John Bolton On Obama’s “One World” Nonsense


John Bolton hits it out of the park with his editorial today about Obama and his “big” speech in Germany:

SEN. BARACK OBAMA said in an interview the day after his Berlin speech that it “allowed me to send a message to the American people that the judgments I have made and the judgments I will make are ones that are going to result in them being safer.”

If that is what the senator thought he was doing, he still has a lot to learn about both foreign policy and the views of the American people. Although well received in the Tiergarten, the Obama speech actually reveals an even more naive view of the world than we had previously been treated to in the United States. In addition, although most of the speech was substantively as content-free as his other campaign pronouncements, when substance did slip in, it was truly radical, from an American perspective.

Bolton tackles a couple of Obama’s points such as his explanation for the fall of the Berlin Wall.

People of the world — look at Berlin, where a wall came down, a continent came together, and history proved that there is no challenge too great for a world that stands as one.

Bolton attacks:

The wall fell because of a decades-long, existential struggle against one of the greatest totalitarian ideologies mankind has ever faced. It was a struggle in which strong and determined U.S. leadership was constantly questioned, both in Europe and by substantial segments of the senator’s own Democratic Party. In Germany in the later years of the Cold War, Ostpolitik — “eastern politics,” a policy of rapprochement rather than resistance — continuously risked a split in the Western alliance and might have allowed communism to survive. The U.S. president who made the final successful assault on communism, Ronald Reagan, was derided by many in Europe as not very bright, too unilateralist and too provocative.

But there are larger implications to Obama’s rediscovery of the “one world” concept, first announced in the U.S. by Wendell Willkie, the failed Republican 1940 presidential nominee, and subsequently buried by the Cold War’s realities.

The successes Obama refers to in his speech — the defeat of Nazism, the Berlin airlift and the collapse of communism — were all gained by strong alliances defeating determined opponents of freedom, not by “one-worldism.” Although the senator was trying to distinguish himself from perceptions of Bush administration policy within the Atlantic Alliance, he was in fact sketching out a post-alliance policy, perhaps one that would unfold in global organizations such as the United Nations. This is far-reaching indeed.

Second, Obama used the Berlin Wall metaphor to describe his foreign policy priorities as president: “The walls between old allies on either side of the Atlantic cannot stand. The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes; natives and immigrants; Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down.”

This is a confused, nearly incoherent compilation, to say the least, amalgamating tensions in the Atlantic Alliance with ancient historical conflicts. One hopes even Obama, inexperienced as he is, doesn’t see all these “walls” as essentially the same in size and scope. But beyond the incoherence, there is a deeper problem, namely that “walls” exist not simply because of a lack of understanding about who is on the other side but because there are true differences in values and interests that lead to human conflict. The Berlin Wall itself was not built because of a failure of communication but because of the implacable hostility of communism toward freedom. The wall was a reflection of that reality, not an unfortunate mistake.

Tearing down the Berlin Wall was possible because one side — our side — defeated the other. Differences in levels of economic development, or the treatment of racial, immigration or religious questions, are not susceptible to the same analysis or solution. Even more basically, challenges to our very civilization, as the Cold War surely was, are not overcome by naively “tearing down walls” with our adversaries.

Bolton makes a great point here. Walls exist not because of misunderstandings or fear but are the result of very real differences in values, beliefs and interests. In the real world these are not overcome by implementing the “we are all one” garbage taught in college international relation classes. Being nice to our enemies will not tear down the walls. Defeating our enemies, such as the USSR, will tear down that wall. Doesn’t matter how much he wants to believe singing kumbaya around the campfire will make us all safer, history is littered with the carcasses of appeasers who thought the same thing.

More here.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Bolton shot the deer in the headlights — With Obambi, it’s all about ‘feelings’

obama is gonna get this country bombed if he keep this crap up. he thinks he is all knowing and all seeing and his sight is far better than ours, he really should rethink this. i know what is better for me and my family than that dipstick.

So evidently it was the Marshall Plan and the will of the German people that made possible the collapse of the Berlin Wall. The stand Reagan and Thatcher took against communism, the Soviet Union and the better part of an appeasing, tongue clicking world had no bearing at all. This weasly little crook is not only ignorant and unaccomplished, his arrogant self-absorption makes slick Willie look like a saint. The Obamessiah is regurgitating the supremely flawed lessons learned in the halls of leftist learning and even the 24/7 protection offered by a fawning, blinkered media cannot prevent him from looking ridiculous. Attack the United States, rewrite history and blow off wounded soldiers because they can’t be effectively used as campaign backdrops…the official Obamedia will work tirelessly to transfuse the appearance of the presidential, but sooner or later the patient will be lost. I just hope it’s before November rolls around.


‘So evidently it was the Marshall Plan and the will of the German people that made possible the collapse of the Berlin Wall’.’

Throw in the fact the Soviet Union had rotted from within and had teetered on the brink of collapse for years until Soviet reformers came to power and invoked glasnost and perestroika and you’ve hit the nail on the head.


“This weasly little crook is not only ignorant and unaccomplished, his arrogant self-absorption makes slick Willie look like a saint.” — OLDPUPPYMAX

good news — He’s gotten the Dems and the MSM to dump the Clintons.
bad news — He’s replaced them.