When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Connect with
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
The mainstream media wouldn’t do it. So we are trying to get your important messages to the American people. 19 This post is a suggested read at, http://aresay.blogspot.com/
If the UAW owns a majority interest in Chrysler and has a substantial ownership interest in GM and/or Board Membership there, how can it possibly continue as the designated bargaining agent for Ford or other car manufacturers? The UAW has a great conflict of interest now that it has bought into ownership of the companies and this may also create some antitrust liability of the union is not careful.
Scrapiron
14 years ago
The rich union leadership are benefitting from O’Dumbo since they trucked members money to O’Dumbo by the millions of dollars. The members (who are evidently super stupid) are losing millions of jobs and will take massive pay cuts under ‘government motors’ management. O’Dumbo has never had a job so has ‘0’ understanding of the American worker, other than they can be used as slaves. Prime example is the ‘white house plantation’ aka, the white house garden where BO and Mo can watch the white slaves work. I should feel sorry for the retarded (democrats) but I can’t bring myself to have any concern for their welfare. They voted for the ‘one’ who is now cutting their throats, so be it.
gra gor
14 years ago
So. So what.
The people put in by the Bushkyites have given away your treasury to their friends on Wall Street. So what is the difference? Same sh*t different pile.
And let the fleecing continue.
@gra gor: No way Bush would have pulled half this “sh*t.”
You attitude is simply enabling Obama to do MORE.
Lisa
14 years ago
Amazing how we the people have not surrounded the white house and the treasury buildings and demanded that these men come out with their hands up!
We sit by and let it happen. I can’t wait for the food shortages and all the idiots who voted for that one are starving.
Old Trooper
14 years ago
The saddest part of this is that the Secured Creditors gave in to this extortion and the Shareholders will get a hard thumping on their investment capital. Having pulled it off once, Team Obama will be encouraged to use the intimidation tactic against US Citizens and Business again. Screwing with the Banking industry and Shareholders establishes a very dangerous precedent.
We are a Nation at War but America’s greatest threat is Congress and Team Obama. If you can crash the Economy from within and by caveat of the most unscrupulous Legislature & President ever, you need not worry about another Terrorist attack. An inside job requires no one to sneak into the country or build bombs. When your currency has the value of toilet paper you have destroyed a nation. When your career politicians and officeholders are corrupted by the power to spend without limits, intimidate industries, “regulate” beyond the scope of their employment, Al Q and Foreign enemies can just sit back & wait for America to collapse without firing a shot.
Civil unrest will follow and “Emergencies” will be declared. Crisis creation seems to be Team Obama’s tactic of choice. The Market is a self correcting entity as long as it is held to current law and is not fooled with by Fools.
You can’t lay this on Bush. 53% of the most uneducated and ill-informed American voters in American history handed the Treasury to Thugs & Punks and placed the most un-qualified, subversive President ever into Office so keep your idiotic Bush bashing comments to yourself.
If the Government lasts into the 2010 Elections, I will be surprised. Making Americans fear their Government has consequences. By bullets or ballots this will be resolved. I’m hoping for the latter. Having been deployed to places where Governments failed and Order ceased to exist,
I’m hoping for the latter.
trizzlor.myopenid.com
14 years ago
The very idea was pooh-poohed by the hoi polloi who got swept along by the hopey changey siren song.
This sentence is a classic, Mike.
drjohn
14 years ago
“White House puts UAW ahead of property rights”
Then what’s to stop Obama from taking anyone’s savings accounts and giving them away to whomever he feels deserves it?
@drjohn asks: “Then what’s to stop Obama from taking anyone’s savings accounts and giving them away to whomever he feels deserves it?”
Isn’t that exactly what they are doing in this case and all the other examples where they are raising taxes and extending further benefits to people who don’t pay any?
As for those Chrysler investors it’s easy for Obama to portray them as greedy Wall Street speculators, but in reality, many of these large investment firms represent the pensions of teachers, nurses and average Americans. Those people have seen a huge chunk of their retirement disappear so Obama can be a hero to the auto unions.
drjohn
14 years ago
It is, Mike, but tax increases have to go through Congress. This action is pure Presidential fiat, and that itself is frightening.
Michael Moon
14 years ago
On top of the concerns about the dear leader over-reaching his legitimate limits of power to redistribute equity and income to his friends in the UAW, and in addition to the insightful comment about the UAW’s conflict of interest as a bargaining agent vs. Ford …
They also have a conflict regarding representing their membership even at Chrysler. Now that they have a seat on the board of directors, how can they bargain in good faith regarding work rules and grievances? The grievance procedures are a huge element of the union’s activities and in fact become the implementation of the previous contract and lay the groundwork for the next contract. Now that they have a seat, can they honestly represent the interests of their own membership AND the stockholders at large? It seems inevitable that somebody in this mix will be screwed, and I won’t be surprised to see a number of lawsuits result.
Unless, of course, dear leader / el presidente / king hussein plans to coerce that possibility out of existence.
The mainstream media wouldn’t do it. So we are trying to get your important messages to the American people. 19 This post is a suggested read at, http://aresay.blogspot.com/
If the UAW owns a majority interest in Chrysler and has a substantial ownership interest in GM and/or Board Membership there, how can it possibly continue as the designated bargaining agent for Ford or other car manufacturers? The UAW has a great conflict of interest now that it has bought into ownership of the companies and this may also create some antitrust liability of the union is not careful.
The rich union leadership are benefitting from O’Dumbo since they trucked members money to O’Dumbo by the millions of dollars. The members (who are evidently super stupid) are losing millions of jobs and will take massive pay cuts under ‘government motors’ management. O’Dumbo has never had a job so has ‘0’ understanding of the American worker, other than they can be used as slaves. Prime example is the ‘white house plantation’ aka, the white house garden where BO and Mo can watch the white slaves work. I should feel sorry for the retarded (democrats) but I can’t bring myself to have any concern for their welfare. They voted for the ‘one’ who is now cutting their throats, so be it.
So. So what.
The people put in by the Bushkyites have given away your treasury to their friends on Wall Street. So what is the difference? Same sh*t different pile.
And let the fleecing continue.
@gra gor: No way Bush would have pulled half this “sh*t.”
You attitude is simply enabling Obama to do MORE.
Amazing how we the people have not surrounded the white house and the treasury buildings and demanded that these men come out with their hands up!
We sit by and let it happen. I can’t wait for the food shortages and all the idiots who voted for that one are starving.
The saddest part of this is that the Secured Creditors gave in to this extortion and the Shareholders will get a hard thumping on their investment capital. Having pulled it off once, Team Obama will be encouraged to use the intimidation tactic against US Citizens and Business again. Screwing with the Banking industry and Shareholders establishes a very dangerous precedent.
We are a Nation at War but America’s greatest threat is Congress and Team Obama. If you can crash the Economy from within and by caveat of the most unscrupulous Legislature & President ever, you need not worry about another Terrorist attack. An inside job requires no one to sneak into the country or build bombs. When your currency has the value of toilet paper you have destroyed a nation. When your career politicians and officeholders are corrupted by the power to spend without limits, intimidate industries, “regulate” beyond the scope of their employment, Al Q and Foreign enemies can just sit back & wait for America to collapse without firing a shot.
Civil unrest will follow and “Emergencies” will be declared. Crisis creation seems to be Team Obama’s tactic of choice. The Market is a self correcting entity as long as it is held to current law and is not fooled with by Fools.
You can’t lay this on Bush. 53% of the most uneducated and ill-informed American voters in American history handed the Treasury to Thugs & Punks and placed the most un-qualified, subversive President ever into Office so keep your idiotic Bush bashing comments to yourself.
If the Government lasts into the 2010 Elections, I will be surprised. Making Americans fear their Government has consequences. By bullets or ballots this will be resolved. I’m hoping for the latter. Having been deployed to places where Governments failed and Order ceased to exist,
I’m hoping for the latter.
This sentence is a classic, Mike.
“White House puts UAW ahead of property rights”
Then what’s to stop Obama from taking anyone’s savings accounts and giving them away to whomever he feels deserves it?
@drjohn asks: “Then what’s to stop Obama from taking anyone’s savings accounts and giving them away to whomever he feels deserves it?”
Isn’t that exactly what they are doing in this case and all the other examples where they are raising taxes and extending further benefits to people who don’t pay any?
As for those Chrysler investors it’s easy for Obama to portray them as greedy Wall Street speculators, but in reality, many of these large investment firms represent the pensions of teachers, nurses and average Americans. Those people have seen a huge chunk of their retirement disappear so Obama can be a hero to the auto unions.
It is, Mike, but tax increases have to go through Congress. This action is pure Presidential fiat, and that itself is frightening.
On top of the concerns about the dear leader over-reaching his legitimate limits of power to redistribute equity and income to his friends in the UAW, and in addition to the insightful comment about the UAW’s conflict of interest as a bargaining agent vs. Ford …
They also have a conflict regarding representing their membership even at Chrysler. Now that they have a seat on the board of directors, how can they bargain in good faith regarding work rules and grievances? The grievance procedures are a huge element of the union’s activities and in fact become the implementation of the previous contract and lay the groundwork for the next contract. Now that they have a seat, can they honestly represent the interests of their own membership AND the stockholders at large? It seems inevitable that somebody in this mix will be screwed, and I won’t be surprised to see a number of lawsuits result.
Unless, of course, dear leader / el presidente / king hussein plans to coerce that possibility out of existence.
Wealth redistribution!
I posted this as a comment to another thread, but it really needs to be stressed. Here is WHY Obama is doing it…
http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2009/05/obamas-new-american-economy.html
Yes, there is a madness to his method, and we WILL pay for it, as will all generations to come.