Gosh, who would have ever guessed that their “New Direction In Iraq” plan was a lie, or that they’d oppose American success in the war in Iraq just to get more political power for their party?
- Democrats lied about the causes of the 911 attacks
- Democrats lied about the whereabouts of Osama Bin Laden after 12/12/01
- Democrats opposed the removal of the Taliban, marched by the tens of thousands, and demanded more “talks” with the Taliban
- Democrats lied about the war in Iraq’s effect on the hunt for Osama Bin Laden
- Democrats lied about terror attack threat warnings-claiming they were political and not real
- Democrats called Al Queda, the Taliban, Saddam holdouts, and insurgents FREEDOM FIGHTERS while describing US military prisons as Gulags and comparing US troops to NAZIs
- Democrats claimed that the military is filled with people who are not smart enough to live lives without getting sent to Iraq
- Democrats opposed the removal of a mass murdering, genocidal dictator
- Democrats lied about the wmd threat that was found in Iraq
- Democrats lied about Al Queda not being in Iraq before the invasion\
- Democrats lied about the closeness of the relationship between Saddam’s regime and Al Queda leadership
- Democrats lied about Al Queda being any part of the post-war insurgency
- Democrats lied about how many people have been killed in the war
- Democrats lied about the dollar cost of the war
- Democrats lied about the war having been “lost”
- Democrats lied about having a plan or even an intention of succeeding in Iraq/ending the war
- Democrats lied to get more political power for their party
Democratic voters do not hold their own to account for these lies even though Democrats hold power in the nation now. Is it easier to oppose than support? Is it better to complain than to solve? Is it better to mislead rather than lead?
Author of “Reparations and America’s 2nd Civil War
Reparations and America’s 2nd Civil War: Malensek, Scott: 9798864028674: Amazon.com: Books