.

Then when the sh*t hit the fan, Obama started to backtrack:

“Well, my intention was simply to let people know what I thought,” Obama said Saturday when asked about his Friday speech after an event in Panama City, Fla., about the BP oil spill. “In this country we treat everybody equally and in accordance with the law, regardless of race, regardless of religion. I was not commenting and I will not comment on the wisdom of making the decision to put a mosque there. I was commenting very specifically on the right people have that dates back to our founding. That’s what our country is about.”

Not even Cokie Roberts was having any of it:

“…she flat out said President Obama “very clearly” endorsed the Ground Zero Mosque in his remarks to a gathering Muslims at the White House for a Ramadan Dinner, and called his attempt to backtrack on what he said “silly.” Roberts said Obama is already taking all the flack for what he said, and to backtrack on it now is “silly.”

Greg Gutfeld pulled the burka off the whole charade with his hysterical suggestion that he would try to build a gay bar next to the proposed mosque. As Gary Kukis noted here:

Park51 twittered, “You’re free to open whatever you like. If you won’t consider the sensibilities of Muslims, you’re not going to build dialog.”

If you’re not going to consider the sensibilities of Americans, you’re not going to build dialog either, Imam Rauf. Sensitivity is a two-way street, but that’s not how it’s going. The demand is that everyone else be sensitive to Muslims while Muslims need not be sensitive to others.

What Obama should have said was that while the right to build the mosque clearly exists, that wisdom suggests it ought to be built elsewhere. Predictably, he didn’t. He took sides against his country once again.

Mark Twain said “It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.”

Obama should have kept his mouth closed. Now it’s Obama’s mosque.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
90 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Its the Progresive playbook…

They cannot bring the rest of the world up, so they must tear the US down… thus making all equal.

EVERYTHING this administration does, points that direction…. from Healthcare, to not using our own resources, to the Banking bill which favors Large banks over small… its all about destroying the power of the US.

When the President of the US BOWS to foreign heads of State, that is all you need to know.

for all you supporters of moderate Muslims … moderate Muslims still believe in the subjugation of woman and the killing of homosexuals.

try looking up the life history of the founder of Islam … compare that to Jesus or Buddah … does that give you any pause about your thoughts on Islam ?

Why did Obama White House have Georgetown Univ. (a Catholic school) drape any Christian signage or symbols before Obama spoke there in April 2009, to commemorate his 100 days in office? 👿

Coastie,

I am with you on that. Just had a discussion with my left leaning Priest about that. As usual, they act dumb with no answer. Really, really ticks me off as a Catholic that they would allow him to do that.

You and I both know exactly why he did it. I just wonder if he requests the same when visiting a Mosque?

In his remarks, Mr. Obama distinguished between the terrorists who plotted the 9/11 attacks and Islam. “Al Qaeda’s cause is not Islam — it is a gross distortion of Islam,” the president said, adding, “In fact, Al Qaeda has killed more Muslims than people of any other religion, and that list includes innocent Muslims who were killed on 9/11.”

What part of that don’t you understand??

“Obama should have kept his mouth closed. Now it’s Obama’s mosque.”

Oh REALLY?? that is really really spinning it Dr. John… Looks like you are trying to be the new right wing spinster here.

“In fact, Al Qaeda has killed more Muslims than people of any other religion, and that list includes innocent Muslims who were killed on 9/11.”

What part of that don’t you understand??

So your position is that the killings on 9-11 are ok since they number fewer than Al Qaeda’s hitlist and we’re blown it out of proportion and we should just forget it.

The Japanese killed more Chinese than they did Americans.

So we should forget Pearl Harbor too?

@RAP

Why do you think Harry Reid broke with Obama? Because he agrees with you?

Why do think there are a million stories about Obama dancing aound the issue?

If you liked this post, you’re gonna love the next one!

Being a muslim himself, Obama will always side with other muslims.

@ minuteman26

Your comment is why so many people are hesitant to taking that last step onto “our” side of the fence. That and the “birthers”…And I have the feeling you’re in that camp as well.

They (Those innocent-ignorant’s that make up those who make elections and opinion matter) do not want to be associated with insanity.

His not a Moslem. He’s not a Jew. Certainly not Buddhist, or Hindu. The version of his “Christianity” is a hateful facade, brought forth by communist bigots, and he no longer follows that belief either!!
(cuz it’s political, not spiritual, and he’s “won” already.)

He’s not anything but himself, and believes in nothing but himself. The sooner you come to accept that fact, is the sooner you can catch up to the reality of what’s actually important.

But let’s assume the end result of that sort of “thinking” if your .00004% in-the-affirmative posit it true…

Biden is president, and Pelosi is next…

You make our side look stupid, and it’s that “stupid” that is the LAST of their ammo.
So please stop handing them ammo, unless your quip is accompanied by a smiley-face…Then it’s just plain funny!

We have plenty of ammo as it is. 😉

@suek:

Is Al Qaeda in Indonesia as well??


Yes.

Dr. John,

I am not saying forget anything. I am not willing to throw away the constitution because of it though. Apparently, many right wingers are.

From a Gov. Christie press conference today responding to questioning about the issue:

“My principles on this are two-fold. One, that we have to acknowledge, respect and give some measure of deference to the feelings of the family members who lost there loved ones there that day. But it would be wrong to so overreact to that, that we paint Islam with a brush of radical Muslim extremists that just want to kill Americans because we are Americans. But beyond that…I am not going to get into it, because I would be guilty of candidly what I think some Republicans are guilty of, and the president is now the president is guilty of, of playing politics with this issue, and I simply am not going to do it.”

Commenting on Obama’s remarks;

I think the president of the United State should rise above that. And should not be using this as a political football, and I don’t believe that it would be responsible of me to get involved and comment on this any further because it just put me in the same political arena as all of them.

Exactly right, IMO. There are bigger fish to fry at the moment for conservatives in government.

…. *and*… a big thank you too, johngalt.

The higher pitched the rhetoric and voices, and the more campaign stands made on this subject instead of the very serious point of no return fiscal debacle – exacerbated by the 2007 thru now Congress, plus this POTUS – the lesser the chances will be for conservatives to reverse this spending trend.

But please… do keep feeding the mosque carpet bomb monster… /sarc

@CRAP

Give it a rest already. Quit acting holier than thou when discussing the Constitution which your brethren regularly use as toilet paper except when it suits them to use it in making their points.

@drjohn:

“In fact, Al Qaeda has killed more Muslims than people of any other religion, and that list includes innocent Muslims who were killed on 9/11.”

What part of that don’t you understand??

So your position is that the killings on 9-11 are ok since they number fewer than Al Qaeda’s hitlist and we’re blown it out of proportion and we should just forget it.

The Japanese killed more Chinese than they did Americans.

So we should forget Pearl Harbor too?

I don’t think that was the point at all, John. Not sure you do either. al-Qaeda is marginalized amongst most Muslims.

The problem with the tiresome Pearl Harbor analogy in the way that it’s been used by the right-wing on this issue, is that it is a false analogy (i.e., saying a mosque at GZ would be like a Shinto Shrine built after Pearl Harbor). I look at it more along the lines of this:

Ground Zero = Pearl Harbor
al Qaeda = Japan
Islam = Asia

al Qaeda is an enemy to most Muslims, just as Japan was an enemy to much of Asia.

Patvann – Check out todays Texas Fred blog and see if you come away with the same point of view.

No, Minute-thinker, I will not. Even if I did, my view would only get stronger. He is merely one in hundreds of opportunistic puppet-handlers, and I already know who he is.

You and you’re ilk are reacting as basal, ignorant… dare I say MORONIC bottom-feeders. The pathetic part of all this, is that I could come up with better “evidence”, while in a drunken stupor!

I choose to use actual reality as my foundation for determining the strengths and weaknesses of this admin, while you choose the dead-end of conspiracy… based on lowest-common-denominator emotion.

You are being played, and yet you dwell in it.

Obama is nothing more than a narcissistic ideologue, and anytime spent thinking (and reacting) to anything but that, is to take your eye off the ball. He and his acolytes revel in the knowledge that you are looking at this diversion with such intent.

Obama thanks you for spending the time spreading the meme that he’s Moslem and wants to replace our constitution with Sharia law. Keep it up, and you might even get a cookie for your efforts…cuz you sure as hell won’t get anything more.

-Let alone votes.

sigh… guess I won’t be able to stop thanking you at this rate, Patvann. :0) There is a potential we will pay dearly for this saunter off the beaten fiscal path.

Got another one up your sleeve johngalt? I got it ready for you too!

A Re-post:

What Obama had to say about placing a Mosque at ground zero was perhaps expected; but a failure on his part to yield to the will of the majority of people in America will cost Obama everything he has and force him out. No mosque will be built on or anywhere near ground zero.

Why were the Obama comments expected?

For a man who writes, “The Muslim Call to Prayer is one of the Prettiest Sounds on Earth”, said Barack Obama to the New York Times. What would you expect?

For a man who spent a great deal of time as a youth in Indonesia surrounded by Muslims; his step-father Sotero was Muslin, his uncles and aunts were Muslim, his grandfather was Muslim and his relatives and friends were Muslim. Obama read and recited the Islamic book called the Koran daily. What would you expect?

For a man that says America is no longer a Christian nation, despite the statistical fact that almost 80% of American’s relate to Christianity in some way. What would you expect? In truth, Muslims are not more than .06 to less than 1.0% of the population in America (est. 2009). Very small percentage of Muslims in America, very small.

On more than one occasion, Obama has had a Freudian slip and declared that he is, or his religion is, Islamic. What would you expect?

Both Obama and Bloomberg have the right idea. This is a religious question. However, remember that there is NO imperative that a mosque be built in the area called ground zero. And, as a matter of tolerance, we can say that those Muslims that want to build a mosque in New York can build it elsewhere. That is tolerance enough and certainly more than the Muslims have for our feelings about ground zero.

And, as for Obama’s declaration that we must allow for religious freedom, I agree. An overwhelming majority of America’s Christians believe that Islam is primitive, of the devil, intolerant, unforgiving and backward. The Koran is proof that Muslims are encouraged to kill infidels rather than tolerate them; and force their religion upon others. Islam is an extremely degenerate set of outdated tenets.

So we have to be tolerant of Muslims when their Islamic ideals call for intolerance; I say NO.

Nevertheless, Christian opinion is strong enough to carry the day and prohibit, by whatever means, the building of a mosque anywhere near ground zero.

And, as long as Obama has declared that we shall have religious freedom, Christians and other dignified non-Muslim individuals will fight openly and freely against everything that Islam and Muslims stands for.

As a matter of fact, we shall pray fervently that the Muslims who don’t give a damn about the sanctity of ground zero can go to hell. Religiously, we shall oppose this plan of theirs with everything we have. And, to those who feel that we should tolerate Muslim’s intolerance regarding respecting our views on ground zero — Obama and Bloomberg and liberal extreme democrats — we American’s will push them out on election day or sooner by any means we can.

American’s have begun their fight to put Islam down as unAmerican; it is part of our religious right and the free exercise our beliefs. Amen.

Patvann It is true the Democratic Party needs more Minuteman22 types trumpeting Obama’s Kenyan birth and Muslim religion in order to secure victory in 2012.The laughability of these falsehoods seem to be lost on them.As Dems we offer them an open pulpit.

I wish Obama would give me the same ‘freedom’ being a christian.
This isuue has ripped of Obamas mask, him being a muslim at heart. His advocacy of good muslims is abvious. Only time would tell, whos side he really is on.

Many states are passing laws requiring proof of citizenship in order for a candidate to appear on the ballot. I wonder, in how many States Obama’s name will not be appearing in 2012.

: “Quit acting holier than thou when discussing the Constitution which your brethren regularly use as toilet paper except when it suits them to use it in making their points.”

Frankly sir that is exactly what I am accusing many of the so called conservatives or right wingers of doing. It was okay with CONservatives for Bush to trash the Constitution and now it appears it’s okay with many of them again.

Patvann – Bottom feeders are the ones that clean up the trash. We have a POTUS who was never properly vetted and we are just now starting to find out who and what he really is. This guy is a hybred; a muslim/marxist mixture. The GOP isn’t going to win squat if they maintain the 2008 status quo. To win they had better become the Conservative party and quickly.

@CRAP

Ok, genius. Let’s discuss the ways that Bush ‘trashed’ the Constitution, shall we? Or can you even put forth a coherent thought on the subject without referring to your precious windbags at HuffPo or Kos?

Or………should we just discuss how Obama has regularly circumvented explicit restrictions placed on the Federal government that are spelled out in the Constitution?

Your choice.

@Everyone else.

This exercise should outline in a clear message to leave the Mosque issue to the fringe. We have more important issues to discuss and rally around, otherwise, the issue of a Mosque building placed near Ground Zero won’t matter anymore.

BLY He’ll be on 60.Real question is how many will he lose?

:

Where would you like to start?? Warrantless wiretapping? FISA law?? Denying access to counsel after arresting Jose Padilla? Mr.s Bush had those and many many more… so get off of your high horse and give it a rest!!! if you think for one minute that Bush didn’t trash the Constitution your head is totally up your rear.

Warrantless wiretapping? FISA law??

Now how did I know that this is where you were going with your argument?

Hmmmmm……

You do realize that the supposed “warrantless wireteapping” and “FISA” are the same issue right?

You also realize that the Courts have upheld the actions of the Bush Admin in this matter right?

You also realize that Obie voted for the expansion of the FISA law when he was still a Senator and that he has has expanded the use of warrantless wiretapping since his Immaculation right?

This whole surveillance trend was started by Slick Willie himself…yep, you read that right.

Clearly you are out of your element once again.

The truth is that Obie’s Justice Dept has simply carried over the very same Bush policies…even expanding on them here and there.

Furthermore, Obie’s Justice Dept recently took the position that:

warrantless tracking is permitted because Americans enjoy no “reasonable expectation of privacy” in their–or at least their cell phones’–whereabouts. U.S. Department of Justice lawyers say that “a customer’s Fourth Amendment rights are not violated when the phone company reveals to the government its own records” that show where a mobile device placed and received calls.

Now remember…what is being referred to above is the tracking of US citizens on US soil without a warrant.

Got that? Warrantless tracking on US soil…no “reasonable expectation of privacy”…

Most recently we have Obie’s advocating for the collection of DNA samples from every person arrested. Not every person convicted…every person arrested.

Did that make you soil your pretty pink panties?

It should.

You wanna whine, cry, and bellyache about Bush listening in on the conversations of known terrorists…with Court approval…when your boy at 1600 is doing much, much worse right here in the homeland.

Basically your boy-prez Obie equals Bush2 so your complaints about W ring hollow. Especially since the actions of President Bush have been upheld by the Courts multiple times.

PATVANN: hi, YOU see what is happening, the divide, between same party, same contributer of FA,
we should not allowed us or others to continue to deepen the gap,
we have to stand together not on this subject because it was a bait sent to us, and we bite on it.
BUT we have a result and we all should close it now, beginning with the AUTHORS of theses POST;
THERE is enough of bad feelings done. bye

@CRAP

Mr.s Bush had those and many many more… so get off of your high horse and give it a rest!!!

Seeing as how AC was kind enough in my absence to expound on your first few claims of Bush ‘trashing’ the Constitution, I am now asking for more, particularly those “many many more” you claim.

As for Obama, I will start the conversation now.

1.

No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.

President Obama drew money for the auto-company bailout, and buyout of GM and Chrysler, and did so without legislative approval or appropriation of money for that express purpose. Bush, who also had a hand in the auto bailout, did so under the TARP, which was legislated by congress. Obama had no constitutional authority to do as he did.

Along with the above, is also the issue of Federal Govt. ownership in a private company.

2.

He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

Obama’s ‘Czars’, who have not had Senate confirmations, but hold incredible amounts of power in the governing of the US, are unConstitutional. No amount of wriggling or claims of prior presidents having them make it any less so.

3.

The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.

That means that Congress, specifically the House of Representatives, is required by the Constitution to administer the taking of the Census, every ten years. Congress, through legislation, assigned the duty to the Census Bureau of the Commerce Dept. Although the commerce dept is part of the executive branch, it in no way gives the President himself the authority to direct the actual process itself, which Obama has done.

4. Obamacare

a) It is not based on any enumerated power of Congress, not even on a very expansive reading of the power to regulate interstate commerce.

b) It violates Substantive Due Process, and interferes with doctor-patient medical decisions to a vastly greater extent than did the laws declared unconstitutional in Roe v. Wade.

c) It relies on Excessive Delegation of the type held unconstitutional in Schechter Poultry.

Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States

a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated regulations of the poultry industry according to the nondelegation doctrine and as an invalid use of Congress’ power under the commerce clause

d) It violates the Tenth Amendment by commandeering state governments.

5. Obama’s numerous EO’s, one of which I will outline below.

DESIGNATING INTERPOL
AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ENTITLED TO
ENJOY CERTAIN PRIVILEGES, EXEMPTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES

The original order was written by Reagan and meant to convey certain privileges to Interpol. Obama’s EO places Interpol above the Constitution by giving them rights previously granted only to Countries, within the boundaries of the US. It means that Interpol can act with impunity within our borders. This was previously not possible under the original EO. Obama has, in effect, subjugated the US citizenry to the ICC(International Criminal Court) without consent of the governed States of the Union.

He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur……..

This by no means is all of Obama’s unconstitutional actions, and indeed, can be seen as only a start being that he still has over two years in office left.

I’m not a “birther” but I just don’t get why obama refuses to produce records that would put to rest for once and for all the issue of whether he is Consitutionally qualified to be the president of the US. Every other president has done so. All his hiding these records tells me is that there really is something to hide. Lawyers are allowed to give juries “adverse inference” charges when evidence that could be given is refused.

Why don’t the rules apply to barry soetoro? And he sure didn’t help himself when he said in a speech that “the muzzeins call to prayer is the sweetest sound on earth.”

Yeah, you bet your life it’s his mosque. In more ways than one.

@DKK

He refuses, because he can use it as a distraction from those who might ordinarily care about what really matters.

Well, if he is Constitutionally unqualified to be president, then everything he does is potentially invalid, and then yes, that most certainly DOES matter.

🙂

Obama is more dangerous than any of the terrorists who acted for Allah on 9-11. His opinions over the Mosque should come as no surprise to anyone who questions Obamas citizenship, his religion and his true motives behind the presidency.

Who is the real Barack Hussein Obama?

CHURCHMOUSE Those citizens who believe Obama to be a Kenyan born Muslim are dangerously stupid.

@Rich Wheeler….

BLY He’ll be on 60.Real question is how many will he lose?

Daaaumn Rich… you dug up 3 more States than Obama’s 57. Go figure… you people dig up dead guys to vote too… now you’ve invented 10 extra States. How many electoral college votes do those extra 10 States wield?

@Donald Bly:

How many electoral college votes do those extra 10 States wield?

Well that would depend completely on how many he needs to win.

azCHURCHMOUSE RICH WHEELER IS A LIBTARD, WHO COME HERE TO DISRUPT,
NOTHING has been prooven on what he says, so he is showing that the others are not stupid,
except he might be. bye

Don Bly and A.C. Got me.Musta bin those Monday night Martinis.You don’t miss a thing.I guarantee he’ll be on 50 states + D.C.Do you doubt this? While we’re at it A.C. your predictions on Repubs. path to Senate control in Nov.

Bees Typos are a bitch.My apologies BYE
A.C.Got a great laugh from your “how many he needs to win”

REAL AMERICAN PATRIOT: hi, WHERE DO YOU THINK THE TERRORIST GET THEIR EDUCATION TO LEARN TO KILL INFIDELS, YOU must know as OBAMA knows that AL QAEDA practice ISLAMIC religion: OF course THEY try to confuse the PEOPLE with diffrent names,
BUT the AMERICANS are not FOOLS as your democrats think.THEY are FOLLOWING the CONSTITUTION RESPECTFULLY, AND are TOLERANT MORE than any other free countrys, they can show their wounds to prove it, and give a list of name of those who died for freedom,
and the truth comes from the AMERICANS.

Rich, why then did Michelle Obama say that Kenya was the “home country” of her husband Barack?

@rich wheeler:

Working on a post with my November Senate and House thoughts.

I keep looking for an ideal opportunity to beat back real life for a bit but I’m only getting short snippets of time on the computer at the moment.

🙂

Rich said, “CHURCHMOUSE Those citizens who believe Obama to be a Kenyan born Muslim are dangerously stupid.”

He even admitted that is faith was Muslim or did you miss that clip? He won’t release his medical records, educational records and won’t produce his real birth certificate. Who is he?

Rich………..Question for ya…how do you explain Obamas decline in popularity? You are in the minority today if you support him. He is a failure. He surrounds himself with socialists, communists….and racists. Sure people had had enough of Bush and wanted change but not a rape of the Constitution and the destruction of society as we know it.

Rich the stupid people sit back and do nothing. They don’t speak up and they allow people to do their bidding for them. The don’t pay attention to what is going on. People are starting to wake up and they are making a difference. The difference will come in November at the polls.

And DKK asked a good question…

”Rich, why then did Michelle Obama say that Kenya was the “home country” of her husband Barack?”

dkk If he was born in Kenya was he then smuggled into the U.S.and his birth announced in two Honolulu newspapers on August 4 1961 and did his relatives or handlers aware of his coming Pres run against Mac in 2008 place these announcements.Just askin

Azchurchmouse Obama’s approval has gone from a high of 70%+ to RCP average today of 45% a dramatic drop.GWB,R.R Bill Clinton and other presidents have had similar first tern numbers and been re-elected.Count Obama out in 2012 at your own risk.Anybody who can beat the Clinton machine(Repubs never could) will always be a formidable opponent.

Rich, I said that Michelle made the comment. Why don;t you ask HER? She has more inside info than I do.

Just answerin’

Just as a side note, newspaper birth announcements don’t work as a reliable means of proof.

Any interested party (ie grandparents) could have placed those two announcements simply as a way of notifying family and friends of the little one’s arrival.

I’m not saying definitively that is what happened in this case but what I am saying is that there are other plausible explanations as to the source of the birth announcement info.

Also, I don’t know if he was born in Kenya or not. But I seriously question why his wife- a lawyer who knows as well as all of us that words have meaning- said it was his HOME COUNTRY. I did not make that up, she said it. YOU tell ME why. And Stanley Durham was a communist sympathizer in a Cold War era, whose parents were the proverbial card carrying Communists. Who knows the truth of the papers? It’s not like the president of the US- you know, the guy we are supposed to believe in and support– has ever been really forthcoming with that information. Or forthcoming with educational or health records- the sole president in my memory who ever did that.

But this I do know. Barry Soetoro became an Indonesian citizen. He was adopted by his stepfather, and in order to attend school in Indonesia, he had to be an Indonesian citizen with renounced US citizenship. How then, does he qualify to be the president? THAT is the coverup that I believe will come out, after he is long gone, and well after the damage is done.