The NYT’s Finally Admits The Obvious

Loading

The NYT’s have finally admitted what pretty much everyone has already figured out for themselves. The surge has worked. But all that we have gained, all we have achieved could be undone by a precipitous withdrawal:

Yet for all the signs of fatigue, General Petraeus is preparing to leave Iraq a remarkably safer place than it was when he arrived. Violence has plummeted from its apocalyptic peaks, Iraqi leaders are asserting themselves, and streets that once seemed dead are flourishing with life. The worst, for now, has been averted.

And so in the general’s exhaustion comes the glimmer of hope, and also a caveat: Iraq has indeed stepped back from self-destruction, General Petraeus said, but the gains are tenuous and unlikely to survive without an American effort that outlasts his tenure. By the time he leaves for the United States next month to assume overall command of American forces in the Middle East and Afghanistan, he will have spent a total of 48 months in Iraq since the war began.

“I don’t know that it was a death spiral, but I mean it was a pretty dire situation,” General Petraeus said, referring to the situation upon his arrival here as the senior commander in Iraq in February 2007. “There have been very substantial gains at this point. Don’t take any of this to imply that we think we’re anywhere near finished.”

“It’s not durable yet. It’s not self-sustaining,” he added. “You know — touch wood — there is still a lot of work to be done.”

His run as commander coincided with the “surge” of American combat forces into Baghdad, in what amounted to a last, desperate gamble to bring the country under control.

The arrival of the 30,000 extra soldiers, deployed to Baghdad’s neighborhoods around the clock, allowed the Americans to exploit a series of momentous events that had begun to unfold at roughly the same time: the splintering of Moktada al-Sadr’s militia, the Mahdi Army; the growing competence of the Iraqi Army; and most important, the about-face by leaders of the country’s Sunni minority, who suddenly stopped opposing the Americans and joined with them against Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia and other local extremist groups.

The surge, clearly, has worked, at least for now: violence, measured in the number of attacks against Americans and Iraqis each week, has dropped by 80 percent in the country since early 2007, according to figures the general provided. Civilian deaths, which peaked at more than 100 a day in late 2006, have also plunged. Car and suicide bombings, which stoked sectarian violence, have fallen from a total of 130 in March 2007 to fewer than 40 last month. In July, fewer Americans were killed in Iraq — 13 — than in any month since the war began.

The result, now visible in the streets, is a calm unlike any the country has seen since the American invasion toppled Saddam Hussein in April 2003. The signs — Iraqi families flooding into parks at sundown, merchants throwing open long-shuttered shops — are stunning to anyone who witnessed the country’s implosion in 2005 and 2006.

ALL
BUSH’S
FAULT

Well, that only took a year eh? A year to admit that the strategy President Bush approved worked. A year in which Michael Yon and other’s throughout the country were reporting on the decline of violence and the success of the surge. A year in which the NYT’s and other liberal rags refused to admit it.

But now they have. And even with the caveat that it all can be undone in a blink of an eye.

And now we come to Obama:

TERRY MORAN: If you had to do it over again, knowing what you know now, would you support the surge?

OBAMA: No, because, keep in mind that-

MORAN: You wouldn’t?

OBAMA: Well, no, keep in mind, these kinds of hypotheticals are very difficult. You know, hindsight is 20/20. But I think that, what I am absolutely convinced of is that at that time, we had to change the political debate because the view of the Bush administration at that time was one that I just disagreed with.

Even more reason to question the man’s judgment. As if befriending criminals, terrorists and corrupt politicians were not enough.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Was the Iraq adventure the most effective approach to dealing with aftermath of 9/11?

The money and the shattered lives?

Granted, responding to 9/11 was not going to be a free ride in any respect however look at the results of the administrations “democracy project”!

lebanon? Hamas in Power, Iran resurgent, Russia asserting herself, the Taliban far from defeated…?

It was an ugly option Dan, but it was the lesser of all the other evils.

Lebanon’s been in INFINITELY worse condition without the invasion of Iraq, and OIF really wasn’t the primary catalyst for that situation.

Hamas in power-again, to even remotely suggest that if the US hadn’t invaded Iraq Hamas never would have taken power is to completely ignore the problems with the 1994 Arab Israeli agreement, why it failed (cause Hamas was the one that really had the power in the Palestinian territories at the time, and they want more than just a state).

Russia’s been re-asserting itself since BEFORE OIF. CNN is ripe with articles about Russia sending their Mid East guy, Primikov, to Iraq with 2 generals. They flew in in cargo planes, the generals got awards from Saddam, and when asked why, “Well, we certainly didn’t come here to drink tea.” was their answer. Then Primakov and his boys drove at least 4 convoys of cargo trucks packed with “diplomatic pouches” into Syria. Hell, I’ve even got the JSTARs radar image of the exodus as well as links to CNN reports of how the US special forces ambushed them and almost got the goods they were smuggling out. Noooooo, Russia has been reasserting itself fast and furious since before OIF. Did they invade anyone? Yeah. They invaded Georgia, S Ossetia, Azerbaijan, Azkazastan, and a list of others before GWB even took office. They signed contracts to build nuclear bomb factories in Iran before Bush even took office. The list goes on. Russia’s power grab isn’t new, it’s just that the veiled idea of politicizing it and spinning it as somehow a result of OIF (and not recognition of Kosovo which is the real cause) is what’s new. Hey, some people just prefer to believe anything a Democrat tells em as if it’s real, and when asked what spin comes from the left…there’s zero examples of silence. That silence is why these international turmoils seem new.

Oh, and as for the Taliban being far from defeated…..hehehe, well, I personally had a conference call w the Deputy commander of Centcom this week, and your perception of the Taliban as some sort of regular force is the real problem. Read up on the call here:

Then see if you can explain what the difference is between a “military success” and an IO “insurgency operation” success, or what General Holmes meant when he said that, “The enemy moves at the speed of the internet.”

http://www.defenselink.mil/dodcmsshare/BloggerAssets/2008-08/08200809331320080819_BrigGenHolmes_transcript.pdf

Dan, it’s great to question authority-especially what comes from the Bush Admin and RNC, but do you question the hype from the Democrats? From their candidates? How about the thoughtspeak that brews from Big Brother….and I’m not talking about govt as big brother. If those guys distort, market, exaggerate, spin, or mislead….do you question them at all? How have they misled you into thinking the world was chocolate rivers, gumdrop trees, cotton candy clouds, caviar dreams, and champagne wishes until George “the most brilliant mastermind of corporate cabal conspiracy in history” supposedly stole the White House in 2000, stole the 2002 elections as well, then manipulated the 2004 elections all while choking on pretzels, crashing mountain bikes, and supposedly being too inept to invade Iraq w/out a plan?

Question authority means all authority-not just from the right.

Philip J. Berg, Esq. Files Federal Lawsuit Requesting Obama Be Removed as a
Candidate as he does not meet the Qualifications for President.

http://www.nextgenerationcorp.com/NextGenBlog/?p=43

Mike’sA, that was hilarious! Esp. the way they used the “Na-na-na-na-na”.

That tune deserves its own thread. Googlebots would go nuts, Digg it, and watch the hits fly!

BUSH WAS RIGHT