Islam’s Plans For The United States


We here at Flopping Aces have said it over and over and over again.  Radical Islam’s primary goal has been and always will be to ensure that Sharia law takes over the world.  Either we submit or we die.  Many of our leftist commenters have gone to great pains to deny this, to tell all of us that we’re bedwetters who should understand that they don’t have the capability to do this.

That may very well be true, but they DID have the capability to kill 4,000 Americans in minutes.  This was done without any WMD.  Now if they get that WMD how many lives need to be lost before everyone starts taking seriously the enemy we face?  10,000?  50,000?

Evidence has come out in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing trial that depicts the plans The Muslim Brotherhood has for the United States:

Amid the mountain of evidence released in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing trial, the most provocative has turned out to be a handful of previously classified evidence detailing Islamist extremists’ ambitious plans for a U.S. takeover…

The documents – introduced in recent weeks as part of the prosecution’s case in the trial of the now defunct Holy Land Foundation and five of its organizers – lay out the Brotherhood’s plans in chillingly stark terms.

A 1991 strategy paper for the Brotherhood, often referred to as the Ikhwan in Arabic, found in the Virginia home of an unindicted co-conspirator in the case, describes the group’s U.S. goals, referred to as a “civilization-jihadist process.”

“The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions,” it states. This process requires a “mastery of the art of ‘coalitions,’ the art of ‘absorption’ and the principles of ‘cooperation.’ ”

Success in the U.S. “in establishing an observant Islamic base with power and effectiveness will be the best support and aid to the global movement,” it states.

A transcript of a Brotherhood orientation meeting recorded in the early 1980s includes discussions of the need for “securing the group” from infiltration by “Zionism, Masonry … the CIA, FBI, etc. so that we find out if they are monitoring us” and “how can we get rid of them.” Discussions later turn to “weapons training at the Ikhwan’s camps” in Oklahoma and Missouri.

Quite interesting that the plans pre-date 2001 which means that Ron Paul’s foreign policy theories are wrong once again.  Shocker!

But I digress.  The Muslim Brotherhood.  The very same group that was met by a Congressional delegation last May (members of the delegation included North Carolina Democrat David Price, Reps. Jeff Fortenberry, R-Neb.; Nick Rahall, D-W.Va.; and Gwen Moore, D-Wis), the very same group that issued "The Project":

The Muslim Brotherhood, represented in the US by the Muslim American Society and other organizations, developed a strategic document in the early 1980s known as “The Project” to cast the vision of how the Islamization of the West might be accomplished.

Calling for the utilization of various tactics as part of a broad 12-point cultural strategy to “establish an Islamic government on earth”, ranging from directed immigration, infiltration of existing institutions, conducting surveillance and gathering intelligence, publishing propaganda, establishing political legitimacy and the sparing but escalating use of violence, including terrorism, The Project has served for more than two decades as the Muslim Brotherhood “master plan” for operations in the West with startling success. It should be noted that much of the material from The Project was incorporated into Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi’s best-selling book published in 1990, Priorities of the Islamic Movement in the Coming Phase.

That very same group made plans on taking this country over with some very sophisticated techniques.  Techniques perfected by the Communist party decades ago when they took over the leftists in this country, and in some ways its working.  The liberal left are doing their very best to maximize the enemies propaganda by blaming the US for anything and everything.  They are minimizing the effect Radical Islam has in the Middle East and the world.  Radical Islams primary  strategy has centered on liberals forcing the US to stand-down in the face of direct conflict.

The liberals have lost this battle so far because of a brave President and some brave Congressional representatives. 

But what will happen in 2008?


Here is a good article on The Muslim Brotherhoods success in achieving their goals in Europe:

Since its founding in 1928, the Muslim Brotherhood (Hizb al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun) has profoundly influenced the political life of the Middle East. Its motto is telling: "Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. The Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope."[1]

While the Brotherhood’s radical ideas have shaped the beliefs of generations of Islamists, over the past two decades, it has lost some of its power and appeal in the Middle East, crushed by harsh repression from local regimes and snubbed by the younger generations of Islamists who often prefer more radical organizations.

But the Middle East is only one part of the Muslim world. Europe has become an incubator for Islamist thought and political development. Since the early 1960s, Muslim Brotherhood members and sympathizers have moved to Europe and slowly but steadily established a wide and well-organized network of mosques, charities, and Islamic organizations. Unlike the larger Islamic community, the Muslim Brotherhood’s ultimate goal may not be simply "to help Muslims be the best citizens they can be," but rather to extend Islamic law throughout Europe and the United States.[2]

Four decades of teaching and cultivation have paid off. The student refugees who migrated from the Middle East forty years ago and their descendants now lead organizations that represent the local Muslim communities in their engagement with Europe’s political elite. Funded by generous contributors from the Persian Gulf, they preside over a centralized network that spans nearly every European country.

These organizations represent themselves as mainstream, even as they continue to embrace the Brotherhood’s radical views and maintain links to terrorists. With moderate rhetoric and well-spoken German, Dutch, and French, they have gained acceptance among European governments and media alike. Politicians across the political spectrum rush to engage them whenever an issue involving Muslims arises or, more parochially, when they seek the vote of the burgeoning Muslim community.

But, speaking Arabic or Turkish before their fellows Muslims, they drop their facade and embrace radicalism. While their representatives speak about interfaith dialogue and integration on television, their mosques preach hate and warn worshippers about the evils of Western society. While they publicly condemn the murder of commuters in Madrid and school children in Russia, they continue to raise money for Hamas and other terrorist organizations. Europeans, eager to create a dialogue with their increasingly disaffected Muslim minority, overlook this duplicity. The case is particularly visible in Germany, which retains a place of key importance in Europe, not only because of its location at the heart of Europe, but also because it played host to the first major wave of Muslim Brotherhood immigrants and is host to the best-organized Brotherhood presence. The German government’s reaction is also instructive if only to show the dangers of accepting Muslim Brotherhood rhetoric at face value, without looking at the broader scope of its activities.

And which group has helped them achieve these goals?  The liberal left

Muslim terrorist leaders are "thankful" for the efforts of activist and congressional candidate Cindy Sheehan, stating in a new book Sheehan’s anti-Iraq war activities and her statements against President Bush "give us hope" the U.S. will change its Mideast policies.

"You [Sheehan] give us hope and you show us that there are different Americans than those whom we know," stated Ramadan Adassi, chief of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror group in the West Bank’s Anskar Refugee Camp.

"This sincere woman says what we’ve been saying all these last years – Saddam never threatened America or its security. Now Iraq is being decimated and America is losing. Voices like Sheehan’s show things can change," said Adassi.

But the left will continue to tell us that these groups are only "fringe" without expecting the rest of us to actually read about The Muslim Brotherhood and its roots.  It is the root of modern-day Islamist thought from which was born al-Qaeda. 


Just look at the success they are having in Britain:

Almost half of Britain’s mosques are under the control of a hardline Islamic sect whose leading preacher loathes Western values and has called on Muslims to “shed blood” for Allah, an investigation by The Times has found.

Riyadh ul Haq […] is in line to become the spiritual leader of the Deobandi sect in Britain. The ultra-conservative movement, which gave birth to the Taleban in Afghanistan, now runs more than 600 of Britain’s 1,350 mosques, according to a police report seen by The Times.

The Times investigation casts serious doubts on government statements that foreign preachers are to blame for spreading the creed of radical Islam in Britain’s mosques and its policy of enouraging the recruitment of more “home-grown” preachers. […]

Seventeen of Britain’s 26 Islamic seminaries are run by Deobandis and they produce 80 per cent of home-trained Muslim clerics. Many had their studies funded by local education authority grants. The sect, which has significant representation on the Muslim Council of Britain, is at its strongest in the towns and cities of the Midlands and northern England. […]

A commentator on religious radicalism in Pakistan, where Deobandis wield significant political influence, told The Times that “blind ignorance” on the part of the Government in Britain had allowed the Deobandis to become the dominant voice of Islam in Britain’s mosques.

Other’s Blogging:

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I apologize to my regular readers for not posting yesterday but we left my parents house on Vancouver Island at 0630 and didn’t arrive home until last night at 2330. LONG day. But I’m back and still ranting.

What is truly sad is that the goals and statements of groups like the Muslim Brotherhood, HAMAS, FATAH, Hizbollah, Al Qeada, and almost EVERY OTHER Islamist with dreams of a global Dar al Islam for the last several centuries have been documented, recorded, and are available for reference. They have also been ignored.

Palastine Media Watch, MEM-RI, JihadWatch and a huge number of others regularly translate and publish what these Islamists are saying and doing. Our media HAS this information and more but chooses not to release it to the public. Instead, our “elites” and media pundits down-play what is actually main-stream Islam and instead call it “radical Islam”. The President does also, however, I feel he cannot come out and be blunt with Islam for fear of upsetting leftists and being called all sorts of names while receiving death threats and fatwas from Islamists (though playing nice has NEVER helped this President). Just look what a few cartoons did. Now ask what would happen if the New York art scene had a “Piss Koran” exhibit. The left, while dishonestly equating Christians to Muslims should be damn glad that the two are eons apart in practice.

In truth, the so-called “Moderates” in Islam are the minority and are quite powerless. Be they Ahmaadi or just Muslims who want TV, ice-cream, and air contitioning. What we call “islamofascists” or “radical Muslims” ARE main-stream Islam. They call the moderates aposates, and in a sense, they are correct. I wanted to believe that the islamofascists had “hyjacked” Islam, but I do not think that is the case. Everywhere I look, Islam calls for violence, subjegation, technological regression, abuse of women, and imposition of Sharia Law. Islam is the only major religion which has a detailed political structure and fanatical desire to impose it. The left should really look into these laws as they are being enacted, often by force, in Europe and America. The left SHOULD be at the forfront of combatting Sharia, but it not only failing to stop it, but is encouraging accomodation/appeasement of Islam. Ironically, just as the Left is doing their utmost to silence Christians and Jews in government, citing “separation of church and state”, they are bending over backwards to use federal funds and mandates to install accomodations for Islamics in schools and aiports (including forcing students to take ‘classes’ in Islam where they pray in school).

Where is the left’s outrage? Where is their sense of self-preservation?

Yet the left, and some on the far right, choose to ignore the openly stated threats and actions of Islam and either blame the West (i.e. the USA) or seek an “America First” isolationism (which did not work for WWII either). The former is profoundly stupid while the latter is terminally short-sighted. Both views are suicidal.

I wouldn’t call these people Muslims, but more like cult leaders and heretics. The reason I say this is because the Koran and their acts don’t match. For starters, suicides and attacks on civilians are forbidden. Then the Koran mentions that Israel belongs to the Jews and not to attack Jews and Christians because they are brothers and worship the same God. Also the virgin thing is for people being killed while worshiping/praying in a Mosque and never applies to “fighters.” These people we are fighting against follow the Koran as much as Jim Jones and David Koresh followed the Bible. Osama bin Laden and the otehr like terrorist leaders are nothing more than dajjal(s) (something akin to false prophets or anti-Christs). The dajjal(s) launched a mufsidÅ«n (an illegal jihad) against the dhimmi (basically a Muslim do not harm list that includes Christians, Jews and sometimes Buddhists, Sikhs, Hindus, and Zoroastrians). Osama’s and simular leaders’ followers are the taqlÄ«d (ignorant followers).


There is another word you should add: Taqqiyah. It means deception which is what you post contains. If you are not Islamic and believe what you wrote, then you have fallen for this deception.

What Koran book are you referencing, the Medena or Mecca chapters? Do you know of the principle of abrogation? Sura 9, according to much Islamic jurisprudence, abrogates the “passive” suras of previous books. Sura 9, or the” Sura of the Sword”, DEMANDS the subjugation and conquest of all “non-believers”.

Abrogation defined in Sura 2:
2:106: “Whatever communications We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, We bring one better than it or like it. Do you not know that Allah has power over all things?”

According to Ibn Khaldun, a respected Islamic jurist and philosopher in the 1400s summarized jihad as follows:

“In the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the [Muslim] mission and [the obligation to] convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force… The other religious groups did not have a universal mission, and the holy war was not a religious duty for them, save only for purposes of defense… Islam is under obligation to gain power over other nations.”
(Ibn Khaldun, The Muqudimmah. An Introduction to History, Translated by Franz Rosenthal. New York, N.Y., 1958, vol. 1, p. 473.)

I doubt he was speaking of “illegal jihad”.

Or this from Egyptian high school books:
“Studies in Theology: Tradition and Morals, Grade 11, (2001) pp. 291-92 …This noble [Qur’anic] Surah [Surat Muhammad]… deals with questions of which the most important are as follows: ‘Encouraging the faithful to perform jihad in God’s cause, to behead the infidels, take them prisoner, break their power, and make their souls humble – all that in a style which contains the highest examples of urging to fight. You see that in His words: “When you meet the unbelievers in the battlefield strike off their heads and, when you have laid them low, bind your captives firmly. Then grant them their freedom or take a ransom from them, until war shall lay down its burdens.'”

“Commentary on the Surahs of Muhammad, Al-Fath, Al-Hujurat and Qaf, Grade 11, (2002) p. 9 …When you meet them in order to fight [them], do not be seized by compassion [towards them] but strike the[ir] necks powerfully…. Striking the neck means fighting, because killing a person is often done by striking off his head. Thus, it has become an expression for killing even if the fighter strikes him elsewhere. This expression contains a harshness and emphasis that are not found in the word “kill”, because it describes killing in the ugliest manner, i.e., cutting the neck and making the organ – the head of the body – fly off [the body].’ ”

This is taught in mainstream Islamic schools, NOT Islam’s version of the Westboro Baptist Church.

And more from the past:
Ibn Hudayl, a 14th century Islamic writer:
“It is permissible to set fire to the lands of the enemy, his stores of grain, his beasts of burden — if it is not possible for the Muslims to take possession of them — as well as to cut down his trees, to raze his cities, in a word, to do everything that might ruin and discourage him, provided that the imam (i.e. the religious “guide” of the community of believers) deems these measures appropriate, suited to hastening the Islamization of that enemy or to weakening him. Indeed, all this contributes to a military triumph over him or to forcing him to capitulate.”

As for paradise not applying to military jihadists, this is also wrong. From the Koran, Sura 9:

9:111: “Surely Allah has bought of the believers their persons and their property for this, that they shall have the garden; they fight in Allah’s way, so they slay and are slain; a promise which is binding on Him in the Taurat and the Injeel and the Quran; and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? Rejoice therefore in the pledge which you have made; and that is the mighty achievement.”

As for Jihad not being sanctioned (again, Sura 9):

“Then when the Sacred Months (the 1st, 7th, 11th, and 12th months of the Islamic calendar) have passed, then kill the Mushrikoon (see V.2:105) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush. But if they repent [by rejecting Shirk (polytheism) and accept Islamic Monotheism] and perform As Salaah (Iqaamat-as-Salaah), and give Zakaah, then leave their way free. Verily, Allaah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful” (Sura 9-5: Ayat al-Sayf (the verse of the sword))

So, sorry, but militant jihadists ARE following the non-abrogated sections of the Koran. The “moderates” are not. The jihadists are backed-up in Islamic schools and centuries of Islamic philosophers and jurists. The will not stop until we are either enslaved, converted, or dead; and if their Maadi returns, jizya is outlawed and we either convert or die. This is the war we face and the enemy we refuse to identify.

Lastly, dhimmi(s) are non-muslims, living under Islamic rule who pay jizya (Protection tax) so that they may live as second to third class serfs under Islamic law. Dhimmis are only “protected” in a sense: They cannot openly practice their religion and are NOT guaranteed protection in reality. Dhimmis may not participate in government or have any self rule. Dhimmis are not free, and they are “protected” so long as they follow and acknowledge Islamic masters. Dhimmis are slaves.

“Quite interesting that the plans pre-date 2001 which means that Ron Paul’s foreign policy theories are wrong once again.”

Since you don’t listen. The US has been meddling in the Middle East for OVER 60 years. Its time we keep our noses where it belongs, FIXING problems in the US. If you look back in history almost every Middle East country has Stabbed us in the back. When OPEC didn’t want to sell the US any gas in 70’s, IRAQ (Mr Saddam Husein) is the only country that sold us gas. In the 80’s the US helped supply weapons to Afganistan (Mr Osama Bin Laden) to fight Russia.

You fail to see that NO MATTER WHAT the USA does, did, or will do, the Islamists will still seek our destruction or forced conversion. Most of the EU has not done a THING to Islam and they are being overrun. Islam stated their intentions to our representatives seeking a peaceful end the “Barbary Coast” piracy in the late 1700s. We were told in no uncertain terms to convert or perish. They have stated this policy since Islam’s inception and LONG before the USA became a world power.

The West did NOT start the war with Islam. Islam, in seeking conquest, started this war. The current conflict is only the most recent battle in this defensive war by the West.

Ron Paul and his supporters, while pissing all over Soldiers and Marines, fail to see that even if “we keep our noses where it belongs”, we WILL BE ATTACKED by Islam UNTIL we convert or die. And yes, the Mall Security being more effective than US Armed Forces idiocy WAS and IS an grave insult to me and every other member of the Armed Forces It is also a bold faced lie.

BTW, where exactly SHOULD the USA, which feeds the world, provides aid to the world, and is relied on by the world to keep peace in places you do not have nightmares about keep our noses? Should we also bury our heads in the sand while the Islamists, socialists, and thug dictators chop off our heads? Should we stand by and let ally after ally fall until America is truly alone? As a saying from a Christian victim of the NAZI death camps goes: “And when they cam for me, there was no one left”.

Ron Paul and his supporters who think redeploying troops home will somehow majically let us defend the United States better forget one, tiny, little piece of federal law: ACTIVE DUTY SOLDIERS MAY NOT ENFORCE LAWS (Section 1385, Title 18, USC). I cannot, as a Soldier, arrest, detain, investigate, or engage in offensive combat anyone within the USA unless Congress declares what ammounts to martial law, or fully repeals the long standing Posse Comitatus Act.

So instead of fighting these barbarians, who openly desire to come here and kill you, in their backyard, you want me to fight a defensive war, on my home territory! Brilliant!!! Hey, let’s have VIEDs in New York City, L.A., Washington DC, and Miami!! Just perfect… While we are at it, let’s have a Beslen massacre every month (terrorists in Iraq have been found with layouts of US schools, but there is no connection… sure….)!! Hey, how about mortar and rocket attacks on YOUR HOUSE just like the Israelis have to deal with daily!!! Oh, the American People would LOVE that!!!

I usually do not talk about the RonPauls, but each week the idiocy gets worse.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s Long Term Goal for the United States

The Muslim Brotherhood lay out their plans to replace the United States Constitution with sharia law.
Amid the mountain of evidence released in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing trial, the most provocative has turned out to be a …

Important trial evidence: Muslim Brotherhood’s pla

A most interesting development in the Holy Land Foundation trial in Texas has taken place: As the Dallas Morning News reveals, the Muslim Brotherhood’s goals in the US included replacing the Constitution with Shari’a law (Hat tip: Hot Air):